b*******y
发帖数: 4304 | 1 和普通想法不一样：
http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2012-07/payloads-over
The ability of a few very-precise standoff weapons to be more efficient and
effective than a larger number of less-precise weapons leads to a surprising
result. In modern warfare, precision standoff weapons such as Tomahawk or
the joint standoff weapon are now more cost-effective in many situations
than short-range gravity bombs such as the joint direct attack munition (
JDAM). A Tomahawk missile, for example, costs about $1.2 million, while a
JDAM is about $30,000. To strike a single target, however, the total
training, maintenance, and operations cost to get a manned aircraft close
enough to deliver the JDAM is several times higher than the cost of
launching a Tomahawk at the same target from a destroyer, submarine or
aircraft operating several hundred miles away. That is one of the trends
leading us to focus more effort on improving and evolving our standoff
sensor and munition payloads. | v****0
发帖数: 1887 | 2 从点攻击上 如此
不过面上的攻击 比如当初萨达姆几个师乘着沙尘暴跑路
还是B52的地毯式轰炸最有效
and
surprising
【在 b*******y 的大作中提到】
: 和普通想法不一样：
: http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2012-07/payloads-over
: The ability of a few very-precise standoff weapons to be more efficient and
: effective than a larger number of less-precise weapons leads to a surprising
: result. In modern warfare, precision standoff weapons such as Tomahawk or
: the joint standoff weapon are now more cost-effective in many situations
: than short-range gravity bombs such as the joint direct attack munition (
: JDAM). A Tomahawk missile, for example, costs about $1.2 million, while a
: JDAM is about $30,000. To strike a single target, however, the total
: training, maintenance, and operations cost to get a manned aircraft close
|
|
