g*********s
发帖数: 1782 | 1 面试被问到这个问题，一下子还真答不上来。代码是在之前的旧程序上改来改去的，没
法统计啊。回答多少合适？一万行？十万行？ |
l***g
发帖数: 1035 | 2 if you work for nasa, probabaly less than 100 lines ... heee..
【在 g*********s 的大作中提到】
: 面试被问到这个问题，一下子还真答不上来。代码是在之前的旧程序上改来改去的，没
: 法统计啊。回答多少合适？一万行？十万行？
|
k*k
发帖数: 508 | 3 三四万差不多了吧，到十万的我看少的很
【在 g*********s 的大作中提到】
: 面试被问到这个问题，一下子还真答不上来。代码是在之前的旧程序上改来改去的，没
: 法统计啊。回答多少合适？一万行？十万行？
|
a****l
发帖数: 8211 | 4 The key part of sw engineer job is "designing" the software, not coding!
【在 g*********s 的大作中提到】
: 面试被问到这个问题，一下子还真答不上来。代码是在之前的旧程序上改来改去的，没
: 法统计啊。回答多少合适？一万行？十万行？
|
k*k
发帖数: 508 | 5 then who would do the coding?
【在 a****l 的大作中提到】
: The key part of sw engineer job is "designing" the software, not coding!
|
l*******9
发帖数: 177 | 6 不需要经过大量实践的那叫艺术家
【在 k*k 的大作中提到】
: then who would do the coding?
|
g*******e
发帖数: 1706 | 7 I used to work for a fortune 100 company. The answer is that:
coder writes 1000 lines of code, and everyone else tells you to change the
design, and towards end of the review, you rewrite the same thing 3 times
and still someone will tell you to change the design.
So you end up doing the same project multiple times.
Now you have 10000 lines of code to claim during your review, and all levels
of managers claim some major design decisions they made, and everybody
walks home happy.
【在 g*********s 的大作中提到】
: 面试被问到这个问题，一下子还真答不上来。代码是在之前的旧程序上改来改去的，没
: 法统计啊。回答多少合适？一万行？十万行？
|
