G*****7
发帖数: 1759 | 1 finally a decent production-grade, x64-capable c++11 compiler on windows.
p.s., not to downplay the c++11 compliance of mingw, but its lack of x64
target-ability is a huge pain. |
G*****7
发帖数: 1759 | 2 icc doesnt recognize c++ amp keywords such as restrict(amp).
【在 G*****7 的大作中提到】
: finally a decent production-grade, x64-capable c++11 compiler on windows.
: p.s., not to downplay the c++11 compliance of mingw, but its lack of x64
: target-ability is a huge pain.
|
t****t
发帖数: 6806 | 3 what kind of keyword is that? I was not aware of that "amp" keyword.
【在 G*****7 的大作中提到】
: icc doesnt recognize c++ amp keywords such as restrict(amp).
|
S**I
发帖数: 15689 | 4 a keyword used by C++ AMP (C++ Accelerated Massive Parallelism) in Visual
Studio 2012, Microsoft specific.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: what kind of keyword is that? I was not aware of that "amp" keyword.
|
t****t
发帖数: 6806 | 5 oh. why would icc support something MS specific?
【在 S**I 的大作中提到】
: a keyword used by C++ AMP (C++ Accelerated Massive Parallelism) in Visual
: Studio 2012, Microsoft specific.
|
c*******y
发帖数: 1630 | 6 good to know, mingw is just a backup plan.
【在 G*****7 的大作中提到】
: finally a decent production-grade, x64-capable c++11 compiler on windows.
: p.s., not to downplay the c++11 compliance of mingw, but its lack of x64
: target-ability is a huge pain.
|
F5
发帖数: 151 | 7 哈哈,我看到你扇了一个自己的贴子
【在 G*****7 的大作中提到】
: finally a decent production-grade, x64-capable c++11 compiler on windows.
: p.s., not to downplay the c++11 compliance of mingw, but its lack of x64
: target-ability is a huge pain.
|
G*****7
发帖数: 1759 | 8 ms designed c++ amp to be an open spec and wishes compiler vendors to
implement that.
now that gcc has cilk, why shouldn't intel (edg actually) support c++ amp.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: oh. why would icc support something MS specific?
|
G*****7
发帖数: 1759 | 9 i pressed too early and posted an empty one.
【在 F5 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈,我看到你扇了一个自己的贴子
|
t****t
发帖数: 6806 | 10 no offense, but i wouldn't touch any "open spec" by ms, given their bad
history on "spec".
【在 G*****7 的大作中提到】
: ms designed c++ amp to be an open spec and wishes compiler vendors to
: implement that.
: now that gcc has cilk, why shouldn't intel (edg actually) support c++ amp.
|
G*****7
发帖数: 1759 | 11 none taken.
i m young and naive, and really had no historic lessons as to what evil ms
have done w.r.t. open specs.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: no offense, but i wouldn't touch any "open spec" by ms, given their bad
: history on "spec".
|
G*****7
发帖数: 1759 | 12 Or do u mean thy are not well received and die alone?
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: no offense, but i wouldn't touch any "open spec" by ms, given their bad
: history on "spec".
|
t****t
发帖数: 6806 | 13 basically when ms promote something from its own, it's more likely to: get
changed, lost "support", lost backward compatibility, incompatible with real
standards, slow support of updated version, etc.
one example someone else mentioned is VJ++. another is javascript used in IE
, although I really can't blame MS for that because javascript itself is a
mess. but IE's javascript is a big headache from what I heard.
【在 G*****7 的大作中提到】
: none taken.
: i m young and naive, and really had no historic lessons as to what evil ms
: have done w.r.t. open specs.
|
