S*******h
发帖数: 7021 | 1 阿桑奇呼吁猪党选民重组新政党，选出像Macron那样的新星来对抗川普政府。阿桑奇貌
似不喜欢川总的CIA头目，怎回事?
Why the Democratic party is doomed:
1. The Democratic establishment has vortexed the party's narrative energy
into hysteria about Russia (a state with a lower GDP than South Korea). It
is starkly obvious that were it not for this hysteria insurgent narratives
of the type promoted by Bernie Sanders would rapidly dominate the party's
base and its relationship with the public. Without the "We didn't lose--
Russia won" narrative the party's elite and those who exist under its
patronage would be purged for being electorally incompetent and
ideologically passé. The collapse of the Democratic vote over the last
eight years is at every level, city, state, Congressional and presidential.
It corresponds to the domination of Democratic decision making structures by
a professional, educated, urban service class and to the shocking decline
in health and longevity of white males, who together with their wives,
daughters, mothers, etc. comprise 63% of the US population (2010 census).
Unlike other industrialized countries US male real wages (all ethnic groups
combined) have not increased since 1973. In trying to stimulate engagement
of non-whites and women Democrats have aggressively promoted identity
politics. This short-term tactic has led to the inevitable strategic
catastrophe of the white and male super majorities responding by seeing
themselves as an unserviced political identity group. Consequently in
response to sotto-voce suggestions that Trump would service this group 53%
of all men voted for Trump, 53% of white women and 63% of white men (PEW
Research).
2. The Trump-Russia collusion narrative is a political dead end. Despite
vast resources, enormous incentives and a year of investigation, Democratic
senators who have seen the classified intelligence at the CIA such as
Senator Feinstein (as recently as March) are forced to admit that there is
no evidence of collusion [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BS5amEq7Fc].
Without collusion, we are left with the Democratic establishment blaming the
public for being repelled by the words of Hillary Clinton and the
Democratic party establishment. Is it a problem that the public discovered
what Hillary Clinton said to Goldman Sachs and what party elites said about
fixing the DNC primaries against Bernie Sanders? A party elite that
maintains that it is the "crime of the century" for the public and their
membership to discover how they behave and what they believe invites scorn.
3. The Democrat establishment needs the support of the security sector and
media barons to push this diversionary conspiracy agenda, so they ingratiate
themselves with these two classes leading to further perceptions that the
Democrats act on behalf of an entrenched power elite. Eventually, Trump or
Pence will 'merge' with the security state leaving Democrats in a vulnerable
position having talked up two deeply unaccountable traditionally Republican
-aligned organizations, in particular, the CIA and the FBI, who will be
turned against them. Other than domestic diversion and geopolitical
destabilization the primary result of the Russian narrative is increased
influence and funding for the security sector which is primarily GOP owned
or aligned.
4. The twin result is to place the primary self-interest concerns of most
Americans, class competition, freedom from crime and ill health and the
empowerment of their children, into the shadows and project the Democrats as
close to DC and media elites. This has further cemented Trump's anti-
establishment positioning and fettered attacks on Trump's run away embrace
of robber barons, dictators and gravitas-free buffoons like the CIA's Mike
Pompeo.
5. GOP/Trump has open goals everywhere: broken promises, inequality, economy
, healthcare, militarization, Goldman Sachs, Saudi Arabia & cronyism, but
the Democrat establishment can't kick these goals since the Russian
collusion narrative has consumed all its energy and it is entangled with
many of the same groups behind Trump's policies.
6. The Democratic base should move to start a new party since the party
elite shows no signs that they will give up power. This can be done quickly
and cheaply as a result of the internet and databases of peoples' political
preferences. This reality is proven in practice with the rapid construction
of the Macron, Sanders and Trump campaigns from nothing. The existing
Democratic party may well have negative reputational capital, stimulating a
Macron-style clean slate approach. Regardless, in the face of such a threat,
the Democratic establishment will either concede control or, as in the case
of Macron, be eliminated by the new structure.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-25/assange-outlines-six-reasons-why-democratic-party-doomed | S*******h
发帖数: 7021 | | a***4
发帖数: 1112 | |
|
