d********r
发帖数: 1238 | 1 Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.117-18 Jul 2, 2000
Be tougher on China-we’re too eager to please
Our biggest long-term challenge will be China. The Chinese people still have
few political rights to speak of. Chinese government leaders, though they
concede little, desperately want us to invest in their country. Though we
have the upper hand, we’re way to eager to please. We see them as a
potential market and we curry favor with them at the expense of our national
interests. Our China policy under Presidents Clinton and Bush has been
aimed at changing the Chinese regime by incentives both economic and
political. The intention has been good, but it’s clear that the Chinese
have been getting far too easy a ride.
Despite the opportunity, I think we need to take a much harder look at China
. There are major problems that too many at the highest reaches of business
want to overlook, [primarily] the human-rights situation.
China: lack of human rights prevents consumer development
Why am I concerned with political rights? I’m a good businessman and I can
be amazingly unsentimental when I need to be. I also recognize that when it
comes down to it, we can’t do much to change a nation’s internal policies.
But I’m unwilling to shrug off the mistreatment of China’s citizens by
their own government. My reason is simple: These oppressive policies make it
clear that China’s current government has contempt for our way of life.
We want to trade with China because of the size of its consumer market. But
if the regime continues to repress individual freedoms, how many consumers
will there really be? Isn’t it inconsistent to compromise our principles by
negotiating trade with a country that may not want and cannot afford our
goods?
We have to make it absolutely clear that we’re willing to trade with China,
but not to trade away our principles, and that under no circumstances will
we keep our markets open to countries that steal from us.
Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.119 & 123 Jul 2, 2000 | b*******t
发帖数: 4756 | 2 你不换技术，你可以不来中国啊，又不是强迫，中国可以自己搞，只是时间问题。
制造业回美国？看看办个什么事美国这些人磨磨唧唧的样子，就那智商，能干得了啥？
制造业回美国比中国制造芯片要难一万倍。 | d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 3 这么做，有点流氓
你要卖我东西，就得把你老婆给我玩两天。你不给，你可以不卖我啊，又不是强迫。
【在 b*******t 的大作中提到】
: 你不换技术，你可以不来中国啊，又不是强迫，中国可以自己搞，只是时间问题。
: 制造业回美国？看看办个什么事美国这些人磨磨唧唧的样子，就那智商，能干得了啥？
: 制造业回美国比中国制造芯片要难一万倍。
| t*c
发帖数: 8291 | 4 关键是西方对中国高科技禁运和阻止华为等高科技公司在美销售本身就是流氓手段。
你可以禁运， 为何中国不能规定市场换技术？ 更何况市场换技术是大多数发展中国
家都实施的做法。是等价交换的一个做法。 人家就是觉得高价买你的产品+获得技术转
让， 才跟自己出的钱等价。
【在 d******a 的大作中提到】
: 这么做，有点流氓
: 你要卖我东西，就得把你老婆给我玩两天。你不给，你可以不卖我啊，又不是强迫。
| d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 5 给我个“其他发展中国家都实施的做法”的例子
【在 t*c 的大作中提到】
: 关键是西方对中国高科技禁运和阻止华为等高科技公司在美销售本身就是流氓手段。
: 你可以禁运， 为何中国不能规定市场换技术？ 更何况市场换技术是大多数发展中国
: 家都实施的做法。是等价交换的一个做法。 人家就是觉得高价买你的产品+获得技术转
: 让， 才跟自己出的钱等价。
| w****i
发帖数: 2369 | 6 市场开放程度和义务在入世贸前就谈好的，等入了世贸就突然来了要用技术换市场的扯
蛋条件，怪不得引起公愤。人家现在要玩对等贸易，你就哭爹喊娘的耍泼.
【在 b*******t 的大作中提到】
: 你不换技术，你可以不来中国啊，又不是强迫，中国可以自己搞，只是时间问题。
: 制造业回美国？看看办个什么事美国这些人磨磨唧唧的样子，就那智商，能干得了啥？
: 制造业回美国比中国制造芯片要难一万倍。
|
|
