r*****u
发帖数: 84 | 1 http://www.kanwa.com/chinese/990203b.html
本 刊 特 约 评 论 员 鲁 申 科
KWIC photo
海 上 TMD 系 统 研 究 的 起 点 首 先 应 该 立 足 于 以 现 有 Aegis 驱 逐 舰的
SPY 1D 大 型 相 控 阵 雷 达 为 基 础 ， 引 进 相 关 设 备 ， 进 一 步 完善 C3I
管 制 功 能 。 日 本 防 卫 厅 消 息 来 源 在 评 价 SPY 1D 的 功 能时， 认 为
它 经 过 了 “ 实 战” 的 考 验 。 在 探 测 北 朝 鲜 发 射 卫星 的 弹 道 轨 迹
过 程 中 ， “ 发 挥 了 威 力 ” 。 在 检 测 朝 鲜 “ 光明 星 ” 卫 星 的 发
射 过 程 中， 海 上 自 卫 队 的 SPY1D 至 少 测 定 到 了一 段 火 箭 的 下 落 过
程 ； 二 段火 箭 的 初 速 ； 二 段 火 箭 的 高 度 ； 二 段 和 三 段 火 箭 ( 卫
星 ) 的分 离 时 间 等 。
今 后 海 基 TMD 防 卫 系 统 急 需 解 决 的 课 题 |
|
g********s
发帖数: 3652 | 2 www.bostondragonboat.org
星期六选拔赛，地点：MIT
星期天：
Western Avenue Bridge to the Weeks footbridge
地图
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Western+Avenue+Bridge,+Cambridge,+MA+02139/
John+W.+Weeks+Bridge,+Cambridge,+MA+02163/@42.3650263,-71.1183088,17z/data=!
4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e3775f1854b3e5:0x79f4499a3242d9b4!2m2!1d-71.116813!
2d42.364229!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e3775c4ab8aa41:0xbc8121eaf8640839!2m2!1d-71.118267
!2d42.36836!3e0 |
|
c***z
发帖数: 6348 | 3 公司位置 Building 17 at 3801 159th Ave. N.E., Redmond, WA 98052
我查了一下开车要18分钟？
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/9956+244th+Pl+NE,+Redmond,+WA+98053/Building
+17+at+3801+159th+Ave.+N.E.,+Redmond,+WA+98052/@47.6813994,-122.1129828,13z/
data=!3m1!4b1!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x549073616226227d:0x609af08240a00f05!2m2!
1d-122.013059!2d47.686617!1m5!1m1!1s0x54906d71ca75416b:0x1d10fcbf30851252!
2m2!1d-122.1280447!2d47.6437825 |
|
Q*****a
发帖数: 33 | 4 公寓：shadowbrook. http://www.essexapartmenthomes.com/washington/seattle-area-apartments/redmond-apartments/shadowbrook
地址：8500 148th Ave NE, Redmond, WA 98052
户型：970 sq ft, 2b2b
租金：2027/month
租期：9月中旬/2016 – 7/19/2017
现在新租的价格是 2146/month for 8 months, 2899/month for 6 months.
家具：洗衣机，烘干机，灶，烤箱，油烟机, 冰箱
交通：
公交：小区门口就有公交车站，到微软园区,亚马逊, Bellevue/Redmond/Seattle
downtown都比较方便。
开车: 到微软园区开车10分钟,到seattle downtown开车30~40分钟（https://www.
google.com/maps/dir/Space+Needle,+400+Broad+Street,+Seattle,+WA+98109/8500+
1... 阅读全帖 |
|
G*******g
发帖数: 3729 | 5 开车35分钟，TRE 52分钟。
话说这些是很简单的事情，您 Google 一下就能出来。
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Fort+Worth,+TX/UT+Southwestern+Ortho+Surgery
,+1801+Inwood+Rd,+Dallas,+TX+75235/@32.7938669,-97.2244142,11z/data=!4m14!
4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x864e6e122dc807ad:0xa4af8bf8dd69acbd!2m2!1d-97.3307658!2d32.
7554883!1m5!1m1!1s0x864e9c1017c507cb:0xb1672da62441f5fa!2m2!1d-96.846411!
2d32.815853!5i2 |
|
Y******e
发帖数: 994 | 6 不知道你成行了没有。
用google map可以找到公交线路，单程大约2小时左右。如果行李多的话估计不会太方
便。
https://www.google.ca/maps/dir/Toronto+Pearson+International+Airport,+
Mississauga,+ON/University+of+Guelph%EF%BC%9F/@43.5746015,-80.1832727,10z/
data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x882b394ac02dd491:0xb41d5de9c4030ec5!2m2!
1d-79.62482!2d43.677718!1m5!1m1!1s0x882b9b3c1d38a0b7:0x8feb99e54d4013c7!2m2!
1d-80.22693!2d43.533226!3e3 |
|
N**********0
发帖数: 506 | 7 不把all nba first team,defensive first team, scoring champ 算进去
a = fmvp: 5分
b = mvp: 3分
c = 总决赛负队的最好球员：2分
d = 总决赛胜队的第二好球员：2分
e = 总决赛胜队的第三好球员：1分
乔丹：6a+5b = 6x5+5x3 = 45分
科比：2a+1b+1c+3d =2x5+1x3+1x2+3x2 = 21分
奥尼尔：3a+1b+2c+1d = 3x5+1x3+2x2+1x2 =24 分
邓肯：3a+2b+1c+1d=3x5+2x3+1x2+1x2 = 25分
詹姆斯：2a+4b+2c=1x5+4x3+2x2 = 26分
因此乔丹的成就>>詹姆斯>邓肯>奥尼尔>科比。
纯属个人意见 |
|
N**********0
发帖数: 506 | 8 不把all nba first team,defensive first team, scoring champ 算进去
a = fmvp: 5分
b = mvp: 3分
c = 总决赛负队的最好球员：2分
d = 总决赛胜队的第二好球员：2分
e = 总决赛胜队的第三好球员：1分
乔丹：6a+5b = 6x5+5x3 = 45分
科比：2a+1b+1c+3d =2x5+1x3+1x2+3x2 = 21分
奥尼尔：3a+1b+2c+1d = 3x5+1x3+2x2+1x2 =24 分
邓肯：3a+2b+1c+1d=3x5+2x3+1x2+1x2 = 25分
詹姆斯：2a+4b+2c=1x5+4x3+2x2 = 26分
因此乔丹的成就>>詹姆斯>邓肯>奥尼尔>科比。
纯属个人意见 |
|
z***y
发帖数: 198 | 9 这是一个好叫品，因为它是高度限制性的，作出这个叫品之后，同伴
就知道你的牌了
事实上在均形时，我们通常也会把自己的4张高花叫出来
如 AJxx Kx Axx Qxxx
Kxxx Axxxx xxx x
1c-1h-1s-2s----
往往原花色有6张，除非是同伴挡住你一阶出的套，才可能5张
如 Ax Kxxx xx AJxxx
1c-1s-2c
让我来解释一下什么是逆叫
所谓逆叫就是你叫过之后，同伴必需到3阶才能叫回你的第1花色
如 AKxx Ax KQJxx xx
1d-2c-2s(逆叫)
这里同伴最便宜的叫回原花色的叫品是3d
1d-1h-1s (不是逆叫)
因为同伴可以方便的叫回2D
1S-2h-3c
逆叫,因为同伴必须在3阶才可能叫回SP
所有的逆叫都是至少逼叫一轮的 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 10 1d 再叫2h 是逆叫, 已经逼叫
1d 再叫3h, 不必要的跳叫, splinter. |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 11
事实上，南拿这样一手平平的牌,对于同伴的限制性2nt开叫，在3s后叫4s是
非常正常的。这牌的错就在于开叫2nt,致使在spade得配之后牌力由于红心的单张而升值
因此我依然认为开叫1d是对多数自然叫牌体系最好的选择。事实上丢局的可能性
并不象想象的那么大，因为当不配时，22-4这样的牌并不很容易完成3nt,
敌方可能争叫或者平衡叫，事实上1c,1d这样的定约在实战中非常少见。 |
|
y****e
发帖数: 71 | 12
取材于报纸：
双有，北开叫，MP制。
北：Bill Pollack
K Q 7 5
A
A K 9 2
A Q 10 6
南：Hugh Ross
A 10 9 3
J 4 3
7 6 4
K 3 2
叫牌如下：
北 东 南 西
1D － 1S －
4NT － 5D －
5NT － 6C －
7S － － ＝
注：1D是非逼叫，有些冒险。5NT大满贯兴趣，6C示草花K。
首攻红桃5。
庄家意识到自己需要王吃两次红桃，但进手不够。第二轮，从明手
打王牌小，手上用10飞过！！J飞中了，大将牌王吃红桃。王牌9再
飞一轮，明手王吃红桃。然后拔方块A，见到东家垫小方块，再拔
方块K。东家不可能王吃，否则西将有方块QJ10，他应该首攻方块Q。
草花到暗手的K，清掉最后两张王牌。西家先垫红桃K，然后不情愿
的垫方块Q。这意味着西很可能有四张草花带J。用草花10飞过，定
约完成。
另一桌，John Mohan－Jill |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 13 本例取自OKB实战.
W W N E S
/
S KJT7 1C 1D 1S /
H AJ65 2D(1) X 4S /
D ---- ?
C AKT32 (1) 至少邀叫牌力, 对黑桃支持或是无将试探.
如何叫牌呢?
在作出决定之前, 先来"想象"一下同伴的牌.
1. N的加倍显示他在方块上有许多大牌.
2. N在其同伴PASS之后只争叫1D, 此后又未能再盖叫3D, 说明他的方
块套不会很长.
3. S没有加叫2D, 表明同伴持有相当的方块长度, >=4 应该是合理的
推测.
4. 同伴至少有5张黑桃, 如果他只有4张黑桃, 不会如此热衷于有可
能是4-3配的4S定约.
5. 如果同伴是5张黑桃, 并且是较为平均的牌型(5-2-4-2,
5-1-4-3...), 除黑桃AQ外,
他应该在红心或草花上还有一个大牌.
6. 如果他只有黑桃AQ, 那么他多半有6张黑桃.
7. 感觉上, 同伴的叫牌更象是基于牌型而不是大牌实力.
嗨, 还磨蹭什么? 快叫6S吧. 6S +1 :)
同伴的牌是
S AQ9852
H 87
D JT542
C ---- |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 14 E S W N
1D X / 2S
/ 3H / 4H
/ 4NT / 5D
/ 6H / //
N
S K753
H Q10
D Q10
C A7652 E
S 8
S A4 H J
H AK76543 D AJ763
D K82 C KQJ1084
C 3
西首攻SQ, 庄家手上赢进, 方块给Q和东的A, 东回出草花K, 明
手赢进
方块到K, 明手将吃方块, 兑现将牌Q, 东跌出J, 庄家将吃草花
回手, 被西
盖将吃, 定约宕一.
南怪自己运气不好, "谁知道东1-1-5-6却开叫1D呢?"
是这样吗?
不对, 假设东的红心J是一张老实牌, 南应该在将吃草花回手之前兑
现黑桃K, 这是非常安全
的. 因为东不可能有6张黑桃. 如果东跟出第二轮黑桃,
他最多只有5张草花, 这样你就可以安全地将吃草花回手完 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 15 1d 2c
2s(reverse, 3h(natural, no point to use 4th suit forcing here
force to game) coz 2sp forces to game,usually it shows a good hand
with 5-6 in H and C at least)
4c(club support!) 4h(cue)
4s(cue) 5h(cue,grand slam invitation,pd must have dia control
or he should bid 5c instead of 4sp coz I skipped dia)
7c(6club, SA,DA,4h, a ruff to h(don't know pd has HJ))
If you play minor raise after 2/1 as forcing to game,
it'll be much easier
1d |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 16 未来故事
大厅随着城市缓慢旋转, 永恒的蓝色月光穿过透明的天花板撒在
人们身上, 夜色之美象遥远的古代传说, 高大的柱廊下面白衣的
人们在乞求神灵的最后关照. 在走上战场之前, 人们当中流传着桥牌
之神的传说, 在这过度拥挤的宇宙中心, 在文明的最后阶段,
桥牌成为最后的解脱.
飞船在缓慢航行, 船员失去日夜的概念,
大家都集中在牌室里, 船长点上一根烟.
南北有局.
他拿到这么一手牌: S A H AK109732 DA42 C53
正当他打算开叫1H时, 右手边的领航员乔先叫了1D.
船长感觉有些不快, 这牌可以考虑按古老的原则加倍再叫红心,
不过如果同伴拿了很多黑心, 船长可不愿意听到这样的叫品:
1D x 3D 4s
p ?
于是船长决定叫一个温和的一红心. 左手的机械师叫1S,
对面的助手似乎还在梦中, 问道, "什么局况"?
领航员友好的告诉他, "南北有局".
助手继续变本加利, "谁是南北"?
船长恶狠狠的瞪了他一眼.
领航员告诉他, "咱们在飞行的时候船长永远坐南."
助手慢吞吞地叫了2H, 领航员叫2S.
船长这时候有些犹豫, 4H 是明显的叫品,但如果对方叫 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 17 第一轮出SQ是更好的打法.
如果不中再双飞C.
因为如果C双飞能中的话, 怎么打都成,
如果C要丢一墩,那保证S不丢墩的手段显然飞牌成功的概率最大.
北的牌应该开1D, 这个18点太好了, 5个好方块套, 两对十九, 控制也好,
同伴长xxx xx Axxx Qxxx, 3NT机会都极好.
所以应该开1D再叫2NT.
2C之后也应该叫2D更好些. 2NT 是不存在的叫品..
南似乎3C就足够了, 4C一般是理解为Gerber. |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 18 * which minor to open
If you have 4-4. 4-3, or 3-3 minors, which one do you open?
My philosophy is on 1st and 2nd seat, shape is more
important; in 3rd and 4th seat. it's more lead directing.
So 1st and 2nd seat 1D tends to imply 4-card suit, unless
it's 4-4-3-2. I do all sorts of things on 3rd seat and
partner is not expected to hang me.
As an example, if I hold D10xxx CAQx, opening strength, then
I open 1D on 1st and 2nd seat, and 1C on 3rd and 4th seat.
On the other hand if holding DAQx C10xx |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 19 你坐西, 北发牌, 南北有局
S AQJT5
H 4
D 7
C AKJ754
North East South West
Pass 1D 2H ?
3H? 加倍? 3C? 2S?
1. 3H, 同伴会指望你有适度的方块配合, 而你没有.
更重要的是, 持这手牌, 你更需要自己描述, 而
不是作出一个模棱两可的扣叫, 让同伴无所适从.
2. 加倍, 面对非常可能的3D回应, 很难再有办法叫
出6-5的牌型, 注意, 否定性加倍的本来用意是帮
助陈述某种自然叫牌无法描述的牌情, 而不是代
替自然叫牌.
3. 3C比2S好, 你手上的大牌实力足够以后再叫2次
黑桃. 以表示草花长于黑桃的自然牌情.
North East South West
Pass 1D 2H 3C
Pass 3D Pass 3S
Pass 4D Pass 4H
Dbl Pas |
|
y****e
发帖数: 71 | 20 Nice, learned a lot.
Back to the question raised, my question is if North holds solid diamond suit,
plus medium club support (Kxx, Q9x, or 10xxx), slam interest in either club or
diamond, after 1D-2C, what will you do?
I think in that example 1D-2C-3D-3NT, 4H must be a cuebid, in that sense, he
might want a spade 2nd round control (otherwise, blackwood will be much better
if he holds both heart and spade control, slam will almost be certain). I
think the most likely reason he did not try blackw |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 21 You give the anwser which I think is right. But seems you still
need a better reason to choose 1D instead of 1S when you are
playing walsh style response.
when pd opens 1C, walsh style prefers a major response to
1D when they are in a 4-4, 4-5 or 4-6 distribution.
But why you want to do that?
The fundamental reason is that your hand
is not good enough to mention both of your suits legitimately
in a natural auction sequence. Thus you favor the majors.
Now you can see my point here. Because you ha |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 22 I think playing inverted minor raise, it's more practical to play
1D 3D to show 7-9 HCP, 5 diamonds.
it's usually not a really good idea to play 3D as <= 6 here because
7-9 is more important in many competition sequences.
anyway, 1D 2C is always a big headache of all systems.
And I really don't like to bid 3 card major at one level, because
I like to raise to 2M with 3.
There is no point to mess up oneself's major suit biddings for
positional considerations.
Anyway, I think the priority of which |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 23 The point here is that you may have a huge diamond fit but playing in 3-3
fit 2S.
when you have 4D or even 5D, you play 2S making which is bad for sure.
Another problem is that
1D 1S
2S 3D
this is forcing, so after pd's raise you can't really play 3D anymore.
Partner may have C shortness instead of major shortness:
SAQx HAxxx DAxxxx Cx
SKxx Hx DKJxxx Cxxxx
this hand may make 5D,
but you play 2S, after trump lead, 2S may go down 2.
This is really awful.
If you jump to 3D after 1D,
you would find |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 24 I think we can design one more relay over 1D 2H(C invitation)
1D 2H
2S(relay, asking for quality)
2NT(bad)
3C to play
3D relay
3H/S: shortness
3NT: no shortness in major.
3C(good, two of 3 top honors)
3D(relay, shortness?)
3H/S: shortness.
3NT: no shortness in major.
3H/S: AKQ in C and short in the majorsuit.
3NT: AKQ in C and no major suit shortness.
if we break the relay, we show value in that major suit and try for 3NT. |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 25 Vul vs not, imp, hold Q KJxx AQTxx KTx. You open a 1st seat 1D. The bidding
went
YOU LHO CHO RHO
1D 2S P P (long hesitation)
X P 3H* P
?
3H's supposed to be lebensol, showing better than a minimum -- he can't have
much as he already failed to make a negative double. Now do you bid the game? |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 26 but 1C 1D 2S is gameforcing, I don't think 2NT can start sign off sequence
here.
If you like you can play it this way:
1C 1D
2S:
2NT: relay to 3C
3C: relayed.
3D: weak hand with at least 5 diamonds.
3H: weak hand with C support.
3S: weak hand with spade fit(this requires partnership discussion).
3NT: mild slam interest in C, balanced hand.
3C: better hand, C support.
3D: better hand, D suit.
3H: better hand, no H stopper.
3S: better hand.
the drawback is that 3NT may b |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 27 I think it's more reasonable to relax 2C opening requirement to be 2 controls
outside main suit. Otherwise you really will have a hard time when a running
suit plus a side Ace. I guarantee you, you will not be able to convey this to
your pd in subsequent bidding, especially when you open on 1 level, this gives
oppo more chances to interfere.
Do you think your job is easier with 1D-P-1S-3H/C, or how about
1D-1S/H-x-4S/H-? You are still in complete darkness. The other factor is the
preemptive valu |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 28 Just saw a hand on cavendish:
dealer: north,he bids 1d, then bidding goes as follows:
1d-pass-1h-pass-1s-pass-1nt-pass-pass-?
what do you bid when you hold
S:JXXX
H:AKJ9
D:AJXX
C:9 |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 29 I sit in south,
S: Ax
H: K108X
D: AQ104X
C: KX
both none, north is the dealer, opened 1c-pass-
i responded 1d
it continues in this way
1c-pass-1d-dbl-rdbl-pass-pass-1s-2d-4n-5d-6d-all pass
west lead ha, then switch to c8
dummy is
S: QX
H: Q9X
D: KJXX
C: AJXX
HOW DO YOU PLAN THE PLAY?
i am sure u can find the right way, though i failed it when i play |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 30
if west keeps 2s 2d then squeeze, but why west throw 1s and 1d? he will throw
2d, keep 3s, 1d
makeable【
double
will |
|
m*e
发帖数: 155 | 31
good point---3D shows nothing but a suit preference
of the 5+d promised over the 4 spades promised in 1d-2s.
i.e. South's having one Ace doesn't necessarily lead to
a slam.
Moreover, North (of course not North with THIS hand) could
even pass 3D. 1D-2S doesn't promise a game. So if I were
North, based on such a 3D(passable) plus the 4C later(that
shows slam interest), supposing they are consistent, there
would be a 6 without ace asking, but no 7 (without ace asking either).
But isn't 3S a non-fo |
|
c****n
发帖数: 21367 | 32 1d 以后 2c是不是不好？
当时情况是
1d 2c
3nt //
我叫了2c... |
|
c****n
发帖数: 21367 | 33 1d 以后 2c是不是不好？
当时情况是
1d 2c
3nt //
我叫了2c... |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 34 A few weeks back, I commentated a match where this hand came up.
You are defending 4S, the dummy came down as:
A87x
Kx
Qxx
Q8xx
and you have
xx
AQxx
AKJT9x
K
You as dealer opened 1D, LHO overcalled 2C, and became declarer in the
following auction:
1D-2C-p-2D
2H-2S-4H-4S
-all pass
pd led D8 through the Qxx, and your 9 wins. You cash DA and both declarer
and pd followed suit.
Q1. Now what?
Let's say you continue with DK, and this time, declarer pitches a H, and pd
the C9.
Q2. What do you do now? |
|
b****s
发帖数: 472 | 35 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wimptb (一失足成千古wimp) 于 (Fri Jun 8 20:41:35 2007) 提到:
A few weeks back, I commentated a match where this hand came up.
You are defending 4S, the dummy came down as:
A87x
Kx
Qxx
Q8xx
and you have
xx
AQxx
AKJT9x
K
You as dealer opened 1D, LHO overcalled 2C, and became declarer in the
following auction:
1D-2C-p-2D
2H-2S-4H-4S
-all pass
pd led D8 through the Qxx, and your 9 wins. You cash DA and both declarer
and pd followed suit.
Q1. Now what?
Let's say y |
|
C*****9
发帖数: 147 | 36 叫牌过程会发生跳闸，搭档间正常通讯或牌力评估中断，最后叫一个mission
impossible的定约。下面一副实战牌例。
S KQ865
H AK965
D T8
C 6
S A742
H -
D KQ76
C J9742
叫牌过程：
E S W N
P 1d P 1s
P 2s X xx
3H 4s P 4N
P 5d P 5s
P 6s all pass
大家发表见解，错在哪里:
S: 1d, 4s, 6s
N: xx, 4N |
|
x***e
发帖数: 2449 | 37 sayc
1d/1h
2s/4s
2/1
1d/1h
2s/3s
4c/4h
4s/// |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 38
Questions:
1. should S bid 1s?
yes, 2S is game forcing, while 17 + 6 = 23 < 26
2. should N bid 4s after hear 2s (fast arrival means weak)
not really, with 3 controls, this is not quite a fast arrival hand
3. should S bid 4n, assuming 3s is strong
no, already overbid.
4. should S bid 5h? asking Q of the trump (although S had the Q)
I am not sure why S wanted ask Q of the trump.
5. should N pass 5h?
No, are you crazy?
1D 1H
1S 2S
3X (some game try) 4S
or
1D 1H
1S 2S
4S
because it's |
|
p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 39 我来试试 （没有做完）：
先数赢墩：6s，1h，1d，1c。C还可以发展1墩。明手可以将1墩。第12墩要么飞中CK，
要么明手多将1墩，要么h长套发展1墩。明手进手最多4张（3s，1c）。
手上将拿第1墩，先拔hA，然后出c6；
1）如果西家赢（本来飞不中）。如果西家再出s，还有时间可以发展h长套。只要h不是
Kxxx，总能发展2墩出来（将牌作桥两次将吃出K：K/Kx/Kxx，d回手清将，c回明手，h
好了）。如果西家不再出s，有时间明手将2墩d （明手先垫1d在大c上）。
2）如果东家赢（本来飞中）。东家没有s出，有时间明手将2墩d 。
3）如果东西忍让，庄家好像还是没办法？(K 西家） |
|
v*******e
发帖数: 3714 | 40 我坐西，dealer。东西有局。手拿
T
A9xx
AKQxx
ATx
开叫1D，North叫2D显示双高，同伴East加倍显示实力（很可能高花上有东西）。这里
说明一下我个人倾向用
negative double来否认对同伴花色的支持，但是很多人只用negative double显示高花
，对同伴低花并不表否认态度，
这个我也能接受。South选择2S加入争叫。现在，四家都开口了，并且对方已经找到了
配合，而我们并没有……
叫牌过程是
West North East South
1D 2D x 2S
(?)
我选择叫4D显示强牌和强套。但是这里我虚报了方块的长度──只有五张。因为对方有
配合我感到有必要强调牌力，在
同伴的negative double下我们很可能是有局的。另外对黑心同伴的挡张我感到不甚信
任，好比 Qxx 之类。。。所以跳
过3NT不是大问题。也许这时我可以叫一口红心（好比3H）来暗示双套，但那样就有强
烈扣叫（因为North的2D）争
取3NT的嫌疑了。。。
Anyway, 叫牌立马火热化了起来。
West North East South |
|
v*******e
发帖数: 3714 | 41 我理解的2over1逼局都是3NT为上限，当然一般可以上四阶。minor的局不应该算在内，
因为点力要求大不相同（那样的
话就得要至少16 total points才敢二盖一叫牌了。。。）
所以1D-2C可以停在4C or 4D上。
我感到叫牌能够讨论到的地方都是比较容易解决的问题。难以解决的是争叫思想，这个
几乎每个人都有自己的喜好，极难达
成共鸣。好比1D 1S 2C这里的2C牌力是什么样？也许连这个2C是否逼叫都很成问题。。
在IMP和MP的时候也有不同的考
虑。开叫方只能知道同伴没有四张红心，草花五张以上，而牌力有可能是
1. 牌力低，方块有配，黑心没挡
2. 牌力高，方块没配，黑心没挡
3. 牌力低，方块没配，黑心有挡
等等等等。。。 |
|
p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 42 It seems not too difficult if just to play for make.
- 3 rounds of S;
- play C (unblocking J from hand) to endplay E;
- dummy has 2 entries, hA and cT, to finess dA and later to cash 1d;
so you will get 6s,2h,1d and 3c for 12 tricks |
|
l****a
发帖数: 272 | 43 Also, the sign offs have to be at 3 levels in some cases.
For example, suppose responder bid 3C over 1C 1D 1S to set up C as trumps,
which is merely a gf bid, opener usually has quite a tough time to continue.
不明白你说的什么。
1C-1D; 1S-3C 你处理成 gf ?
还是来中文吧。 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 44 This is intrinsic to the wide range of 1x 1y 1z. Partnership discussion is
needed on how to show different strength range. Even with your proposed
framework, 1D 1H 1S 2D relays to 2H, higher bids GF, how strong is 1D 1H 1S
3D? Don't you still have the same problem as xyz? |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 45 Some thoughts on one hand
This hand was played in the bbo money bridge game. You play with a robot,
your LHO also plays with a robot. The score format is total points.
You hold Ax K9x xx AKQ8xx , both white,
The first question is what to open?
Of course 1NT is a possible choice. However, this hand is probably
too strong for 1NT because of the strong suit in clubs. You don't need
a lot from partner to make 3NT. So you should open 1C, even play with
a robot.
The bidding develops :
1C p 1D 1H ?
Now... 阅读全帖 |
|
o*******n
发帖数: 6500 | 46 有一副应该不是很复杂的4H庄
桌上是
Txxx
J8xxx
A7x
A
手上是
J
AT9x
K6xx
KJxx
石淼开叫1D
1D-(1S)-x-(xx)
2H-(2S)-4H //
首攻方块3 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 47 1D 1S
2D 3H(splinter)
3S(cue, SA or SK) 4C(cue, extra)
4H(cue, odd number of KC(I use some odd/even showing scheme here, 4D shows
even, bypass 4D shows odd) 4S(cue SK)
5D(nothing else, also denies DQ(4NT shows DQ)) 6C(CK, DQ is not a problem)
7D(the shape is right, partner offers two H ruffs, so 13 tricks should be a
good bet)
If I use kickback, it needs some guess work.
1D 1S
2D 3H
3S(cue SA) 4H(RKC)
4N(3 KC) 5S(we have all KC, DQ, and I also have SK)
7D(not a wild gamble , you only need partne... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****a
发帖数: 272 | 48 还是先说2NT 吧. 哈代和劳伦斯都明确表示过, 2NT 否认D 5+.
1D-2C 后 2D 的优先级最高. 之所以这么设计, 原因是很明了的.
但是那种偏牌, 5332, 长套孱弱, 短套坚固的, 因为他们俩的书都是属于普及和入门级
别的, 自然对这类难题也就回避了. 但是呢, 这类牌例, 也只能算特例了.
解决方法在开叫, 可以有
a. 14p 的话, 开1nt 算了.
b, 12p 的话, pass.
c, 13p 的话, 把一张D 插在H 套里, 再开叫.
接下来, 说 1D-2C; 2NT-3S; 3S 就是寻求 44 配合的S 了.
pd 可以选择打3NT, 也可以选择打 4-4 甚至 4-3 的 4S.
这个世界本身就不是完美的.
Axx |
|
l****a
发帖数: 272 | 49
这手牌, 有三个特征, 四张黑桃，方块好配合, CAK 坚固,比S的质量相差很多.
老实说, 我开始也没想到直接应叫2C, 直到arrows 指出来以后,
我才觉得这个叫法很妙. 你是不是觉得2C 是个很糟糕的, 不可以接受的叫品呢?
这个1NT 不排除5张D了, 我前面讲过, 2C 立刻询问D 张数, 越早澄清越好.
而且, 1NT除了笼统的描述牌型, 不保证挡张, 大牌的位置是全不清楚的,
特别是, 有的人可能还会单张S 叫1NT 的.
越是general 的, 同时, 也是越不specific 的.
这样的进程, 开叫人叫了两次, 可是应叫人想知道的还是很多.
1NT后应叫人去逼局, 没问题,
但是, 2C 的起点就是想去满贯, 我觉得更简单直接.
1D-2C;2NT 后, 否认了5+D, 一般就是低限开叫, 那么,
我很心安理得的去找个局停住了, 不去试探满贯了.
至于找不找的到完美的局, 这点上, 我没有好办法了.
1D-1S; 1NT 后, 你是不是还想满贯呢?
Ax xxx AQxxx Qxx 叫1NT 没问题吧? |
|
o*******n
发帖数: 6500 | 50 我想起来我为啥要问1453牌型，在1D-1S后叫啥了
下午忙，晚上又给一一上政治课去了:)
就是这个第二个序列里面这个5S
如果1453可能叫2D的话，联手9张将牌，不能保证DQ吧
当然自己手里拿着K，如果方块要5张好套，也基本应该保证AQJ了
如果是
x
Axxx
AKJxx
xxx
对着
AKxx
x
xxxx
AKxx
前面进程是不是应该差不多？
1D 1S
2D 3H
然后怎么叫
a
Ａ．
采用 |
|
