a********1
发帖数: 54 | 1 大家好，想请教下有没有人最近刚做过华盛顿州CPA考试对于国际生学分的评估环节？
现在NASBA只允许一家评估机构来评估报名CPA的学分，所要求提交的材料里有一个是
Authorization Waiver，但是这个我在NASBA官网上没见到哪里有提到过这个，不知道
这个是什么呢？哪里可以去下载来填呢？
以下是我收到的敦促补交材料的邮件：
“Thank you for submitting an application for evaluation through NASBA's
International Evaluation Services (NIES). We have received your documents,
but are missing the following documentation necessary to begin processing
your evaluation.
Please submit the following missing official documents to our office for
review:
Copy of Dri... 阅读全帖 |
|
l******y
发帖数: 1 | 2 http://www.esi-topics.com/arab/authors/b1a.html
Rank Author Total Cites Number of Papers Cites Per Paper
1 Meyerowitz, EM 5904 86 68.65
2 CHUA, NH 4271 108 39.55
3 CHORY, J 3884 89 43.64
4 SHINOZAKI, K 3632 134 27.10
5 AUSUBEL, FM 3445 49 70.31
6 JONES, JDG 3389 56 6 |
|
k*****n
发帖数: 417 | 3 我知道的程和平就是这样的 分别在他的Cell和Nature文章中让第一作者做了co-
corresponding author
我还是学生，文章就我和老板两个作者。难道不应该老板是corresponding author？？
？这个有没有什么问题啊？ |
|
h****g
发帖数: 439 | 4 一个课题，我的idea，我准备的各种材料，我建立的基本方法，我做了能够证明这个课
题能往下做的关键实验，之后我就走了。 现在，别人按照我的思路把课题做完了，别
人写的文章，要发表了。
我有权要求co-first author吧？是不是所有的杂志都可以挂co-first author呢？ |
|
b******d
发帖数: 149 | 5
You definitely deserve an authorship, but I don't think that you have
mentioned enough details of your contributions and others to let people
judge exactly which authorship. My guess is that the best case for you is
co-first author, but on second position or latter if there are more than 2
co-first authors. Does your PI think otherwise?
Yes, to my knowledge most journals allow co-first, even co-corresponding. |
|
P******B
发帖数: 65 | 6 我做了能够证明这个课
=======================
If you've generated the key figure of this paper, you certainly deserve at
least a co-1st author. Research means much more than pipetting. Otherwise,
I'd INSIST this being written out clearly in author contributions.
Innovation and originality should be rewarded, which is important for the
healthy development of the scientific society. |
|
m*********7
发帖数: 606 | 7 这个就是经典的，真正equal contribution的案例了，不光是first author, 也是
correspondence author。
这种情况下，就是比哪个老板牛了。 |
|
y******8
发帖数: 1764 | 8 就算你是corresponding author，只要一看文章的资助是谁出的，就知道谁是最重要的
作者。现在biomedical研究就是烧钱，所以谁出钱，谁最大。
有一些小的纯理论的分支，就很容易出现学生做corresponding author的例子。 |
|
P****d
发帖数: 564 | 9 For an interesting socioligical analysis of how credits are given in science
, see
http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/merton/matthew1.pdf
As long as your mentor is the last author of the paper, nobody pays
attention to whose name carries that little star of correspondence. Even
after you become independent and become the last author of your paper, your
credit will be reduced if your mentor's name is on it. Earning the
recognition by your peers, who will offer you jobs, review your papers an... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**u
发帖数: 346 | 10 理想状态下我觉得这种情况你应该是唯一的corresponding author, 而不是共同。
甚至是唯一作者都不为过，如果所有试验也都是你自己做的。
如果你想要争取credit，还有个办法就是在author contribution上面写详细点。 |
|
p*****m
发帖数: 7030 | 11 你要是觉得想要就去要 不过我是这么想：
首先，老板给不给这个co-authorship，其实和你做的东西是不是独立啊，老板一直感不
感兴趣啊，你是不是自己有funding啊，关系都不是很大，更多的确实是传统上这么搞不
这么搞。比如说某些field就是喜欢一作做corresponding author（比如经典的电生理）
。所以ls说要看传统很有道理。当然了，传统也可以改变的。
但是呢，其实这个co-corresponding author是没什么用的东西。一方面，不会有什么内
行真的靠这个来评价你的水平，毕竟大家不需要像国内的官僚一样数IF或者文章数来判
断人（否则的话你就应该看到那些传统上让一作做通讯作者的lab应该每个人都出来做好
学校的AP了 呵呵），你的水平怎么样通过你老板的推荐信，你的文章，你的面试之类的
能看得很清楚，这个authorship对你career不会有什么大用处。同时你说这个Invited
review的问题，我也可以比较有把握地说，没啥帮助。。
data |
|
w******e
发帖数: 1187 | 12
你要是觉得想要就去要 不过我是这么想：
首先，老板给不给这个co-authorship，其实和你做的东西是不是独立啊，老板一直感不
感兴趣啊，你是不是自己有funding啊，关系都不是很大，更多的确实是传统上这么搞不
这么搞。比如说某些field就是喜欢一作做corresponding author（比如经典的电生理）
。所以ls说要看传统很有道理。当然了，传统也可以改变的。
但是呢，其实这个co-corresponding author是没什么用的东西。一方面，不会有什么内
行真的靠这个来评价你的水平，毕竟大家不需要像国内的官僚一样数IF或者文章数来判
断人（否则的话你就应该看到那些传统上让一作做通讯作者的lab应该每个人都出来做好
学校的AP了 呵呵），你的水平怎么样通过你老板的推荐信，你的文章，你的面试之类的
能看得很清楚，这个authorship对你career不会有什么大用处。同时你说这个Invited
review的问题，我也可以比较有把握地说，没啥帮助。。
do you mean it's not helpful to get invited review or inv... 阅读全帖 |
|
e*******e
发帖数: 1837 | 13 If there are only two authors on the paper, nobody cares about the author
contribution section. The default is you did the experiment and wrote the
paper. |
|
f*****s
发帖数: 104 | 14 现在实验室里有一个project，做了最主要工作的A几年前就离开了实验室。老板把
paper给了B接着做，让B做第一作者，同时也让C帮忙。据C说，B很多东西都不会，大部
分都是C做的。B是最受宠的，所以first author还是B的。C无所谓自己的排名。
A,B,C做的都是bioinformatics。老板让我做project里唯一的wet lab来验证，并教B做
这个试验。我一开始低估了试验的难度，以为两周肯定能搞定。所以也没有问老板排名
的问题。
现在大概三周过去了，有些进展，但跟老板的设想有很大出入。
这三周没有任何时间做我自己的project。现在没有把握能作出老板想要的结果，即使
能作出来，至少还需要两个星期。
现在有点进退两难。
一种做法是现在跟老板要求做co-first author，接着做下去。
另一种做法是跟老板说我不做了，让B自己接着做。
大家帮忙出出主义吧。 |
|
w**********0
发帖数: 46 | 15 找工作， 不了解CNS的情况， 反正PNAS的Co-first author 没什么人认。
还有CNS的co-author，也没什么用。
发第一第一作者的文章是王道啊！ |
|
S*****s
发帖数: 242 | 16 这是什么谬论？co-first author就是first author。什么叫没什么人认？ 谁不认了？
举个例来看看。 |
|
e*******3
发帖数: 43 | 17 其实来问也没有什么用了，因为在几秒钟内就被否决了。
在一个实验室做薄厚，带来了自己博士期间开发的技术，并给现在的实验室建了这个技
术平台。开始没有project，这个实验室其实本来看重的也只是我这个技术。其他的课
题也不让我参与。所以我就本着当前实验室的条件和我带来的技术，设计了课题做了实
验，也写了文章。整个过程中薄厚老板在购买试剂上还算支持，我每周向他平均汇报两
次。他也准备把我现在还不错的工作申请专利，但没说让我参与。我写了文章之后因为
是用了自己带来的技术设计了课题试验，整个过程所有试验都靠自己，没有人帮忙，也
没有人能够讨论（我一个工程背景，还要去教他们生物试验），文章也是一人写成，所
以在把打印好的文章交给他的时候问能不能也作coresponding author,结果被老板秒杀
，No, you are a postdoc。 心中顿感凄凉，过着平均每天在实验室超过12小时，还没
有周末的苦日子，没有好的福利，拿着比清洁工还低的工资，其实对别人来说你只是一
个奴隶。我真的是太傻了，没有认清自己的地位居然提出如此失礼的要求，下篇文章可
真不敢再提什么要求了，人家给你这份工作你... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*********y
发帖数: 792 | 18 比较土的问一句，这个corresponding author到底有啥用啊？经常看到有人说这个，可
是我们phd期间的paper老板都是让我们自己做corresponding author的阿，貌似根本没
人专门讨论过这个问题，是老板太nice了还是只有生化方面的学科care这个？ |
|
h****u
发帖数: 480 | 19
In your case, this could go either way. It boils down to some mythical
beliefs that your boss has had throughout the years.
You asked and didn't get it. It's not a big deal, life goes on.
Continue
doing good work and build your own credentials.
BTW, if you had asked for corresponding author instead of coresponding
author, you might have got it :) |
|
i***m
发帖数: 1 | 20 A personal comment only:
This may depend on how you interpret "design research". Your supervisor
might have designed the research five years ago when she/he submitted her/
his proposal to a funding agency, while you might not even be in her/his lab
at that time. Your understanding of "designed research" may have been
included in "performed research/experiment". The latter may NOT simply be
conducting the experimental steps/procedures given by someone ("without
brain"). From my understanding, ... 阅读全帖 |
|
O******s
发帖数: 59 | 21 do you give equal credits to the two co first authors on a paper in CNS? or
in most situations, you think the second "co first author" is just a
comforting prize? |
|
l******g
发帖数: 1145 | 22 第一次来生物版发帖，就是树洞贴，唉~真是被郁闷到了。
先说下前因后果吧。
话说我现在是四年级的学生，隔壁就是我一个committee member（就叫他V老板吧）的
实验室。虽然我们各自专攻的方向不太相同，但因为做的某个信号通路是一样的，所以
就有合作。
前年年底时，V老板手下一个postdoc（叫他C好了）找我合作，我们吓折腾了一通发现
结果很好，两边老板挺高兴的，就让我们继续试。
那段时间手气很好，预实验数据太漂亮了，而且意外发现两个很重要的信号通路是上
下游关系，我老板当时就兴奋的叫嚣要投nature。
然后去年年初，这个合作课题正式开始了。因为研究的方向是V老板的方向，所以他们
那边自然是主导。基本上就是C做in vivo的动物，我做in vitro的细胞。有些样品处理
好以后，C会接受过去做一部分。
除了我们两个以外，V老板还让他手下另一个新来的postdoc（叫他K）和技术员S一起来
帮忙。
到这里说明一下，C是印度人，K是美国人。
课题开始的时候，V老板就跟我老板说，让她当共同通讯作者，我当共同第一作者。我
当时觉得自己不deserve，毕竟C的工作量是2/3。但既然对... 阅读全帖 |
|
w**********0
发帖数: 46 | 23 "继续求问有三人co的先例吗？"
No one really take care of the Third Co-first author.
It is only=Third Author. |
|
t*d
发帖数: 1290 | 24 there is another possibility: the in vivo results from C are fake.
BTW, there are quite a few papers at CNS with more than 2 co-first authors. And co-1st, no matter at 2nd or 3rd place, is a 1st author. |
|
k******e
发帖数: 8870 | 25 co-corresponding author if u have never been co-corresponding author before
and do not have GC yet. |
|
T**********y
发帖数: 559 | 26 大家有无Blood投稿经历？initial submission的时候，co-authors 会收到email
notification？还是只有corresponding author收到。THX! |
|
a*q
发帖数: 2109 | 27 刚刚有人已经说了，实际情况就跟author contribution里面写的一样，点子是两个学
生一起想出来的，学生现在也都过得很不错，实在没有什么黑幕。 |
|
l*****g
发帖数: 996 | 28 我在老板这里博后两年半才开始投第一篇一座文章，通讯作者是老板的合作者。这个合作
者submit了以后给所有人电邮了一份，我一看他写的我的contribution只有分析数据，
虽然我是第一作者，但是明显如果只有做数据分析，肯定不够资格当一座的。
我当时挺生气地，就给这个合作者单独发信，要求以后修改这篇文章的时候把我在写作
上的贡献也加进去。我说的比较委婉，就是如果不加的话我将来找工作，人家雇主就没有
办法证明我写作技能的（我写作很弱，所以这个才更加重要）。原话是：
Just one minor thing in the author contribution, in the subsequent revision,
is it possible to specify my contribution in terms of the writing up in the
method, analysis, and result sections please? I think this could be an
important aspect that a potential employe... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*****g
发帖数: 996 | 29 嗯，原话是：
Just one minor thing in the author contribution, in the subsequent revision,
is it possible to specify my contribution in terms of the writing up in the
method, analysis, and result sections please? I think this could be an
important aspect that a potential employer might be looking. Sorry for the
inconveniency!
还有
I know this sounds silly but I was actually once asked by an interviewer
specifically, whether I wrote up the analysis that I did for a study (which
I did but was not specified... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*********y
发帖数: 579 | 30 We just published a paper.It came out as AUTHOR CHOICE ARTICLE.The jounal
page says it requires 200 bucks more which I don't care. Anybody knows why
and how the editor select for AUTHOR CHOICE ARTICLE? I don't want to ask my
boss-he definitly knows.
Once selected, it's free to access. |
|
j******9
发帖数: 128 | 31 What is the maening "有名字就挺好了，还要啥自行车哦~"?
I very appreciated my boss. Ithink he is not only my boss. He is so nice to
give my the author list, but I just want to know more about the academic
credit to co-author.
在 chord88 (chord88) 的大作中提到: 】 |
|
N******n
发帖数: 3003 | 32 it is true. There is no proper rules for author list in China, except the
first one and the last one. Usually the social status played a major part in
deciding the co-first author |
|
n******7
发帖数: 12463 | 33 这个在我做的一个project是这样
我的问题是senior author什么意义呢？
first都知道是干活的
corresponding都知道是出钱的
senior是说剩下的author里面再排，恭喜比较多的？ |
|
k****o
发帖数: 728 | 34 一个工作刚被AC接受, equal contribution的2nd author。原稿按常规在first two
authors上打了记号标注，结果proof发过来标注没了，编辑换在acknowledgement里说
了一下。这是AC的规矩吗？还是可以争取按常规办？ |
|
t******v
发帖数: 6650 | 35 corresponding author 好啊 |
|
s****i
发帖数: 45 | 36 Corresponding author, no doubt! |
|
h*******a
发帖数: 184 | 37 名字放在第一位的就是第一作者吗？
那如果有两个人是co-author那你怎么知道他们是co-author而不是第一及第二作者？ |
|
f********n
发帖数: 1647 | 38 一直没搞懂这两者啥关系
特别是在这两个不是一个人的情况下
美国看重哪一个哇？
又有人说回国找工作的话corresponding author基本也算第一作者？ |
|
h*****r
发帖数: 81 | 39 The Water Quality Research and Development Center at the Southern Nevada
Water Authority (SNWA; www.snwa.com) is actively recruiting applicants for a
paid graduate internship in Henderson, Nevada. The Graduate Intern would
work at the SNWA R&D lab while enrolled in a graduate level academic program
. The duration of this internship is tentatively for 12 months with a
possible extension up to 18 months.
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES The Intern will provide field assistance and
support for current proj... 阅读全帖 |
|
w********h
发帖数: 12367 | 40 标 题: TOP 25 AUTHORS on Nanotechnology
发信站: 日月光华 (Sat Jun 1 09:05:50 2002)
Rank| Author| Total Cites Number of Papers| Cites PerPaper
1 SMALLEY RE 3816 78 48.92
2 ALIVISATOS AP 3084 97 31.79
3 AJAYAN PM 2659 63 42.21
4 EBBESEN TW 2424 36 67.33
5 THESS A 2213 23 96.22
6 GRATZEL M 1980 79 25.06
7 IIJIMA S 1959 75 26.12
8 RINZLER AG 1937 36 53.81
9 DAI HJ 1851 31 59.71
10 INOUE A 1719 184 9.34
11 BAWENDI MG 1602 54 29.67
12 LIEBER CM 1546 57 27.12
13 COLBERT DT 1519 18 84.39
14 NIKOLAEV P 1344 17 |
|
c*s
发帖数: 2145 | 41 发信人: l***[email protected] (一叶孤舟), 信区: NanoST
标 题: Top 25 authors about Quantum Dots
发信站: BBS 水木清华站 (Sat Dec 21 09:11:33 2002)
转信站: Philly!news.cn99.com!news.happynet.org!maily.cic.tsinghua.edu.cn!SMTH
Rank Author Total Cites Number of Papers Cites Per Paper
1 BIMBERG, D 5070 284 17.85
2 LEDENTSOV, NN 3717 226 16.45
3 KOPEV, PS 3544 149 23.79
4 ALFEROV, ZI 3478 169 20.58
5 BAWENDI, MG 3375 66 51.14
6 USTINOV, VM 3368 |
|
p******n
发帖数: 66 | 42 Does the order of the author list matter in math publication?
A friend (doing graph theory) told me that they use alphabatic order for
author list. |
|
f*******3
发帖数: 5 | 43 有人知道Employment Authorization Number 的申请过程吗? 难吗?
一小公司要给我OFFER, 今天被告知, 我需要一个Employment Authorization Number,
因为会到电厂工作. 说911 后要求的. 有谁知道这个东西吗?
非常感谢你的帮助!! |
|
p********8
发帖数: 6 | 44 Just received letter from ECFMG, it is said the authorized personnel list
for signature not updating. They told me i can let school send a lettle to
them.So someone could send me a sample of letter for authorized personnel
list? Thanks millions! |
|
l*********0
发帖数: 85 | 45 For everybody, see blow:
Dear ECFMG officer:
This letter is to provide a list of personnel authorized to sign the
verification of Medical Education Form (Form 327A) from ***** Medical
University.
The following signature is from authorized personnel:
*****
Signature: ___________
Title: Dean of **** Medical University
Sincerely,
******Medical University
Signature:
Stamp/seal: |
|
发帖数: 1 | 46 之前在美东一家医院做research assistant，帮助科研publication的一部分，之前签
了author disclosure还有boss也说会把我加入co-author，但是最近去问却说不没有加
，表示appropriate，突然感觉自己被欺骗和耍了，真是不知道怎么办才好。主要是
boss还是reference人，之后工作还需要她reference。自己感觉有冤不能伸张，大家留
意说说吧 |
|
|
w*******y
发帖数: 60932 | 48 Softpedia has a special WinX DVD Author free, full version download
available. The normal cost is $39.95. The registration code is included in
the download so no email registration is needed. These Softpedia promo's are
time limited, we just don't know how long. So if you want this be sure and
get it ASAP. You can find out more info about the promo here-
Link:
http://tricks-collections.com/winx-dvd-author-special-edition-full-version/
Here is the softpedia page-
Link:
http://www.softpedia.com |
|
|
w*******y
发帖数: 60932 | 50 I used the Yelp App on my iPhone to check in to Sports Authority and saw the
offer for a free $10 Cash Card. I showed it to the cashier and got $10 off
my purchase.Minimum purchase of $10.
This was in Daily City, CA just south of San Francisco. Deal also seems to
be live Sacramento, CA.
It seems like you can get the deal at each Sports Authority once per yelp
account!
Good luck!
|
|
