由买买提看人间百态

topics

全部话题 - 话题: bigblue
首页 上页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 下页 末页 (共10页)
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
1
来自主题: Football版 - NFL 2012 Pick'em Survivor (Week 1)
冠军奖: 朱八八
17周, 17胜, 18分, 完美纪录, 发36个包子.
最佳模仿奖: 宠物龟
深知群众的寂寞心理, 抓紧机会另搞一个专猜输家的sucker game,
也轰轰烈烈的玩了半个赛季.
深入虎穴奖: 茶众
第一周就力排众议玩大下狗取免死金牌, 红皮赢难民,
高瞻远瞩的预示了RGIII时代的来临.
你得了一次便宜也就算了, 还真要一直坚持与众不同, 就该死得快 奖: 茶众
有免死牌, 竟然也在第三周就出局, 包括选了雷达,
成为唯一一个输多赢少的玩家, 啧, 啧啧.
独具慧眼奖: 拜神
红鸟和水牛, 最后总共就赢了11场, 全年下来其他所有玩家只选过这两个队一次.
而拜神偏偏放着其他强队不上, 用这俩取得二连胜开季.
George Constanza之
"I'm just gonna show up. What can they do to me"奖: 拜神
在第3周, 在两边都已经被淘汰出局, 在第4周, 竟然又若无其事的出现,
继续在两边下注. 若非个别群众 -- namely, BigBlue -- 眼睛雪亮, 他就混过去了.
如此头脑和胆量, 非神医才... 阅读全帖
p****u
发帖数: 22764
2
来自主题: Football版 - NFL 2012 find sucker survivor(week 1)
我来出把力
Survivors after week 1
【PetTurtle】IND
【BigBlue】NO
【Lathander】TEN
【GoRockets】TEN
【GGYY】TEN
【zli】GB
【brmj】CLE
【letsgo】TEN
【PaiMei】CIN
【pplulu】CLE
【phonemodem】STL
【heydays】BUF
【Renshaw】TEN
【Manuel】STL
【devince】IND
【baal】IND
【XiaoLongRen】IND
【maymito】MIA
【Toe】IND
【SCIP】STL
【TaiNiuLe】IND
Eliminated
Week 1: prales, wxx07, Teamster, AT2011, onesail, arron, happydawn
p****u
发帖数: 22764
3
来自主题: Football版 - NFL 2012 find sucker survivor(week 1)
Survivors after week 2
【PetTurtle】IND, JAC
【BigBlue】NO, JAC
【zli】GB, TB
【pplulu】CLE, JAC
【phonemodem】STL, JAC
【heydays】BUF, CLE
【Renshaw】TEN, JAC
【Manuel】STL, NYJ
【devince】IND, JAC
【baal】IND, CHI
【XiaoLongRen】IND, TB
【maymito】MIA, JAC
【SCIP】STL, DET
Joined in week 2 (PetTurtle to verify)
【Nehalem】TB
【FTSCI】JAC
Eliminated
Week 2: brmj, GGYY, Toe, GoRockets, letsgo | logic98, Maverick
弃权: Lathander, PaiMei, TaiNiuLe
Week 1: prales, wxx07, Teamster, AT2011, onesail, arron, happydawn
p****u
发帖数: 22764
4
来自主题: Football版 - NFL 2012 find sucker survivor(week 1)
第三周成了大家的滑铁卢,胜者直接进入四强甚至更好了,呵呵
Survivors after week 3
【baal】IND, CHI, STL
【pplulu】CLE, JAC, STL
【Manuel】STL, NYJ, (SEA)
【devince】IND, JAC, NE
Eliminated
Week 3: zli(KC), phonemodem(MIN), PetTurtle(MIN), SCIP(TEN),
FTSCI(OAK), Nehalem(MIN), heydays(JAC), XiaoLongRen(KC),
Renshaw(KC), BigBlue(KC), maymito()
Week 2: brmj, GGYY, Toe, GoRockets, letsgo | logic98, Maverick
Abstention: Lathander, PaiMei, TaiNiuLe
Week 1: prales, wxx07, Teamster, AT2011, onesail, arron, happydawn
p****u
发帖数: 22764
5
来自主题: Football版 - NFL 2012 find sucker survivor(week 1)
下午要出差,这周只有三个人,devince已经上岸
Survivors after week 4
【baal】IND, CHI, STL, (CAR)
【pplulu】CLE, JAC, STL, (TEN)
【devince】IND, JAC, NE, CLE
Eliminated
Week 4:
Week 3: zli(KC), phonemodem(MIN), PetTurtle(MIN), SCIP(TEN),
FTSCI(OAK), Nehalem(MIN), heydays(JAC), XiaoLongRen(KC),
Renshaw(KC), BigBlue(KC), maymito(), Manuel(SEA)
Week 2: brmj, GGYY, Toe, GoRockets, letsgo | logic98, Maverick
Abstention: Lathander, PaiMei, TaiNiuLe
Week 1: prales, wxx07, Teamster, AT2011, onesail, arron, happyd... 阅读全帖
P*******e
发帖数: 39399
6
来自主题: Football版 - NFL 2012 find sucker survivor(week 1)
NFL 2012 Survivor (Win at Week 8)
baal: IND, CHI, STL, CAR, BUF, OAK, NYJ, JAC
bonus guess from Week 9: ARI
runner up:
pplulu: CLE, JAC, STL, TEN, NYJ, OAK, SEA, (TB)
寻找本轮比赛的输家
1. 选过的球队不可再选
2. 每轮截止日期为每轮第一场比赛开赛时刻 不选择者视为自动弃权
(截止日期之前允许修改 但是之后修改一律取消资格)
3. 如果选中球队本轮平局 可以继续参与后续比赛 两次平局淘汰 最后比较算半场
Week 8 survival rate:1/2
Week 7 survival rate: 2/2
Week 6 survival rate: 2/3
Week 5 survival rate: 3/3
Week 4 survival rate: 3/3
Week 3 survival rate: 3/15
week 2 survival rate: 15/25
week 1 survival rate: 21... 阅读全帖
p****u
发帖数: 22764
7
来自主题: Football版 - NFL 2012 find sucker survivor(week 1)
我来出把力
Survivors after week 1
【PetTurtle】IND
【BigBlue】NO
【Lathander】TEN
【GoRockets】TEN
【GGYY】TEN
【zli】GB
【brmj】CLE
【letsgo】TEN
【PaiMei】CIN
【pplulu】CLE
【phonemodem】STL
【heydays】BUF
【Renshaw】TEN
【Manuel】STL
【devince】IND
【baal】IND
【XiaoLongRen】IND
【maymito】MIA
【Toe】IND
【SCIP】STL
【TaiNiuLe】IND
Eliminated
Week 1: prales, wxx07, Teamster, AT2011, onesail, arron, happydawn
p****u
发帖数: 22764
8
来自主题: Football版 - NFL 2012 find sucker survivor(week 1)
Survivors after week 2
【PetTurtle】IND, JAC
【BigBlue】NO, JAC
【zli】GB, TB
【pplulu】CLE, JAC
【phonemodem】STL, JAC
【heydays】BUF, CLE
【Renshaw】TEN, JAC
【Manuel】STL, NYJ
【devince】IND, JAC
【baal】IND, CHI
【XiaoLongRen】IND, TB
【maymito】MIA, JAC
【SCIP】STL, DET
Joined in week 2 (PetTurtle to verify)
【Nehalem】TB
【FTSCI】JAC
Eliminated
Week 2: brmj, GGYY, Toe, GoRockets, letsgo | logic98, Maverick
弃权: Lathander, PaiMei, TaiNiuLe
Week 1: prales, wxx07, Teamster, AT2011, onesail, arron, happydawn
p****u
发帖数: 22764
9
来自主题: Football版 - NFL 2012 find sucker survivor(week 1)
第三周成了大家的滑铁卢,胜者直接进入三甲了
Survivors after week 3
【baal】IND, CHI, STL
【pplulu】CLE, JAC, STL
【devince】IND, JAC, NE
Eliminated
Week 3: zli(KC), phonemodem(MIN), PetTurtle(MIN), SCIP(TEN),
FTSCI(OAK), Nehalem(MIN), heydays(JAC), XiaoLongRen(KC),
Renshaw(KC), BigBlue(KC), maymito(), Manuel(SEA)
Week 2: brmj, GGYY, Toe, GoRockets, letsgo | logic98, Maverick
Abstention: Lathander, PaiMei, TaiNiuLe
Week 1: prales, wxx07, Teamster, AT2011, onesail, arron, happydawn
p****u
发帖数: 22764
10
来自主题: Football版 - NFL 2012 find sucker survivor(week 1)
下午要出差,这周只有三个人,devince已经上岸
Survivors after week 4
【baal】IND, CHI, STL, (CAR)
【pplulu】CLE, JAC, STL, (TEN)
【devince】IND, JAC, NE, CLE
Eliminated
Week 4:
Week 3: zli(KC), phonemodem(MIN), PetTurtle(MIN), SCIP(TEN),
FTSCI(OAK), Nehalem(MIN), heydays(JAC), XiaoLongRen(KC),
Renshaw(KC), BigBlue(KC), maymito(), Manuel(SEA)
Week 2: brmj, GGYY, Toe, GoRockets, letsgo | logic98, Maverick
Abstention: Lathander, PaiMei, TaiNiuLe
Week 1: prales, wxx07, Teamster, AT2011, onesail, arron, happyd... 阅读全帖
z*i
发帖数: 58873
11
来自主题: Football版 - 有些事实没法读懂
bigblue永远不会隐形bso eli。。。 永远是大张旗鼓的大鸣大放的。。。
barden比cruz机会多是因为matchup。 小白菜不是那种不会根据情况改变target的人。
。。(照地上的牛顿开一枪)
p****u
发帖数: 22764
12
BigBlue太冤
o**********r
发帖数: 1585
13
来自主题: Football版 - 现在的争议不是几个钱, OK!?
不知道工会是不是也被经纪人和律师官僚化和绑架了,其实bigblue说的几点,如果量
化清楚,还是可以接受的;就算坑儿有限,不是还有资历和经验在那里
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
14
来自主题: Football版 - breaking news: NFL and NFLRA have a deal
我的理由很清楚的阐述在下面,去年对球员适用,今年对裁判更适用。
这就是谁更需要谁的问题: "很清楚了, NFL绝无仅有的巨大成功,
更多取决与资本家们的商业运作, 而打工仔们在球场上的血汗是次要的.
球员们更需要老板们."
刘少奇说过,"要欢迎资本家来 '剥削' 我们", 千真万确的大实话.
One can debate the whens and hows of which this should be done, but not the
ifs.
发信人: BigBlue (#15), 信区: Football
标 题: The Case for NFL Owners
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Mar 12 23:23:59 2011, 美东)
先看看历史
** 100多年了, 大学橄榄球一直不断有好的球员送往职业, 从未变过.
** 但是, 除了现在这个NFL, 其他的职业联盟 -- AAFL, AFL, USFL, XFL, 等等 --
无一例外都失败, 差一点的整个破产, 好一点的也被吞并了.
即使NFL, 在头二十年也有二三十个球队倒闭.
** 那就很清楚... 阅读全帖
l*x
发帖数: 14021
15
来自主题: Football版 - breaking news: NFL and NFLRA have a deal
BigBlue, you do know it's we the fans are the only side in a no-win
situation, the longer the holdout continues. Either the referees or the
owners or both will eventually get what they want once the lockout is over.
But we who ultimately paying our hard earned money to watch the games are
getting screwed.
Unions deserve the f***, so do the owners. It's not like the money saved
from the referees will be refunded to the fans. No, it will go straight to
the owners pockets.
The owners are taking us ... 阅读全帖
x*******1
发帖数: 28835
16
来自主题: Football版 - why BM puts zli's post on top?
http://www.mitbbs.com/article1/Football/31492347_0_1.html
what's the deal?
shame on bigblue like bo hou has relationship with multiple women?
toooooo sick..
U*S
发帖数: 4914
17
来自主题: Football版 - 最近Bigblue不来灌水了啊!
呵呵
U*S
发帖数: 4914
18
onside kick or punt,双方抢作一团却都没有控制住球,球出边界,之前没有任何犯
规。此时是receiving 方从球出边界的地方开始进攻吗?
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
19
Yes. Why the uncertainty?
l*******z
发帖数: 4276
20
以前看到不少onside kick receiving team故意直接将球打出界
a****y
发帖数: 2548
21
是不是想问如果直接踢出去有没有penalty?
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
22
He stated "之前没有任何犯规".
A*****a
发帖数: 52743
23
yes
U*S
发帖数: 4914
24
以前没看到receiving方故意把球打出界,所以问问,double check一下。
A*****a
发帖数: 52743
25
打出去的难度未必比控制住低
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
26
Wait a minute ... is this not illegal batting?
Say on a conventional fumble and the ball is rolling on the ground, the
offense canNOT intentionally push or hit or slap or kick the ball to make it
go out of bound (and thus maintain possession).
I am not sure about onside kicks ...
l*x
发帖数: 14021
27
i thought it is illegal only if the offense intentionally kick the ball
forward, then they not only retain the possession but may also get the first
down, if the ball pass the first down line and goes out of bound.
the thing is how do you define intentionally, which is very subjective.
去年港人对牌子, 汤哥放炮, 跑马路眼疾手快扑上去抢球,其实把球往前拨到牌子端
区,最后不记得是safety 还是 touchdown。 但是没判犯规。 也许因为没出界?
前两周,龙哥边线上放炮,他趴在地上伸手一拨把球横着拨出边界,也没算犯规。

it
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
28
那可就是误判了.
球在地上滚的时候你可以尽情扑上去抢,
但是不能用手打(或用脚踢)把球弄出界.
看看下面这个超级碗42的game log, 第二节还剩2:31:
"... Penalty on Ahmad Bradshaw: Illegal Bat, 10 yards"
就是这种情况, 我记得很清楚.
球被他打了以后还是往回走滚出边线的, 也不行.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/200802030nwe.ht
l*****8
发帖数: 16949
29
看了一下,好象没看见不能往界外bat.只说不能往对方方向bat.
Article 8 A player may not bat or punch:
(a) a loose ball (in field of play) toward opponent’s goal line;
(b) a loose ball (that has touched the ground) in any direction, if it is in
either end zone;
(c) a backward pass in flight may not be batted forward by an offensive
player.
l*****8
发帖数: 16949
30
第一种情况是往对方方向打在position上得利,第二种是到了端区。第三种是防止接力
传球。没有说不能往界外或者自己方向bat.
d*****1
发帖数: 1837
31
这个是犯规,重新踢
l*x
发帖数: 14021
32
That's my understanding too. Either defense or offense cannot intentionally
bat the ball forward.
从3分40秒开始,汤哥放炮,牌子两球员离球最近,但都想弯腰捡球,跑马路从很远飞
身扑来,貌似抢球,其实是“故意?”把球往前捅到牌子端区。 这个没判犯规,估计
是没法断定是否“故意”。
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d823a2078/

in
l*****8
发帖数: 16949
33
我看到过。解说还夸很聪明,没见到扔小旗。
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
34
I am confused. So do you agree or disagree with my position that "receiving
方故意把球打出界" (regardless which end zone the ball happens to travel
toward) is indeed against the rule? I am not sure if there are provisions
for onside kicks.
l*****8
发帖数: 16949
35
我觉得不违反rule。起码我没见到打出界被判得。而且rule book里的定义只有那么三
条,没有提到打出界。

receiving
d*****1
发帖数: 1837
36
某年,俺们学校的一场比赛,我方故意把球打出界外,判重踢
d*****1
发帖数: 1837
37
找到了,
2008 ND vs Navy, 4Q 2:30,
Notre Dame penalty 15 yard illegal batting accepted.
Matt Harmon on-side kick recovered by Navy at the NDame 41.
h*****r
发帖数: 1864
38
Anyway,如果自己控制不住球,international batting 10码总比把球权直接给别人好
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
39
我还是不明白, 那这个动作是违反了上面列举的(a), (b), (c) 三条中的哪一条?
还是说如果接球方是把球backward地打出界, 就不犯规了?
That would be very hard to do, in mind set or in reality.
l*****8
发帖数: 16949
40
我觉得不犯规阿。到网上搜了一下,NCAA的rule book也是类似,没说是犯规。但是在
一个论坛上一个高中裁判说在高中比赛里是犯规。在那里bat loose ball是不允许的。
反正不是太清楚。
上面说的几个例子是不是向届外bat的同时也向前bat?
l*******z
发帖数: 4276
41
这种情况下如果判罚怎么判。主要是球权算谁的,特别是如果球被跑马路直接打出end
zone出界的情况?

intentionally
d*****1
发帖数: 1837
42
这个是裁判的judgemnet,说你故意的,那就是犯规
俺们学校那个球,就是接球的在空中直接把球打出界外
明显是故意的
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
43
也就是说,只要被认为是故意的,
那么不管是正常的plays or kick offs, 不管是往前打往后打往边线打,
甚至可能并没有打出界, 统统都是犯规?
That's my original position.
N*****m
发帖数: 42603
44
不合理吧
跑路马路那个球如果不是故意,就没有故意了
l*****8
发帖数: 16949
45
我在NCAA的rule book里仔仔细细的查了半天,没找到说向后故意打出界是犯规的条目。
这个裁判论坛上有人说在NFL和NCAA不算犯规。有人说在NFHS(估计是高中联赛)算犯规。
http://www.refstripes.com/forum/index.php?topic=6141.0
l*x
发帖数: 14021
46
我找不到视频,但我说了 ,上个星期,龙哥就是坐着地上,故意把前面的球横着一拨
拨出界。他完全可以再往前扑一点,双手拿住球。很明显他懒得那样做,也不想拿球后
被防守队员上来撞一下,直接拍球出界,play over,方便省事。所以我的理解还是故
意往前拨才是犯规。
多年前,绿湾就是混战中有人倒地时,用脚把球往前踢。在前面被绿湾的人捡到了。我
以为first down。 但被判犯规。 旁边的老球迷就说故意往前踢确实是犯规。 试想如
果这球踢出界了,那岂不要给你first down?
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
47
我知道几年前有一场高中比赛,
QB传球, 飞出禁区的底线了, 一个WR跳起来,
全身都已经凌空在界外但脚还没有着地的时候,
把球bat回禁区内, 队友接住, TD.
这个镜头反复播放, 全国喝彩.
假如裁判没有误判, 漏判, 那这个动作没有犯规的原因,
是因为他把球往回打? 是因为他在空中打? 是因为他在禁区打?
This is confusing.

目。
规。
l*x
发帖数: 14021
48
显然,防hail mary时,防守都是故意把球打下来,往前往后都可以。
逻辑兄贴的规则里,端区内只有球触地后才不可以拍。
B*****e
发帖数: 9375
49
Right, right, the batted ball becomes a focus point only when a fumble has
already happened or possession has yet to be determined, like on a onside-
kick.
My brain just got short-circuited.
l*x
发帖数: 14021
50
在跑马路拍球处罚15码(or 10), 牌子球(原贴错写成刚人球了),first down。

end
首页 上页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 下页 末页 (共10页)