r**o
发帖数: 534 | 1 看来美国人对lawyer也是恨之入骨啊 - 看新闻后面的留言有感
Dawg (7 hours ago)Report AbuseWow! Thats more than any soldier would get,
fighting for our freedoms. These guys worked a blue collar job just like
boilermaker's, steelworkers, pipefitters, etc. They should have had life
insurance.
confussed (8 hours ago)Report AbuseMy grandfather's was in the mines. So I
kinda know about the money thing. As we have said many times. The families
won't be hurting for money.They will be taken care of,then if they can,they
can sue th |
|
z**********e
发帖数: 22064 | 2 二战中美国兵因为这个被打死的很多，美国兵对这个怨声载道。
还有，这个跟人多人少有关系吗？
其实，就是拉枪栓的声音，都不这么危险：至少它不告诉对方，我没子弹了。
查到了这个，在韩战中，美军采用“双枪制”：两人配合，一个打，一个压满子弹等着
；等到“砰”一声弹夹弹出，对方露头时，压满子弹的那个就正好开火。
http://thefiringline.com/forums/archive/index.php?t-106892.html
PDAView Full Version : Did the Garand`s "ping" get GIs killed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
FatelvisMarch 28, 2002, 07:51 PM
I once heard, that in close-up fighting, (I believe in the South Pacific),
that in a stalemate cover situa... 阅读全帖 |
|
t**********e
发帖数: 23 | 3 看清楚标题 ， 说的是个人感受
你要谈你知道的minivan， 你来写一篇鸿文。 by the way, is odyssey a minivan or
not? you got me so confussed!!
呼唤逻辑！！ |
|
w******d
发帖数: 230 | 4 可是每次宝宝吐出来之后，还能喝上2盎司的配方奶，或之前我pump出来的母乳。所以
才confussed. |
|
m*******y
发帖数: 14292 | 5 no............................... he gonna get so confussed. he gonna become
gay......
princess |
|
A**4
发帖数: 2165 | 6 your nickname is the misleading one. Anyway, I'm new here, so it's possible
to be confussed |
|
d*g
发帖数: 16592 | 7 faint, I already said that.
you don't have to explain to me.
But I just got confussed by your last post. |
|
w*****8
发帖数: 18 | 8 In my opinion, Picasso's portrait (image5 below) is not good at all,
probably elementrary school level, but is considered as a master-piece! Even his
mistakes, remarked by goldy, were "来自生活高于生活的，是允许一定程度的夸张
和变形的". However, my posts (sketch, sketch2) got very bad feedbacks (also
by goldy):
"比例感觉还是有问题, 动作的透视角度也不太对",
"对人体结构，解剖什么的显然了解不够".
Why? Because I am nobody?
My question is: how should we (or do you or does goldy) evaluate Picasso's
work? All Picasso's works MUST be master-pieces just becaus |
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 9 。。。
毫无疑问你的两个sketch比毕加索这个差了n个级别。
n>=3
Even his
also
Picasso |
|
w*****8
发帖数: 18 | 10
You give a conclusion without any TECHNICAL reasons :( |
|
f*********r
发帖数: 223 | 11 oh my, if you can't see the difference, that means you might not have the
sensitivity to be able to learn art well.
Sorry, seems you just dont have that nerve. |
|
w*****8
发帖数: 18 | 12 You might be right about my skills.
But could you tell me why Picasso's mistakes are "good" while my mistakes
are bad? |
|
f*********r
发帖数: 223 | 13 Cool, one pointer: the lines are quite broken and there isnt much details to
compare with.if you post a bigger size sketch with more details, it would
be easier to see more what you can do. these drawing really are not showing
much.One thing I do feel is that you are looking at your paper/drawing much
more than looking at the model, which is one problem I have too.
I didnt look at the drawing with the artist/names in mind, I just look at
them as drawings. The one from Picasso has very accurate/d |
|
l*****i
发帖数: 20533 | 14 首先你觉得毕加索这幅肖像的主题是什么？他要传达一个什么东西？然后你觉得毕加索
的那个画里头哪里有问题？再然后，你觉得那些个‘问题’是不是妨碍毕加索表达他的
主题？
同样的路线，你再来分析一下你的画。
又或者，我们换一个思路：通过毕加索的肖像画，你能得到多少那个模特的信息？然后
，通过你的画，你又能得到多少信息？或者说，看点是什么？
有缺陷并不一定不好。你要非要‘很像’，那为什么不用照相机？合理的安排以便突出
主题，这是绘画的一个基本概念了。所以好和坏的区别就在于你的缺陷与优点是不是符
合你的主题？ |
|
r**a
发帖数: 761 | 15 you raised a very good point and I appreciate you sharing your sketch and
your
honest opinions.
Just step back and offer a little bit of my personal experience first. When
I
was a junior student in a design class, there was one student who always
received high scores, and who almost seemed like not trying at all. I was a
little upset and thought this student got high scores consistently only
because
he impressed the instructors from the beginning and now he was not judged by
his work, but by imp |
|
t***s
发帖数: 1247 | 16 谁能简单说明一下，毕姥爷出于什么缘故把两个眼镜画的不一样大呢？如果符合真实情
况（远处小，进处大）又会有什么样的效果呢？ |
|
|
g***y
发帖数: 16371 | 18 毫无疑问，你目前还认识不到自己的位置
多看看，多临摹，多画画吧
其他的都多说无意
Even his
also
Picasso |
|
l*****i
发帖数: 20533 | 19 没什么缘故。不重要而已。符合真实情况，也不会有什么效果。 |
|
w*****8
发帖数: 18 | 20 You guys know what you are talking about??
I knew it. Picasso's work is great because he is Picasso.
If you thought it was my work, it will be a shit.
Tell you the truth, the sketches were NOT mine, they
are Picasso's work! Get it? I am so disappointed that
you all don't know art at all, although you thought you did,
and acted like you did.
I am out of here! Bye. |
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 21 Gosh
even if those are picasso's work, they are no good.
Sorry but it is true. I am sure those sketches of Picasso were not
critically acclaimed. |
|
|
g***y
发帖数: 16371 | 23 好的作品和坏的作品是一眼就可以看出来的
这个和画家本人没关系
即使你告诉我们这些都是毕加索的作品
我想这里的大部分也都说这俩者之间的差别很大
作品不好就是不好，和人没关系 |
|
r**a
发帖数: 761 | 24 这样啊，原来我也可以说和毕加索一个水平。。在他画的差的时候。。
对了，金庸开始的作品也是烂的一塌糊涂，比如侠客行和鹿鼎记，天壤之别阿 |
|
m*****s
发帖数: 30 | 25 这里有一个trick，你让大家比较的是完成的作品和尝试阶段的sketch。我想这和钢琴
家演奏和练习新曲的区别是差不多的吧。 :)
Even his
also
Picasso |
|
l*****i
发帖数: 20533 | 26 我看不是他不想画完整，他只能画到这个程度而已。凭他这种态度，一辈子也差不多只
能画到这个程度。 |
|
m*****s
发帖数: 30 | 27 没有啊，这应该是毕老的sketch吧，我挺第一张sketch的右上角那幅，笔画很少但姿态
很生动。 |
|
l*****i
发帖数: 20533 | 28 我不管这是谁的作品。那根本不重要。只有楼主这种人才成天瞎嚷嚷，还以为其他人都
跟他一样想。关键在于楼主看不出这里头的差别，好坏都分不出来，还自以为是。所以
他注定了这辈子就只能到那个程度了。
就算那真的是毕加索的涂鸦之作，或者谁谁的涂鸦都好，楼主既然选来当作自己的作品
，也就说明了楼主画的画撑死了和那个一样。而且搞不好什么都画不了也未可知。 |
|
w*******s
发帖数: 1644 | 29 。。。
我无语了。
我是个门外汉，但是即便这样，在我眼里你的作品和大师的作品一眼也能看出区别啊。
毕加索这幅画用笔准确，下笔果断线条简洁，细节交代清楚。
相比之下你的两副只是轮廓上相对准确，但线条凌乱破碎，没有细节，特别是面部和手
。让人觉得是雾里看花。感觉你画的时候就不够果断仿佛犹犹豫豫地慢慢描。
ANYWAY,我不懂绘画，算是乱讲。 |
|
g***y
发帖数: 16371 | 30 现在想起来找的那俩幅作品应该是毕加索十岁以前的涂鸦。似乎有点印象
我曾见过他大约就是是十一，十二岁的作品。很牛
他的牛指得是，和他同龄人相比，甚至远超他的同龄人
但是绝对无法与一个真正的，成熟的大师相比
而且还有一点很重要，就是毕加索的那俩副画可能是默写
如果是默写的话，那么跟写生的作品比就又不同了
因为默写一般很难写出细节 |
|
t*a
发帖数: 79 | 31
你没读懂帖子。3幅都是毕枷锁的画！
后两幅，GOOGLE一下就知道是他这“天才”24岁(1905年)的劣作。阿毕压根不会画人体
。。。(过几天再科普) |
|
w*****8
发帖数: 18 | 32
Very funny!!!
Where were you when you said:
"比例感觉还是有问题, 动作的透视角度也不太对",
"对人体结构，解剖什么的显然了解不够"??
Did you mean Picasso didn't know human structure?
You made all people laughing! |
|
f*********r
发帖数: 223 | 33 不懂就不懂，你看不出来就算了。这样真的很无聊。
如果像Tra所说，速写与素描无可比之处，但是好坏还是有别的。用1个钟头的素描和1
分钟的速写练习来比较画者水平确实不公道，但是孰优孰劣当然可以讲评。
你不过也就是做了一个实验而已，对于美术恐怕是一点也不通的。 |
|
f*********r
发帖数: 223 | 34 嗯，Tra还是你厉害啊，
不过我觉得第一副那个戴眼镜的肖像还是很好的啊！ |
|
w*******s
发帖数: 1644 | 35 （脸红）
其实这3幅画我都过去没见过。。。也不知道哪个是老毕的，反正就觉得用笔上头一副
比后两幅的好。。。。然后我也没考古，看跟帖说LZ的两幅画，我以为就是后面两幅。。。汗死了。
我纯粹是门外汉乱讲。 |
|
T*******e
发帖数: 1156 | 36 别脸红..
俺又读了遍原铁, 后两幅不是加索的,应该是OP画的
。。。汗死了。 |
|
|
f*********r
发帖数: 223 | 38 ＬＺ原贴是骗人的阿，其实３幅都是Ｐｉｃａｓｓｏ的画。好坏有差距一点儿都不奇怪
，就好像我画他３０张速写，就一两张还能看看，其他都垃圾。 |
|
f*********r
发帖数: 223 | 39 别。。。 你脾气好啊，还愿意来灌，好多人好像上当生气了，一去不回头了 |
|
g***y
发帖数: 16371 | 40 不回头的也未必就是生气了
只能说这个例子证明了这一点：鹰有的时候飞的比鸡都低，但是鸡却永远也飞不到鹰的
高度。 |
|
|
l*****i
发帖数: 20533 | 42 大概楼主说的就是你这种了。一听说是毕加索腿都哆嗦了。 |
|
l*****i
发帖数: 20533 | 43 有几个的确看到毕加索名头就脸红心跳的。
有几个逻辑跟楼主差不多档次被楼主绕进去的。
其他的倒还都好。 |
|
T*******e
发帖数: 1156 | 44 见笑鸟，俺来学习的，不光听说毕加索多锁，看到这里各位高人也多锁... |
|
f*********r
发帖数: 223 | 45 说得好 ：）
不过小鸡还可是很可爱的，不像ＬＺ |
|
a******i
发帖数: 186 | 46 I also have the same confussion as you have. I just want to say that the
true life is totally different from what we have learned from textbook or
from other people. |
|
t****m
发帖数: 35 | 47 我也觉得是个错误。只不过我的总结里有一些不是中医、经络的，比如Body
Confussing等。当时想，就先贴到fitness版，有机会再转到中医版。这次就还是这样
处理吧。
以后，我就常驻本版算了。 |
|
s*********e
发帖数: 97 | 48 seems like a simple question:
Here is a solid element in Lagrange Coordinate System(CS).
I know now the stress and strain of it in local CS(element CS):
SIGMA[xx],
SIGMA[yy],
SIGMA[zz],
SIGMA[xy],
SIGMA[yz],
SIGMA[xz],
...
also geometry and points' coordinates, etc.
How could i build up the transform matrix to know global stress and strain,
Still more parameters required?
any fortran or C++ rountine for example?I am confussed of the tensor
transforming, would like to be concerte.
BTW: This probl |
|
d**s
发帖数: 61 | 49 反而要别人写EMAIL: 告诉他？
???...人家一爷们，从不管任何事。
那个人怎么知道的？
我也很confussing.
但我相信人家绝对是出于正义，良心和道德，咱们根本不认识呀。
EMAIL |
|
