e******u
发帖数: 537 | 1 http://usc.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1611480
McNair was just "the sacrificial lamb" tying USC to knowledge of whatever it
was Reggie Bush and his family -- or maybe we should reverse that order --
were doing, they say.
The McNair brief argues that the NCAA had to "fabricate" evidence and change
witness statements. But then after being apprised of the falsity of some of
its evidence like the famous wrong-year, wrong-caller Lloyd Lake two-minute
phone call, the NCAA still allowed three different ... 阅读全帖 |
|
e******u
发帖数: 537 | 2 Quote from court ruling
"The defamatory publication is the operative statement’s recitation that
McNair knew about the NCAA rules violations and lied about that knowledge.
Yet, this conclusion is based on the interviews of Lake and McNair about the
two-minute call, which interviews were not disclosed. Furthermore, the
operative statement was the justification for the serious sanctions against
McNair, and common sense tells us that a sanction is more than a simple
opinion. In sum, a reasonable fa... 阅读全帖 |
|
df
发帖数: 319 | 3 It is ridiculous, absurd and defamatory. |
|
wh
发帖数: 141625 | 4 40 Incorrectly Used Words That Can Make You Look Dumb
Jeff Haden
Ghostwriter, Speaker, Inc. Magazine Contributing Editor
December 03, 2014
While I like to think I know a little about business writing, I still fall
into a few word traps.
Take the words "who" and "whom." I rarely use "whom" when I should -- even
when spell check suggests "whom" I think it sounds pretentious. So I use "
who."
And then I sound dumb.
Just like one misspelled word can get your resume tossed onto the "nope"
pile, one i... 阅读全帖 |
|
wh
发帖数: 141625 | 5 你好快，我刚改完帖 :P
freaks是不是有点defamatory的感觉？ |
|
a****n
发帖数: 56 | 6
You know, in America here, one can sue you just by these defamatory words.
Who the f**king hell you are? If you continue this way of discussion, I can'
t
see you have any nurture of the so called 'Liberty'. Be an adult, OK?
That was only my viewpoint and I was not expecting everyone to agree with me
, OK?
Stop '你身上大陆人的奴才本性一目了然', that will only make us sick of you,
understand?
F***K U, just for you. You id**t. In case you don't understand:
你以为自己谁阿， 来到了美国都还不知道怎么和别人讨论问题, 动不动就人生攻击，
最鄙视的就是这样的人了。... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 7 By Michelle Malkin | May 6, 2014 | 22:05
Hollywood is sick, sick, sick. Behind its curtain of holier-than-thou
progressivism, the entertainment world's top A-list stars have engaged in
the most depraved sexual abuse against vulnerable children and teens,
according to a growing number of victims. After years of cover-up, the
institutional scandal is exploding. Finally.
The latest alleged atrocities involve "X-Men" director Bryan Singer and at
least three other power players in the business: veter... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*******y
发帖数: 222 | 8 未必如此吧。诽谤罪的举证责任好像是一个复杂的问题。比如在英国法律中，责任在被
告。
However, the common law of libel reverses the traditional positions
somewhat: a defamatory statement is presumed to be false, unless the
defendant can prove its truth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law#Burden_of_p
国内的不清楚，下面这个不权威，但是可以看看。
因为法律审判一个基本原则是：以事实为依据，以法律为准绳。法律要判定是否有罪，
要有切实的事实根据。在诽谤罪中，所谓的“事实”是被告说出的，每个人都应当遵守
诚实这个最起码的道德准则，要对自己的话语负责，即所言必须一事实为依据，否则法
律就缺少判定有罪与否的依据，无法形成一个逻辑上自圆其说的判定。
第二，如果由原告来证明诽谤内容的真伪，那就违背了刑事诉讼中无罪推定的原则。
第三，事实上如由原告来证明诽... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
h****l
发帖数: 57 | 9 学生会随即发出的第二封公开信
To the Editor:
We the Chinese students and scholars at Kansas State University are shocked,
saddened, disappointed and feel hurt by the publication of the article, "
Public universities should not accept students firm the countries that have
bad relations with US", by Sean Frye in Collegian last Friday.
We are shocked because we have been collectively labeled by Sean Frye as “
enemies” of the US simply because we come from China.
We are saddened because the grossly wrong accusatio... 阅读全帖 |
|
t******n
发帖数: 2939 | 10 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
onionball (辣球) 于 (Sun Jan 29 12:53:42 2012, 美东) 提到:
方到现在没有证据说是代笔，难道不是活该输官司
韩寒为啥要拿出手稿来对证？
不管韩寒是不是有代笔问题，官司上我支持韩寒，不然按照方舟子这种没证据就咬得疯
狗搞法，中国各界还不早晚一团混水人人自危？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
lanhua (慢炖土豆) 于 (Sun Jan 29 13:06:14 2012, 美东) 提到:
难道现在不是么？
“不然按照方舟子这种没证据就咬得疯
狗搞法，中国各界还不早晚一团混水人人自危？”
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wesley (向左向右) 于 (Sun Jan 29 19:22:06 2012, 美东) 提到:
你分不清诽谤和质疑。方舟子已经拿出了一堆基于事实的质疑，形成了一个证据链。怎么
说没有证据呢？
现在中国的公众人物缺少的恰恰是... 阅读全帖 |
|
t*******r
发帖数: 22634 | 11 我刚才古狗了一下 Vegod Corp. v. American Broadcasting Companies,
Inc. , 25 Cal.3d 763，里面有这么一段，而且这段的关键词是 “influential
role in ordering society”：
Distinguishing between private and public figure the court
reasoned that public figures ordinarily will have significantly
greater access to the media to contradict lie and error than
will private individuals, and that those classed as public
have voluntarily thrust themselves to the fore, inviting
attention and comment and exposing themselves to increased
risk ... 阅读全帖 |
|
t*******r
发帖数: 22634 | 12 按照 19 楼的 test 判定准则——“influential role in ordering society”，
这两者之间没有联系。即使个人在公众面前炒作，也可能被定义为
limited purpose public figure。
Distinguishing between private and public figure the court
reasoned that public figures ordinarily will have significantly
greater access to the media to contradict lie and error than
will private individuals, and that those classed as public
have voluntarily thrust themselves to the fore, inviting
attention and comment and exposing themselves to increased
risk of defamatory f... 阅读全帖 |
|
d****z
发帖数: 9761 | 13 还真来劲了啊，给你们贴个最近判决的诽谤案，不要以为网上发帖转贴可以不负责任
发信人: dreamz (帐号出租), 信区: Boston
标 题: Re: 网络追击清华铊中毒案的同案犯 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 18 22:22:51 2013, 美东)
这个很简单了，因为美国法律是CASE LAW，最早出现的LANDMARK CASE就是风向标，有
法有例可引，后面就容易多了
'Anonymous' Posters to Pay $13 Million for Defamatory Comments
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/jury-awards-13-million-texas-def |
|
m****p
发帖数: 865 | 14 华人大妈白宫请愿一石激起千层饼，各种nc请愿出现在we the people主页上，诸如要
求调查昆明px计划的，要求豆腐脑官方卤味的，要求解放香港的。
请愿伊始很多人担心的是泛政治化，大幕徐徐揭开，似乎却是在上演一出闹剧。
好奇心驱使下看了一下白宫请愿的policy。白宫设置请愿网站的目的是什么呢？
“The White House has created We the People to be a platform on the White
House website where individuals can create and sign petitions that call for
action by the federal government on a range of issues facing our nation. For
each topic included in We the People, users can petition the Administration
to address a problem, support or oppose a prop... 阅读全帖 |
|
c***t
发帖数: 383 | 15 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
trinitron2 (捶你蠢) 于 (Wed Apr 17 23:40:07 2013, 美东) 提到:
谁能找到正主孙维，是大功一件, 就算她改名，整容，通过她丈夫谢飞宇，总能找到她！
其他的同案犯：
李含琳 Hanlin Li,
Iowa State University Ph.D., Analytical Chemistry 1997 – 2002
Tsinghua University B.S., Chemistry 1992 – 1997
Pfizer, Director Clinical Operations and Medical Affairs
February 2002 – November 2011
Vertex
Senior Scientist
Groton, Connecticut (New London/Norwich, Connecticut Area)
家庭地址，电话，社会关系？
高菲
金亚(太阳正暖)
1975年生，女，清华大学物化 2班，92级本科生，清华大... 阅读全帖 |
|
V******9
发帖数: 1281 | 16 小叶的事好像不了了之了。偶听说英国有个Libel Law很偏向诉讼人。因为
"A defamatory statement is presumed to be false, unless the defendant can
prove its truth." 当年英国某刊物攻击麦当劳食品就被老麦诉了，而且赢了。
这事得小叶起诉(for defamation)，国内人（律师）帮忙。偶脚着饶毅可以协助一下（
听说饶毅常在这儿深海作业）。 可以先通告NATURE我们要诉。IT会选择 撤稿择或私了。
Link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law |
|
j*******g
发帖数: 188 | 17 Some states' courts hold that defamation which is broadcast by means of
radio or television should be classified as libel.
If NY courts consider TV broadcasting as libel,I think they might have a
case here:
"Plaintiff suing in libel need not plead or prove special damages if
defamatory statement tends to expose plaintiff to public contempt, ridicule,
aversion or disgrace, or induce evil opinion of him in minds of right-
thinking persons, and deprive him of friendly intercourse in society." |
|
g*b
发帖数: 223 | 18 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
loop (loop) 于 (Wed Dec 31 16:12:26 2003) 提到:
1。 如果只是在双方的Email和个人通信里进行人身攻击和威胁；
2。 扩散到和一方认识的第三方。
3。 扩散到不特定的大众，比如在买卖堤上，或者象上面贴中所说的发布传单。
上面那一种可以认定是侵权？可以提出何种诉讼？需要保留什么样的证据和证人？
美国没有什么案例支持？
多谢！
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
littletigger (好好学习天天向上) 于 (Wed Dec 31 23:51:08 2003) 提到:
This is just for a hypothetical discussion. It serves no other purpose and is
not intended as an advice. And it is just an inexperienced 1L's view after one
semester's ... 阅读全帖 |
|
a********l
发帖数: 73 | 19 Sue for libel? If it's published/written and it's defamatory you might sue
for libel. But you need to prove you suffered damages. |
|
l****a
发帖数: 82 | 20 前一段请一个real estate agent帮我们卖房子，服务和态度都非常不让我满意。最后
一个电话对方态度很粗鲁，说要解除合约，直接挂掉我电话。我再打电话过去，对方不
接，我很生气，留言说不满意，要在论坛上留review。之后发短信告诉对方会去BBB
file complaint。
今天接到对方律师函，把所有错都推到我头上，说，如果我去向BBB投诉，我的
complaint就是defamatory,他们就会起诉我。
请问，如果我向BBB投诉（我的投诉会基于事实），他们是否真的可以起诉我？起诉我
，他们的胜算的可能性有多大？
就他们给我发律师函，威胁我不得向监管机构投诉这件事来说，他们这样做是否违法？
或者违反行业规定？
谢谢了。 |
|
s******n
发帖数: 2279 | 21 http://www.prep4usmle.com/terms/
5.5 The Website and Website Services shall not be used for any of the
following:
5.5.1 Intentionally or unintentionally violating any applicable local, state
, national, or international law, or any rules or regulations thereunder;
5.5.2 Intentionally violating any intellectual property rights of a third
party;
5.5.3 Disseminating or posting harmful content including, without limitation
, viruses, Trojan horses, worms, spyware, or any other computer programming
r... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***i
发帖数: 11639 | 22 This article has drawn an extraordinary level of outraged response. The
volume of comments has been so great that our online commenting system is
unable to cope: it deletes earlier posts as new ones arrive. We much regret
this ongoing problem. The disappearance of some cogent responses to the
story has fuelled suspicions that Nature is deliberately censoring the
strongest criticisms. This is absolutely not the case: Nature welcomes
critically minded discussion of our content. (We intentionally r... 阅读全帖 |
|
v*****i
发帖数: 448 | 23 来自主题: _KiteRunner版 - 收购公告 BluewWorld Inc reserves rights to pursue legal action against any defamatory
or slanderous speech that may cause irremediable damage to the firm's
reputation and business.
greedy company from now on. Kiterunner JB: You shouldn't have done
business with that despicable Canuck. Now you will rot in hell together! |
|
g********n
发帖数: 2314 | 24 原来是'Performance profiling' could help to catch cheater 现在是 '
Performance profiling' could help to dispel doubts.
Why great Olympic feats raise suspicions
'Performance profiling' could help to dispel doubts.
Ewen Callaway
01 August 2012 Corrected: 03 August 2012
Chinese swimmer Ye Shiwen broke the world record for the women's 400-metre
individual medley event at the Olympic Games on 28 July.
L. NEAL /AFP / GETTY IMAGES
Article tools
print
email
rights & permissions
share/bookmark
At the Olympics,... 阅读全帖 |
|
