由买买提看人间百态

topics

全部话题 - 话题: euqal
1 (共1页)
k*******r
发帖数: 16963
1
en,但是回中国还称自己是MD就不对了。看我前面的帖子。美国的学位验证机构出具的
证明是bachelor of medicine,然后括号,first professional degree in China,
equal to MD。在美国,一个本科医学学士要称自己是MD,OK,没有问题。虽然如果你
还是美国读博的学生,没有用MD做博后,也没有拿到行医执照,这样比较奇怪,但也OK。
但是你回国,还称自己是MD,这就不对。因为你就是医学学士,而不是医学博士。美国
其实还是认定你的学位是bachelor of medicine,只是为了在美国行医的需要,认定这
个学位euqal to MD。比如英国的医生,他们在本国英国行医,身上的牌子不会是MD,
而就是本身那个master学位。

吗?
k*******r
发帖数: 16963
2
来自主题: Military版 - 医学博士MD在各国的区别对比
国内所有医学院本科毕业学位证英文官方翻译是BMed,不会是MD。即使你去考board,
美国的学位验证机构出具的证明确认你的学位是bachelor of medicine,后面有个括号
,first professional degree in China, equal to MD。在美国,一个本科医学学士要
称自己是MD,OK,没有问题。虽然如果你还是美国读博的学生,没有用MD做博后,也没
有拿到行医执照,这样就比较奇怪,但也还OK。不过很少有学生这样做,称自己是MD。
MD主要是给美国人看的。毕竟你如果挂个Bachelor of Medicine的牌子,美国病人不理
解你咋个当医生,不是MD咋个看病。美国其实还是认定你的学位是bachelor of
medicine,只是为了在美国行医的需要,又认定这个学位euqal to 美国的MD。所以严
格说,美国并没有说你的学位是MD,而是equal to MD。但前面说了,说自己是MD, 也
OK。
但给国内的人看,医学本科学士称自己是MD,是不对的。因为你就是医学学士,而不是
医学博士。一般中文简历,很少有人敢把医学学士改成医学博士,严... 阅读全帖
l*********u
发帖数: 193
3
来自主题: Faculty版 - 关于euqal contribution问题询问!
最近有一篇文章要准备投到nature子刊上去,命中率可能会比较大。小弟是第一作者,
后面的第2,第3作者建议老板我们三个同时为equal contribution,但是authorship不
变,我还是第一。问题是基本都是我做的工作,譬如重大突破点什么的。如果我不同意
,他们肯定不能为equal contribution,但是这样会把他们得罪了。请问自己单独
first author和first author加上2个共同作者有什么区别?对我会有很大的影响吗?
多谢!
c********o
发帖数: 1
4
来自主题: Faculty版 - 关于euqal contribution问题询问!
The most impotant is how your peers view the contribution. authorship doesn'
t really matter.
l*********u
发帖数: 193
5
来自主题: Faculty版 - 关于euqal contribution问题询问!
是不是我的贡献会被降低啊?就像一个东西分成了3份似的。

doesn'
g********r
发帖数: 8017
6
来自主题: Faculty版 - 关于euqal contribution问题询问!
感觉上会。除非你们三个是不同领域的,各自的贡献本来就看得很清楚。
g*******e
发帖数: 179
7
I think that for most regional universities, teaching and research are
euqally important. But still different universities may vary, so it is hard
to conclude like that. If I say I prefer teaching over research, maybe that
is not what they are looking for.
It is really hard to answer this question, which is the reason I posted here
. Thank you very much for your opinion.
b********0
发帖数: 201
8
1 master room available in 2 bedrooms and 1 bath in Jefferson buidlding in
New
Port available from July 1st, with monthly rent $1200 including water and
gas.
Internet fee and electricity will be shared euqally.
The room has big window with good views, 5 minutes walk to Path.
A couple live in both small room and the living room. You will share the
bathroom with the couple.
If you are interested or you want the photoes, please email: brightakureyri@
yahoo.com
m*****u
发帖数: 1342
9
来自主题: Investment版 - 国有化
This is my understanding. Usually a company has 3 types of capital: debt,
preferred stock, common stock. In terms of ownership the equity holders (
common stock holders) own the company. We say they borrow from the debt
holders: in return they pay interest and principle to the debt holders down
the road.
In the case of bankrupcy, debt holders have priority over preferred holders,
preferred have priority over common, etc. (note all debt are not euqal too,
some are senior than others, some are sec
k***e
发帖数: 556
10
来自主题: JobHunting版 - 让人沮丧的Goog电话面试
just randomly takes an integer value, say k,
then check whether \sigma_{i}X_i^k is euqal for both arrays
thus, we will choose some const c, and randomly pick c numbers, for each one
of the c numbers we do the preceding check.
Sure there are false positive, because that is an monte carlo algorithm. if
we want to bound the success probability, we need to make some assumptions
about input distribution. then we assume the inputs are randomly pick up
from the distribution and use the idea in proving
b********s
发帖数: 1676
11
来自主题: JobHunting版 - amazon电面大家是怎么读代码的
我直接读的for i euqal 0, i less than n, i plus plus. 如果不是特别的条件语句,
多个括号的,大家应该都能听懂吧
G***G
发帖数: 16778
12
来自主题: Living版 - 为什么TX的房子那么便宜?
but there is no euqality between them.
I*****e
发帖数: 7085
13
来自主题: Parenting版 - equal opportunity education
google一下,发现居然只有equal opportunity employment act,没有euqal
opportunity education act
"Equal employment opportunity was further enhanced when President Lyndon B.
Johnson signed Executive Order 11246 on September 24, 1965, created to
prohibit federal contractors from discriminating against employees on the
basis of race, sex, creed, religion, color, or national origin."
能不能搞个类似的equal opportunity education act that prohibits universities
from discriminating against students on the basis of race, sex, ... 阅读全帖
l*********u
发帖数: 193
14
来自主题: Postdoc版 - 关于euqal contribution问题询问!
最近有一篇文章要准备投到nature子刊上去,命中率可能会比较大。小弟是第一作者,
后面的第2,第3作者建议老板我们三个同时为equal contribution,但是authorship不
变,我还是第一。问题是基本都是我做的工作,譬如重大突破点什么的。如果我不同意
,他们肯定不能为equal contribution,但是这样会把他们得罪了。请问自己单独
first author和first author加上2个共同作者有什么区别?对我会有很大的影响吗?
多谢!
F****x
发帖数: 517
15
来自主题: Postdoc版 - 关于euqal contribution问题询问!
区别显然很大,绝大部分贡献,和最多1/3贡献的区别
还是跟老板商量下吧,要是我肯定不同意
T*R
发帖数: 36302
16
来自主题: Returnee版 - Gen2010---
You should know some basic facts of america retirement benefits.
The most important one is SS, this is guranteed by US government. You pay 6
% SST every pay chec, (this is euqal to china's 养老金), then after age 67
, you can get monthly SS check from US governement( you will get partial
money after 62, or earlier if you are diabled). Normal double income chinese
family can get up to 4K+ monthly pay check from Uncle Sam.
Then some companies have their own pension plans, especially schools,
federa... 阅读全帖
f********d
发帖数: 753
17
来自主题: Vancouver版 - ft to death, 我居然晒黑了
sigh,
looks heathy not euqal to looks good ya
像村妞
d********l
发帖数: 4221
18
kick team not euqal to offense team
v****n
发帖数: 7841
19
过程稍微记录一下, 也算是给大家一个参考.
从UK定了台XPAN II, 让卖家用ParcelForce. ParcelForce是Royal Mail的子品牌, 本
来以为会走postal的路线. 没想到到
了US以后竟然是Fedex来Handle.
第一天入关以后, Fedex给我发来了CF 5106, FCC 740, 0283-invoce.
CF5106估计是用来确定importer也就是receiver身份的, 我把SSN神马的都填上, 同时
注明了是Non-US Resident,
Mailing address填的是目前US住址, Physical Location填的是收件地址(我公司).
FFC 740, 这个很奇怪, 明明是film camera, 而且seller在custom form上也写的是
used hasselblad film camera, 但
是Fedex那边说, 不填这个他们就没法报关. 仔细看看form, 上面说适用于与Radio
Frequency Device, 于是打了个电话
给fedex的报关员, 严词拒绝填写, 坚持认定packag... 阅读全帖
j****e
发帖数: 919
20
maybe he did EB1B, which is way easier than 1A but euqally fast.
R*o
发帖数: 3781
21
A man cannot euqal himself with God
unless He is God
if He is god, he is not an ordinary man
do we need to continue this funny argument again and again?
l**a
发帖数: 5175
22
来自主题: Wisdom版 - 附佛外道名单
whenever talk about about money, I am very honest.
I will say what I knew.
not like FAMEN diciples, they have many leyers, not euqally
knowing everything, I guess, like qianhai's marriage was a secret for a long
time until some ppl post her vedio on youtube.
why she kept her marriage a secret?
I should not pay too much attention to her anymore.
For those who liked her, should follow her anyway, good luck and bless.
F*****l
发帖数: 7
23
来自主题: Java版 - JSP is rubbish!
Maybe you can convert it to servlet. If you have a jsp engine, it should not
be difficult to convert a html to a servlet. So you can try a servlet
instead a jsp, but they are euqal.
But I don't know if there is also such a limitation for java file.
l*********u
发帖数: 193
24
来自主题: Chemistry版 - 关于euqal contribution问题
最近有一篇文章要准备投到nature子刊上去,命中率可能会比较大。小弟是第一作者,
后面的第2,第3作者建议老板我们三个同时为equal contribution,但是authorship不
变,我还是第一。问题是基本都是我做的工作,譬如重大突破点什么的。如果我不同意
,他们肯定不能为equal contribution,但是这样会把他们得罪了。请问自己单独
first author和first author加上2个共同作者有什么区别?对我会有很大的影响吗?
多谢!
d**l
发帖数: 897
25
来自主题: Chemistry版 - 关于euqal contribution问题
其实作者越少越好,何况equal contribution
w****t
发帖数: 1849
26
来自主题: Chemistry版 - 关于euqal contribution问题
只是感觉好而已吧,在质上没什么区别。
s*******h
发帖数: 3731
27
来自主题: Chemistry版 - 关于euqal contribution问题
我靠,当然不成。。。他们厚脸皮要equal,你害怕得罪他们?
干就一个字。。
m****c
发帖数: 2416
28
来自主题: Chemistry版 - 关于euqal contribution问题
既然是建议,那就不接受建议好了。。。
d*********1
发帖数: 25
29
来自主题: Quant版 - a hedge fund brainteaser question
Three registers: a , b , c and with three commands available:
a => c; ( a is allowed to store in c)
b => c; ( b is allowed to store in c)
a-c => a; ( a-c is allowed to store in a)
how to store b into a?
I know how to store -b to a so far ...
eg: a => c; then do 'a- c =>a'; we get a=0; then we can do 'b=>c' ; we can
get ; 0- b=>a; so a euqals b;
but i could not get b to a?
any thoughts?
d*********1
发帖数: 25
30
来自主题: Quant版 - a hedge fund brainteaser question
**: 0- b=>a; so a euqals b;
correction; so a should be equal to -b;
b*****n
发帖数: 319
31
比如象proc reg用spec就可以
找了半天没找到
b*******g
发帖数: 513
32
google "proc mixed equal variance", you can find something at least related.
1 (共1页)