z9
发帖数: 648 | 1 从你上班通知payroll到现在多久了?
以前一直听说OPT是不用交SS和MEDICARE的税的, 所以一上班, 我就告诉PAYROLL的人,
不用扣这些税. 结果就收到一封SS信, 意思大致是我没交SS税, 根据WEP & GPO, 我的
PENSION会减掉很多.
然后我才发现, 如果在美国超过5年, 即使是OPT,也要交这两个税的. 我已经超过5年了
. 可是一直没交这些税. 那我该咋办啊? 还有啥弥补的措施没? |
|
h****s
发帖数: 16779 | 2 出处得查纸的书本，网上只有一些quote：
IRC Section 6501(e)(1)(A) sets forth the general rule for substantial
omission of items from gross income. It provides that "[i]f the taxpayer
omits from gross income an amount properly includible therein," and the
amount is "in excess of 25 percent of the amount of gross income stated
in the return," tax may be assessed or a court proceeding to collect the
tax can advance without assessment "at any time within 6 years after the
return [is] filed."
http://edocket.access.gpo... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
|
O******e
发帖数: 734 | 6 The minimum six-month validity requirement for the
passport is specified by law. See 8 CFR 214.1(a)(3)(i)
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/janqtr/8cfr214.1.htm
The consular officer has the discretionary authority
to decide whether to issue the visa in your old
passport or insist that you get a new passport first.
But the CBP immigration officer is bound by 8 CFR and
is not supposed to allow you entry unless you have a
new passport. If the visa is issued in your old
passport and you then |
|
|
|
|
s******u
发帖数: 179 | 10 - This Notice Only Applies to Scholars Previously Subject to NSEERS Exit
Registration -
On April 27, 2011, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that
the special registration process associated with the National Security Entry
-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) will no longer apply to those foreign
nationals entering the U.S. from countries previously deemed by the federal
government to be a national security risk.
You were previously subject to NSEERS if:
* There is a handwrit... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
w**a
发帖数: 2662 | 12 【 以下文字转载自 Travel 讨论区 】
发信人: wupa (乌帕), 信区: Travel
标 题: orlando使馆墨西哥签证记 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jun 21 20:38:54 2011, 美东)
发信人: wupa (乌帕), 信区: Florida
标 题: orlando使馆墨西哥签证记
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jun 21 20:29:03 2011, 美东)
【背景】
一群朋友打算去Cancun玩玩，酒店飞机都订好了之后开始考虑签证问题。其中
一个人有绿卡，自然不需要签证。
另外几个人是f1，刚刚回国返签过，有效回美签证。这种情况下，去墨西哥玩也不需要
墨西哥签证。
剩下还有一个朋友是f1，但是f1签证过期了。
还有我，f1转h1b之后，没有回国过，护照上只有过期的f1签证过期。
本来根据规定，我这种情况去墨西哥旅游时间再30天之内的，回美国的时候签证有效期是自动延长并
自动转换成h1b的入境签证的，所以不用签墨西哥签证。但是墨西哥的官员们始终是太混乱料，各
种条例都不清楚，看到版上各种不能上飞机的帖子，决定还... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
O******e
发帖数: 734 | 14 The actual Code of Federal Regulations for the Dept of
Homeland Security says "a copy", but doesn't define
what kind of copy is required. The Dept of State's
Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 9 provides clarification
on this issue, effectively saying whichever copy of
the I-797 is used, it can only be used to schedule the
visa appointment, and that the consular officer must
actually verify that your H-1B approval notice is valid
by looking up your Petition Information Management
System (PIMS) recor... 阅读全帖 |
|
O******e
发帖数: 734 | 15 The actual Code of Federal Regulations for the Dept of
Homeland Security says "a copy", but doesn't define
what kind of copy is required. The Dept of State's
Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 9 provides clarification
on this issue, effectively saying whichever copy of
the I-797 is used, it can only be used to schedule the
visa appointment, and that the consular officer must
actually verify that your H-1B approval notice is valid
by looking up your Petition Information Management
System (PIMS) recor... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
n*****2
发帖数: 133 | 17 貌似1月就已经生效了，见
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-11-18/pdf/2016-27540.pdf
60-day nonimmigrant grace
periods. To further enhance job
portability, the final rule establishes a
grace period of up to 60 consecutive
days during each authorized validity
period for individuals in the E–1, E–2,
E–3, H–1B, H–1B1, L–1, O–1 or TN
classifications. This grace period allows
high-skilled workers in these
classifications, including those whose
employment ceases prior to the end of
the petition validity period... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
t*******r
发帖数: 22634 | 20 （感谢 kirn 的最初贴子和 celtic 找到 Federal Register 的链接。） |
|
|
|
u***s
发帖数: 591 | 23 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
MadCow (Very Mad) 于 (Tue Dec 12 10:51:45 2006) 提到:
They are counting out the time needed for security checks, which may take
forever and you can do nothing about it.
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/11dec20060800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/ua061211/ua061009.txt
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
vacuuum (vacuuum) 于 (Tue Dec 12 10:54:13 2006) 提到:
这么多, can you zz the paragraph
needed for security checks, which may take
☆─────────────────── |
|
|
h*****j
发帖数: 192 | 25 据今日最新消息，USCIS 将于今年11月23日开始实行新的收费标准。以下是几个大家比
较关注的几个：
New Fee Old Fee
I-90： $365 $290
I-130：$420 $355
I-131(AP)：$360 $305
I-140：$580 $475
I-485：$985+%85=$1070 $930+$80=$1010
I-765(EAD)：$380 $340
I-907(PP)： $1225 $1000
详见 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-23725.pdf 的第四页。 |
|
A*T
发帖数: 4820 | 26 瓦呀呀，大家快申
据今日最新消息，USCIS 将于今年11月23日开始实行新的收费标准。以下是几个大家比
较关注的几个：
New Fee Old Fee
I-90： $365 $290
I-130：$420 $355
I-131(AP)：$360 $305
I-140：$580 $475
I-485：$985+%85=$1070 $930+$80=$1010
I-765(EAD)：$380 $340
I-907(PP)： $1225 $1000
详见 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-23725.pdf 的第四页。 |
|
|
|
|
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 30 可以，但是很难读。
那天推出的所有新规定的详细描述在这里：https://www.federalregister.gov/
documents/2016/11/18/2016-27540/retention-of-eb-1-eb-2-and-eb-3-immigrant-
workers-and-program-improvements-affecting-high-skilled
或PDF版：https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-11-18/pdf/2016-27540.pdf
具体这个EAD申请了延期就自动延期工作允许的规定是PDF里的第58页（82455）左边“
Third, to help prevent gaps in employment authorization, ...”开始。这个规定
适用于15个EAD类型，在那页上的脚注里列出；包括A3, A5, A7, A8, A10, A12/C19,
C8, C9, C10, C16, C20, C22, C24, C31。
规定的文字在8 CFR 274a.13(d)：http://w... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
w*******t
发帖数: 2459 | 33 俺看了一下, LIST和你的不一样...
Part 774 - The Commerce Control List
Category 0 - Nuclear Materials, Facilities & Equipment (and Miscellaneous
Items)
Category 1 - Materials, Chemicals, Microorganisms, and Toxins
Category 2 - Materials Processing
Category 3 - Electronics
Category 4 - Computers
Category 5 (Part 1) - Telecommunications
Category 5 (Part 2) - Information Security
Category 6 - Sensors and Lasers
Category 7 - Navigation and Avionics
Category 8 - Marine
Category 9 - Propulsion Systems, Space Vehic... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*e
发帖数: 1987 | 34 他的这个意见没有涉及奥本制定VB的权利，甚至他485递交的日期也是从VB推出来的，所以
并不会招致奥本的反对。
唯一的难点在于要移民局更改它的政府行政法规8 CFR 245.1 (g) (1) http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2010/janqtr/8cfr245.1.htm，该页倒数第7段
“An immigrant visa is considered available for ACCEPTINGＡＮＤPROCESSING
the application Form I-485 is the preference category
applicant has a priority date on the waiting list which is earlier than
the date shown in the Bulletin ”
要把它改成“An immigrant visa is considered available for ACCEPTING the
application Form I-485 is the preference... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*e
发帖数: 1987 | 35 yes, 这个提议是很好，比要求完全放开485递交的难度降低了很多。不过相对难度是降
低了，绝对难度其实还是比较高的。要实现这条，先要修改政府行政法规CFR 245.1 (g
) (1)，而修改政府行政法规虽然不需要通过国会，但手续还是很复杂的。摘录一些近
期NIU 485提前递交小组内部讨论email：
=================================================================
关于政府以前的有关提前处理485的议案 （RIN: 1615-AB82），我今天晚上又看了一下
相关信息。跟大家讨论一下
1) 每个在这个email list 上的志愿者,请把这个网页好好读一下.
http://www.reginfo.gov/public/jsp/Utilities/faq.jsp
这里的信息对我们十分重要, 告诉了我们如果有需求,怎么向政府机构反映. 我们的依
据就是
Executive Order 12866 和 Executive Order 13563.
2) 什么情况下, 机构(agency) 认为这个提案是"signi... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****r
发帖数: 969 | 36 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Helsinki (跑步然后桑拿) 于 (Sun Aug 14 19:41:34 2011, 美东) 提到:
大家有啥好主意？我正在帮NIU起草第一封信，但是卡在要求这一段了。如果我要求他们收I-
485,他们会简单回复我，要我联系奥本。如果我要求他们和奥本合作，这显然牵涉到他
们跨部门合作，作为外人要求他们办不是他们自己能够内部解决的事情，比较容易被官
话打发掉。
当年奥本2007年大放水，是处于什么目的？于外交部何益？于移民局何益？理解了这一
点比较好沟通。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
ardorbird (独自徘徊在天堂与地狱之间) 于 (Sun Aug 14 22:20:00 2011, 美东) 提到:
没有什么响应嘛，难道熟悉那段历史的人都绿了？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Helsinki (跑步然后桑拿) 于 (Sun Aug 14 23:06:55 2011, ... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p***s
发帖数: 584 | 43 2010、2011年Senate的calendar：
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/
CCAL-112scal-2011-11-25/pdf/CCAL-112scal-2011-11-25.pdf
从日历上看，整个12月都休息，没啥活动。2012年一月的没有，不过如果参考2010、
2011两年，可以看出1月、2月加起来一大半都不是legislative。
这样看3012即使今年过了House，基本要明年2月末3月初才能开始在Senate讨论。
烙印这么急着让3012投票，估计就是怕即使能过，但过晚了，ROW吃太多FY2012名额。
但看Senate的日程安排，加上即使3012能过Senate，整个过程也需要2-3个月，最乐观
的生效期应该是明年5-6月。这个时候FY2012的名额已经基本被ROW浪费完了。 |
|
p***s
发帖数: 584 | 44 Senate今天开始休会了~ calendar：
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CCAL-112scal-2011-12-08/pdf/CCAL-1
2011-12-08.pdf
3012一个co-sponsor没有，立法委提都没提。。。
from trackitt:
No movement today at all - in fact the Seante had a lot of Special order
floor speeches but not a single recorded vote. Mr.Grassley is unlikely to
release his hold till all the other business is completed to avoid this as
being a legislative rider.I would love to be surprised but Congress is
most likely going to skip town once the Payroll tax extens... 阅读全帖 |
|
n**e
发帖数: 180 | 45 说的很有道理。Rule 14就是为了避开Grassley这个反动政客。
有兴趣的可以看一下"Routes to the Senate Floor: Rule XIV and
Unanimous Consent"一文中S. 1718, a Hurricane Katrina-related bill这个例子。
http://www.llsdc.org/attachments/wysiwyg/544/CRS-RS22299.pdf
"Mr. FRIST. I understand there is at bill at the desk. I ask for its
first reading.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
(The legislative clerk then read the bill, S. 1718, by title, as provided in
Rule XIV.)
Mr. FRIST. Now I ask for its second reading and in order to p... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
c*******a
发帖数: 71 | 47 From trackitt:
Posted by Leo1970 (19) 04 Jun 2012
to mb2006:
I just called Senator Grassley's office and his office confirmed that
Senator Grassley still maintains his hold on HR 3012. His office confirmed
that subject article report stating "Sen Grassley only recently lifted a
hold on a bill by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) that would eliminate the
employment-based per-country visa cap" is not correct.
Posted by JeffDG73 (242) 04 Jun 2012
to mb2006:
Just to burst the bubble.
This morning's Senat... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
d*********y
发帖数: 748 | 49 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CCAL-112scal-2012-08-01/content-de
昨天才去掉的。我觉得这意味着no objection to an unanimous consent to pass the
measure。我相信如果有secret holds的话，应该也一并去掉了。
下面提供参考：
Notice of Intent to Object
When following the objection to an unanimous consent to proceeding to, and,
or passage of, a measure or matter on their behalf, a Senator has notified
the appropriate leader, or their designee, in writing and submits such
objection for inclusion in the Congressional Record and the Senate Calendar
o... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
