发帖数: 1 | 1 Muslims like to rape. this is not a hearsay this is a fact. I used to live
in the place we constantly the news of Local woman getting raped by Muslim
descendant. Later on I moved out of that City |
|
W*****B
发帖数: 4796 | 2 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: WCNMLGB (CCC), 信区: Military
标 题: 波多黎各的电力回复没有？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Dec 18 15:41:27 2017, 美东)
都好几个月了，还是老样子。人民估计也习惯了没电的日子。这样可以有时间亲戚邻里
更多的促膝谈心交流。突然来电了，可能还要不适应了吧。
还有瞒报死亡人数。
Puerto Rico Orders Review and Recount of Hurricane Deaths
Facing mounting evidence that Puerto Rico has vastly undercounted the number
of people who died because of Hurricane Maria, Gov. Ricardo A. Rosselló
ordered on Monday that every ... 阅读全帖 |
|
w******e
发帖数: 953 | 3 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democrats-are-headed-for-a-major-
clash-over-impeachment/ar-BBHqbaB?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=mailsignout
After bruising defeats in Virginia, New Jersey, and Alabama, Republicans are
bracing for the possibility that Democrats take back the House in 2018—and
Democrats, after a year in the wilderness, are beginning to seriously
debate the political ramifications of impeaching Donald Trump if they do.
For months, the Democratic base has been agitating for leadership to... 阅读全帖 |
|
w**d
发帖数: 2334 | 4 u know the difference b/w hearsays and facts? |
|
发帖数: 1 | 5 这只是 hearsay，法庭上起不了作用，不过倒是可以让 FBI 有足够的怀疑，继续追查
下去。
不过呢，就算给了 13 万，这恐怕也不是什么大事。因为重点不在川普有没有买娼，重
点是有没有违反关于竞选捐款的法律。之前外界有一种看法认为，给钱的目的是为了让
他能顺利当选，所以这笔钱即使是川普自己的钱，都应算是对竞选的捐款，而超过 $
2700 的捐款都要上报。这只是民间看法，US Attorney/FBI 会不会以此起诉尚难说，
而最终法院会不会接受就更遥远了。
on |
|
c*******e
发帖数: 5818 | 6 没看明白，你简单点，发春说这事很大，trump 肯定完了，就是时间问题，那你的意思
是 trump还有缓？？？
：这只是 hearsay，法庭上起不了作用，不过倒是可以让 FBI 有足够的怀疑，继续追查
：下去。 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 7 很有可能会成立！这本来就是司法系统运作的方式，比证据。如果你可以找到一堆人愿
意作伪证，我当然沦为不利的一方，有冤无处诉。全世界的司法本来就是这么运作的，
我不知道你举这个例子有何意义？
（补充：如果他们作证只是说你有告诉他们我偷你钱，这没有用，这叫 hearsay。但如
果他们作证说我真偷了你钱，我就惨了。） |
|
发帖数: 1 | 8 我刚才读贴不仔细，后来仔细看了就在我的回帖中加了一句话：
（补充：如果他们作证只是说你有告诉他们我偷你钱，这没有用，这叫 hearsay。但如
果他们作证说我真偷了你钱，我就惨了。）
总之，全世界的司法系统都是根据证人的证词判案，你要找人作伪证说我偷了钱，我就
会变成有罪。全世界如此，我不知道你说这个有何意义？ |
|
发帖数: 1 | 9 你说的是 hearsay。 转述他人的话不能当作证据 但是诉说自己的亲身经历可以当作证
据。
Word of mouth 是一传十十传百的意思，有时候当作口碑使用。但跟 word on the
street 不太一样，后者则是真正市井传言、马路消息，真假不知的消息。前者好像只
是说口头传递的形式，但没有贬义。我不太会解释，仅供参考。
corroboration |
|
发帖数: 1 | 10 楼主别急，这叫做 Hearsay，法庭上不作数的。不过 FBI 可以问他是从谁那里听来的
，然后追上去，所以这个神
学院教授的证言，还是有点重要性。但看起来 FBI 根本是做样子，几个出面作证的人
都置之不理 |
|
s********t
发帖数: 4150 | 11 For the first time since Donald Trump entered the political fray, I find
myself grateful that he’s in it. I’m reluctant to admit it and astonished
to say it, especially since the president mocked Christine Blasey Ford in
his ugly and gratuitous way at a rally on Tuesday. Perhaps it’s worth
unpacking this admission for those who might be equally astonished to read
it.
I’m grateful because Trump has not backed down in the face of the
slipperiness, hypocrisy and dangerous standard-setting deployed ... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 12 An ex-boyfriend turned up to question her narratives in a sworn affidavit
alleging that she was demonstrably neither aerophobic nor claustrophobic—
and perhaps far from being a novice in matters of taking lie-detector tests.
Instead, he suggested that she had used her psychotherapy skills to coach
her doppelganger friend how to massage such a test—a Zelig-like best friend
who unfortunately also turned up at the hearings, and may well have hosted
Ford before the Senate circus, and also allegedly ... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 13 外面下着暴雨，俺接着来对番薯仔耳提面命。
番薯仔，俺刚查了维基，咱抛开那些晦涩理论的部分，你来翻译一下这段白话，就明白
了Jerry的话是法庭标准证据了。
For example, to prove Tom was in town, the attorney asks a witness, "What
did Susan tell you about Tom being in town?" Since the witness's answer will
rely on an out-of-court statement that Susan made, if Susan is not
available for cross-examination, and it is to prove the truth that Tom was
in town, it is hearsay. A justification for the objection is that the person
who made the statement is not in court and thus is i... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 14 番薯仔，你学习要有学习的态度。俺教你hearsay你丫为啥不真诚谢我一句呢？
: 一、“一无所知，还好意思问别人声乐有几种”，所以你的处世哲学是不懂
: 就不能问？
: 还是不懂装懂？是不是？哈哈哈！为了损人，连这种不知羞耻的逻辑都敢拿出来
斗，不
: 觉得自己很可笑？
: 二、上次有人凭我一个帖子就说我不懂钓鱼，跟我死杠半天，最后认错。你现在
也是凭
: 了一个帖子就铁口直断，不觉得自己很可笑？
: 三、你们两个就跟完整哥一样，他铁口直断我不懂钓鱼，你铁口直断我不懂音乐
，完整
: 哥铁口直断我是同性恋处男单身。。。Blah blah blah。何必为了斗争，把自己
弄得如
: 此不堪？
: 四、言归正传，我知道有意大利美声法，有中国民族唱法（就是彭丽媛那派），
至于近
|
|
发帖数: 1 | 15 你是教萝卜还是大硬盘 hearsay ，你搞错人了吧？记得我教你 It's my second time
还有 yesterday was a sad day 吗？你说谢谢了没？ |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 16 有道理，该感谢的是要感谢。
俺谢谢番薯仔，自从来到美国不用现金，俺四则运算数学能力大幅下降，已经退化到数
数都不能的地步。受到了番薯仔读英文数the的热情感染，俺数数能力最近有点提高。
所以谢谢番薯仔。
: 你是教萝卜还是大硬盘 hearsay ，你搞错人了吧？记得我教你 It's my second
time
: 还有 yesterday was a sad day 吗？你说谢谢了没？
|
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 17 几个与唱歌艺术毫无关系的英文单词被生拉硬凑进来，何其可怜。
就如同番薯仔前面提的hearsay一样，你丫用个谷歌翻译看看中文翻译，后面就全靠脑
补，脑补不足，脸皮来凑。。。。。
: 考级的标准我前面已经概略提了：“刚开始的时候考音阶、视奏、音准、乐句，
。。。
: 再上去考音乐性包括乐曲诠释。”。不好意思，说错了请您指教。
: 至于卡拉 OK 的评分，我真没接触过，不过据猜测嘛是基于 DSP 技术，分析歌
者的频
: 率高低看看有没有走音，然后也可以分析是否合拍，这些都不难做到。当然啦，
这是我
: 的猜测，请您指教。
: 添加1：除了频率与节奏外，卡拉 OK 能不能分析歌词有没有唱错？现在自然语
言处理
: 的技术很先进，而且卡拉 OK 又不用管 semantics，它只管发音，照说绝无问题
。只不
: 过中文是一种 tonal language，而唱歌的时候没有 tone，可能比对时的算法要
修改一
: 下。当然啦，这也是我瞎猜，我什么都不懂，请您指教。
: 添加2：如果要做歌词分析，我们是要做比较聪... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 18 你的yelp评论大家已经看过了，就是钓鱼没装备喊冷啊，你就不要再装处出来卖第二次
啊。
来点新鲜的，像便宜割杂草镰刀啊，hearsay这种要大力弘扬。。。。
: How about this? Let me make it easier for you: Show me yours, I'll
show you
: mine. Show me a review you wrote on Reddit or anywhere, I'll show you
a
: review I wrote on Yelp. See see who mocks who. Of course, I can't stop
you
: from copying other people's comment, but I can guarantee mine. So,
this is
: based on honor and honesty.
|
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 19 你先挑战我的，这就跑了？
番薯仔真窝囊，随便一吓就缩头了。也许是真的有语病？我自己还没看呢，只是对数
the，不懂hearsay的货有百分之百的信心而已。
提到百分比，俺不得不提一下这里的最大值为百分之百。丫挺的微波毛线开创历史先河
，百分比的最大值原来可能是百分之好几千上万。。。。
: 你跟我赌个屁！你上面的承诺还没兑现，现在又想赌？脸皮真的穿甲弹打不破啊？
: 得了，此楼已经证明你就是个泼皮无赖，我玩够了。萝卜，你要继续粉他你继续。
|
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 20 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: beijingren (to thine own self be true), 信区: Military
标 题: 乌克兰这事，右派认为情报界给床铺下了蛊
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 27 22:47:35 2019, 美东)
Intel Community Quietly Scrapped Requirement For "First-Hand Knowledge"
Before CIA 'Rumorblower' Relied On Hearsay
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/intel-community-quietly-scrapped-
requirement-first-hand-knowledge-cia-rumorblower-relied |
|
y*****e
发帖数: 201 | 21 直接dispute那个读他notes的人hearsay，不知效果会如何？ |
|
d**g
发帖数: 167 | 22 County of Nassau v Levine
2010 NY Slip Op 20305 [29 Misc 3d 474]
July 12, 2010
Kluewer, J.
District Court Of Nassau County, First District
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
§ 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, November 17, 2010
[*1]
County of Nassau, Plaintiff,
v
Samuel M. Levine, Defendant.
District Court of Nassau County, First District, July 12, 2010
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Samuel M. Levine, Long Beach, defendant pro se. John Ciampoli, County
Attorney... 阅读全帖 |
|
r***e
发帖数: 653 | 23 别用听说这两个字，这叫hearsay.靠𣎴住。你也知道两次法庭不同，所以让你
去这个法庭网站好好看看。第一次选no contest和第二次有什么关系啊？你照样可以选
。只是第一次如果是no contest + defensive driving，在一年内就不行了，但可以选
no contest并申请parole. 看看你这次这个法庭有没有这个可选。既然你一年内没
defensive driving过，你这次就仍可能有机会用这个。让你去查该法庭的网站，你去
DMV 干啥？ |
|
r***e
发帖数: 653 | 24 你听朋友说没用，那叫hearsay,不做数。你先去法院，看看有什么选择。首先，你确信
周二就让你出庭？还是说收到ticket以后，10天内与court联系？基本上看你的情况，
你接到ticket以后，除了问朋友，你啥都没干。仔细看你的ticket了没有？警察cite的
是什么？cite的原文跟ticket上citation number一致不？ticket上对你本人和你的车
的基本信息是否正确？
我觉得你所谓的周二上庭，不过就是去make plea。你那个是哪家法庭，那个法庭给你
啥option我不知道，但是德州很多法庭是允许你选plea guilty, no contest或no
guilty的。如果可选no contest, 你还可以选defensive driving或parole，交
discounted或full罚款不用上庭,不影响你的保险，就算把事了了。如果你那个法庭只
有guilty或not guilty, 你要研究一下，看看这个法庭的程序，如果选了not guilty以
后，有没有啥pretrial，如果有pretrial，那基本上就是plea bargain的过程。
... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*****2
发帖数: 799 | 25 hearsay, documents made out of court, lack of foundation |
|
G*****7
发帖数: 1759 | 26 only consider d if you live close to a "diesel station", has a penis or a
boy friend, and wouldn't mind hearsays that diesel additives induce cancer. |
|
m**********r
发帖数: 2099 | 27 You are confused.你先说：对方可能是全责。然后你改口说comparative negligence
首先，行车记录仪是hearsay，不一定可以成为证据，不成为证据再怎么记录仪都没用。
第二，这种事故，如果完全走保险，那就过去了。如果对方直接起诉，上庭，说自己脑
损伤，需要长期康复训练，你这种逻
辑速度推断yada yada yada，陪审团才不听：大部分人根本听不懂数学，物理，速度计
算，你以为陪审团都是研究生毕业？大部分人本来就不喜欢坐在那里，你还给他们讲物
理学，数学计算？陪审团能看见的，被告是一个年轻人，中国人，还是女性，另一边的
原告是白发苍苍的老人，骑自行车被人撞，本身这个事情对被告就不利。
第三，即使按照你说的，但你说的只是：汽车“曾经”有一个时间点，超过了自行车。
但超过以后呢？难道保持那个速度往前冲？不是吧，肯定有刹车的过程：因为前面是
stop sign，汽车要停下来，要刹车，要减速，对不对？于是你的逻辑里面，你怎么证
明在汽车刹车过程里面自行车没有反超？对方可以说：自行车重量轻，刹车距离短，所
以完全可能自行车先到停牌。而且对方还可以说：既然司机... 阅读全帖 |
|
m**********r
发帖数: 2099 | 28 如果在加州，因为People v. Goldsmith，这个摄像，State可以argue that it is
not testimonial evidence so that confrontation clause doesn't apply and it
is not hearsay either, 这样警察不来可能你也一样败诉。其他州警察不来你要提
Crawford v. Washington，因为不是ongoing emergency所以Bryant doesn't apply,
因而你有constitutional right to cross examine the cop，你有希望胜。
现在你在论坛发帖，承认自己没停，如果叫State人肉了你，你可能要败诉。 |
|
m**********r
发帖数: 2099 | 29 所以你还必须argue救护车闪灯你竟然实际上没看见，而且一般的人类在你的角度都不
可能看见，证明这个你需要accident reconstruction expert，这种expert我在以前做
garden variety PI的那家公司请过，每小时350，预付5个小时现场做调查做数学模型
加写报告。作证另算，我记得是每小时600，作证预付4个小时。如果这个expert不作证
，所有他写的报告都是hearsay，法官可以不看，直接扔垃圾桶。你还必须证明当时救
护车没有鸣笛，你怎么证明？需要调阅EMS出车记录，拿到救护车司机的证词，承认他
作为一个司机开救护车竟然不开警笛。以上，都是基于法官同意你请证人作证的前提下。
但即使是这样，follow too closely--->追尾，
这个就够了，你这个只能是mitigating factor，就是说你的责任是肯定的，但法官看
你可怜，少判一点，本来罚款200，现在150算了。从整体来看，救护车通过，你不刹车
这个本来就questionable，还加上跟车特别近，造成追尾前车，doesn't look good at
all.你的说法是：... 阅读全帖 |
|
c**d
发帖数: 3888 | 30 You have a lot of misunderstanding based on piecemeal info and hearsay.
Sorry for my harsh languages earlier. But you have very limited
understanding so you really shouldn't try to handle this matter yourself.
Talk to a local lawyer with good reputation.
Your own insurance company is not always on your side. They are doing this
to make money. They have no incentive to tell you about your full rights. In
fact, they can get into trouble for committing unauthorized practice of law
(something many ... 阅读全帖 |
|
U********T
发帖数: 174 | 31 这个没有逻辑把, 如果流星用hearsay引用raint的话，我觉得要打问号；如果流星说是
他自己说的，那还是有可信度的，至少没有流星的负面消息(去掉他跟raint一伙这个负
面因素)
根raint说流星什么有关系吗？那可以是表演的【 在 Mayhem (AL state) 的大作中提
到: 】 |
|
c****2
发帖数: 3640 | 32 你的朋友在误导你，俄罗斯和日卡要多少有多少，白菜价甩都甩不完
通过几个hearsay轻易下结论，未必是真的在回报
现在不确定性因素太多，而且大多是人为的
价格和需求变来变去的，至少我不敢囤卡，也不敢预测价格趋势
了。 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 33 华裔赌徒邸千（45岁东北人）借钱不还 在美国华人社区流窜诈骗
邸千，一位来自中国大连市的45岁男子，在美国居住了二十多年，因为沉湎赌博而倾家
荡产，妻离子散，于是不停地搬家，到处向人借钱不还，租房欠缴租金，还经常报警诬
陷债主和房东。邸千骗钱的手段之一，就是吹嘘自己的“辉煌历史”，并将一份履历表
作为“道具”。
以下《中国游泳教练工作简历及主要成绩》由邸千同志自己编写，内容的真实性存疑，
未经大连市体育局等单位审核。
中国游泳教练工作简历及主要成绩
姓名：邸千 性别：男 出生年月：1971年2月21日
家庭住址：大连市中山区中南路亿成花园8号楼2单元501室
邮政编码：116001 电话：15322033666
简历：
1979年----1983年哈尔滨市兆麟小学校
1983年----1986年大连市辽宁师范大学附属中学 中学
1986年----1989年大连市辽宁师范大学附属中学 高中
1989年----1993年大连大学师范学院体育系体育教育专业
1993年----2007年大连市体育局体育运动学校游泳教练
2008年----日本神户大学青少年游泳教练员培训班学习
2009年---... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 35 I am sure economy will grow. But you don't know if the index is a fair
reflection.
Nasdaq in 2000 is an example, DJI in 1929 is an example. Taiwan index in
1990s is an example. It's been 20+ years for Taiwan and it hasn't recovered.
At the end of the day, I'd take backtest over hearsay and personal
experience. Most traders lose money because they become emotional in front
of the market and they can't stick to their model. General market won't
change for a long time frame, because greed and fear ... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
j**********r
发帖数: 3798 | 37 Netflix's turnover rate is not higher than big startups, and it has good
benefits. Don't spread hearsay. |
|
t*******n
发帖数: 4445 | 38 I just think it's a good idea to verify facts, before filing a complaint
based on hearsay. Also I don't see why that affects you financially, as the
insurance will pay what the policy says.
BTW what do you want? If it's discount, go back to the dentist and try
negotiating first. Complaint may or may not cause trouble for the dentist,
but it's probably not going to get your money back. Arbitration requires
both parties' consent first. |
|
t*******n
发帖数: 4445 | 39 I just think it's a good idea to verify facts, before filing a complaint
based on hearsay. Also I don't see why that affects you financially, as the
insurance will pay what the policy says.
BTW what do you want? If it's discount, go back to the dentist and try
negotiating first. Complaint may or may not cause trouble for the dentist,
but it's probably not going to get your money back. Arbitration requires
both parties' consent first. |
|
g*****t
发帖数: 394 | 40 谢谢大家回复。事实上我也啥都不懂，我姐姐电话和我说的，她也是听医生说的，所以
说确实是hearsay。现在他们关心的是“房间隔缺损介入术”(英文Atrial septal
defect closure）这种手术的长期预后，就是几十年之后会不会有一些负面的影响。因
为美国这边这个手术开始的比较早，所以可能会有一些case report或者research。希
望有对这个了解的朋友能帮忙，谢谢。 |
|
l*h
发帖数: 4124 | 41 frankly, not only hearsay, but purely bullshit.
"治疗抽动症的又对多动症有影响" |
|
l*h
发帖数: 4124 | 42 no one can help you with such hearsay. |
|
l*h
发帖数: 4124 | 43 it looks like doctors in China, when given a condition, only think about
possibilities that some expensive procedures can be done. i talked to quite
some in those biggest hospitals, they seemed genuinely not knowing those
more common, but no-expensive-procedure possibilities. they don't learn by
systematic learning, but only by casual chatting and hearsay. it look like
the vast majority of doctors in China are functioning this way.
not certain what regimen is being used (there are so many for ga... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*h
发帖数: 4124 | 44 you need an oncologist to coordinate her care. hearsay does a lot more harm
than good. such poorly written "medical summary" is close to useless.
to be honest, there are essentially no properly trained oncologists in China.
右。 |
|
l*h
发帖数: 4124 | 45 your mom is not alone.
a very high percentage of Chinese people behave this way: trust hearsay and
dismiss proved knowledge/facts unconditionally.
these people also include many with a PhD in biomedical sciences, who
believe they know science from inside out and are the only carrier of
science.
呢？ |
|
l*h
发帖数: 4124 | 46 to be frank, you have a very strange mindset. or not strange, but very
typical of Chinese who trust hearsay unconditionally and question
professional advice and tested knowledge like a knee-jerk response. |
|
l*h
发帖数: 4124 | 47 to be honest, you have NO rights to inquire into your "friend's" medical
information, except for some hearsay from his/her family. |
|
E*********n
发帖数: 144 | 48 我想你是hearsay吧，一会说骨转移后活了两年，一会说发现时全身扩散，然后活了十
几年。全身扩散还进行了手术？ 只要有remote metastasis, 手术就不再可能，一般是
系统化疗，局部放疗，加靶向。我可以负责得告诉你，癌症的愈后和病人的心情毫无关
系。癌症的愈后的决定因素是癌症的种类，分期，癌细胞的分化程度，是否转移，以及
手术切割的干净程度。所以早期发现，尽早手术是关健。 |
|
a****l
发帖数: 6431 | 49 formally published news often time do not disclose too much of the
information of the victim(s) in order to protect them, I think.
But you can still get information from gossips/rumor/hearsays, I guess? |
|
p*i
发帖数: 1328 | 50 That is overstated. A mother who wanted the best for her child made a
mistake. There is no need to jump to conclusions according to hearsays and
lay opinions. |
|
