d***s
发帖数: 55 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 EE 讨论区 】
发信人: doris (blank), 信区: EE
标 题: IPDPS征人share hotel (男)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Apr 4 22:14:15 2011, 美东)
代人发帖，勿回站内。
去今年的IPDPS,在Anchorage AK,准备05/15周日和05/16周一住两天,有人愿意share
hotel
吗？ email联系: v*******[email protected] |
|
r****c
发帖数: 2585 | 2 IPDPS is second tier
not too bad
but not good |
|
d***s
发帖数: 55 | 3 代人发帖，勿回站内。
去今年的IPDPS,在Anchorage AK,准备05/15周日和05/16周一住两天,有人愿意share
hotel
吗？ email联系: v*******[email protected] |
|
f*****r
发帖数: 229 | 4
It seems that you like scientific computing areas, and give their conferences
really high rank.
Why put ICS/IPDPS in here? I always think that they focus more on architecture
field. BTW, for system work, ICS may be not bad than ICDCS, and both better
than IPDPS. |
|
L***s
发帖数: 9258 | 5 发信人: Mang (忙 盲 茫), 信区: TsinghuaCent
标 题: 任教于美国一流大学的部分清华学子
发信站: 水木社区 (Tue Sep 10 11:30:55 2013), 站内
【致谢】感谢参与编写和提供信息的以下校友：
IhateBS strong
根据美国US News 2013年美国大学排名前100的顺序统计，缺漏错误之处难免，请大家
补充
分为Full Professor（正教授）、Associate Professor（副教授）和Assistant
Professor三类，
其中前两类一般具有终身教职，不含解放前的清华学子，也含有极少数非tenure track
教职
人员,和已离职的人员，只列出，不计入统计总数。
共有在职Tenure track系列教职的共492 人，其中90名正教授。副教授186人
另有部分著名实验室全职研究人员22人
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,哈佛大学 6
林希虹
Professor, 生物统计系... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 8 如果找的是research job, 我看去正好建立点关系，被check 也就3周。 如果是工业界
，基本就别去了。 但是你们老板这么好说话，paper没人 present在ipdps, 那是很大
事故了。 |
|
s****n
发帖数: 147 | 9 distributed system design - decouple, fault tolerance, replication,
consistency, etc.
distributed job/task scheduling - mesos, HTCondor
distributed file system - CEPH
distributed NoSQL design
conference paper - SC, ICDCS, IPDPS, SoCC, NSDI, etc. |
|
s****n
发帖数: 147 | 10 distributed system design - decouple, fault tolerance, replication,
consistency, etc.
distributed job/task scheduling - mesos, HTCondor
distributed file system - CEPH
distributed NoSQL design
conference paper - SC, ICDCS, IPDPS, SoCC, NSDI, etc. |
|
z*********g
发帖数: 5 | 11 PACT is definitely lower than ISCA and ASPLOS.
( Compared to those parallel and distributed computing confs like IPDPS, ICPP
and PDCS, PACT is way better! )
BTW, ASPLOS is at least as good as ISCA.
ISCA's got too much politics in it. ASPLOS is less 'political' than ISCA. This
fact makes ASPLOS better.
below |
|
c******n
发帖数: 4965 | 12 ~~SC
better than IPDPS
pretty good |
|
l****n
发帖数: 16 | 13 In parallel-arch field.
top picks: ASPLOS, ISCA, MICRO, PACT, HPCA.
second tiers: IPDPS, SC, ICPP, SPAA, ISC, PDCS, etc.. |
|
f***n
发帖数: 117 | 14 That really depends on the concentration of the conf.
in podc they only care about archi, while in ipdps applications got
respected as well.
if you go further to pads, application would be mainstream |
|
|
c******n
发帖数: 4965 | 16 well, that's not a good reason though,
most reviewers are just procrastinating,
it takes at most 4 hours to thoroughly read a paper,
since the reviewers are supposed to be experts |
|
x*g
发帖数: 68 | 17 I agree with what you said. Once I was assigned 5 papers to review two days
before the review deadline. Other reviewers got much longer review period
(longer than a month), but I only got 2 days because the program chair
happened not be able to finish his reviews in time and had to assign me 5
papers two days before the deadline.
So I had to spend less than 3 hours to review each paper (and although I am
not the expert for 2 papers). Later on, when I saw the comments from all
reviewers, I found |
|
c******n
发帖数: 4965 | 18 come on, within a two-day period, you can always sqeeze out 4 hours,
if you are that busy, better not serve as reviewers |
|
x*g
发帖数: 68 | 19 it may end up with a student of the reviewer reviewing the paper. You can't
expect a faculty to review not-so-important workshop papers within two days
becasue he is usually very busy has higher priority work to do. At least, I am
sure this won't work for my advisor. :)
ll rely on reviwing papers to make a living? |
|
j*********t
发帖数: 11 | 20 It has nothing to do with whether it's important or not. Instead, it's about
schedule. Big guys usually have pretty full schedule each day, so if you
want to grab several hours from them, you got to reserve it in advance.
Suddenly giving you a paper and set the deadline as 2 days later, is
nothing but an insult.
am |
|
|
z**5
发帖数: 221 | 22 Workshop papers are different from the main conference papers. |
|
d*****g
发帖数: 1538 | 23 How do you guys know which conference is in which tier? Only from experience
passing among ppl, or there is any link? |
|
|
a***g
发帖数: 70 | 25 还有 ICPP 或 IPDPS，不过不是 mainly focus on grid computing。 |
|
s**i
发帖数: 83 | 26 It is supposed to be due today, but no response till now. |
|
s*******f
发帖数: 366 | 27 有谁在atlanta参加这个会议的啊~要不要一起聚聚？ |
|
f***n
发帖数: 117 | 28 在sheraton大厅上网呢
怎么聚？
貌似无数亚洲面孔 |
|
|
I******c
发帖数: 163 | 30 最近两年ipdps上有几篇关于在gpu上实现mapreduce的文章。你可以看看。实用不实用
就不知道了。 |
|
|
d******e
发帖数: 16 | 32 Many people are talking about how boring PhD research is. I share
some of my feeling with you here. Nowadays publishing papers in conferences
of computer architecture and parallel processing are more and more
difficult. The following reasons make it so difficult:
1. This area is too crowded. I have been in the audience of a panel discussion
of IPDPS(International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium) and
even those Big Names in the community(Marc Snir, Peter Kogge etc) agrees that
this |
|
|
m*****h
发帖数: 2292 | 34 2000年前就有了，一开始是一些亚太地区的区域会议为主
2005年后各ieee society（也有acm等其他组织）的主流会议就纷纷登陆中国大陆了
PIMRC 2003, ICCV 2005, MMSP 2005, IROS 2006, SIGMOD/PODS 2007, ICME 2007,
ICPP 2007, SRDS 2007, ICNP 2007, SiPS 2007, WWW 2008, ICC 2008, ICDCS 2008,
ICWS 2008, ICDE 2009, MobiCom 2009, Multimedia 2009, CDC 2009, IWQoS 2010,
ISWC 2010, CSCW 2011, INFOCOM 2011, ICRA 2011, SIGIR 2011, NetCod 2011,
UbiComp 2011, ICIS 2011, IPSN 2012, IPDPS 2012, KDD 2012, Mobiquitous 2012,
WCNC 2013, ISCAS 2013, IJCAI 2013, MASS 2013, ICML 2... 阅读全帖 |
|
w*********e
发帖数: 5286 | 35 出身什么学校倒不重要，paper内容不评论，没看过，
仅仅就publication list而言,
1.2006年毕业之后的paper数量非常非常高，应该是working hard,
很push，很aggressive的人
2.no top conference paper at all， 最好的也是INFOCOM，IPDPS之类二流
conference, 这个领域一般看conference
3.2006年毕业的时候paper数量和层次都一般，nothing impressive
这个AP很好的解释了我为什么不喜欢呆在academia的原因 |
|
