t******6
发帖数: 1657 | 1 the references you cited are alreay published, you are not the judge of the
work. |
|
A*********r
发帖数: 8271 | 2 写到authorship里或者contribution里。不能用来加强judge work of others.
的。这个可以说平分高的paper会大大增加影响力？ |
|
n*****y
发帖数: 361 | 3 就是说一定要有accept/deny的decision？
在Faculty of 1000 评分写评语算不算judge work of others?
这个review journal（Current Opinion）和Faculty of 1000是一个门派的。
the |
|
t******6
发帖数: 1657 | 4 the comments in the Faculty 1000 is also not judge, since your comments will
not change the situation of the work, it is already published |
|
y*********r
发帖数: 78 | 5 也不知有多少人申请做这个lead judge. 怎么才能吹一下。 |
|
y*********r
发帖数: 78 | 6 为什么不算呢？难道这不是judge other's work 吗？ |
|
y****i
发帖数: 455 | 7 准备EB1b,只claim 2项可以么？
1. contribution [includes citations (over 300)+一些奖和其他的东西].
2. publications (over 60)
虽然也有Judge of works of others (around 30)，但还是不想单独claim这一项，可
以把它放在contribution里么？ |
|
x*******S
发帖数: 577 | 8 Yes, you can put it down to support your contribution.
I think the contribution is always little bit tough to prove with solid
evidence. But judge other's work can be proved relatively easy with all
solid evidence. you have 30 reviews, if they are for good journal, might
worth to try to claim. |
|
y*********r
发帖数: 78 | 9 editor（editor名头不错）的邀请信上有一些话觉得可以一用， 比如：
Because of your substantial expertise xxx, I would like to ask your help xxx
请问各位大侠， 这是放在contribution， 还是放在judge里好一些。
多谢指教。 |
|
|
y*********r
发帖数: 78 | 11 多谢。 有道理。 原来也一直准备放在judge部分， 只是偶尔觉得这么牛的editor这样
写， 就有点想claim significance了。 看来还是照远计划进行好了 |
|
h******3
发帖数: 84 | 12 谢谢你的回复！
如果这个hot off the press有可能算做review的话，我要不要多做几个？
因为我们老板是这个杂志的主编，原来经常扔过来活儿让我们底下的人帮着写刚发表的
paper的commentary review。
如果这个不太能算作judge of work of others的话，我估计就没必要去揽这个活儿了
吧。 |
|
h******3
发帖数: 84 | 13 谢谢你。非常中肯的意见！
那我就不去参加这个什么高中生的judge了，浪费时间而已。 |
|
b*******g
发帖数: 1040 | 14 如题，有没有只审中文稿件的同学claim judge 成功的呢？
我投了70多英文journal 还是没得到机会。国内导师帮忙联系了4个中文杂志。3个是中
国牌的，一个是吉林大学学报。最近拼命攒，能攒到20篇,可没英文的啊，这样能行吗
？ |
|
g******u
发帖数: 66 | 15 如果是claim这3项,估计多数人都把judge others' work放在了最后.但contribution
和authorship哪个放在前面好呢?
把authorship放在最前面? 先唬一下移民官? 看看我的文章多牛X,top 啊,多少国家多
少次引用啊,图表啊什么的先轰炸轰炸...
还是把contribution放在最前面? 多少能先让移民官大致了解了解做的东西,然后再接
着吹???? 这样第二步谈authorship 啥的感觉有个循序渐进的过程...
PL已经写好了,就是这个顺序还有点拿不定主义, 请大家给些意见,谢谢! |
|
J********L
发帖数: 2635 | 16 写paper，怎么能算judge？？？？？？？？？？？ |
|
x**********o
发帖数: 136 | 17 只是参与写review paper ，不是一作。我觉得review paper也是评论别人的工作，是
不是可以放在judge这一部分里？ |
|
l*******h
发帖数: 455 | 18 这个很搞笑。
通常学生答辩专挑最面的 faculty， 这居然也能算成judge, 哈哈
当 TA 判作业是不是也可以啊 |
|
l*******h
发帖数: 455 | 19 看是哪儿的 faculty 了吧， 有的faculty 学校都没有phd program ，所以能被外校学
生请去做committee 也很有面子吧， 不过这个可以做为 eb1 的 judge 证据 就 很搞
笑了 |
|
k******e
发帖数: 8870 | 20 yes. i saw some ppl use it to claim judge. but i think you better to have
others to claim too. |
|
m*******u
发帖数: 679 | 21 在uscis的policy memo里有这么一段话，
Participating in the judging of the work of others in the same or an allied
academic field alone, regardless of the circumstances, should satisfy the
regulatory criteria in part one. However, for the analysis in part two, the
alien’s participation should be evaluated to determine whether it was
indicative of the alien being recognized internationally as outstanding in a
specific academic area。
求建议： 除了让editor写信直接证明internally recognized，还有其他的方法去证明
么？ |
|
c****n
发帖数: 271 | 22 最近review了本专业协会会议的11篇abstract
review的同时对于其中(3篇)申请了一个award的abstract要给出是否推荐给award的
commettee的意见
award的commettee最后再评审
这个award的评选标准是
*Exemplifies innovation within various disciplines across
Biotechnology;
*Demonstrates originality in research or approach focused on
addressing a problem;
*Provides an impact on basic science by which it can be applied to
drug development;
*Represents a creative approach that can be adapted by the
biotechnology field in a significant manner.
请问这个review在EB1的时候能够claim么？
... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
L*3
发帖数: 3766 | 24 感觉judge比其他两项强。放在第一位是不是让IO有个好印象？ |
|
|
l*******j
发帖数: 37 | 26 很少的journal review次数 （几次）
但是是一个一般杂志的Associate editor （invited）
不知道够不够claim judge这一项 |
|
l****u
发帖数: 3449 | 27 够不够先不说，肯定要把这一条放到judge里面去啊，这个很牛啊 |
|
n*********t
发帖数: 258 | 28 以前一直每在意，后来看到一个AP（我的推荐人）的CV里面提到了这个，故来版上问问。
在以前的实验室，我曾经做过一个本科生的Mentor，带过他两年。现在查找记录，发现
只留下和Program Assistant的每学期打分的Email记录,如下:
"Our records indicate that you are mentoring XXX who is currently registered
for Honors xxx for Spring 2012.
To submit the letter grade for this course, please reply to this message
with the grade you would like to assign. Please be sure that both your name
and the student’s name appear in your message."
想知道这种经历对支持contribution 或者 JUDGE有用处吗？版上的筒子们都用过类似
的材料没有。以前一直每在意，后来看来一个AP... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*****l
发帖数: 244 | 29 I felt review paper should belong to "authorship" but if we claim them under
"judge of other's work", will it trigger REF or enhance this section?
Thanks! |
|
b****j
发帖数: 2414 | 30 a review paper published by you is in authorship;
a paper reviewed by you and published by others is in judge. |
|
g**********r
发帖数: 422 | 31 好像也有人把自己写的review文章算作judge别人工作，前两天看到板上一个1a是这么
做的。
想想也有道理，因为review里面不都是对别人工作的评价嘛。 |
|
O*C
发帖数: 649 | 32 一般大家都claim peer－review，这个我也有10来个。但是觉得比较弱，想到了还写过
review，能用这个claim judge others么？ |
|
c***x
发帖数: 1169 | 33 I do not know either, but below is my experience.
My boss got an invited review and I was the first author. I managed to get
the RL from that journal saying they invited ME for summarizing XX area due
to my niubility. My attorney add this part on the judging others, but she
used a little bit different title, like "cmuwx is the authority in XX area".
Then under this title, she added this one together with my ~10 review work. |
|
t********7
发帖数: 673 | 34 should have directly invitation for the purpose to judge others work.... |
|
m******j
发帖数: 251 | 35 一般大家审稿多少次才算满足移民局要求的Participation as a judge？
谢谢！ |
|
c***x
发帖数: 1169 | 36 You can say that "waa330 is an authority of the field of XXX, thus waa330
was invited for the review paper XXX to summary the most updated progress of
XX field, and in this review paper, he/she has pointed out the future
direction of XXX".
So it can go into one category of judging others, as waa330 has been thought
to be one of the authorities in the field of XXX. |
|
p******e
发帖数: 528 | 37 1。作为某个会议的的组织者。比方说我要选择会议的内容，参加者
等等。
2。参与到了某个项目，proposal，funding的评审委员后对其他人的
proposal进行评估。
3。在杂志中担任的editorial board上工作。对于来稿选择审稿人，
对审稿人的意见进行评估。
请问这几项能否作为judge他人的证据呢？ |
|
e******x
发帖数: 23 | 38 公司律师，F家。我们打算claim authorship和contribution。这俩条我们觉得背景还
行，应该够了。但是律师非要claim 4条。
仅靠一篇非一作的review paper，律师要claim participation as a judge。我们没有
提供任何审稿的材料，自己也只有3篇审稿。
仅靠别人的review article cite了我们的文章，律师就要claim published materials
written by others about alien's work。
我们提出了异议，指出1）就写过一篇review，反而显得judgement work不frequent,
especially compared to peers. 2）别人的review article 只是cite我们的文章，没
有重点讨论，不符合这条criteria。我们建议这两个claim都拿掉避免被uscis
challenge.
但是律师非常自信的说根据他们的经验，这两个claim没有问题，会让整个case更加
strong。之前看到太多不那么strong的claim招R... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***k
发帖数: 2829 | 39 Summmary direcly copied from original article.
-- In his ruling, ... U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen avoided diving into
sweeping constitutional questions or tackling presidential powers head-on.
Instead, he faulted Obama for not giving public notice of his plans. The
failure to do so, Hanen wrote, was a violation of the 1946 Administrative
Procedure Act, which requires notice in a publication called the Federal
Register as well as an opportunity for people to submit views in writing.
-- it cou... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*******n
发帖数: 8388 | 40 发信人: Zhuhaoda (朱好大), 信区: EB23
标 题: 简而言之obama amnesty的违法之处是没有perm
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Feb 18 16:55:40 2015, 美东)
In his ruling on Monday that upended plans to shield millions of people from
deportation, U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen avoided diving into sweeping
constitutional questions or tackling presidential powers head-on. Instead,
he faulted Obama for not giving public notice of his plans.
"It's a very procedural point – that he did this too quickly," said Michael
Kagan, a law professor at... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*******n
发帖数: 8388 | 41 我把你的帖子整理一下。你还是集中一个帖子发言吧。东一个西一个的既没有重点，又
容易把其他有用的帖子压沉。
-----------------------------------------------------------
发信人: Zhuhaoda (朱好大), 信区: EB23
标 题: Re: 简而言之obama amnesty的违法之处是没有perm
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Feb 18 16:57:24 2015, 美东)
The failure to do so, Hanen wrote, was a violation of the 1946
Administrative Procedure Act, which requires notice in a publication called
the Federal Register as well as an opportunity for people to submit views in
writing.
There was no consensus among lawyers with expe... 阅读全帖 |
|
m******0
发帖数: 222 | 42 月份的时候不是说EA被federal judge hold了，然后政府上诉了吗？
现在进展到哪一步了？
EA仍然被hold还是release了？ |
|
f*****a
发帖数: 1026 | 43 President Barack Obama's policies to allow some undocumented immigrants to
stay in the U.S. hit another snag on Monday.
Judge Andrew Hanen of the U.S. District Court in Brownsville, Texas,
announced that rather than granting or even rejecting the administration's
request to move forward with Obama's 2014 executive actions on immigration,
he will make no additional rulings until after March 19.
Hanen had initially halted Obama's deportation relief policies through a
preliminary injunction last mo... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
p*******u
发帖数: 92 | 45 The Italian judge who found former Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti guilty of
ordering a Mafia murder has received a death threat.
Lino Verrina is chairman of the Perugia appeals court which imposed a 24-year
jail sentence on Mr Andreotti on Sunday.
It's not the first time that I have had to deal with death threats - then, as
now, I remained calm
Lino Verrina
Mr Andreotti, a giant in Italian post-war politics, had been accused of asking
the Mafia to murder an investigative journalist who was tho |
|
A**i
发帖数: 4328 | 46 哪个JUDGE？今天广播还说O８要解雇一个将军
O８好强的战斗力... |
|
b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 47 就是把它那个深海采油法规给废了的judge
hehe |
|
b*******3
发帖数: 1461 | 48 盗版 vs 正版 you be the judge |
|
w**********1
发帖数: 127 | 49 why judge can issue order to wire tapping my phone for his personal use for
as long as 8 years???
Where is the law?
Winnie Tin |
|
|
