a*****y
发帖数: 311 | 1 For the speakers that I have audited. Maggie 1.7 does sound a lot better
than traditional cone speakers as far as I can tell --- the clarity is
unmatched by the traditional speakers, although I think ML ElectroMotion is
probably even better in clarity. However I think Maggie 1.7 is very
sensitive to the quality of amplifiers. Yesterday I audited Maggie 1.7 first
on a 1600 amplifier and then a 16,000 one, definitely heard the difference.
I am doing my research online and found the following, thin... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*****y
发帖数: 311 | 2 I think when the 16,000 was driving the speakers, it sounded the speakers
are much more 'at ease' --- if you like, for the lack of a better word.
All in all to hear the difference, you really need to just listen to it back
to back. Find a good local dealer to do the audition, 10 reviews put
together won't match an hour spent in the showroom.
and there is a good FAQ on magnepan that might answer some of your other
questions.
http://www.magnepan.com/faq#equipment
？1 |
|
|
a*****y
发帖数: 311 | 4 I think ML ESL is more directly comparable to Magnepan 1.7
Went to audit Maggie 1.7 yesterday, and can't say I am extremely impressed
after two hours of listening.
And what amplifiers do you guys use? |
|
y****p
发帖数: 87 | 5 也是对Magnepan 1.7感兴趣，听了一次，除了低音差点，没有觉得和常规音箱有大的区
别，板上的高人能否讲讲这对音箱的优缺点，同样的价位还有那些音箱值得考虑？ |
|
D**********s
发帖数: 3139 | 6 audiostatic听过几次，比magnepan强。 |
|
y****p
发帖数: 87 | 7 去了附近唯一的magnepan dealer, 不知怎么回事，觉得好像设置有严重问题，效果好
像还不如我现在家里的polk speakers, 很失望，也可能是我期望值太高了。音箱的水
太深了，小青蛙不知该怎么跳了，呵呵。
back |
|
|
d**********r
发帖数: 24123 | 9 这个箱子的价格很大程度不是因为复古，而是因为古
声音好的可以买 Wilson Audio, Thiel, Genesis, B&W Diamond, Martin Logan,
Magnepan 这些牌子。当然。。。还有很多。 |
|
l******n
发帖数: 11737 | 10 如果是廉价货，很有可能还不如你电视，比如用一段时间就开始嗡嗡沙沙响什么的。。
。反正那钱就不值得。最好买比较受好评的，功放买亚马逊打折的onkyo就比较好。
如果弄2.1，还不如弄好耳机。还有一个叫magnapan的平面音响很给力，好像只网购，
一直都是600刀左右。
http://www.magnepan.com/model_MMG
有环绕的话看电影感觉还是不一样的。 |
|
