s***l
发帖数: 2236 | 1 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
JourneyUp (异乡人) 于 (Tue Mar 25 18:22:09 2014, 美东) 提到:
core
我不是为了反对而反对，又不是吃饱了撑的！
我反对的原因没说过吗？上次转的文章基本代表了。观点有互相冲突吗？还是反对的原
因和角度各不相同呢？那我列个一二三吧。
一，CC 的推手们向各州推动 CC的过程不公开不透明，各州是被 stimulus money 和
No Child Left Behind 的 waiver 所贿赂上船的。CC自我推销的语言多是空话，甚至
谎言。
CC说是 state led. 事实：它从来不是。
二，CC 从来没有在任何一个学校试验过。他们自己称有大量研究支持这个标准，但却
拿不出一个研究的 citation。我在 CC的官网没找到，如果那位找到了，请分享！
既然没有任何试点，没人知道 CC 是否真的能改进中小学教育。反正 Bill Gates 的孩
子们上的是学费超过 $20,000的私校（也是他的母校），一般公立学校的孩子作荷兰猪
，替大富翁作... 阅读全帖 |
|
N****g
发帖数: 2829 | 2 My Comments:
这句是关键“舒默表示，他自己早就提有科技綠卡法案，共和黨提出此案完全沒有必要
。何況共和黨版的「科技綠卡」法案是要排擠受到歡迎的「抽籤綠卡」名額。舒默強調
他反對的理由
是，「科技綠卡」不應犧牲掉其他的移民。”
总结就是：
民主党的版本抽签绿卡不减，凭空增加STEM名额，Diversity和STEM皆大欢喜，民主党
credit全占，且继续抽签绿卡搬运老黑大票仓，共和党一点好处捞不到。
共和党版本，取消抽签绿卡，断了民主党票仓，并且全占STEM bill的credit，民主党
一点好处捞不到。
大家都不肯妥协。
http://udn.com/NEWS/WORLD/WOR6/7548084.shtml
科技綠卡法案 參院胎死腹中
【世界日報╱特派員林寶慶華盛頓報導】
2012.12.06 09:09 pm
國會眾院院會在上月30日通過的增加高學位移民配額人數的「科技綠卡」法案，5日一
提出即在參院遭到杯葛，無法列入表決議程。高科技業者對本報表示，要等明年再說。
關切移民議題的德州共和黨籍參議員孔寧(John Cornyn）5日在參院院會提出動議，要
求參院無異議... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
E******y
发帖数: 614 | 4
Some of them that I can think of:
极限 - Limit
连续 - Continuous
导数 - Derivitive
微分 - Differential
不定积分 - Integral
无穷极数 - Infinite Series
多元函数的微分 - Multi-Variable Differential
微分方程 - Differential Equation
行列式 - Determinant
矩阵 - Matrix
线性方程组 - Linear Equation
二次型 - Quadratic Form
矩阵的特征值 - Eigenvalue
线性规划 - Linear Programming
非线性规划 - Non-Linear Programming
多目标数学规划 - Multi-Objective Mathmatical Programming
动态规划 - Dynamic Programming
库存论 - Inventory Theory
排队论 - Queuing Theory
决策论 - Decision Theory
模型 |
|
z*****n
发帖数: 206 | 5 您MITBBS的ID是:
zerosen
您的星座:
Taurus
您学什么专业的呢:
Mathmatics
您具体住大Boston地区哪里
Medford
您对Boston的印象如何:
Too many good kids here, hard to find some bad ones like xmly or myself
(I\'ve been in boston for more than 1 year, and asked to REPORT yesterday)
您最喜欢的音乐家:
Dont like music
您最喜欢的运动:
Basketball, Hiking, Sleeping(especially 16+ hours/day)
预计Boston版要常常版聚fb，您最爱吃的三个菜是:
Meat, Meat, no vegetable please
您觉得吃过的Boston最好的餐馆和特色菜是:
Smith & Wollensky,
Steak for sure!
您觉得旅游过最美的地方是:
Nanjing
您最想去旅行的三个地方(仅限地球:):
Tibet,TI |
|
m*******e
发帖数: 1280 | 6 hehe you have engineering background, you must have known how mathmatical
modeling has changed financial analysis, for example.
there are many such modeling involved in my work on bioinformatics and
genomics, that's why I get to know their power.
You don't have to fully understand all the mechanisms, but you can still
implement a model to catch the major factors to make a very powerful
predictor.
Anyhow you must know better than me. |
|
m****s
发帖数: 8992 | 7 所以 无穷大 + 1 =无穷大 + 0
根据消元法，上式成为 1 = 0
what the fuck is 消元法??
i suppose it is referring to A = B => A-c = B -c
for that to be true, there is a condition on c, called finality.
in other words, here is the CORRECT version of this so called fucking 消元法:
A = B => A-c = B -c (for all finite number c)
A lot of people never learned to look at the conditions for formulas when
they learn mathmatics.
Therefore, there is no fucking 消元法 to be used here.
Q.E.D |
|
y***u
发帖数: 5243 | 8 do mathmatics manually...
Suan 24 bah |
|
j********r
发帖数: 96 | 9 We are in search of a full time Software Engineer, specifically with optics
/ scientific hardware experience.
If interested contact: J**[email protected]
Required skills:
- Expert Visual Studio experience
- Expert VB.Net, C#
- Solid C++ Experience
- Strong mathmatical / troubleshooting
- Bachelors degree in Computer Science
***Experience with scientific measurement instrumentation strongly preferred |
|
j********r
发帖数: 96 | 10 Greetings,
I have a Full Time opportunity with a great start-up on the eastside. We
are looking for a Software Engineer with direct Search and Optimization
experience.
If you are interested please contact: J**[email protected]
Here's the experience we are looking for:
- Application development (4 years +)
- Text processing, search, algorithm development
- Experience building scalable solutions
- Hands on experience developing with one or more; Groovy, Ruby, Java, or C/
C++
- Experience designing... 阅读全帖 |
|
B******1
发帖数: 9094 | 11 what about work place shootings? -- 首先我们只讨论校园，因为精力有限，大家
都是正式工作的人，没空成天研究这个。
Work place shooting is relevant to the discussion since it provides a
backdrop of shootings with clear motives rather than most campus shootings -
no direct conflict between the shooter and his/her victims.
The other type of shootings, shooting in public places, is more similar to
the school shooting, than the work place shooting, based on the connection
or the lack of between the shooter and the victims.
Numbers alone ... 阅读全帖 |
|
B*****R
发帖数: 1539 | 12 really?
I think just because of unbalanced schedule, mathmatically it's pretty easy to
tell NL west and AL west are the best division since 3 teams in each of them
win more than 90 games.
do I have to list their record against other divsion? it's so obvious
bragging
Diamondbacks,
bring
the WS |
|
i********r
发帖数: 1153 | 13
我还没全看完，讲一下我的看法。
Preflop is OK. Reraise will define the situation better, postflop play will
proabably be easier for you. I don't think call is wrong, reraise will
probably better if your opponent's postflop play is solid though.
check raise is fine, your raise is too big, without a specific reason your
raise shouldn't be larger than the pot usually. Mathmatically, pot size bet
is large enough to make most of the draws wrong to call, larger than that is
useless. You might make them make a bigge |
|
h****h
发帖数: 1168 | 14 i agree if i was holding AK,
1/2 pot betting after the flop with the flush draw on board
is too weak. at least 2/3 pot or pot size for me.
mathmatically, flush draw can chase the pot size bet.
half
for |
|
T*********k
发帖数: 1621 | 15 Mathmatically, The AA guy is a huge favor over the other two hands.
QQ is drawing nearly dead, the flush draw guy is just a gambler and a huge
underdog as well, this world is full of them.
Yeah, the only way you chase him out maybe the re-shove all-in preflop, but
I see hands like three way all-in and the one guy has 55s over QQs, AAs. Of
course full tilt gave the guy set and he took the pot. You never know if he
will be in or not.
Put me on top set over middle set and flush draw everyday. I'd l... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 16 this is only the ideal calc.
(only called pre) 99/77 would hardly pay KK off without some good draws to
go together with their pair.
even you bet gradually, say $50, everyone gets 1:4, 1:5, 1:6, 1:7, they're
mathmatically correct to call with open ended, flush draw, pair+gutshot, etc
., let alone made hands.
a thin lioness can't beat 4 wolves most of time, hehe.
will
so |
|
s*******o
发帖数: 4896 | 17 laf I saw this arguements way many times.
One mathmatical side always claim bankroll management, EV, and long run.
On the other side, people always claim you cannot find a realist way to
get large sample size, thus reduce variance/sample size ratio.Thus, they
always consider protecting their stack as most important thing, even it
is -EV play(e.g., buy insurance).
I can't see either these two side can convince the other side. hahahaha
down
estimate |
|
p*******0
发帖数: 23 | 18 pde is not ode. It has wide application in mathmatical finance.
Maybe Im lame, but pde is really something you cannot generalize by saying "
I can solve pde" |
|
a**********d
发帖数: 206 | 19 Let's make an assumption that is true with a mathmatics' eyes. The only
reason that it is screwed up is that woman tells by their feelings and man
tells by their bodies. |
|
|
t******n
发帖数: 2939 | 21 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
l63 (l63) 于 (Thu May 23 00:34:22 2013, 美东) 提到:
假设素数只有有限个, 记为 p_1,p_2,...,p_k
考察 N = p_1*p_2*...*p_k + 1
可知: 对于任意i = 1,2,3,...,k, p_i 不能整除 N
由素数的定义:
a是素数 <=> a是大于1的自然数, 且a不被任何小于a的素数整除
可知: N是素数
这与素数只有p_1,p_2,...,p_k矛盾.
故假设不成立.
所以素数有无穷多个.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
l63 (l63) 于 (Thu May 23 00:37:03 2013, 美东) 提到:
在承认素数的这个等价定义 (即 a是素数 <=> a是大于1的自然数, 且a不被任何小于a
的素数整除) 的前提下, 居然有人会认为这个证明是错的, 或者是不完备的.
我实在不能理解.
求问一下大家, 是不是有的人的脑子天生有缺陷, 根本怎么教都不会明白... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*******7
发帖数: 6300 | 22 【 以下文字转载自 TrustInJesus 讨论区 】
发信人: jmsma2007 (James), 信区: TrustInJesus
标 题: 康来昌：拿出证据证明上帝的存在
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Apr 27 19:14:00 2013, 美东)
http://www.guizheng.net/article.asp?id=770
《拿出证据证明上帝的存在》
作者：康来昌 （美国获神学博士，曾任中华福音神学院教务长，现为台北信友堂牧师
。）
1、无神论的口号：拿出证据来！
先说明标题。（1）“拿出证据来！”是五四新青年，特别是有"考据癖"的胡适先
生的口头禅。他强调作学问要“无一字一句无来历”，不能信口开河。很多人认为，接
受一个信仰，也得有充分的证据。这篇文章要讨论信耶稣与证据的关系。（2）“上帝
存在”，是指圣经所记载、正统基督徒所说的那位独一、全能、全善的三一真神的存在
。本文不讨论其他宗教神明的有无。
19世纪的英国数学家W.K. Clifford（1845-79）本是天主教徒，后变成不可知论（
其实就是无神论）。他说过一段被多... 阅读全帖 |
|
z**n
发帖数: 22303 | 23 发信人: jmsma2007 (James), 信区: TrustInJesus
标 题: 康来昌：拿出证据证明上帝的存在
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Apr 27 19:14:00 2013, 美东)
http://www.guizheng.net/article.asp?id=770
《拿出证据证明上帝的存在》
作者：康来昌 （美国获神学博士，曾任中华福音神学院教务长，现为台北信友堂牧师
。）
1、无神论的口号：拿出证据来！
先说明标题。（1）“拿出证据来！”是五四新青年，特别是有"考据癖"的胡适先
生的口头禅。他强调作学问要“无一字一句无来历”，不能信口开河。很多人认为，接
受一个信仰，也得有充分的证据。这篇文章要讨论信耶稣与证据的关系。（2）“上帝
存在”，是指圣经所记载、正统基督徒所说的那位独一、全能、全善的三一真神的存在
。本文不讨论其他宗教神明的有无。
19世纪的英国数学家W.K. Clifford（1845-79）本是天主教徒，后变成不可知论（
其实就是无神论）。他说过一段被多人奉为圭臬的话：“任何人在任何时代、地方，如
果相信任何没有充分证... 阅读全帖 |
|
A***g
发帖数: 1816 | 24 计算机数学是不是MCS啊？Mathmatics and computer science |
|
|
g*******1
发帖数: 8758 | 26 details pls...
还没看的惭愧飘过 |
|
N***r
发帖数: 2539 | 27 我正看开头呢，刚看完躯干大致结构，现在是脑袋侧面。都是，先有几个点，再分来分
去，把一些关键点和角度找到。
还说当年达分歧study这个人体结构的时候颇不容易。 |
|
|
N***r
发帖数: 2539 | 29 没错，我现在就是拿个笔记本一只笔边看边跟着画，做上笔记。 |
|
|
|
|
|
g***m
发帖数: 465 | 34 所以西方从一开始就认真弄数学和科学,扎扎实实,并且应用于建筑等实用领域.
俺们同胞们从一开始,甚至到现在,都在糊弄.偶尔出个天才炫耀一下,也只是奇技淫
巧的范畴. |
|
g***m
发帖数: 465 | 35 对了,锁骨的比例怎么确定?
好象有个叫Horace的人写过一本怎么画还是怎么看画的书,俺都忘了讲什么的了. |
|
N***r
发帖数: 2539 | 36 以头（垂直）高为标准单位
从上往下，乳头在第二个单位处，以中轴线对称的两乳头的间距也正好是一单位，设为
A1,A2点
从上往下，肚脐在第三个单位处，设为B点。
从上往下，两条锁骨的交接处在1+1/3单位处，设为C点。
以C点为标准划一条水平线，设为L1。
分别连接B和A1，B和A2，得两条线，设为R1,R2。
延长R1和R2，分别和L1得两交点，设为D1,D2。
连接C和D1，C和D2，即两条锁骨。有点曲线就更好了。 |
|
|
|
L******s
发帖数: 2349 | 39 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
NStar (May the Stupidity Be With You) 于 (Sat Mar 22 16:28:09 2008) 提到:
看教程有感
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
goooo1111 (C-x C-s) 于 (Sat Mar 22 16:31:14 2008) 提到:
details pls...
还没看的惭愧飘过
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
NStar (May the Stupidity Be With You) 于 (Sat Mar 22 16:34:34 2008) 提到:
我正看开头呢，刚看完躯干大致结构，现在是脑袋侧面。都是，先有几个点，再分来分
去，把一些关键点和角度找到。
还说当年达分歧study这个人体结构的时候颇不容易。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
NStar (May the ... 阅读全帖 |
|
r***o
发帖数: 1285 | 40 I guess the arthur is not familiar with mathmatics. hehe |
|
R********n
发帖数: 657 | 41 拉丁文
Isaacus Newton Eques auratus,
Qui animi vi prope/PROVE/ divina,
Planetarum/PLANET/ motus/MOTION/, figuras/FIGURES/,
Cometarum semitas, Oceanique/OCEAN/ aestus,
sua mathesi/MATHMATICS/ facem praeferente,
primus demonstravit;
Radiorum lucis dissimilitudines,
Colorumque inde nascentium proprietates,
quas nemo anteá vel suspicatus erat, pervestigavit.
Natur?/NATURE/, Antiquitatis, S. Scr |
|
D*****y
发帖数: 5788 | 42 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
RealNewton (牛顿) 于 (Mon Dec 14 13:18:53 2009, 美东) 提到:
拉丁文
Isaacus Newton Eques auratus,
Qui animi vi prope/PROVE/ divina,
Planetarum/PLANET/ motus/MOTION/, figuras/FIGURES/,
Cometarum semitas, Oceanique/OCEAN/ aestus,
sua mathesi/MATHMATICS/ facem praeferente,
primus demonstravit;
Radiorum lucis dissimilitudines,
Colorumque inde nascentium proprietates,
q |
|
j*******7
发帖数: 6300 | 43 http://www.guizheng.net/article.asp?id=770
《拿出证据证明上帝的存在》
作者：康来昌 （美国获神学博士，曾任中华福音神学院教务长，现为台北信友堂牧师
。）
1、无神论的口号：拿出证据来！
先说明标题。（1）“拿出证据来！”是五四新青年，特别是有"考据癖"的胡适先
生的口头禅。他强调作学问要“无一字一句无来历”，不能信口开河。很多人认为，接
受一个信仰，也得有充分的证据。这篇文章要讨论信耶稣与证据的关系。（2）“上帝
存在”，是指圣经所记载、正统基督徒所说的那位独一、全能、全善的三一真神的存在
。本文不讨论其他宗教神明的有无。
19世纪的英国数学家W.K. Clifford（1845-79）本是天主教徒，后变成不可知论（
其实就是无神论）。他说过一段被多人奉为圭臬的话：“任何人在任何时代、地方，如
果相信任何没有充分证据的东西，就是错误的。”（“It is wrong always,
everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon
insufficient evide... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*****a
发帖数: 1038 | 44 Same... morning --- general part
(civil+chemical+mathmatics+hydraulics+thermal+electrical+computer+..)
afternoon- general part or specific part U have the right to choose general
part or civil/electrical/chemical/mechanic
PE -- morning -- general part (structural+traffic+environmental+wter resource)
afteroon -- specific part..
The difference is that for EIT - close the book
PE, you can take any reference books w/u..
alumni.
depends
state, |
|
h****e
发帖数: 72 | 45 How about a treat if you visit me at our house?
institute,
but
(civil+chemical+mathmatics+hydraulics+thermal+electrical+computer+..)
likes |
|
h****e
发帖数: 72 | 46 Got to go back home now, thank you for consulting.
institute,
but
(civil+chemical+mathmatics+hydraulics+thermal+electrical+computer+..)
likes |
|
l*****e
发帖数: 264 | 47 see what you guys are talking about, seems as if WHU is a place full of rascals
for fighting but not for studying. In my four years there, that is 365*4 = 1440
days, only less than 15 days that fighting happened, :-)
And guys in Cherrygarden were really fierce, Computer science, biology and
mathmatics and foreign language guys fighted each other, annually, or monthly?
As i remember in one year, maybe 1993(?) one guy in computer science was beated
by one of my classmates, hoho. Unfortunately i di |
|
l**p
发帖数: 16 | 48
positions
in
one.
多谢答复！
我还有一个问题请教。我同时收到Washington University 和 Univerity of
Nevada Las Vegas 的奖学金，让我在这周答复。我现在正在头疼，选哪所。
WU是Systems Science and Mathmatics，搞控制的基础理论研究。UVLV是机械
系，也是搞控制的。都是PH。D 而我只想读MASTER就毕业的。WU是国内老板介
绍的，对方告知，希望我不要任何理由退学或转学。我怕我到时候走了，大家都
会很生气。而UNLV是我自己联系的，不存在这种顾忌。但WU的名气似乎比UNLV大
多了，不是一个数量级的。我真是很矛盾。
望大侠赐教！ |
|
