s***y
发帖数: 2607 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Apple 讨论区 】
发信人: zirtek (疹子), 信区: Apple
标 题: MBAir的屏幕不行啊
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Aug 21 11:08:14 2011, 美东)
被x220的ips屏直接秒杀
没拿x220对比过mbp, 但我觉得色彩方面跟我家那台09年的imac 24旗鼓相当了 |
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 2 看看单看specsheet对手赢了吗
MBAir vs Acer Aspire S3
11/13.3" vs 13"
1366x768/1440x900 vs 1366x768
Core i5 vs Core i5
max 0.68” thick vs 0.51”-0.68”
2.38/2.96lb vs 2.98lb
64GB/128GB SSD vs 20GB SSD + 320GB HDD
2GB/4GB RAM vs 4GB
Acer宣传的厚度是最薄处0.51”
苹果宣传的厚度是最厚处0.68”
$999/1299 vs $899 |
|
|
|
p****a
发帖数: 4829 | 5 【 以下文字转载自 Apple 讨论区 】
发信人: leopardo (云豹爆), 信区: Apple
标 题: MBAir速度测试出来了，几乎和目前MB一样快
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 25 21:15:28 2010, 美东)
速度几乎达到MacBook 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, 2GB (Mid 2010)
当然这个是综合测评得分
http://www.macworld.com/article/154596/2010/10/macbookair_benchmarks.html?lsrc=rss_main
硬盘速度则是远超过其它所有Macbook (Pro)用硬盘的不是SSD的
玩Call of Duty的FPS达到37-40FPS，比起上一代MBA快了三倍多，居然苹果没有宣传速
度的提升。而且比Macbook 2.4Ghz Mid 2010的还快。吃惊。
要是SSD的容量再大一点，这个Macbook几乎没有存在的必要了。除非降价或者性能大幅
提升，但是MBP就没地方放了。
1.83Ghz的MBA的CPU运算速度也超过上一代的2.13GHz的M... 阅读全帖 |
|
w********1
发帖数: 3492 | 6 Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:36:23 PDT
9to5Mac reports that it has received information on the MacBook Air upgrades
to be announced today, with each of the 11.6-inch and 13.3-inch sizes
arriving in two standard configurations with a third customizable high-end
configuration also heading into stock at some retailers.
According to the report, the initial model descriptions include not only a
boost in processor performance to Intel's latest Ivy Bridge processors but
also boosts to RAM (maxing out at 8 GB on... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*********6
发帖数: 1972 | 7 “Apple店说维修要$720？？？”
这家apple店摆明了想宰你 苹果有flat rate repair 送Texas维修中心修
我rmbp保修期外换了整个屏幕，主板以及连接线，一共花了$280 （而且还被信用卡延
保cover了）
Proposed Resolution: Replace logic board, display, and any other components
needed to restore to full functionality
Item Number Description Price Amount Due
S1498LL/A Labor Charge, IB/MB/MBAIR $ 100.00 $ 100.00
S1517LL/A Flat Rate Repair Charge, IB/MB/MBAIR $ 180.00 $ 180.00
Total (Tax not included) $ 280.00 $ 280.00 |
|
m**********e
发帖数: 1045 | 8 刚在APPLE.COM买了13 寸的Macbook air.
Prepared for Shipment Product / Part No. Unit Price Qty Ext. Price
MBAIR 13.3/1.86/2/128FLASH-USA
MC503LL/A $1,299.00 1 $1,299.00
Ships: within 24 hours
Delivers: Nov 29 - Dec 2
HP PHOTOSMART WIRELESS PRINTER-USA
H1355LL/B $99.95 1 $99.95
Ships: within 24 hours
Delivers: Nov 27 - Dec 2
Promotion Savings: -$101.00
SubTotal: $1,297.95
Tax: $77.88
Shipping Charge: $0.00
Total: $1,375.83 |
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 9 不觉得因此强很多啊
如果是这样
那么MBAir 2GB内存升级到4GB内存岂不是就强很多？
这个120e倒是可以买来玩玩
买了一个用来装Linux |
|
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 11 W520不上SSD，跑很多东西估计还不如MBAir快 |
|
j***a
发帖数: 10844 | 12 原来一个也是，基本没用，换成MBAir后，感觉好多了，灌水得利器。。。 |
|
|
|
|
s***y
发帖数: 2607 | 16 没看人从技术角度说呢。
btw，ips跟ips一定是一样的吗？ |
|
g*****n
发帖数: 21539 | 17 技术角度来看, 还目有看过, x220ips很一般, 而且也不是标配 |
|
|
|
|
|
C****c
发帖数: 9157 | 22 我觉得最好的是 ipod mini
之后我买过ipod video
MBair iphone4 |
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 23 选材的话，也有miss的吧。比如iPod背面，经常是全新的很漂亮但是随便容易磨花。
iPod也不是没有用过宣布不容易磨花的材质，但是常常又会返回去用容易磨花的材质。
iPod nano第一代还因此吃官司，最后还赔钱了。
白色Macbook最开始有变黄的问题。后来又是开裂。我希望我的白色macbook不要裂啊。
铝合金的手感，档次感觉确实很不错。但是重量轻不了了。以前Mac的笔记本多数都还
比PC轻很多的，现在这个优势基本上都渐渐没有了。当然比最便宜的那些PC笔记本系列
还是轻薄，但是已经没法和主流轻薄PC笔记本比轻薄了。就说最近的MBAir, 当时也是
没有对手，但是人家PC厂家现在赶超的速度也很快。
苹果走的是简洁的minimalism路线。这个确实是苹果做到了极致。其他无人能比。 |
|
|
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 26 不过要加$100。
可能不能自己加，这个manual还没有出来不清楚 |
|
|
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 29 硬件上是个PC不是真代表你观点中的open吗？
不过不好意思如果你看看最新的MBAir，里面很多部件都不是通用的了哦。 |
|
|
|
b**e
发帖数: 492 | 32 哇，期待明年的新产品，看ipad，mbp怎么应对，还有明年的mpa，攒钱攒钱！！！ |
|
|
l******o
发帖数: 2649 | 34 有人说：
Back when I wrote the review for the iMacs, I asked Apple about over-
provisioning and other technologies used to help maintain a SSD's integrity.
What they eventually told me is that their SSDs are designed with firmware
and specifications to prevent slowdowns as they age, and over-provisioning
is one method they use. They didn't provide any more specifics to me. It's
not too far-fetched to think Apple uses similar firmware and specifications
for SSDs, though we need to do more research on... 阅读全帖 |
|
l******o
发帖数: 2649 | 35 We did find (quite by accident) that Apple may have more reasons behind not
installing Flash by default other than the stated reason of ensuring that
users always have the most up-to-date version. Having Flash installed can
cut battery runtime considerably—as much as 20 percent in our testing. With
a handful of websites loaded in Safari, Flash-based ads kept the CPU
running far more than seemed necessary, and the best time I recorded with
Flash installed was just 4 hours. After deleting Flash, h... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
f*******5
发帖数: 10321 | 37 removing quicktime could save another 30%.
not
With
MacBook |
|
J********a
发帖数: 5208 | 38 removing everything could save 100%
isn't computers supposed to be used? |
|
r****y
发帖数: 26819 | 39 按上次的link来看，不玩游戏，不打开HTML5动画，也能节省不少电。 |
|
|
|
J********a
发帖数: 5208 | 42 买个电脑这不能干那不能干买来干啥？电脑买来就是操的，操完扔沟里拉倒 |
|
|
f*******5
发帖数: 10321 | 44 网站可以把基于flash的广告全换成基于quicktime video行吧。这样的网站非要去还不
过滤，怪谁。 |
|
|
f*******5
发帖数: 10321 | 46 adblock+选个easylist和一个chinalist不就完了。 |
|
J********a
发帖数: 5208 | 47 of course and flashblock is a must, but won't you play flash movie if you
want to watch it? Or to save battery and leave it? |
|
|
d****p
发帖数: 685 | 49 Any evidence to back up your claim and the so called "figure"?
It is well known that Flash implementation on Mac is poor and it will be way
better to use quicktime to view the same content. |
|
J********a
发帖数: 5208 | 50 click, play and fk off that's it whatever it can play...
way |
|
