由买买提看人间百态

topics

全部话题 - 话题: nabc
首页 上页 1 2 3 下页 末页 (共3页)
b***y
发帖数: 2804
1
但人家去Vegas不是自费。:) 而且Houston太贵,一个晚上的房费就要150刀。。。
Good luck!
m****r
发帖数: 6639
2
等等明年的reno吧, 我.
c****u
发帖数: 3277
3
what's is bean ribbon?
c****u
发帖数: 3277
4
Houston 贵成这样了?我倒是有可能去San Diego.
o*******n
发帖数: 6500
5
Bean Red Ribbon Pairs
c****u
发帖数: 3277
6
oh, 我一直都管那个叫red ribbon.
o*******n
发帖数: 6500
7
大部分人都叫red ribbon
呵呵
f******e
发帖数: 465
8
休斯敦旅馆选择应该很多吧。找不到便宜的motel? 当然我相信赛地的旅馆会相当贵。
w****b
发帖数: 623
9
来自主题: Bridge版 - 在网上看NABC bulletin
我这次没去。

Pairs
a***n
发帖数: 287
10
来自主题: Bridge版 - 在网上看NABC bulletin
嗯,最后他们名列第20. 算是非常出色了.(杨庆他们好象有一次Blue Ribbon是第十几,
更牛
一些).

Pairs
g****o
发帖数: 1284
11
来自主题: Bridge版 - 在网上看NABC bulletin
Are you talking about Wei Qijiao and Liu Yi?
b***y
发帖数: 2804
12
来自主题: Bridge版 - 在网上看NABC bulletin
20名是很好的成绩。这是三天的pairs,水平和Blue Ribbon差得不多,我觉得能进
final已经相当不错了。
a***n
发帖数: 287
13
来自主题: Bridge版 - 在网上看NABC bulletin
Right.
z***y
发帖数: 198
14
来自主题: Bridge版 - 在网上看NABC bulletin
没去没去。很忙啊

Pairs
w****b
发帖数: 623
15
来自主题: Bridge版 - 在网上看NABC bulletin
没有没有,他们比我们牛。我们的Blue Ribbon只打了23。这个LM pairs,我打过四次
,但从未取得过名次。
a***n
发帖数: 287
16
来自主题: Bridge版 - Nickell's team征召了Ralph Katz
至少这次summer NABC打Spingold的阵容是如此.
m****r
发帖数: 6639
17
来自主题: Bridge版 - reno的NABC
去的人多嘛? 我突然发现我准备去了.
o*******n
发帖数: 6500
18
来自主题: Bridge版 - reno的NABC
这么近,不去对不起自己啊
哈哈
o*******n
发帖数: 6500
19
谢谢,决赛第二节打得不好,很遗憾

scored
p*********6
发帖数: 679
20
抄,已经相当不错了,能预赛第一。C是0-1500吧?高手还是蛮多的,特别是没时间去
club爬分的。不过赢得话,今天的bulletin上的照片就不是那对胖子了-:)
b***y
发帖数: 2804
21
0-300(或300-500间的 non-life-master)。我相信他们有拿冠军的实力
,但桥牌有时候还要看运气和状态。
C*****9
发帖数: 147
22
来自主题: Bridge版 - Reno系列之七 鸡肋鸡肋
我对鸡肋的看法:
1.3H成局前景大,风险也很大。如果同伴S不短,H不是6张,并且H偏分,-800也是可能
的,所以是肉多骨头硬。
2.2H是没有前景的,舍不得的只是大牌点,用以防守一样有效,这是肉少骨头多。
查了一下National的记录(MP和IMP第23副):
http://www.acbl.org/nabc/recaps/2010/01/13/
东西得110或-100,-200大约有30%,多数应该是叫了2H的,建议这些选手认真学习11楼
文件,写得非常好。
m****r
发帖数: 6639
23
来自主题: Bridge版 - bucky你死到哪里去了?
oh! NABC?
那么, 不打球了?
p*********6
发帖数: 679
24
来自主题: Bridge版 - 飞还是挤
其实把“低级的双人赛”的“低级“去掉,会更有趣。不同地方,6NT打法不一样。如
果在俱乐部,6NT不一定叫到,但几乎是必然飞D,所以你也飞。如果在NABC LM Pairs
之若,几乎是必然打挤牌,所以你也打挤。分数不会差。
b***y
发帖数: 2804
25
来自主题: Bridge版 - 诚证在北美长期桥牌搭档
Regional/sectional,规则上是没有地方限制,但如果不在同一个地方,谁会去打?如
果是NABC中的不太低级的比赛,还有可能。
p***r
发帖数: 20570
26
来自主题: Bridge版 - 诚证在北美长期桥牌搭档
If you really want to find a serious partner, you should probably try www.
bridgebase.com/forums. They have a forum for partnership searching.
This is simply a wrong place to look for serious partners because most here
just play social bridge. Many of them would never play any NABC+ events and
would never want to become experts. Of course here are a few good players,
most of them do have a partner.
v**********e
发帖数: 1295
27
来自主题: Bridge版 - 诚证在北美长期桥牌搭档
地区级别的比赛只会在local找人打,NABC级别的要有米的...比较实际的作法是先在
local打出点名气. 在我看来网上的默契在牌桌前根本不值得一提...
还不知道你是哪个州的。。。
o*******n
发帖数: 6500
28
来自主题: Bridge版 - 输了,我觉得。。
说的是NABC大赛
p***r
发帖数: 20570
29
来自主题: Bridge版 - 【每周一题】叫牌探讨
Well, if you play 2H as nonforcing, then you have to play 3H to be natural.
If you play 2H as forcing or gameforcing, 3H can certainly be a splinter
raise.
For vanilla 2/1, new suit is generally forcing with a few exceptions. Here,
2H is forcing for vanilla 2/1 and 3H should be considered as a splinter
raise except that partnership have some other agreements.
At bbo, I played so called expert standard 2/1 with some pretty good players
, including Justin Lall. In that scheme, 3H is also considere... 阅读全帖
b***y
发帖数: 2804
30
来自主题: Bridge版 - voice feature in Vugraph
今天才突然意识到,这个星期是NABC。这个桥牌版居然没人感兴趣?
现在BBO Vugraph增加了voice功能,比枯燥的文字评论生动多了。
p*********6
发帖数: 679
31
今天的NABC bulletin介绍美国青年队(26岁组)。居然4人中国本土来的,其中一人
Zizhou Wang 曾经是清华bridge club 主席。
b***y
发帖数: 2804
32
来自主题: Bridge版 - 【每周一题】防守信号
这个星期在费城举行GNT及NABC全美大赛,首先预祝前去参加的各位牌手好运。
这次的题目考验你和同伴之间的默契。
IMP双有,你坐南拿到:72 / AT8642 / KQ4 / 92
同伴第一家开叫,叫牌过程如下:
N E S W
3NT X 4C P
P 4S P P
X AP
3NT = 赌博性,一门坚强低花套(至少7张),旁门无A/K
4C = 逃叫,pass or correct
第一个问题:你首攻什么?
a****s
发帖数: 524
33
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
I failed to make this 4S, wanna give a try?
S Q9x
H Axx
D 97xx
C KTx
S AKJxx
H x
D KJT
C Axxx
Swiss team.
1S (3H) 3S (P)
4S
The lead was a low club, presumably a singleton. So I better win in hand
with ace.
I draw 2 rounds of trumps with K and J. then lead a club to K. Although it
is unlikely (at this level) that LHO would ruff your loser, it never hurts
to give him a chance, right?
He disappointed me by pitching a heart and I win the King.
what's next?
r*********s
发帖数: 36
34
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
Keep playing a club?
j*******e
发帖数: 2168
35
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
this seems to involve quite some guess work:
1) who's more likely to hold the remaining trump
2) who has DQ (assuming RHO has DA)
a****s
发帖数: 524
36
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
OK.
I led a diamond to J, but the ace jump out on my right and a trump then
returned. now what?
j*******e
发帖数: 2168
37
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
still needs to guess DQ right.
1) If you believe DQ is on side, win with SQ and finesse D now.
2) If you tend to think DQ is off side, play DK and another D to LHO who has
no club to return, and your remaining D is good with HA as entry. Your D is
congested if you let DQ win first.
which one is more likely? the fact that the ace jumped out seems to suggest
the Q is on side...
b***y
发帖数: 2804
38
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
Second club to CK did hurt your chance, since you lost a valuable tempo.
Simplest line is to play DJ from hand after drawing 2 rounds of trumps.
I am also thinking that, even "at this level", people still make defensive
mistakes. Flying DA seems a play that could never gain. Unless RHO started
with AQ tight, then you will make no matter what.
o*******n
发帖数: 6500
39
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
我觉得打草花到K已经浪费了一个entry/stopper
应该立刻打方块争取立起一个方块赢墩
左手不太可能有方块A,防止他是Qx双张,拿到方块将吃,应该打方块K
这样只要右手方块不是AQxx四张总能做成
a****s
发帖数: 524
40
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
you do have a point.
but how do you explain to teammates a simple finesse makes the contract but
you went down when RHO had AQxx in diamonds?
a****s
发帖数: 524
41
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
wouldn't work either,
the actual layout was Ax on your right, Qxxx on your left.
As I said at the table, playing diamond first was too deep
for me.
a****s
发帖数: 524
42
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
实战中,我放10飞机,输给Q。
LHO 红心K,我哼着小曲儿眀手出小红心。
鬼子果然接着出红心,红心A垫掉方块K,但是不幸方块不是3-3.
向高手讨教了一下:一轮将牌后,就出草花,后面机会要好得多。
在牌桌上,我只想到可能被将吃两次草花,就把这条路线排除了。

has
is
suggest
j*******e
发帖数: 2168
43
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
en, 方块3-3的可能还是相当大的,HA垫DK是一高招,没搞成着实有些不幸
另外LHO防守失误,见你忍让H,如能敏锐地回一张D,那就宕的稍微多一点,呵呵
b***y
发帖数: 2804
44
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
不能完全算是失误。继续红心可以确保宕一。回方块的话,万一庄家5233牌型就会送成
。虽然如果真是5233牌型的话这个做庄路线就不可理解,但打牌不可太贪。:-)
b***y
发帖数: 2804
45
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
如果准备将吃梅花,这个牌在先期要作个猜断,LHO是两张还是三张将牌。第一种打法
,你猜LHO是两张,那么就掉一轮将然后打梅花到CK,接着继续梅花,准备由明手将吃
第四张。第二种打法,打LHO三张将,那就拔两轮将牌,然后梅花到CK再出梅花给右手。
即时你猜错,这两种打法仍有机会。第一种情况,假定左手实际是三张将牌,你出小梅
花,左手将吃,方块到同伴DA,再将吃梅花,红心脱手;你HA拿住,仍有飞DQ的机会。
第二种情况,假定左手实际是两张将牌,你打第三轮梅花后,RHO拿住并吊第三轮将牌
,你明手SQ赢,还有打RHO方块AQ的机会。
总体感觉是第一种打法综合机会更大些。
v**********e
发帖数: 1295
46
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (1)
Very interesting hand. I may play like you did.
a****s
发帖数: 524
47
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (2)
S A98
H KJ72
D 6543
C T4
1N 3N
What is your lead?
m****r
发帖数: 6639
48
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (2)
H2.
p*********6
发帖数: 679
49
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (2)
H2. 难道这里还有明堂?Major4张,p 或许有A/or Q。。。
b***y
发帖数: 2804
50
来自主题: Bridge版 - NABC+ Swiss Team (2)
估计本来没有名堂,但有人自作聪明,于是就有了明堂。:-))
首页 上页 1 2 3 下页 末页 (共3页)