a****b
发帖数: 3588 | 1 RDN 也是
在YAHOO 上看到些贴子
这里贴1个
FYI
These stocks trade a lot on sentiment. Right now is "housing is getting
worse, the MIs are exposed to housing, short them into the ground", a year
ago it was "housing is improving, the MIs are exposed to housing, let's pile
into them."
The reality of RDN's situation is quite different. It's financial situation
changes slowly. Borrowers don't default just because the Case Shiller index
dropped 2%, nor do delinquent borrowers cure because it rose 2%.
What is clear is... 阅读全帖 |
|
h*********r
发帖数: 2844 | 2 40% short term. profit only, 0 profit no tax. negative profit negates income
up to 3000 tax loss per year. |
|
a******1
发帖数: 2340 | 3 我瞎看看
我这TA就10月16给过一个buy signal和11月5和11月19给过2个sell，貌似两个sell都被
negated了，momentun还是很强的。 |
|
|
w***w
发帖数: 6301 | 5 现在neutral了。
昨天的call今天被negate了。
昨天是wrong call。 |
|
B**********r
发帖数: 812 | 6 参看知名律师网上的
your response should prove your evidence is at least 51% believable to IO
http://www.niwus.com/art0022.html
移民申请的举证标准及RFE问题
按照移民局的工作程序，如果移民官在审理案件时发现某些主要证据缺失，可以要求申
请人补充证据
（RFE）。如果主要证据齐全，移民官则需要批准申请，而不必再要求申请人补充一些
无关紧要的材料。
不过，在实际操作中，有些移民官并不完全遵守工作程序，在申请人已经提供了足够的
证据后，仍然要求
申请人补充材料。长此以往，滥发RFE便成为影响移民局工作效率的固疾。移民局曾几
度以备忘录的方式，
澄清发放补证通知的标准，并要求移民官予以执行。
移民局在备忘录中反复澄清移民申请的举证标准。在此，我们对美国法律中的两种不同
举证标准做一简单
介绍。一般而言，民事和行政法程序中的举证标准是“占优势的证据” （
preponderance of the
evidence），而刑法程序的举证标准则是“确凿无疑的证据”（beyond reasona... 阅读全帖 |
|
l********h
发帖数: 130 | 7 同样的问题，我的律师回信如下
There would be no impact by having your wife file as a derivative
beneficiary with you on an I-485. And you can do the same (i.e. file as a
derivative beneficiary) whenever she receives her new I-140 approval. Then
, it would be a race to the finish line. Whichever set of I-485s is approved
first will provide you and her with Permanent Resident status and negate
the pending I-485s (which will be denied because you would already be a
Permanent Resident). |
|
w*******y
发帖数: 372 | 8 Having H4 does not negate EAD, I think. Can someone clarify? |
|
a*****a
发帖数: 1385 | 9 J表交不交只是迟早的问题，因为485没那么快就批，等到轮到你的时候，肯定需要RFE
，到时候J表无论如何也是需要。所以J表逃不掉，也不用套，如果你不跳槽的话，J表
没什么难的。如果你一直是同一个雇主，那么J表就相当于一个evl。
至于说双飞不用J表，怎么说？这个我没研究。我怀疑这个说法的来源是因为,J表某种
程度就是evl，尤其是对于同一个雇主，那么既然是双飞，那么那个pending 140里面自
然就出现了各种雇主的信息和support letter，于是就相当于有了evl，所以J表不需要
？这是我的猜测，具体不太清楚。
准备J表也是雇主和律师的事情，他发之前你把把关，不懂到这里问。
至于进门的问题，嗯，说实话不好说，如果你确定你不换公司，现在职位很稳定不会出
问题，公司也不会出问题，那么早点搞降级的优势在于早点把事情定下来，哪怕律师垃
圾，但是你也有时间检查他来督促他，有充足的时间来补救。
想象一个拖拉的律师，双飞的whole point就是行动要快，理想时间是注意到下个月你
的pd当前以后，经过15-20天的准备，在下个月初把材料一起提交出去。如果这个律师
拖沓，你不就是nega... 阅读全帖 |
|
T******T
发帖数: 3066 | 10 fk this facade of a democracy, this is total bullshit. One man sitting in
his voter funded office gets to negate the wills of several million voters
and million of campaign $$. What's the point of voting anyways. |
|
t**********p
发帖数: 2672 | 11 Now that he's dead which was the goal of the United States efforts in
Afghanistan, I guess the troops can come home. But that won't happen as long
as the middle east has more oil reserves than anywhere else. As far as I'm
concerned, America is a bigger terrorist than Osama ever was.
When the government distracts you with it's left hand you should wonder what
the right hand is doing. This all comes at a very convenient time for the
president... It makes for a nice distraction from the economic tr... 阅读全帖 |
|
m****s
发帖数: 8992 | 12 这种荒凉的美， 非我这样近30年没回中国的人， 很难享受到。。。
国人不习惯。
:):):)
Double negation. |
|
j**4
发帖数: 10425 | 13 there are so many negations in the last sentence, i am totally lost
not |
|
d******2
发帖数: 695 | 14 1、第欧根尼综合症：
Diogenes又名肮脏混乱综合症或众议院综合征
症状特点:
1.生活脏乱，
2.极度自卑感
3.又强迫性的囤积行为，无法舍弃财物，过度的购买欲
4.有强烈的隐居欲望，拒绝他人帮助
5.主要出现在老年人上，有时伴随老年痴呆症
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
2、外地口音综合症：
Foreign accent syndrome:外国口音综合症(Foreign accent syndrome)是一种临床上
很罕见的病症通常伴随着严重的脑损伤，此病导致患者说母语时如同带有外国口音，例
如：一个美国人可能说话带着法国口音
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
3、科塔尔综合症
科塔尔综合征（Cotard syndrome）： 以虚无妄想（nihilistic del... 阅读全帖 |
|
e*********u
发帖数: 3591 | 15 MAYOR KEVIN L. FAULCONER
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2014
CONTACT:
Craig Gustafson at (619) 453-9880 or [email protected]
(function(){try{var s,a,i,j,r,c,l,b=document.getElementsByTagName("script");l=b[b.length-1].previousSibling;a=l.getAttribute('data-cfemail');if(a){s='';r=parseInt(a.substr(0,2),16);for(j=2;a.length-j;j+=2){c=parseInt(a.substr(j,2),16)^r;s+=String.fromCharCode(c);}s=document.createTextNode(s);l.parentNode.replaceChild(s,l);}}catch(e){}})();
/* ]]>... 阅读全帖 |
|
T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 16 http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/proposition-13-then
from 1998
Why was Proposition 13 so overwhelmingly approved in 1978? Few expected it
to win. In fact, on two separate occasions, less draconian versions of
Proposition 13 had failed. But by 1978 raging inflation had sent property
tax bills in the Golden State soaring so high that many families had to sell
their homes because they couldn’t afford to pay their taxes. Despite a
torrent of horror stories from teachers’ unions, politicia... 阅读全帖 |
|
L*1
发帖数: 11537 | 17 Can't agree more.
All your hard work is negated at the last step for agreeing to buy the
extended warranty. |
|
L*1
发帖数: 11537 | 18 Can't agree more.
All your hard work is negated at the last step for agreeing to buy the
extended warranty. |
|
l********d
发帖数: 443 | 19 your before-tax contributions do help with reducing AGI, and thus negating
AMT. But having more dependents is actually pro AMT, because you are
claiming for exemptions.
AMT is generally caused by two factors (1) high income (AGI), (2) high below
-the-line deductions (including exemptions). |
|
k****a
发帖数: 7077 | 20 真会为兄弟出气。
虽然他当教练不怎地。
http://espn.go.com/espnradio/play?id=7968079
My thoughts are this: His coaching is beyond reproach so he doesn't need me
to defend him. Teams change coaches in professional sports. How you go about
it is important. For him to have been in the office all day and Alex
Martins knows he's there, and then lets him leave and then calls him on the
phone to fire him--unprofessional. To hide behind the fact or try to make
everyone believe that Dwight Howard didn't have a part in this ... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*i
发帖数: 9453 | 21 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
orion (M42) 于 (Fri Jul 13 00:26:36 2007) 提到:
Some kinds of chocolate, rich in antioxidants called flavonoids, have been
shown to benefit heart health.
But all types of chocolate aren't the same, and too much chocolate can
negate any benefits, the Cleveland Clinic says.
The clinic offers this additional information:
* Dark chocolate is richest in flavonoids, so choose dark chocolate over
milk chocolate.
* Chocolate does contain fat, but it cont |
|
f**********1
发帖数: 52 | 22 Giants @ 49ers
-- both teams are fairly balanced and Giants has better O, and 49ers has
field advantage and slight better D. But Giants play better on the road, so
negates the home field advantage for 49ers.
-- key is in QB play in cruch time, Eli has clear edge here. Now that
Giants passed Packers, they are on a destiny to repeat 07-08's run, plus in
experience..
Winner: Giants
Ravens @ Patroits
-- Ravers are very inconsistent on the road, that's the biggest unknown
factor, key is to shut dow... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*x
发帖数: 14021 | 23 twitter 上说 狮子扔小红旗犯规，negated the review.
还有这样的规矩？ |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 10757 | 24 不光是这个问题，Forsette那个TD run是scoring play，本来是automatic review的，
但是因为 Lions 教练不知道这个，错扔了challenge的棋子，结果直接给了15 yards的
unsportsman conduct，然后Negate review的机会，这不是搞笑吗？？？ 教练哪能记
得这些狗屁的规则，有些资深裁判都不能完全明白这些NFL规则的。 |
|
z*i
发帖数: 58873 | 25 A top NFL executive says the rule that negated using video replay to confirm
a Houston touchdown Thursday “may be too harsh” and will be re-examined
immediately.
Ray Anderson, the league’s director of football operations, says a 15-yard
penalty for throwing the challenge flag on a play that is automatically
reviewed might be enough.
“We will certainly discuss the rule with the competition committee members,
as we do all situations involving unique and unusual circumstances, and
determine if we f... 阅读全帖 |
|
z*****a
发帖数: 3809 | 26 Luck is terrible today. Two interceptions in the first two drives (one was
negated by a defensive offside penalty). |
|
d*****e
发帖数: 16730 | 27 没必要吧 又不是大学生
撑死罚狠点 把那1分飞狗 给剥夺了 |
|
z*i
发帖数: 58873 | 28 都不应该。 可以罚事后的yd，但是剥夺没理由啊。 |
|
|
z*i
发帖数: 58873 | 30 恩， 因为td不是通过taunting取得的。 |
|
k***r
发帖数: 13724 | 31 这是准备给慢走个下马威吧，进了pro就得收敛点。 |
|
|
l*x
发帖数: 14021 | 33 要是公羊的球员用头盔朝他膝盖撞，他就煞笔了。这个是在圣路易斯的主场，这么多观
众。要搞回海鹰主场搞好了。客场搞更加不厚道。
龙哥去年对狮子时自摸了一个，过线前也是手把球举起来。但是没判犯规。区别是，龙
哥举球是远离防守球员方向的。如果朝着防守球员方向举，就算taunting。 |
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 34 Taunting is just a little more public than trash talks that
never get penalized. And I think it's fair to taunt a
trash talker. |
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 35 I don't think anybody in NFL gives a damn to Manziel.
Goodell just wants to make NFL the no-fun league, as if
these felons would suddenly become kids' role models
as long as taunting is banned. |
|
c***c
发帖数: 4341 | 36 没必要，看看ESPN关于这个的Poll的结果就知道了，大多数人都不介意。我觉得应该允
许发泄，可以事后罚码数 |
|
n***i
发帖数: 4627 | 37 这个在脑残啊啊就td就没有了。。。
no fun league规则还是松啊 |
|
|
l*x
发帖数: 14021 | 39 taunting 绝对不对，你骂No fun league 也好，怪别人trash talk 也好。一码归一码
。不能给Taunting做借口。
个人的脑残不应该影响比赛结果，甚至也不应该罚整个队。我觉得罚钱最好。你要have
fun交钱好了。也不连累球队。还帮助慈善。
还有要搞就在主场搞。至少观众have fun。在客场搞就更不对了。
最脑残的是，你的健康是at defender's mercy。惹急了，人家往膝盖一撞就把你废了
。还不犯规。 |
|
R*3
发帖数: 11814 | 40 那个球，对方差点就在端线前把他推出去了。 非常脑残的犯规。海鹰好几个人这几场
都有一些莫名其妙的举动。教练组这周要好好整风了。
have |
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 41
have
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't get this part. It's coward to do this kind
of crap at home only.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So what's the boundary of excessive celebration? It's
really the same as taunting, and the line is purely gray. |
|
l*******z
发帖数: 4276 | 42 对，我也觉得无所谓。所谓的这些坏处客队球员的任何一个good play都有，都会piss
off fans, 都会at the mercy of defender, etc. 你要说什么sportsmanship, 那进攻
球员TD, reception, 防守球员tackle, sack, INT后的那些celebration算不算?有很多
都很aggressive的，像上次Steve Smith,还有前两天一个防守队员有点过分的跳舞。这
些都要管以后就很难控制界限了。NFL本来就是一个很exciting,很physical的sport,发
泄出来是人的天性。没表现出来的就是装B罢了。
现在美国社会就是左B当道，没事找抽的太多了，很多都少数凌驾于多数。这个问题，
还有Redskin的问题，都有poll显示super majority都是无所谓的。
还有那个injury on the mercy,这个整个运动都是。都是成人了，人家愿意take 这个
risk, so what? |
|
R*3
发帖数: 11814 | 43 我觉得要的色也要等PLAY完成以后，像这个球，差点就被推出界，真是不应该。当时场
上进攻一直打不开，如果因为他的HAVE FUN导致最后没有TD，就真成罪人了。还是不能
太自我，至少在PLAY还没有结束的时候。任何这种类似的脑残行为都是不以球队利益为
第一的自私行为，应该坚决制止！
piss |
|
|
|
|
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 48
drive
taunting
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
谁吃饱了撑的没事就taunt.显然是被抽耳光的那一方前边trash talk
或者各种挑衅庆祝太多才被人搞。所以只要不禁止trash talk和那些
一个sack甚至tackle就疯狂庆祝的行为，偏要来禁止taunting，就跟
楼上有人说的一样纯属左逼脑袋一拍就搞狗屁政治正确。 |
|
P*******e
发帖数: 39399 | 49 我不支持taunting 事后罚码数是正当的惩罚 球员应该有所收敛
昨天那个球确实没必要 但是适度庆祝和发泄我是支持的
比如不许聚众庆祝 我觉得就是反人性的
人性跟体育道德之间 我选择人性 |
|
|
