H**r
发帖数: 10015 | 1 棒子人均GDP nomial 2万，ppp的话3万
不过HDI世界12 |
|
f****e
发帖数: 24964 | 2 但是PPP和nomial两种体系下中国人均GDP国际排名基本差不多啊
调低
的p |
|
p******u
发帖数: 14642 | 3 知道了，是ppp，丫的拿ppp和我鳖nomial鸡的屁比。。。。。这算数比三锅还强 |
|
O**l
发帖数: 12923 | 4 你简直比猪还蠢 美国要是平减设0.2 real gdp是4
去年风力发电笑死 风力发电和煤炭发电是一个level 以前没有装风力发电 以前没装高
压电
最搞笑 天朝发电量去年增长也就2%
你再解释解释去年中国工程机械的销量下滑了40% 今年头两个月又下滑了60% 是咋会是
哈哈哈哈
哈哈哈 你这傻逼 真是搞笑
美国去年铁路货运量大概增长了5%-6% s说nomial gap 增长4.2还make sense
尼玛 铁路货运量下滑了5% 尤其是去年最后一个q下滑了10% 居然报gdp增长7%+
也太尼玛忽悠傻逼 不过真有傻逼信 嘿嘿 |
|
w*********r
发帖数: 42116 | 5 如果大陆各省区按公布的最低工资发薪水，大陆人收入当然比越南高了。如果你去查询
gdp per capita，不论nomial还是ppp，大陆当然比越南、印度要强多了。可是很大一
部分大陆人反映出来的完全不是这样，大陆普通人不比越南、印度强。
如果你在比较一下在美国的中国人、印度人、越南人，你会发觉，我说的是很合理的。
7.
B& |
|
|
|
O**l
发帖数: 12923 | 8 猪都比他聪明
猪至少知道自己蠢
这货蠢得没边 还没有自知之明
的大作中提到: 】 |
|
|
O**l
发帖数: 12923 | 10 这个是萝卜马甲
哈哈哈 左逼龙虾党和这种伪装极右是一回事 |
|
|
O**l
发帖数: 12923 | 12 龙虾党只会google
对了 你在廊坊吧 还谷歌 笑死我 |
|
|
O**l
发帖数: 12923 | 14 哈哈 廊五和萝卜在这集合
两个傻逼终于聚头了
对着nominal gdp的标题喊明明3%
笑死人啊 |
|
|
|
|
e*e
发帖数: 38 | 18 for soustic guitar, typically 4mm is the nomial value. |
|
x***e
发帖数: 62 | 19 Friedman initiates this idea in 1950's --1960's
his idea is very simple: if holding money does creat utiltiy for people,
then the maxmimum of utility people can get by holding money(or real money
balance) is reached when holding money is indifferent to holding any other
assets, which means real interest rate is eaqual to the return of holding
real money balance. since the opportunity cost of holding money is nomial
interst rate, then when real interest rate is zero people are indifferent
between |
|
c**********r
发帖数: 4 | 20 【 以下文字转载自 CS 讨论区 】
发信人: csresearcher (life for research), 信区: CS
标 题: About QCQP optimization problem
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Dec 18 21:03:17 2005)
Does anyone know how to solve the Quadratically Constrained Quadratic
Programming problem? (Suppose the objective and constraint functions are
convex)
Can this be solved in poly-nomial time?
Any link on refereces will be highly appreciated!
Thanks! |
|
p*****k
发帖数: 318 | 21
you are absolutely right! thx.
i have edited the earlier post: a quick fix i can think of is to put in these multi-nomial coefficients. unfortunately it does not yield as nice analytical result any more (well it was ugly before anyway). it does serve a useful purpose as an algorithm to get the exact answer for any N. |
|
j*****e
发帖数: 182 | 22 Nominal tests refers to tests developed for categorical data with outcome
measured at nomial level(no order). Chi-squared goodness-of-fit test is an
example. |
|
G*****9
发帖数: 3225 | 23 I got a problem: suppose that we are dealing with a multi-nomial logit
regression analysis, with response variable values as: 1, 2, 3, 4. Suppose
there are 1K observations, each containing the following columns:
1) Time tag
2) Property A
3) Property B
4) Property C
5) Choice: valued at one of the following 1, 2, 3, 4
6) Number of people making the choice: 1-2000.
How I should convert the data to apply Proc MDC?
Thank you. |
|
