由买买提看人间百态

topics

全部话题 - 话题: opp
首页 上页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 下页 末页 (共10页)
e*g
发帖数: 4981
1
来自主题: Military版 - 哪个是芙蓉姐夫
2017
Simcha Barkai*
Assistant Professor
London Business School
Ben Charoenwong
Assistant Professor
National University of Singapore
Hyunsoo Doh*
Assistant Professor
National University of Singapore
Yunzhi Hu*
Assistant Professor
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
N. Aaron Pancost*
Assistant Professor
University of Texas at Austin
Tarik Umar
Assistant Professor
Rice University
Alexander Zentefis
Assistant Professor
Yale University
2016
John Nash
Assistant Professor of Finance
Hong Kong U... 阅读全帖
b*****d
发帖数: 1900
2
来自主题: Faculty版 - CAREER budget
左右吧。 faq41写了。大部分按minimum limit来award.要多了也会被要求改的
41. What is an appropriate level of funding to request?
The CAREER budget request should reflect the scope of the research and
education plans, and the practices within your discipline. The minimum
CAREER award size is $400,000, including indirect cost or overhead, for a 5-
year period except in the Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) and the
Office of Polar Programs (OPP). Proposals to BIO and OPP must request a
minimum of $500,000 (appro... 阅读全帖
u*********r
发帖数: 1181
3
上面部分是费用,下面部分是各自相应的average annual total return。
非常感谢啊
Gross Expense Ratio:
=======================
TIER I - LIFECYCLE FUNDS
- show details. - hide details.
LIFEPATH 2015 07/05/2006 Blended Fund Investments* N/A 0.1221
% No additional fees apply.
LIFEPATH 2020 06/30/2006 Blended Fund Investments* N/A 0.1092
% No additional fees apply.
LIFEPATH 2025 07/05/2006 Blended Fund Investments* N/A 0.1237
% No additional fees apply.
LIFEPATH 2030 06/3... 阅读全帖
d**e
发帖数: 6098
4
请不要发信问我关于这个职位的情况,因为我也只是转这个email,或者可能版上很多同
学也收到.
-------------------------------------------
RF or Firmware Rotation - Multiple Entry Level or New Grad Engineering
Openings- San Diego- (LTE, Systems, HSPA, M2M, Device, Broadband, Wireless,
On-site gym, Tennis)
Have you graduated within the last 3 years or less with your BS/ MS in CS,
CE, EE, or similar and you are looking for a challenge in the mobile device
space?
Novatel Wireless Inc. is offering this opportunity with perks such as yoga/
aerobi... 阅读全帖
d****a
发帖数: 2901
5
I agree. just missed the big opp. 可惜太忙了。but more opp will show up.

发帖数: 1
6
来自主题: Stock版 - Musk令人担忧
相对于FCF, OPP比较容易弄正

:又发OPP的tweet
f*******2
发帖数: 91
7
各位好!我是F1学生,2009年的美国签证已经过期了,从去年到今年共从美国去加拿大
2次(不超过30天,办了加拿大Multiple签证的,那签证到八月一号才过期),由于有
Automatic VISA Revalidation政策而无需在加拿大办理返回美国的签证。但是在入境
美国的时候,入境官两次在入境章上都手写了一点东西。第一次是“F1 D/S”然后“
opp.”,第二次有F1没有D/S,还多了一个带圈的“R”。我想问一下,这几个符号是什
么意思啊?(我知道D/S,但不知道opp.和“R”)如果我3月份想第三次去加拿大,这
种奇怪的符号对我入境美国有影响吗??谢谢!(对了,我的I-20到今年8月6号就到期
了)
s**g
发帖数: 709
8
EB3C的律师说决定very weakly reasoned。 我们正在讨论下一步的策略, 是否在60天
内上诉。先向大家通报一下,大家有意见和建议,请发电邮至:e********[email protected]
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. #
23).The court has considered the parties’ briefing and supporting evidence
, and has heard from the parties at oral argument. For the reasons explained
below, the court GRANTS the motion (Dkt. # 23).
II. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are individuals from China who are seeking to acquire permanent
resident status ... 阅读全帖
f******g
发帖数: 1697
9
来自主题: NewYork版 - [合集] 有一些小人
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
beefcurtain2 (women on fashion are cunts) 于 (Thu Jun 30 23:19:29 2011, 美东) 提到:
以为我说了tinachen几句, 就是因为那个什么chinapride是我朋友。。。
patsy没有像zult那样屁户bettycn和软精子, 没有像zult那样, 只要我一post, 就封
我, 就以为patsy和我是朋友。。。
你们以为谁都像你们那样,那么high school, 把网上和网下朋友联系起来, 然后一
个被攻击, 然后马上群攻么, 然后报团, 互相舔屁眼么?
那个chinapride, 本来就是个萎缩男/女, 我连他/她是什么, 都不知道。。 我和
patsy见过, total time spend together 不超过4,5小时。。。
别以为谁都像你们这样high school clique-ish...
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
gogopanda (你好... 阅读全帖
m*******i
发帖数: 8711
10
来自主题: SanFrancisco版 - san carlos的房子怎样?
. In the middle means you don't lose opps on both sides. Besides, pennisula
has a lot job opps too
s*****i
发帖数: 5548
11
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
carfax12345 (car) 于 (Wed Jul 11 16:35:02 2012, 美东) 提到:
Whoever wants to buy, please contact Yuxkun ASAP.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
loverain208 (bluevolcano) 于 (Wed Jul 11 17:47:53 2012, 美东) 提到:
Pleasea count me in.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
nkfly (南开阿非) 于 (Wed Jul 11 17:49:00 2012, 美东) 提到:
好歹先看看第一批买的feedback...
估计一半都已经在接灰了。。。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wheresmyjob (排行老三) 于 (Wed Jul 11 20:13:26 201... 阅读全帖
W***n
发帖数: 11530
12
来自主题: Utah版 - 新的生活?

LA is too conjested and air quality is bad. But probably they've more job
opps than Utab.
I don't believe you have never seen snow before. There're so many mountains
around LA. Just the closest one, San Gabriel Range offer many hiking opps in
Winter season.
w***y
发帖数: 572
13
LZ 的统计是用你说的公式:
b2b margin=opp only b2b-only b2b
我的统计是用的相反的公式:
b2b margin=only b2b - opp only b2b
所以差一个符号,意义是一样的.
LAL 不但没有在场次安排上占任何便宜,而且经今年是最差的
这里有LINK,自己看吧:
http://basketbawful.blogspot.com/2010/11/obscenely-comprehensiv
H**U
发帖数: 1814
14
来自主题: Basketball版 - 冰箱真是个废物
多搞了个2000万的主,球队各项数据基本和上赛季一样,进攻效率还少有下降,防守基
本没啥提高。
本赛季:
PTS/G: 105.7 (4th of 30)
Opp PTS/G: 102.5 (26th of 30)
SRS: 3.94 (9th of 30)
Pace: 95.7 (7th of 30)
Off Rtg: 109.4 (3rd of 30)
Def Rtg: 106.1 (17th of 30)
上赛季:
PTS/G: 106.0 (2nd of 30)
Opp PTS/G: 102.5 (28th of 30)
SRS: 3.69 (8th of 30)
Pace: 96.1 (1st of 30)
Off Rtg: 109.7 (6th of 30)
Def Rtg: 106.1 (16th of 30)
w**n
发帖数: 244
15
来自主题: Bridge版 - how to bid? a quiz
It's not good to bid dbl in the first round since you
don't know if opps hold strong hand or not. If you bid
dbl in the first round, with moderate hand, Opps may
bid game just because of your kindly "dbl". The situation
changes a lot in the second round after the bidding.
I prefer bidding dbl in the second round.
w**n
发帖数: 244
16
来自主题: Bridge版 - 实战叫牌问题
As I understood, 1NT over opp's openning promised 15-17HCP and
stops in opp's suit.

XX doesn't mean they have slam. Just wait for further response
from P. With this hand, I don't think it's good to bid out your
suits directly.
If you bid 1NT with this hand, What will you do with hand like,
Axx KQXX QX KJxx
x***e
发帖数: 2449
17
来自主题: Bridge版 - 实战叫牌问题

To me. 1 nt Depends, since it is both. I will agree with
15-17.
12-14 to no vul. and stops in opp's suit is needed.
However, since opp * and p not *.
I can imagine the high suits are not promising at p.
Bet a 3nt or a low suit is my opinion. :)
w**n
发帖数: 244
18
来自主题: Bridge版 - Defence Problem
Opp must worry about sth since he didn't try 3NT with 6-7 card
in hearts. One should think about why partner returned Dia
instead of Spade. He may have one winner in Heart which might
be what opp worried about 3NT. So discard the first round of
Dia, take the second round if Dia King is still not shown and
return the third Dia. You may get one in Spade, one in Heart,
one in Dia and one in club.
j*******e
发帖数: 2168
19
来自主题: Bridge版 - How to play this hand
yesterday at local club's pair game. Opps are expect players. I play 3NT. Opps
didn't bid anything.
Axx
9xx
KQ10xx
AQ
Jxx
AJx
Jxx
K10xx
Opening lead was a low spade. How to play this hand?
a*******s
发帖数: 295
20
来自主题: Bridge版 - what's your call?(1)

at
Your solution is complete, but I 'd rather pass.
It's not likely we have a super-fit in minor enough to make a game.
Even it is the case, I know opps will surely keep the bidding alive
because of my short spades. Yes, you may not be able to enter the
bidding later after 1(2)S-3S by opps. On the other hand, you may
be able to bid diamond safely on 2 level, and avoid the nasty
problem of 1H-1NT-2S-?. My experience is whatever you bid now, chances
are that you are going to get a minus.
c****u
发帖数: 3277
21
来自主题: Bridge版 - what's your call?(1)
the problem is that pd need to hold at least 16 HCP to make this hand
"belong" to your side I think. in that case, he may take some action after
1S. Since your RHO didn't bid, he might be either too weak to bid or
have a heart stack. Three level usually belongs to opps, so if they bid
2S, I'd not compete, since my pd passed that 1S, which suggested that we
don't have enough HCP to compete to 3 level and pd may have sp stack
himself, because we are vul, opps tend to double us when possible.
Somet
a*******s
发帖数: 295
22
来自主题: Bridge版 - lucky 3NT
IMP Dlr S Vul E-W
S J75
H AQ862
D AJ
C J76
S AKQ4
H T7
D 653
C AQT8
Against Strong opps, I open 1NT, opps remain silence,
pd transfers to hearts and rebids 3NT, which is the
final contract.
West started with the Dimond Q, on which I covered with
Ace and East followed the suit with 4. Since I 'd like
to gather some distribution information first, I played
off 4 round spades. It turned out that east had 98 doubleton
and dicarded club 2 and heart 3, in that order. Not much help
so far.
It seems I
y****e
发帖数: 71
23
来自主题: Bridge版 - Sigh our board is so quite.
That is interesting dream, I never had anything close.
Maybe that suggested we should combine bridge board with other card games like
"red 10", :D
BTW, I played one hand the other day, I am the 4th position to bid, with card
lik1 AKxx x 109xxx KJx, Left hand opp opened 2S, my partner 3C, RHO pass, I
think for a while and bid 3S (opps asked what that means, I explain that it
means spade stoppers, consulting possible 3NT), partner 4H, I sign off at 5C.
The result is 6C, and partner said his 4H is
c****u
发帖数: 3277
24
来自主题: Bridge版 - more on bidding (2)
still reasonable la.
you may reverse dummy and ruff some clubs even when opps tap you.
you may only lose 1S, 1H, 1C and get
3D, 3H, 2 ruffs and 2 spades against some soft defense.
The hand is quite suit oriented because the value in majors are all slow.
even if pd has a club stopper, opps may take 5 tricks before you develop
9 tricks.
g**********y
发帖数: 14569
25
来自主题: Bridge版 - 1H - 3H, 大家喜欢什么约定?
I don't think so. Even Garozzo told me that, I can't buy it.
Bridge is not just make best out of your hand, it is also an art of making
trouble for opps.
If play 1H - 3H as preemptive, I don't think it is that bad to give away
information. Your side has a great fit doesn't mean opp can find a great fit
in remaining space, chances are:
1. they have a fit, they can play 4, but "Finding" has push them over 4.
2. they have a fit, but distribution is not that good.
4. the worst, they find a great fit
m*e
发帖数: 155
26
来自主题: Bridge版 - 1H/S-X-1N=?
1. Yes, it makes all the sense to allow the responder to bid "BOTH
weak hands with a long suit AND good hands with a long suit" through
a sort of transfer. Mike Lawrence recommends a similar variation,
a variation of Capp too. In that sense, 1N would contribute much
more than what is defined by precision (the normal 1H/S-2H/S hands).
2. In terms of giving opps more room, it is not a fatal drawback to me:
Using 1N rather than 2D/H to show direct raise to 2 hand, opps get
free:
c****u
发帖数: 3277
27
来自主题: Bridge版 - defending against multi 2d
there are two major schools in defending against multi.
I like the simple one:
x: take out, assuming opps opened 2S
2H: take out, assuming opps opened 2H.
all other bids are natural.
A complex one is:
x: either 13-15 balanced or 18 + any shape
2H/S/2NT: natural.
so with take out oriented hands, we have to pass first, which may
creat some other problems.
a*******s
发帖数: 295
28
来自主题: Bridge版 - what to bid
If they do have a grand, 5S from you is more likely to push them there than
6S is. The reason is: Given this auction, It's not a surprise that opps would
bid over 5S. If they just located their fit at 6 level, there
is a greater temptation for them to raise 1 level higher. But if you bid 6S
immediately, it's a much tougher decision for opps to make.
If you passed first place, don't bid over 6H, unless you think even 7S is
a good save against their 6H. Since you have no defensive trick, and there
f*o
发帖数: 168
29
来自主题: Bridge版 - interesting hand tonight
my hand as following:
8
QTxxx
ATxx
QJx
bidding as following:
opp me opp pd
1D 1H 1S 4C
4S ?
What do u think about pd's 4c bid?
what will u bid?
x***e
发帖数: 2449
30
来自主题: Bridge版 - what is the best strategy here?
This hand is not suitable for X.
X should show very good defence strength as well. It more likely to show you h
ave strong hand overall.
With 8H, it is more likely you'd better bid as accurate as early as possible i
nstead of waiting to exchange as much information as possible and not affraid
of Opps bidding at all, which is the way we use X.
No wonder 4H is the correct bid.
Maybe you are worrying about you have a strong hand and this hand is not only
bid for cut Opps throat, but also you want t
f*****x
发帖数: 545
31
来自主题: Bridge版 - 相似的一把牌
This hand is slightly different. And I think it is even better to bid 4H here.
The reason is that opp has not yet get a chance to mention their possible spa
de suit. So it is urgent to bury them.
In the hand I gave, LHO opened 1S. In a sense if they have a fit in spade it c
annot be buried whatever you do. So its goal has changed somewhat. First, as c
ozofu mentioned, is to bury their minor suit. This may not be so urgent after
LHO's initial pass. Second, is to cut opps' info. exchange channel.
b****s
发帖数: 472
32
来自主题: Bridge版 - What is Michaels?
if opp bids 1 of a minor, you bid 2 of the minor to show both majors (5+
hearts, 5+ spades usually).
if opp bids 1 of a major, you bid 2 of the major to show the other major and
an unspecified minor.
check out:
http://homepage.mac.com/bridgeguys/Conventions/MichaelsCuebid.html
b****s
发帖数: 472
33
来自主题: Bridge版 - [合集] What is Michaels?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
cuteniu (妞儿) 于 (Tue May 22 21:44:29 2007) 提到:
What is it?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
boreas ( 北风之神~在人生的N叉路口) 于 (Wed May 23 04:53:15 2007) 提到:
if opp bids 1 of a minor, you bid 2 of the minor to show both majors (5+
hearts, 5+ spades usually).
if opp bids 1 of a major, you bid 2 of the major to show the other major and
an unspecified minor.
check out:
http://homepage.mac.com/bridgeguys/Conventions/MichaelsCuebid.html

☆───────────────
b****s
发帖数: 472
34
来自主题: Bridge版 - bidding question
two boards I played last night.
1.
1S 1NT 2S ?
opp find spade match. p bid 1nt. you hold 63 T96 AJT75 Q96.
what's your call? I passed and got a bottom...
2.
1D - 1S ?
holding AK964 A8432 A J4
opp bid my suit. a takeout double doesn't seem right
for the singleton DA and doubleton CJ4.
i chose 2H, all pass. got another poor score.
b****s
发帖数: 472
35
来自主题: Bridge版 - [合集] bidding question
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
boreas (北风之神) 于 (Thu Sep 6 16:13:01 2007) 提到:
two boards I played last night.
1.
1S 1NT 2S ?
opp find spade match. p bid 1nt. you hold 63 T96 AJT75 Q96.
what's your call? I passed and got a bottom...
2.
1D - 1S ?
holding AK964 A8432 A J4
opp bid my suit. a takeout double doesn't seem right
for the singleton DA and doubleton CJ4.
i chose 2H, all pass. got another poor score.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
mapcar (绵掌) 于 (Thu S
p***r
发帖数: 20570
36
来自主题: Bridge版 - 坐庄问题, 3NT
This treatment is certainly very simple and practical. Reserve the double
for penalty is good in the sense that if you play penalty double, opps may
not overcall as much as before to disturb your 2/1.
The simplest treatment is still to play double as penalty and pass as hands
that is defensive oriented, but no trump stacks. Of course, the meaning of
2NT right away is open to discussion. IMO, it can be a transfer to C and all
bids by opener can be transfer oriented started from 2NT, which would
u... 阅读全帖
p***r
发帖数: 20570
37
来自主题: Bridge版 - 坐庄问题, 3NT
Actually trying to penalize opp at two level with 3-3 split can sometimes
lead to huge disasters. 3-3 is good for defense when opp is quite (semi)
balanced and you may have crossruff potentials. In this situation, 2S is
usually bid by long and good spades with shortness somewhere. So most of
their assets are in trumps, but not side suit honors. They are most likely
to take 4-5 tricks in trumps and a few side tricks. So it is quite rare that
your 3-3 trump would ruff out their side suit honors to... 阅读全帖
p***r
发帖数: 20570
38
来自主题: Bridge版 - Some thoughts on one hand
Still, working out all the possibilities at the table is very difficult and
I doubt any declarers in the world would think this deep and foresee all the
possibilities in one or two minutes. Still, the general principle to cut
down opps' communications is very important in hands like this one. A lot of
unmakable(unbeatable) contracts can be makable(beatable) if you read the
position well and attack opps' communications aggressively.

When
singleton.
C
play
p***r
发帖数: 20570
39
来自主题: Bridge版 - 非主流一问
This logic is bizarre. One should play some certain conventions or systems
because it is good to handle a certain type of hands or to create a lot of
problems for opps, not because some pairs in a top 8 bermuda bowl finished
team play this convention. If this convention is intrinsically worse than
standard treatment like this one (because it makes the opp's defense much
easier), one should not play it at all.
b***y
发帖数: 2804
40
来自主题: Bridge版 - 非主流一问
Google translation:
你说的是真实的,不应该刻意选择一个坏的公约发挥。然而,一些世界冠军对选择的事
实,即发挥本公约,它开启了可能性,他们可能知道一些不这样做,有可能被你忽略了
一些本公约的优点。或者,也许本公约的集成以及与他们的具体制度。而不是假设顶级
8对大脑失败驳回总愚蠢的公约,它可能是值得弄清楚他们为什么选择了这个看似劣势
的治疗。

这种逻辑是奇怪的。一是要发挥一些某些公约或制度因为它是很好的处理某种类型的手
创造了很多OPPS问题,而不是因为在百慕大杯前8对完成队出战本公约。如果本公约在
本质上是比像这样的标准治疗(因为它使OPP的国防更容易),应该没有发挥它在所有
p***r
发帖数: 20570
41
来自主题: Bridge版 - is it a marginal decision?
Showing 4+ hearts are not as attractive as showing 4+ S.
For example, suppose you hold x AKxx KQJxxx xx, over 1C opening, you want to
show your hearts, because you may belong to 4H or if they have a huge C fit
, you may hit a huge H fit that may buy the final contract and compete over
their C contracts.
However, if it is over 1S, it becomes less clear, whether you should risk a
possible 2C or 3C bid from partner and make a takeout double. One reason is
that if they find their S fit, your D or H ... 阅读全帖
p***r
发帖数: 20570
42
来自主题: Bridge版 - is it a marginal decision?
This 2NT to show 6-4 shape thing is not very attractive after 1S 2D, because
you can often make off shape takeout doubles to land at a 8 card fit at
three levels or have a chance to double opps' aggressive opening and raise.
Also, for hands with a void in opp's 8 card fitted suit, players often
shouldn't compete over aggressively at 2 or 3 levels, because your partner
often knows that you have a void and still refrains to bid on. So you should
often make a takeout double with two way hands that ... 阅读全帖
p***r
发帖数: 20570
43
来自主题: Bridge版 - 实战叫牌两题
There are just many of them
For example: AJxxx xxx Qxx xx, facing a normal club lead and H Q is likely
to be off, you most likely don't want to play 6H (The 5C bidder can easily
hold xx - AJxx KQJTxxx, shoot 5C and hope to be lucky). There are 3 very
important cards for this hand, SA, HQ and (SJ or 5 spades). A bad 2S wouldn'
t offer you all of them and you will be likely down in 6H. Also, if partner
holds all of them, he would accept your slam invitation. If partner's hand
is weaker, he would r... 阅读全帖
p***r
发帖数: 20570
44
来自主题: Bridge版 - 叫牌
Of course it is a minor issue. As I said, playing with wimptb, I never have
difficulties figuring out how many KC he holds.
Still, I don't really think I can always claim that I have no problem in
this issue, because sometimes your opps may preempt a lot . For example, in
a sequence like:
1S 4H(opp) ?
Now you may want to ask for KC with some sort of extra and good spade fit.
For example: you may hold Sxxxx Hx DAKQJxx CKQ.
Suppose your partner bid 5C, you really don't know how many KC he holds.
H... 阅读全帖
p***r
发帖数: 20570
45
来自主题: Bridge版 - 叫牌问题(11)
par contest is very different from real bridge situations. Gib is not bad in
par contest simply because in par contest a lot of constraints can be
supplied. In real life, that's totally a different issue. You have to figure
out defender's possible holding all by yourself. Also, in par contest, you
just solve the problem. In real life bridge, your opps intentionally seek
your holes and weakness to take the maximum profit out of them.
Unfortunately, there are just way too many holes in gib's playi... 阅读全帖
p***r
发帖数: 20570
46
来自主题: Bridge版 - 一个叫牌
The 5th trump improves the hand offensive strength for about half a loser.
Still, it's a 8 loser hand and I would bid 4S right away too. That's the
nature of this game. When white, your range to bid 4S is considerably wide.
It's not you who should determine whether to bid 5S later, it is your
partner. Also, nobody can really guarantee that he can bid correctly in this
situations. However, if you just bid 3S, and they bid 4H, partner pass, do
you want to bid again? In that sense, 3S is a bad bid.... 阅读全帖
p***r
发帖数: 20570
47
来自主题: Bridge版 - 【每周一题】概率打法
This line is only good in theory that opps don't find the good lead or
switch. Whenever opps clubs are 4-1, they may switch to C after DA and later
get a ruff to beat you. This probability may lead your testing play in D
very expensive.
p***r
发帖数: 20570
48
来自主题: Bridge版 - 叫牌
I don't think the points in the article are valid at all.
If you show a game invitational hand, it doesn't mean that you have the
defensive strength to beat opps' games, especially against solid players.
Here, 2D is only one round forcing, can be bid based on a good D suit, like
xxx xx KQJxx KJx. So the minimum level that the auction can end is 2NT. Any
opp's bids above 2NT through 4 level shouldn't create any forcing pass
situations.
Suppose the bidding goes like 1C 1H 2D 4H , there is no way f... 阅读全帖
p***r
发帖数: 20570
49
来自主题: Bridge版 - 叫牌
Ax Q9xxx AKxxx x is also a very unlikely hand you may hold.
Even if partner bids 4S over your penalty double, you can pass and 4S is
often makable.
In your real situation, 4S isn't a horrible contract. 4H is a huge overbid
and you shouldn't need a lot of time to beat such kind of opps. Also, if you
have played against this opp before, you can pass the penalty double with
good confidence.
p******e
发帖数: 1151
50
来自主题: Bridge版 - 【每月一题】It's Your Call
It is a complicated question. I do not really think thoroughly.
1. What I said about 5D should apply to this sequence (or similar situation
, 5level new suit should mean things like that, under a competitive
situation. In particular, you want to know the support and key card).
1H 3S 4C 4H
5D
Here 5D means slam interest and D suit, 6-5. (in the example you mentioned,
5D is particularly important since having DK or not makes a huge difference.
And you also have a somehow safe house 5H).
2. If a h... 阅读全帖
首页 上页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 下页 末页 (共10页)