c*a
发帖数: 806 | 1 at least not p2mp lsp's
so what has been bothering you? routing protocol on p2mp or simply the
atm switch issue, never touched bpx, only a little on ls1010, and igx |
|
z**r
发帖数: 17771 | 2 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
zher (民工.四个节点之起步篇) 于 (Wed Dec 14 22:37:43 2005) 提到:
on ATM PVC, I am dying on this
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
cfa (可怜虫) 于 (Wed Dec 14 23:29:05 2005) 提到:
at least not p2mp lsp's
so what has been bothering you? routing protocol on p2mp or simply the
atm switch issue, never touched bpx, only a little on ls1010, and igx
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
bluenose (OC3072) 于 (Wed Dec 14 23:42:02 2005) 提到:
There are no routing p |
|
t*******r
发帖数: 3271 | 3 你说的是provider tunnel而已, 不是NG-MVPN的种类.
其他tunnel type还有呢
rsvp-te p2mp lsp
mldp p2mp lsp
pim-ssm tree
pim-asm tree
pim-bidir tree
IR
mldp mp2mp lsp
Rosen严格来讲不能叫作ng-mvpn |
|
s*****g
发帖数: 1055 | 4 Why in interAS scenario, BGP is better than LDP? as far as VPLS is concerned
, it should not care about BGP/ASBR etc, only it needs is MPLS
transportation to remote PEs, and LDP session to remote PEs to exchange L2
FECs.The issue that how to signal MPLS LSP over AS boundary is irrelevant to VPLS signaling.
I thought only Juniper is sticking to BGP VPLS, while the rest of world uses
LDP VPLS and use BGP for auto-discovery.
One obvious advantage of BGP-VPLS is that BGP has router-reflector concept... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
z**r
发帖数: 17771 | 6 RSVP-P2MP还是要弄一堆TE tunnels，还是mLDP来得更直观，而且也更scalable |
|
z**r
发帖数: 17771 | 7 兼容draft rosen，MI-PMSI和S-PMSI
NG-MVPN应该三种，mLDP，MVPN GRE (Rosen)和P2MP-TE
l3vpn- |
|
w***s
发帖数: 321 | 8 how about PVLAN OSPF P2MP? |
|
s*****g
发帖数: 1055 | 9 Very good suggestion, unfortunately Arista EOS does not support P2MP OSPF. |
|
w***s
发帖数: 321 | 10 说实话，P2MP也就是解决地址问题，真正能支持1000个邻居的除了BGP就是EIGRP |
|
s*******8
发帖数: 12734 | 11 没有点对点这个说法的，中文真的很害死人。
dedicated我指的是physical上的。
点对点你可能指的是ciruit是对应的。
ppp是一个protocal，你要怎么样，是你的事情，是你去design，phyical还是那条线。
你可以ATM，FR，PPP，P2MP，都可以。
isp是个公司的名字啊，公司的design是随便他们的，你要什么服务，他给你搭的啊。 |
|
