m******m
发帖数: 11 | 1 at least, you should be able to use the patent in your authorship part,
which is a publication too.
Next, you can try to search if your patent being cited anywhere, which will
be a nice evidence of its impact. (counted as citation in my case and
mentioned in contribution too)
Thirdly, if your patent is being used in any product of the company, then
you can claim your contribution via the market coverage/dominance of the
product and the sales revenue of the product. |
|
s****i
发帖数: 262 | 2 I can check my patent published online but company lawyer let me make some
changes and see my patent is published but not yet granted. Is there any
differece? |
|
g*********1
发帖数: 459 | 3 有个澳大利亚的公司非常认真地询问了我们的patent,但是是跟学校的通信，我只收到
了学校的通知。并且说是美国的patent,澳大利亚不能用，要先变成国际的patent，现
在正在弄。这个不知道算不算有人询问，证据够不够强？
contribution 里面是在找不到啥好写的东西。
谢谢 |
|
W*****s
发帖数: 684 | 4 If it's patent, why it is still pending? If it is pending, then it is only
patent application. Not patent. Not every application will be approved. |
|
b****n
发帖数: 379 | 5 patent 来不及申，invention disclosure 对申请EB1a/b 有用吗？
patent application 有用吗？
还是只有granted patent才有用？
谢谢！ |
|
c*******n
发帖数: 82 | 6 请教各位一个关于专利的问题，现在手头有3个patent applications，其中一个已经被
一个公司licensed，然后请学校的Office of Technology Transfer开了一个Memo说明
其中一个技术已经被公司licensed，有学校相关人员的签名，但是没有说明具体的公司。
问题：
（1）学校的人员说这些是专利申请，不能叫专利 （Please note that none of the
patent applications have issued as patents.学校的工作人员的原话）。我的问题
是可不可以放在contribution中claim所做的贡献？
（２）这个Memo可不可以用来支持贡献？
非常感谢各位的宝贵意见，想咨询一下如何处理这些申请中的专利，因为这些是专利申
请中，还没有正式成为专利，不想被REF. |
|
b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 7 其实并不矛盾，大蜜一直提到谨慎使用专利是有个前提的，就是这个专利必须有了商业
化的应用，并且产生了很大的影响。
移民局是这样定义patents的，
patents currently being utilized and shown to have significant impacts
因此你们公司律师要求的其实并不完全准确，正确的做法应该是由你们公司的高级别的
专业主啊官比如部门VP，CTO等来首先说你是该专利的主要贡献着，其次陈述专利已经
转化成产品，也就是你所说的patent application. 同时提供证明，比如contracts 或
者commercialized 的报道。
没有上面两点，就确实很容易招致RFE.
信. |
|
r*****d
发帖数: 46 | 8 收到的NOID里指出我没有证明我的patent有academic contribution。请问这个要怎么
证明？Patent的内容都发了paper了，而patent本身就是为了公司利益，怎么样才能跟
academic contribution联系起来？谢谢！ |
|
N***0
发帖数: 106 | 9 VO的逻辑是需要证实已经发生的东西，比如patent的commercialize results，而不是
将来的可能性。强调潜在前景有可能miss point。而且没有商用化的patent不见得就能
够比citation多的paper重，VO可以质疑patent本身只是routine的东西。 |
|
a*****n
发帖数: 682 | 10 会不会触发RFE?
两个patent，没法证明被应用了。律师在PL一开始介绍我现在的职位的时候提了一下，
后面exhibit list里面也列出来了。但在正文里面claim authorship and
contribution的时候完全没提这两个patent，这样会不会招惹RFE？看大家都强烈建议
慎用patent，心理有些忐忑啊 |
|
a*****n
发帖数: 682 | 11 那还有的挽救，我的已经file了
在简介我的工作经历的时候，律师写了这两个patent，但在后面论证authorship and
contribution的时候没提patent全部是拿读书期间发的paper来阐述的，希望IO不要拿
patent说事。。。 |
|
s*****w
发帖数: 262 | 12 你的patent也是pending的吗？ 当初不知道pending patent容易被rfe,就没找人写
patent |
|
发帖数: 1 | 13 有一个patent已经被应用于公司的产品中，但是还在internal review，就是大老板在
review，甚至还没到公司的律师手里。
仔细看了版上有关patent的帖子，这种情况如果claim的话容易被rfe。这个patent算是
我一个比较大的亮点，如果想claim的话，需要提供什么材料呢？ |
|
e*******x
发帖数: 285 | 14 请问大家，刚刚pending的patent,但是已经commercialized。需要怎样file...律师说
要写一个描述文件，证明patent怎么implemented...
另外就是需要download一个申请的copy...在USPTO上面找不到download刚刚submit的
patent啊。现在只有application number.
请问大家是怎么弄的？多谢！！！ |
|
w*********3
发帖数: 28 | 15 请教版上各位大牛。。。有个patent在google scholar citation有20+，这个能算进文
章citation里吗？
另外，现在公司律师在准备材料，想问一下我这个case如果想pp的话，是不是风险比较
大？
背景：
CS PhD
文章+会议abstract 9
google citation一共100左右，其中包括那个patent（还都是自己公司patent引用的）
review 10， 有两个水会的program committee |
|
s*******o
发帖数: 395 | 16 毕业以后一直在工业界，有几个patents。
博士时候的一个patent被卖给了一家公司，已经在量产。
工作的两个patents 已经应用在了量产的产品上。
这些东西在PL里面如何写才能突出contribution 呢？
请不吝赐教！
Thanks |
|
c*********8
发帖数: 1327 | 17 很多patent尤其是业界的，pending patent都广泛的应用了
你看很多硬件产品各种consumer products电子玩具什么的后边不都有Patent Pending
加专利号么
软件disclosure有的也常见。
只要应用的证据提交 |
|
b*****n
发帖数: 10665 | 18 什么是PATENT ENGINEER？
PATENT AGENT？
PATENT EXAMINER？ |
|
l**f
发帖数: 145 | 19 有意者，请直接联[email protected]/* */。多谢！
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
Patent Agent/Tech-Specialist position – Full-time/Part-time
Overview:
Responsibilities will include drafting/translating patent applications in
electronics, computer, and information technology (IT)
Qualification Summary:
- Superior writing skills
- Background in EE
- Display-related background preferred
- Advanced degree required
- Fluency in English and Chinese, bilingual
- Patent preparation/prosecution experienc... 阅读全帖 |
|
y*b
发帖数: 3190 | 20 "I have been told (thanks) that Sony will indeed produce Canon’s upcoming
high resolution sensor. The source presents this as a joint venture and
patent exchange between Canon and Sony.
In other words, and according to the source, Canon and Sony will agree on a
patent exchange to produce a 53MP sensor for Canon’s upcoming high
resolution DSLRs. This sensor would keep the Exmor technology, and feature
Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF. The best of both worlds someone may say. Sony
would still sell senso... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
y*b
发帖数: 3190 | 22 Nikon reached a settlement for the patent infringement lawsuit against Sigma
"Nikon reports that it reached a settlement for the patent infringement
lawsuit against Sigma filed in Japan in 2011. The amount of the settlement
Nikon received from Sigma was not disclosed:
Nikon Corporation (Kazuo Ushida, President, Tokyo, hereafter referred to as
“Nikon”) announces that it reached a judicial settlement as of April 21,
2015 with regard to the patent infringement lawsuit (hereafter referred to
as “Law... 阅读全帖 |
|
y*b
发帖数: 3190 | 23 "a patent showing an upgraded optical formula has appeared.
Patent Publication No. 2014-206674
Published 2014.10.30
Filing date 2013.4.15
Example 1
Zoom ratio 2.06
Focal length f = 16.49-23.74-33.94mm
Fno. 2.91
Half angle of view ω = 52.69-42.35-32.51 °
BF 38.74-48.38-63.65mm
Source: [EG]"
http://www.canonrumors.com/2015/05/patent-canon-ef-16-35-f2-8l- |
|
y*b
发帖数: 3190 | 24 "A patent showing another crazy superzoom has appeared, this time the
optical formula is for an EF 28-560mm f/2.8-5.6L USM. We’d assume such a
lens would also have IS if it ever came to market. We expected to see a non
-L superzoom sometime in 2016, but that has apparently been put off until
late 2017 at the earliest.
Patent Publication No. 2016-142795
Published 2016.8.8
Filing date 2015.1.30
Zoom ratio 18.86
Focal length 28.80 119.57 543.20
F-number 2.88 4.56 5.88
Half angle of view (degrees... 阅读全帖 |
|
l**n
发帖数: 7272 | 25 patent is fully necessary for small guys to survive. the other day, people
were talking about that OS vendors stole ideas from application developers.
if those ideas are patentable, there would be a better chance for small
guys.
on the other hand, those big companies are surely trying to jam/game the
system. Money talks. it has been like that for thousands of years.
personally, i fully support open patent platform that USPTO was/is testing.
hopefully, it will be reality soon. |
|
a****a
发帖数: 3905 | 26 先看看apple都用那些patent来做patent trolling再来说软件patent保护创新。
西。 |
|
p***c
发帖数: 5202 | 27 apple的不少patent说起来patent挺牛b，其实大家都清楚，就是个idea而已，比方那个
若干年前的圆角方形。。。。
现在这个时代，idea不都是互相抄？你出个youtube，我也搞个online video sharing
，你出个myspace，我弄个facebook，你搞facebook，我做google+，你做dropbox，我
弄icloud。。。。没完没了。。。到美国留学的同学，那些paper，引用过去过来，咳
咳。。。。
做得好不好，是看execution，那么多startup和成熟公司，好多相似的idea，有的s了
，有的活了，就是看执行能力。。。。。这要是patent过去过来，大家都别干活成天打
官司了。。。。
乔老擅长的就是execution，你说谁不知道把电话做好用，做漂亮。。。前几个帖子有
位果粉同学说得好，乔老能坚持到底哪怕得罪无数人，这个就是大牛。只要公司能把
idea变成好产品，还能占领市场。
成王败寇
只靠打官司限制对手，不是个好现象也不是好兆头 |
|
w********1
发帖数: 3492 | 28 Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:28:41 PDT
A newly-published Apple patent application (via AppleInsider) reveals Apple'
s interest in exploring the use of the iPod nano's clip as a charging and
docking mechanism, a move that would eliminate the need for a dedicated
docking port on the bottom edge of the device as found in the current design.
By incorporating electrical contacts into the clip and using a dock adapter
to provide compatibility with Apple's current docking stations, the clamping
action of the iP... 阅读全帖 |
|
f***5
发帖数: 1569 | 29 我民科一次。
老有人说什么苹果把什么长方形注册了。
我不是太懂，
但我觉得吧，patent这个东西，不是你想申请就能申请到。
这是可以卖钱打官司的东西。不是那么随便的
当时审批的人批准，肯定有他的道理，为什么这个东西可以成为patent.
我们不能自己老是想当然觉得，这个东西不牛屄，凭什么有patent。
可能人家批准的原因是我等不能明白的
这个跟你抢注册域名，抢商标应该是两码事。
求拍砖 |
|
z*********h
发帖数: 133 | 30 2 questions:
1. Did he invent it? he wrote about it, but was not necessarily the first
one to do it (of course I didn't have the time to read through the full
dissertation. it should be clear from his dissertation to see whether he was
the one invented it)
2. Did he patent it? Even if he invented it, if he didn't patent it at that
time, then the technology was in the public domain with the publication of
his PhD dissertation (or any of his papers). Nobody, not Apple, not himself,
would be able t... 阅读全帖 |
|
c**i
发帖数: 6973 | 31 (1) Ian Sherr, Apple in Top Phone Spot. Wall Street Journal, Aug 5, 2011 (
title in print)
online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110804-718400.html
(International Data Corp (IDC) said Thursday that for 2Q11, global market
shares of smartphones, not just cellphones, are Apple 19% (2), Samsung 16.2%
(3), and Nokia 15.7% (1); the numer in parenthesis indicating the ranking
in 1Q11)
Note:
(a) The report cites
Ramon T. Llamas, Apple Overtakes Nokia for Worldwide Smartphone Leadership.
Can It Last? IDC, Aug... 阅读全帖 |
|
S*****s
发帖数: 242 | 32 What is the purpose to contact the inventor? The patent does not prevent
others to do research but profit. If you are making money from this
inhibitor, you need to arrange a licensing. It sounds like that you are
simply doing research, there is no point to even contact the holder. In many
cases, the holder does not really "hold" the patents while the company or
university or whatever organization often hold the patents.
one
easy
into |
|
h*****b
发帖数: 492 | 33 【 以下文字转载自 Chemistry 讨论区 】
发信人: hensbcb (Try to love myself), 信区: Chemistry
标 题: 请问patent去哪查？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Feb 16 11:17:49 2011, 美东)
如果想知道一项技术又没有被申请patent,应该去哪查？有专门的patent的文献库马？
就像NCBI这样
的？谢谢 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 34 Broad 已经辟谣了
https://www.broadinstitute.org/what-broad/areas-focus/project-spotlight/
journalists-statement-and-background-crispr-patent-interfer
Update: August 17, 2016
In its Opposition Document 2, posted August 16, the Regents of the
University of California again claim Broad relied on Jinek 2012 to engineer
a eukaryotic CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system.
This is false, and has been demonstrated to be false numerous times in the
public record.
In an attempt to strengthen its case, in Opposition ... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*********D
发帖数: 1727 | 35 天！这样太TM的过分了。看远一点啊。这把自己的路堵死了。
想起我们的compound，file patent。学校说拿到的可能性不大，学校不要也不管。老
板自好自己讨腰包找律师申请。最后要开公司（到现在还没启动呢），patent先分成。
第一作者拿的份额和老板一样，我和其他参与者一样多。老板后来给我说，你该多一些
，比其他人出力明显多很多，可也没法摆平呢。我笑了笑：你出钱，自己当老板，也就
和第一作者一样多。学校出钱的话，50%就归学校了，咱们谁也分不了多少。算了吧，
先搞起来再说。能不能卖钱还不知道，拿不拿得到patent也是未知数。要能搞到grant,
你我最合算。反正他们都要走的，我们两个都没想退休，有钱才能继续干。。。
塞，有时候就想，其实人都不笨，就是不知道有些人怎么就不能看得远一点。 |
|
b********d
发帖数: 720 | 36 话说EE领域这种做patent law工作的口宽吗？
需要上law school,然后考patent bar还是直接考patent bar就可以？
在有工作经验的前提下 |
|
c********n
发帖数: 199 | 37 直接考patent bar, 从patent agent做起，一边工作一边上law school，毕业了就是
patent lawyer. |
|
s**********i
发帖数: 711 | 38
there can't be B2=C2 or B3=C3. previously claims in other
patents can't be claimed again, although sometimes they make
mistakes. if as a whole system, C needs B2 or B3, the patent
must disclose them but can't claim them.
you can't use anything claimed in a current patent, without
authorization.
the laws, codes, and procedures can be found at www.uspto.gov
website. the law is 35 USC, code is 37 CFR. |
|
o****e
发帖数: 195 | 39 if what you said here is true (i.e., the invention ~claimed~ in patent B here
WAS disclosed by a paper 2-3 years before B's filing date), then it's possible
that patent B's claim of this invention is invalid, and that means you can use
that invention disclosed in A without a problem.
But, you need to pay close attention here to make sure that the invention
claimed in B is exactly, completely anticipated by A. for example, patent B
has claims B1, B2, B3, ... B1 is called independent claim, and |
|
s**********i
发帖数: 711 | 40
a patent is valid unless PTO or the courts say it's invalid.
a patent application could claim benefit from early applications,
thus 2-3 years before this application filing date alone doesn't
make it invalid. also, the paper must describe someone else's
work, not the inventors' listed on the patent. |
|
o****e
发帖数: 195 | 41 1) getting a patent granted does not mean the patent is valid, if the court
later determines that it's invalid, it's invalid from day one, it's not
invalidated because someone takes it to the court, it's invalidated because
it's invalid to begin with.
2) my original post says "earliest effective filing date".
3) most people can tell if the patent and the paper have at least one common
inventer/author.
B.
textbook.
here
possible
use |
|
o****e
发帖数: 195 | 42 you have a Ph.D., the first thing you should take care of is GC.
patent bar can wait, GC can't.
there are only two situations in which you can take the patent bar:
1) GC holder
2) H1B holder working in a law firm.
also, passing the patent bar does not automatically get you a job. check the
greed IP board in www.infirmation.com to see some market sentiment.
on the other hand, if you are good -- solid technical background, good
language skills, good personality, and willing to be a work horse; y |
|
o****e
发帖数: 195 | 43 if you already have GC, you should first focus on finding a patent drafter
position (technology specialist, as called at some firms). this way, you can
have a good estimate of the market. maybe they will require you to take the
patent bar, maybe not. it's very firm and individual case-specific.
if you can secure such a position before you even start law school, you will
be playing a totally different game against very few competitors.
you can reverse-engineer the network to find patent attorn |
|
d********o
发帖数: 337 | 44 考过patent bar,找一些head hunters,并搬到NYC等机会比较多的地方,会有帮助.
如果还不能注册考patent bar,也可以先学习一点,这样可以对firm说只要提供
sponsorship马上就能考过.
考LSAT;上一些general 的 patent 课程(不一定是 law school 的),也可能有帮助. |
|
o****e
发帖数: 195 | 45
That's exactly right. Taking the patent bar has little bearing on one's
success in landing a good patent-agent job. The things that do matter for
these positions are: technical expertise, writing skills, verbal
communication and social skills.
It's very difficult to hire someone with all three above, so most firms will
settle for two. Having passed the patent bar or not may not even be a
consideration for the firms, because they can always find someone with a reg
number to sign the documen |
|
t******r
发帖数: 71 | 46 So how about this "dream plan" of mine as a current science/engineering PhD
student:
LSAT -> techinical specialist @ law firm -> patent bar -> patent agent ->
law school -> bar exams -> patent lawyer
I have family concerns and am planning a first child maybe next year, which
is why I don't want to hurry into a law school. How long estimately does it
take to go through the procedure above? What should I know about the timing?
Considering GC, how does it fit into the picture? (Although I have a so |
|
n*********e
发帖数: 665 | 47 本人材料专业博士，博士后一年。由于传统材料公司最近不景气，而且几乎都不支持
H1B,我很难迈出从学校到公司的这一步。现在生物版劝退话题火热，觉得自己也应该找
找别的出路。仔细想了想，统计，计算机，金融和自己背景相去太远，（而且也不感兴
趣),而patent law似乎可以用到我的专业知识，而且自己将来仍然有机会把握材料领域
的发展（最好的结果往往在patent中，而不是publication上）；同时也听说过一些申
请成功的例子。现在希望各位老大指点一下，我的想法是不是可行，申请patent law方
向工作现在应该做些什么准备工作。多谢多谢！
个人信息：基本上了解能源，高分子材料和纳米材料的现状，研究方向包括燃料
电池，太阳能电池，表面自清洁，生物降解高
分子，纳米结构；现在没有绿卡，没有industial H1B. |
|
c**d
发帖数: 3888 | 48
B.S. and J.D. (M.S./Ph.D. helpful but usually not req'd)
资格考试什么的.
Bar exam + patent bar exam
Engineering/scientist experience helpful but usually not req'd
前景如何呢?MONEY PAY的怎么样?
If you're lucky: get into a big firm as a associate. Salary starts at $160K.
Later on, maybe partnership, maybe inhouse.
If you're unlucky: Small immigration firm after law school. Struggle to keep
yourself fed.
Patent prosecution and litigation, patent portfolio counseling, strategic
counseling etc.
That is all I have t |
|
y********7
发帖数: 29 | 49 "A recognized Bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent will make you a
category A applicant for the patent bar. A few examples of what you will
find under category A are degrees in biology, computer science, electronics
technology, chemistry, pharmacology, physics, and numerous engineering
degrees.
A patent agent does not need a law degree. Both USPTO registered attorneys
and agents can prepare, file, and prosecute patent applications" |
|
