M********9
发帖数: 705 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Rite_aid 俱乐部 】
发信人: Maggie2009 (Maggie), 信区: Rite_aid
标 题: Reach/Almay/bayer/previde VVQ 换 huggies VVQ
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 13 17:38:07 2011, 美东)
2个reach
2个previde
9个 almay
1个bayer
1:1换 huggies vvq。 |
|
B***E
发帖数: 2001 | 2 去深度洗牙后，大夫给推荐的
在他那买了瓶 Colgate PerioGard, 0.12%
但是给我的prescription上是 PreviDent Rinse， 0.2%，
这俩区别大吗？ 就是那个含量百分比不同吗？ 谢谢 |
|
c*****i
发帖数: 1392 | 3 Q1:
data flag(drop=prevID prevscore);
set StudentScore;
if _n_=1 then flag=0;
else do;
set StudentScore(drop=year rename=(studentID=prevID score=prevscore));
if studentID ^= prevID then flag=0;
else if score
else flag=1;
end;
run;
Q2:
proc sort data=StudentScore;
by studentID year score;
run;
data StudentScoreNew;
set StudentScore;
by studentID year score;
if last.studentID;
run; |
|
|
L*1
发帖数: 11537 | 5 The active ingredients might be the same.
Google. |
|
e*****3
发帖数: 541 | 6 Prevident? I think it is the 4th time for me. |
|
y****r
发帖数: 3036 | 7 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
cooldw57 (Windsurfer) 于 (Wed Apr 4 18:27:08 2012, 美东) 提到:
现在利率有些涨了，谁能帮忙推荐一个可以用来refinance的agent? 谢谢！
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
YvonneHe (eh99) 于 (Wed Apr 4 18:28:30 2012, 美东) 提到:
我们刚做了2.5%的ARM。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wennyzhang49 (wenny) 于 (Wed Apr 4 19:03:46 2012, 美东) 提到:
Jean 钱建华 978-8842377
Vivian 7818794366
2.5%的ARM，就这个一点没涨
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
happypig2008 (happy2008) 于 (Thu Apr... 阅读全帖 |
|
on
发帖数: 199 | 8 I didn't use it for a few months. Today when I tried to log in, for some
reasons, it insists on me to previde a phone number. (I have the right login
password). I'm very reluctant to do that already harassed by all those
telemarketers too much.
Any alternatives? |
|
b*****n
发帖数: 10665 | 9 确实也见过每半年来诊所，都有新虫牙的主。
不过楼主这个，发展的也太快了巴？！
是属于RECURRENT DECAY还是完全新的CAVITY阿？
你让医生开FLUORIDEX或者PREVIDENT牙膏用巴。
另外用记得用牙线。
以前要是有牙周炎，每三个月清理一次牙齿。 |
|
A**4
发帖数: 2165 | 10 I don't think he get more than 0.35% chance of beating Fed's GS number. Yes,
0.35%. Nadal needs another 7 to surpass Fed, previding 17 is Fed's final
number.
Which means he need to won 4 in courts other than FO, which 3 more would be
he highest possible achivement, which put his total to 10 and I don't think
that would happen by itself. Another 4 on hard or grass courts on top of
that would be even more unlikely. So I can put a bet with you for whatever
you want that Nadal would not supass Fed's... 阅读全帖 |
|
