h****1
发帖数: 1 | 1 lz怎么会提前知道结果的？不是下个月15号才知道吗？ |
|
|
|
n***l
发帖数: 1468 | 4 我也是, 3个overall rate, 1个2, 1个3, 1个4
估计也黄了
问两个问题:
1. 这个response, 有实际作用吗? 是不是也就是做个样子. 对最后结果不起作用.
2. 要accepted, 最低要求是什么? 是不是都必须3以上(甚至要一个5) |
|
|
|
d******e
发帖数: 7844 | 7 SDM不是滥会，2，3，4就想录Short，那岂不太容易了。
大概15%，好像总数比去年多了100多
我今年投也是2,3,4，呵呵 |
|
t******e
发帖数: 1293 | 8 等到明年2月份的KDD，又很多submission了。呵呵 |
|
n***l
发帖数: 1468 | 9 各位前辈, 能否给指引指引,
在Database,特别是data mining领域, 哪些会议算是一流, 哪些算是二流, 哪些会是很
容易中(用来粉饰resume)?
www, vldb, kdd, sdm, sigmod, pods, SIGIR, pakdd, icde, icdm, more and more..
.... |
|
d******e
发帖数: 7844 | 10 你列的这里面PAKDD和WWW比其他的应该都容易。
.. |
|
t******e
发帖数: 1293 | 11 我怎么觉得WWW也是top conference呢？ |
|
j****a
发帖数: 1277 | 12 www当作top conference感觉还差那么点意思 |
|
g**********y
发帖数: 14569 | 13 Keep your eyes open :) as I know, many serious Java/OO experts start to
notice the impact of Ruby or already involved in Ruby development. A good
example is Martin Fowler and his thoughtworks colleagues, I find a lot of
them working in some Ruby open source.
Tim Bray (XML spec writer) publish a blog to complain about Ruby. On the
same day, a college student in Australia rebuted him. And that open a web-
war. On same day, I saw so many blogs are discussing this incident.
Java will not become Ruby |
|
h********n
发帖数: 4079 | 14 楼主, 不知道我理解的对不对, 你说的是PNAS给你们的文章回答是"不能接受, 如果补
实验可以resubmit"? 这个不是拒, 这个一般来说最终会接受的.
如果是这样, 你要写的是 point-to-point explanation/answer, 而不是rebuttal. 你
永远不要rebut审稿人或者editor. 把那些实验的结果写上去, 说明理由, 并且放在
supplemental data里面就可以了.
当然, 如果我上面的理解不对, 那当我没说.
些实验，但是那些实验我们做过并认为和审稿人以为能证明的东西根本没有关系，所以
我们并不想把这些实验放上去。 文章被editor毙掉了，但说如果补充了实验可以
resubmit. 我们写了rebuttal letter说明为什么那个审稿人说的实验和我们的文章根
本没关系，而且他对实验有很多的误解。
们给个说法。 |
|
M*****n
发帖数: 16729 | 15 其实办成像以前板上的journal club形式就很好。
new publication就是new post
跟贴可以赞扬，也可以批评，然后author可以defend, 写rebutal.
post质量的好坏，大家投票。如果达到一定票数，就可以加入精华区。 |
|
P******t
发帖数: 1717 | 16 本来不过是李开复同学发了篇paper，
方是民同学读了，指出其中有些内容有over interpret data之嫌，给了比较harsh的
review comments
本来李同学针对方同学的review comments给出解释或者修改即可，再提交reviewer（
方）和editor(观众），看能不能达成谅解和共识。
俺没有看李/方的什么网站或围脖，不清楚究竟如何。不过据说，据说李同学确实正在
态度平稳的针对review comments给出解释。目前还不知道第二/三/....n轮方的
comments是什么。
本来就是这么简单的发paper和接受同行评议（都是知识分子，也都来美国喝过洋墨水
），何况还是公开身份的reviewer，不是匿名的。
事情到此也一切都还显得正常。不过这边厢买买提上的一些言论就显得很有意思了：
1. 有对李PI人格崇拜的路人甲跳出来给李PI打抱不平：李PI多好多好的一个人，关心
帮助青年学生，而且多么有能力曾在CNS上（苹果微软狗狗）发过多少高水平论文，你
一个远不如人家李PI成功的小破校恐怕连lab都没有的teaching faculty，有啥资格对
... 阅读全帖 |
|
B*M
发帖数: 1418 | 17 希望年轻的PI们都能以此为榜样~~
http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id=
-------------------------------------
Twelve Tips for Reviewers
An occasional column by Henry L. Roediger, III
Many critical skills needed for becoming a successful academic are typically
not taught in graduate school, at least not in any formal way. One of these
is how to review journal articles. Few students coming out of graduate
school have much experience reviewing papers, and yet, at least for those
students ... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***n
发帖数: 109 | 18 两个reviewer都同意发表了，另外一个reviewer说只要删掉一个claim就成。editor也
原则上同意发表。
看样子老板还想rebut，sigh。昨天连夜分析数据，就睡了不到4个小时... |
|
M*P
发帖数: 6456 | 19 老板要rebute
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 7.8 |
|
F*Q
发帖数: 3259 | 20 【 以下文字转载自 Mathematics 讨论区 】
发信人: fullmath (风之子), 信区: Mathematics
标 题: 菲尔兹奖得主Donaldson揭田刚学术剽窃
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Nov 24 11:38:48 2013, 美东)
国际顶尖数学家唐纳森教授等再揭田刚学术剽窃
作者：东闲
近日伦敦皇家学院首席教授唐纳森，美国纽约石溪大学教授陈秀雄等学者联
名公开发文，揭露田刚的又一起剽窃丑闻。唐纳森是国际顶尖数学家，曾获得菲
尔兹奖、克劳福特奖、邵逸夫数学奖等众多国际数学最高奖。陈秀雄是国际著名
几何学家，曾在国际数学家大会上做过邀请报告。
文章以十页的篇幅逐条列举了田刚在长达1年多时间里多次抄袭、公然抢夺
唐纳森教授等学术成果的来龙去脉。事实清楚，证据确凿。唐纳森教授作为国际
顶尖学者，发长文公开指责田刚抄袭，说明事态已经到了非常严重的程度。
这已经不是田刚第一次被揭发学术不端了。国际顶尖数学家丘成桐，萧荫堂
等都曾多次指出田刚自从读博士起就存在剽窃、夸大等学术不端行为。
唐纳森教授等文章链接
Xiuxiong C... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*******0
发帖数: 190 | 21 TOKYO—RIKEN has decided against reopening an investigation into two stem
cell papers that concluded that the lead author, Haruko Obokata of RIKEN's
Center for Developmental Biology in Kobe, engaged in research misconduct.
The institute has yet to decide whether Obokata will be punished.
RIKEN launched an investigation after claims of image manipulation and
plagiarism surfaced regarding a research article and a letter published
online in Nature on 29 January that described a new, simple way of cr... 阅读全帖 |
|
m***j
发帖数: 1215 | 22 遇到这样的审稿意见，简直无语。编辑直接给据了。哎，感觉rebutal的机会很渺茫阿
。求建议！怎么和编辑argue。
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Publish in a different journal.
Comments:
This manuscript by Cheng et al describes the nonequlibrium molecular
dynamics for thermal conductivity XXX. The work is carried out carefully and
includes an interesting result related with a thermal conductivity of two
nanomaterials. Although the authors explained the size dependence of
conductivity using non-equilibrium MD, theoretical and experimental studies
about ... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***e
发帖数: 6082 | 23 审稿意见就是狗屁，编辑说你行就行，三个审稿都说小修改的可以被编辑直接拒，三个
审稿里面两个说一钱不值的照样小修改后接受，有空rebutal还不如拿着那点时间改格
式，自我感觉好的话还不如投个差不多级别的杂志
and
studies |
|
u**d
发帖数: 211 | 24 不会有用，文章的 decision，肯定是经过 committee 讨论的
chair 也会尊重讨论，不可能改变结果。
可以过段时间, 平静以后再来看 review，有时候别人的评价，也不是完全无用。
他诚心要据你，也要找到一些理由。即使可能不是很重要，下一稿修改过来就好了。
学术界投稿本来就有随机性。我身边很多人，一片文章投了1、2年才被顶级会议/刊物
接受。有运气的成分。另一方面不断修改也起了很大的作用。
所以放平心态，据了也没啥，修改修改再投就是了。
当然，要是文章就是跟在别人后面灌个水，估计再怎么投也难有好的归宿。
早点找个地方接受了，然后 move on 吧 |
|
F**********s
发帖数: 54 | 25 Littlenorth has done his utmost to ridicule my points (if not myself).
Ridicule may be a shield, but it is not a weapon. Yes I am a corporate
lawyer and I feel good about it. And thanks to my school, they didn’t ever
want to expel me. Obviously you have started to take umbrage at something
else, not the argument itself. I don’t want to say you lost my respect as a
person when I saw your post in the other thread, but I suggest you to be a
little respectful and mature. Don’t turn this discussion i... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*********h
发帖数: 77 | 26 Very briefly, my response.
1. you apparently misread my post re "corporate lawyer." read it again to
see whether i was referring to in-house counsels or just taking a jab at the
kind of law school/law firm douchebags that we are all too familiar with.
not only did i not do my "utmost to ridicule" (oh you will know when i do),
i went to great lengths trying to avoid the kind of confrontational and
preachy language found in your post below. if this is the way it has to
turn out, then so be it.
... 阅读全帖 |
|
d********e
发帖数: 2221 | 27 the following is how I write a response:
1. read the current claims, but do not read the spec.
2. if the claims are clear and understandable, check every argument the
examiner made and find those that are rebuttable.
3. rebut every rebuttable argument.
ah! |
|
d********e
发帖数: 2221 | 28 I only read the portions the examiner cited. if the examiner's position is
very difficult to rebut, I browse other portions for teaching away or
inoperability. Just don't read the references word by word, especially the
secondary references.
This is a balance between thoroughness and efficiency.
the |
|
g****a
发帖数: 1520 | 29 全文见
Xiuxiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, Song Sun
September 19, 2013
http://www2.imperial.ac.uk/~skdona/KEDEVELOPMENTS-9-19-2013.PDF
部分摘录
Gang Tian has made claims to credit for these results. The purpose of this
document is to rebut these claims on the grounds of originality, priority
and correctness of the mathematical arguments. We acknowledge Tian's many
contributions to this field in the past and, partly for this reason, we have
avoided raising our objections publicly over the last 15 months, bu... 阅读全帖 |
|
g****a
发帖数: 1520 | 30 全文见
Xiuxiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, Song Sun
September 19, 2013
http://www2.imperial.ac.uk/~skdona/KEDEVELOPMENTS-9-19-2013.PDF
部分摘录
Gang Tian has made claims to credit for these results. The purpose of this
document is to rebut these claims on the grounds of originality, priority
and correctness of the mathematical arguments. We acknowledge Tian's many
contributions to this field in the past and, partly for this reason, we have
avoided raising our objections publicly over the last 15 months, bu... 阅读全帖 |
|
f******h
发帖数: 104 | 31 国际顶尖数学家唐纳森教授等再揭田刚学术剽窃
作者：东闲
近日伦敦皇家学院首席教授唐纳森，美国纽约石溪大学教授陈秀雄等学者联
名公开发文，揭露田刚的又一起剽窃丑闻。唐纳森是国际顶尖数学家，曾获得菲
尔兹奖、克劳福特奖、邵逸夫数学奖等众多国际数学最高奖。陈秀雄是国际著名
几何学家，曾在国际数学家大会上做过邀请报告。
文章以十页的篇幅逐条列举了田刚在长达1年多时间里多次抄袭、公然抢夺
唐纳森教授等学术成果的来龙去脉。事实清楚，证据确凿。唐纳森教授作为国际
顶尖学者，发长文公开指责田刚抄袭，说明事态已经到了非常严重的程度。
这已经不是田刚第一次被揭发学术不端了。国际顶尖数学家丘成桐，萧荫堂
等都曾多次指出田刚自从读博士起就存在剽窃、夸大等学术不端行为。
唐纳森教授等文章链接
Xiuxiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, Song Sun
September 19, 2013
http://www2.imperial.ac.uk/~skdona/KEDEVELOPMENTS-9-19-2013.PDF
部分原文摘录（附中文翻译供参考）
Gang Tian... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 32 from: Liang Xue
to: John Hutchinson
cc: Tomasz Wierzbicki
date: Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM
subject: Re: No winners--follow-up
Dear John,
Thank you for your email. I had a difficult time to understand the
message you want sent. My guess is that the central message you would like
to emphasize is that you can develop the same model once you understood that
ductile fracture is indeed J3 dependent. Possibly. I
believe many people have the necessary knowledge to do so on their
own. H... 阅读全帖 |
|
h***s
发帖数: 2499 | 33 half-half
据说prl总是给一次rebut的，即使两个都是- |
|
N***m
发帖数: 4460 | 34 confused. What do you rebut?
some |
|
J****u
发帖数: 229 | 35 for such a low profile journal, you shouldn't bother the editor again |
|
g****i
发帖数: 30 | 36 【 以下文字转载自 Mathematics 讨论区 】
发信人: guinea (猪猪), 信区: Mathematics
标 题: 田刚抄袭最新证据（唐纳尔森教授撰文）
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Nov 20 21:06:17 2013, 美东)
全文见
Xiuxiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, Song Sun
September 19, 2013
http://www2.imperial.ac.uk/~skdona/KEDEVELOPMENTS-9-19-2013.PDF
部分摘录
Gang Tian has made claims to credit for these results. The purpose of this
document is to rebut these claims on the grounds of originality, priority
and correctness of the mathematical arguments. We acknowledge Tian's many
contributio... 阅读全帖 |
|
f***n
发帖数: 781 | 37 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: mandman (满老), 信区: Military
标 题: 一季度高盛发放红利五十五亿美元
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Apr 20 13:38:14 2010, 美东)
顶风作案，高盛就是牛！
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/apr/20/goldman-sachs-profits-bonuses
Just days after US regulators began a $1bn (£650m) fraud action against
the firm, Goldman revealed a leap in quarterly profits from $1.8bn to $3.
5bn and disclosed that it was setting aside $5.49bn to pay its employees. A
top lawyer at the bank rebutted the Securities and Exchange |
|
s**********8
发帖数: 25265 | 38 Good Laboratory Practice
In the experimental (non-clinical) research arena, the phrase good
laboratory practice or GLP specifically refers to a quality system of
management controls for research laboratories and organizations to try to
ensure the uniformity, consistency, reliability, reproducibility, quality,
and integrity of chemical (including pharmaceuticals) safety and efficacy
tests.
GLP was instituted following cases of animal test fraud by pharmaceutical
and industrial chemical (mainl... 阅读全帖 |
|
S*********g
发帖数: 24893 | 39 好的
你负责政法委那一块儿，严厉打击看不顺眼的猥琐男
蓉蓉帮我搞精神文明建设,搞点黄片，定期放一放，缓解压力
小麦指导经济，搞A股，搞B股，放假消息
我帮你们rebut complaints |
|
B*S
发帖数: 1328 | 40 I know I am not supposed to do this here. But both the view point and
the conclusion are interesting...
************************************************************************
In a recent report Stöferle went on to say:
1) The Dow/gold ratio suggests a possible future $10,400 price
for gold.
At 8.5x the Dow/gold ratio is currently slightly above the long-term
median of 8x. This means that gold is still relatively inexpensive in
comparison with the Dow Jones. Bull markets tend to en... 阅读全帖 |
|
