d*b
发帖数: 21830 | 1 1. 红灯camera分redspeed和redflex两种（见下面的图）
2. 技术上redflex比较先进点，redflex一般一个box就能照看整个路口，所以，别以为
你的路口没redflex就不会被照
3. 2种camera都用埋在地下的线圈感应你有没有闯红灯，所以，黄灯时把车开到路中间
一般就不会被照，但不能保证。
4. 地下的感应线圈是每个白线下2个，一前一后，圆柱状，直径大约10cm
5. redflex和redspeed都带激光测速，所以即使绿灯开车路过带camera的路口也要小心。
6.一般州的法律要求speed citation必须有driver的脸部相片，所以现在一个路口一个
方向一个camera的设置，即使speeding也不能给你开citation, 但不能保证变态的州政
府和条子。
结论：用带GPS/laser的radar detector基本都能探测到camera，但能不能避免
citation就很难说了。 |
|
c****0
发帖数: 14490 | 2 参考2.
Ignoring Photo Radar and Red Light Camera Tickets in Arizona
**Disclaimer** This article does not constitute legal advice, nor does it
take into account any unreported subversive methods currently being used by
American Traffic Solutions, Redflex Traffic Systems, Process Servers, Judges
and courts in Arizona such as the Scottsdale City Court
With that disclaimer out of the way, now seems like a great time to
reiterate an important piece of knowledge that every motorist who lives or
travels ... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*b
发帖数: 21830 | 3 right turn on red要full stop本来就是个joke, Woodfield Mall的case（State v.
People)就说，200万个right turn on red才会有一个accident. Right turn on red应
该改为yield而不是stop, 这玩意历史上从来都是不enforce的，现在state跟RedFlex/
SafeSpeed勾结抢钱而已。RedFlex本身也是臭名昭著，在Indiana, Minnesota都被人告
，在Chicago迟早也会被人告，这种罚单迟早得吐出来。 |
|
b***G
发帖数: 542 | 4 安装这些摄像头基本上就是肥了REDFLEX,对交通安全没什么帮助，反而增加了黄灯追尾
的数量。
POWAY市人口才50000多，安装这些摄像头的第一个月就在七个路口开了4000多张罚单，
收入以百万计。
加州居民辛苦挣来的银子白白流向位于ARIZONA的这家专门安装交通摄像头牟利的公司
，还增加了车祸数量，既不合情又不合理，撤销是大势所趋。 |
|
g****n
发帖数: 3313 | 5 这篇文章挺有意思。看来红灯的确是多功能的。
07. JUN, 2010 0 COMMENTS
Handing out $436 red-light tickets has paid dividends for Fremont, but not
for
Union City.
Fremont’s red-light camera program has turned six-figure profits and
correlates
with a major drop in intersection collisions, police said. But Union City,
which
also uses camera vendor Redflex Traffic Systems, has lost money on its
program and
has not seen a significant reduction in collisions, Union City police Lt.
Kelly
Musgrove said.
With red-light camera |
|
