l*x
发帖数: 14021 | 1 l looked up the average ages of these two teams before the game and though
it could be a factor.
steelers are the 2nd oldest teams following the redskins. packers are about
2 years younger and among the youngest teams. they became much younger after
two of the oldest guys, driver and woodson, left the game due to injuries. |
|
k***r
发帖数: 13724 | 2 49ers, ten, redskin, vikings....
which one? |
|
|
B*****e
发帖数: 9375 | 4 Total wins over/under,
好象都无懈可击, 没甚么可买的, 不愧是精密的职业产品.
How about Colts over, Chargers under?
CARDINALS 7
FALCONS 10
RAVENS 10.5
BILLS 5.5
PANTHERS 4.5
BEARS 8.5
BENGALS 5.5
BROWNS 6.5
COWBOYS 9
BRONCOS 5.5
LIONS 8
PACKERS 11.5
TEXANS 8.5
COLTS 9.5
JAGUARS 6.5
CHIEFS 8
DOLPHINS 7.5
VIKINGS 7
PATRIOTS 11.5
SAINTS 10
GIANTS 9.5
JETS 10
RAIDERS 7
EAGLES 10.5
STEELERS 10.5
CHARGERS 10
49ERS 7.5
SEAHAWKS 6
RAMS 7.5
BUCS 8
TITANS 7
REDSKINS 6 |
|
b********n
发帖数: 4256 | 5 CARDINALS 6.5 ?
I will take cowboys over, colts over, packers over, giants under..
发信人: BigBlue (#15), 信区: Football
标 题: 唯加斯的赌盘出来了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Aug 5 14:00:56 2011, 美东)
Total wins over/under,
好象都无懈可击, 没甚么可买的, 不愧是精密的职业产品.
How about Colts over, Chargers under?
CARDINALS 7
FALCONS 10
RAVENS 10.5
BILLS 5.5
PANTHERS 4.5
BEARS 8.5
BENGALS 5.5
BROWNS 6.5
COWBOYS 9
BRONCOS 5.5
LIONS 8
PACKERS 11.5
TEXANS 8.5
COLTS 9.5
JAGUARS 6.5
CHIEFS 8
DOLPHINS 7.5
VIKINGS 7
PATRIOTS 11.5
SAINTS 10
GIANTS 9.... 阅读全帖 |
|
B*****e
发帖数: 9375 | 6 Total wins over/under,
好象都无懈可击, 没甚么可买的, 不愧是精密的职业产品.
How about Colts over, Chargers under?
CARDINALS 7
FALCONS 10
RAVENS 10.5
BILLS 5.5
PANTHERS 4.5
BEARS 8.5
BENGALS 5.5
BROWNS 6.5
COWBOYS 9
BRONCOS 5.5
LIONS 8
PACKERS 11.5
TEXANS 8.5
COLTS 9.5
JAGUARS 6.5
CHIEFS 8
DOLPHINS 7.5
VIKINGS 7
PATRIOTS 11.5
SAINTS 10
GIANTS 9.5
JETS 10
RAIDERS 7
EAGLES 10.5
STEELERS 10.5
CHARGERS 10
49ERS 7.5
SEAHAWKS 6
RAMS 7.5
BUCS 8
TITANS 7
REDSKINS 6 |
|
b********n
发帖数: 4256 | 7 CARDINALS 6.5 ?
I will take cowboys over, colts over, packers over, giants under..
发信人: BigBlue (#15), 信区: Football
标 题: 唯加斯的赌盘出来了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Aug 5 14:00:56 2011, 美东)
Total wins over/under,
好象都无懈可击, 没甚么可买的, 不愧是精密的职业产品.
How about Colts over, Chargers under?
CARDINALS 7
FALCONS 10
RAVENS 10.5
BILLS 5.5
PANTHERS 4.5
BEARS 8.5
BENGALS 5.5
BROWNS 6.5
COWBOYS 9
BRONCOS 5.5
LIONS 8
PACKERS 11.5
TEXANS 8.5
COLTS 9.5
JAGUARS 6.5
CHIEFS 8
DOLPHINS 7.5
VIKINGS 7
PATRIOTS 11.5
SAINTS 10
GIANTS 9.... 阅读全帖 |
|
M*****a
发帖数: 7122 | 8 3 teams you don't ever wish to be drafted to: bengals. bills. redskin
next |
|
M*****a
发帖数: 7122 | 9 现在stuck在giants/redskin俩无能赛上了。。。 |
|
|
|
l*****8
发帖数: 16949 | 12 前天就听到了。不过这个Center也够衰的，居然这么容易被骗。 |
|
a***n
发帖数: 5665 | 13 c'mon.... its part of the game... |
|
K**7
发帖数: 6610 | 14 据说是有明令禁止的
如果那样的话，红皮就是玩阴的
当然了，你仍然可以说是part of game
不过有个笨蛋center的球队不这么认为 |
|
B*****e
发帖数: 9375 | 15 Yes, the rule specifically prohibits it.
It was installed after Dick Butkus had great success yelling out "hut hut!"
to confuse the opposing centers in the 1960s. |
|
T*********s
发帖数: 2987 | 16 It sounds like Shannahan. The "mastermind" |
|
W********s
发帖数: 2256 | 17 但这个犯规裁判很少吹吧？还记得Bush push？这种犯规裁判也不吹。既然不吹，就应
该拿掉，省得给某些裁判和我党一样搞选择性执法的机会。
" |
|
m*******r
发帖数: 3635 | 18 how about Grossman?
I think Redskin tried Campbell - Mcnabb and then Grossman?! |
|
o*******6
发帖数: 6113 | 19 The whole Redskins staff is totally a joke. |
|
H****t
发帖数: 2542 | 20 Or Redskins....
曼宁+香辣汉，我考，太sexy了，立马超级碗的有力竞争者。 |
|
r****p
发帖数: 1949 | 21 暴力球是NFL的一个流派，每隔５～１０年这类流派就会拿一次super bowl，像：
2003 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
2001 Baltimore Ravens
1992 Washington Redskins
1991 New York Giants
1987 New York Giants
1986 Chicago Bears |
|
d*****e
发帖数: 16730 | 22 Sun 11/13 New York Jets at NY Jets
Mon 11/21 Kansas City ChiefsKansas City
Sun 11/27 Philadelphia Eagles at Philadelphia
Sun 12/4 Indianapolis ColtsIndianapolis
Sun 12/11 Washington Redskins at Washington
Sun 12/18 Denver Broncos at Denver
Sat 12/24 Miami DolphinsMiami
Sun 1/1 Buffalo BillsBuffalo
赛程上来看 jet这场三连败非常有可能
接下来的赛程还不错
总之这几年还是有竞争力的 不要期望太高就是了 |
|
P*******e
发帖数: 39399 | 23 还行 除了giants 都比较弱
11 Nov. 17 at Broncos
8:20 PM EST
TV: NFL NETWORK Sirius: 92
12 Nov. 27 Bills
1:00 PM EST
TV: CBS DirecTV: 705
13 Dec. 04 at Redskins
1:00 PM EST
TV: CBS DirecTV: 704
14 Dec. 11 Chiefs
1:00 PM EST
TV: CBS DirecTV: 706
15 Dec. 18 at Eagles
4:15 PM EST
TV: CBS DirecTV: 715
16 Dec. 24 Giants
1:00 PM EST
TV: FOX DirecTV: 709
17 Jan. 01... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
i*********r
发帖数: 5101 | 25 俺家sexy rexy 干掉小可人 romo. |
|
|
|
|
w*********s
发帖数: 8428 | 29 Rex -> John Beck -> Rex again |
|
P*******e
发帖数: 39399 | 30 看了下john beck 现在三十 07年才draft
结果一看college是BYU的 估计就是mission去了
还好是college之前不是之后 要不回来更废。。。
xx害死人啊 不过这家伙本来也很废吧。。。 |
|
|
A*****a
发帖数: 52743 | 32 果然不负吾望，cowboys 6-4, 季后赛应该不成问题吧 |
|
|
|
H****i
发帖数: 728 | 35 Redskins是个losing team
香辣汗的RB的选择完全不可理喻 |
|
|
|
|
f**********n
发帖数: 10757 | 39 看到那个redskin的那个TD，我不知道是不是口号被破解了，但是giants自己没有执行好啊，这种quick pass，RT是一定要把DE cut倒的，结果91号很轻松的shed这个block，这个play就失败一般了，这个91号白人球商不错，一看eli马上要出手，他肯定sack不到，就下意识空中截球，结果成功了，主要还是自己执行不好。
91号看起来还是要pass rush的，如果真的破解口令了，他应该drop into left zone in pass coverage，这样int几率更大
员的打法. |
|
|
|
x**********g
发帖数: 618 | 42 not necessary, if Gaints lose to Jets and beat Cowboy and Eagle beat Cowboy
and Redskins, then Eagle will go to Playoff, because gaints lost this damn
game. |
|
s*******u
发帖数: 1855 | 43 assuming eagles can beat redskins in week 17, if giants loses to jets next
week, no matter what, it is gone. |
|
f****g
发帖数: 2073 | 44 # Coach Name Team Age Conf/Div Compensation*
1
Mike Holmgren Seattle Seahawks 60 NFC West $8,000,000
2
Mike Shanahan Denver Broncos 56 AFC West $6,000,000
3
Jeff Fisher Tennessee Titans 50 AFC South $5,500,000
4
Lovie Smith Chicago Bears 50 NFC North $5,500,000
5
Bill Billichick New England Patriots 56 AFC East $5,000,000
6
Tony Dungy Indianapolis Colts 53 AFC South $5,000,000
7
Tom C... 阅读全帖 |
|
a****y
发帖数: 2548 | 45 想说Cowboys和Redskins吧。NFL从来没有啥宇宙队，都是NCAA带的。 |
|
H****t
发帖数: 2542 | 46
靠，绿湾当然是黑帮，而且是老牌黑帮。极其类似于soccer的意大利---
既有远古时代的辉煌，又有近年来的牛比。
我来科普一下吧。
NFL的黑帮有这些：
Packers(意大利), Cowboys(英格兰), Steelers(德国), 49ers(巴西), Pats(阿根廷),
Giants(法国)。类似不是很恰当，但意思差不多。
还有两个也绝对应该算在黑帮内，但近年来逐渐势微----Raiders, Redskins。
好比乌拉圭，前苏联。
Colts类似于荷兰，常年活跃，但称霸武林的次数极少。 |
|
s*****l
发帖数: 1844 | 47 that's due to injury, mainly. After AR came out, they were unstoppble.
Predicted that they will win SB after their game with Pats with a backup QB.
..
The soso Redskins beat them twice, weird.. |
|
G*******s
发帖数: 10605 | 48 49ers, Bears, Dolphins, Redskins, Broncos, Texans?
I am listing some pretty good defense teams that may be elevated to
contenders with Manning joining. |
|
B*********s
发帖数: 4158 | 49 redskins did their best though |
|
c*****x
发帖数: 429 | 50 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-06/patriots-are-favored-t
The Patriots, who were beaten 21-17 in Indianapolis, are listed as 5-1
favorites at the MGM Grand’s sports book in Las Vegas. The Giants don’t
even have the best odds in their division after winning their second Super
Bowl in five seasons.
ODDS TO WIN 2013 SUPER BOWL
===========================
Team Odds
===========================
New England Patriots 5-1
Green Bay Packers 11-2
Pittsburgh Steelers 6-1
... 阅读全帖 |
|
