c******t
发帖数: 1733 | 1 RKC deep 6由 RKC最基本的6个kb动作组成，program是 5 swing, 5 snatch, 5 clean
, 5 press, 5 front squat, 1 turkish getup. 先右手作完这些动作，再换左手作完
，这样为一个set. 整个workout一共5个set。beginer level 左右手换手时休息半分
钟，每set间休息1分钟。intermediate level 换手时不休息，set间休息1分钟。
advanced level 不休息作完全部。为增加难度和流畅性我把5 clean, 5 press, 5
front squat 合成了5个clean-press-front squat combo。 我用70lb的kb, 总共15分
钟完成。因为这个program 非常非常tough, 可能我有个别动作走形 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 2 No. What I mean is that optimized structures exist in many areas. Even if
you play an optimized system, you still may have problems in some hand types
. In that sense, I don't really care about perfection at all. There is one
simple example, before RKC was invented, players play Blackwood for many
years. In many cases, you have to guess whether partner holds trump K and Q.
These kind of guesses are so called judgment calls. When RKC was invented,
all these kinds of "judgment calls" just disappe... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 3 The reason why 4NT is designed as RKC for H, is because you could have set
up diamond as trump by bidding 4D first, but you don't have room to set up
hearts as trump (4H will not be forcing).
For me, the first principle is, if you have a chance to set up trump before
using 4NT, then 4NT is not RKC for that suit. For example 1H-4NT, that is
not RKC for me, since I could have made a forcing raise first, followed by
4NT. Similarly, 1H-1S-2D-4NT is quantitative (balanced 19-ish). I think 1H-
1S-3D-4... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 4 这副牌正常RKC没问题，但是很多其它的牌，4NT作为RKC太高，所以我们低花上从不用
4NT作为RKC，要么在特定的序列我们约定使用kickback，要么就不使用RKC，把4NT作为
别的用途。其实我们真正需要的是一个将牌问叫。 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 5 对这副牌的讨论超出了我的预期，这是一件大好事。
我把实战叫牌贴出来，大家讨论一下。同伴是２３６２牌型，持有ＳＡ／ＨＡ／ＤＡ．
叫牌过程：
PD ME
－ －
1D 1S
2D 3H
3S 4C
6D P
6D看上去有点premature，但我们有些系统上的问题。我一般主张低花的满贯主要采用
扣叫的手段来试探，只在很有限的几个序列定义了kickback rkc，因为kickback太容易
搞错。这里在3H之后，我们没有RKC的手段，同伴感觉反正也问不清楚，就直接拉满贯
了。事后我反省了一下我们的体系，我觉得当我们不用RKC的时候，至少还是需要有一
个将牌问叫的手段，因为扣叫最大的问题在于，没法弄清楚将牌上的控制，这大概是我
们体系的一个漏洞。
我想大概请教一下，用你们最熟悉的系统和装置，你们会怎样叫这个牌。 |
|
g****o
发帖数: 1284 | 6 我不用kickback rkc。就这副牌而言，简单的RKC应该也work吧？
1D - 1S
2D - 3H
3S - 4C
4NT - 5H
5NT - 6H
7D
3H = Splinter, 4张方块支持。而且我绝对不会拿单张HK去做splinter。
3S = 扣叫。应该没有疑问，不会是想打S定约。否则前一轮绝对不应该叫2D。
4C = 扣叫。
4NT = RKC
5H = 2 Key Cards （DK + CA)
5NT = 问K。
6H = 2个K，但绝对不会有HK。有人可能不会同意我，但这就是我的风格。
7D没问题。 |
|
g****o
发帖数: 1284 | 7 Groetheim不是已经不用CRASH了么？他们体系的新发展是问完牌型后如果叫品仍然低于
4D，则用4D做结束信号，强制转移到4H后再表示对特定花色的满贯兴趣。3NT总是止叫
。除了4D和3NT以外最便宜的花色都是以特定花色为将牌的RKC。比如北开叫的情况，3D
（5-3-4-1）后南最便宜的叫品是4C，这是以最长套（这里是S）为将牌的RKC。如果南
叫4H，则是以次长套（这里是D）为将牌的RKC，依次类推。如果有花色等长的情况，优
先级人工设定为H>S>C>D。 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 8 You can just cubbid 4C and hope to hear 4D from partner.
After Partner's 4D, you should just RKC with 4S. After 4NT, which shows 1 KC
, a normal treatment is to bid 5S to ask for side suit kings. If you happen
to have some better gadgets here, you should bid 5NT to show SQ and all KC
and HQ. 5NT also denies DQ (because you have skipped 5D). Later, partner can
bid 6C to show CK, 6D to show DQ, blabla...
If partner just bids 4H over 4C, you can also try 4S as RKC probably.
Chances for 7H(7NT) isn'... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 9 Often you just can't really be the captain after the first round of RKC,
which is especially true in grand slam decisions. In many situations, grand
slams are bid by collaborations. So it's more like a covalent bonding,
instead of ionic bonding. Everybody need to contribute some information to
reach the final decision. Captain types of bidding actually happens less
frequently in bidding. It is good in some shapely two suiters, where side
suit honors or shortness are important. For example, suppo... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 10 You can just cubbid 4C and hope to hear 4D from partner.
After Partner's 4D, you should just RKC with 4S. After 4NT, which shows 1 KC
, a normal treatment is to bid 5S to ask for side suit kings. If you happen
to have some better gadgets here, you should bid 5NT to show SQ and all KC
and HQ. 5NT also denies DQ (because you have skipped 5D). Later, partner can
bid 6C to show CK, 6D to show DQ, blabla...
If partner just bids 4H over 4C, you can also try 4S as RKC probably.
Chances for 7H(7NT) isn'... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 11 Often you just can't really be the captain after the first round of RKC,
which is especially true in grand slam decisions. In many situations, grand
slams are bid by collaborations. So it's more like a covalent bonding,
instead of ionic bonding. Everybody need to contribute some information to
reach the final decision. Captain types of bidding actually happens less
frequently in bidding. It is good in some shapely two suiters, where side
suit honors or shortness are important. For example, suppo... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 12 but who knows these conventions?
nobody knows what 4sp means after 1nt-2c-2d.
and next time, change that 5 h to 5 dia, how can u bid?
I think my way is fair enough.
1nt -2h-2s-4c(splinter, inviting slam)-4d(cue)-5c(cue)-5h(HA)-6d(D cont)-6h(HK)
-7s.
even that 6h can be 7sp too.
btw, if u do want to add a convention , u can use 4c as void rkc.
so 4c is to ask rkc except club suit.
1nt-2h-2s-4c-4s(2kc without sq) -5h(asking heartsuit) - 7s( have HKQ, so ...) |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 13 I would bid 4C with C support. Although some partnership may play 4C
as RKC, I think it's more important to show partner your C support and
grandslam in C is still possible:
S- HAxx DAKQTxxx CKxx
vs:
SKJxx HQxx D- CAQJxxx
a good bidding sequence would be:
1D 2C
3D 3N
4C 4D(kick back RKC)
5S(sp void, odd number of KC) 7C
Here, I'd ratner play 4D after 3NT as a very strong slam try, partner should
usually bid 4H to check KC, something like: Sx HAKx DAKQJxxx Cxx
4H/4S still are natural and forcing, |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 14
you need some gadget here. If you play 2C 2D 2N 3C 3S 4NT as invitational,
you need to play 4H over 4S to set up spade as trumps and ask for RKC(opener
can bid 4S with a minimum hand which is sign off).
so it may go like:
p 2C
2D 2N
3S 4H
4N(1 or 4 RKC) 5C(Q?)
5D(yes, and DK) 6D(do you have DQ?)
7S(yes)
yes, 3S is better than 2S, with 6-4 shape and no wastage, gotta bid one level
higher.
3D over the double might be better. Over 1S, the double should be a little
bit more serious than the double |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 15 well, if you play take out double here, you still may get too
high, suppose partner holds 3-5-3-2 shape, and no points, he will be
forced to bid either 3H or 3S which can cause you a big trouble because
it may get chopped. You often can't tell
whether a cuebid shows first round or second round control, usually
you just ask RKC to clearify it. However, there are some rare situations
that you can't RKC because of your voids like this one, here, you need
to apply a lot of logical thinking at cuebid |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 16 If you think you have a reasonable chance to mkae 6H if partner holds
5 hearts, then 3S might not be a good choice cause it then becomes
an underbid. Instead, you can start from 3C here:
1D 1H
3C 3D
4H(suppose you are not playing kickback rkc)
Now partner knows that you hold exact 0-4-5-4 shape and super maximum,
thus it's possible to move on after 4H.
For those who play kickback rkc, you just can't bid this way. |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 17 Yeah you are certainly right. I've seen enough of these, too.
Perhaps in this situation, and in future similar situations, when pd shows
some 5-4-3-1 shape (could be 5-4-4-0, but only guranteed 5-4-3-1 shape), and
strong slam interest, while the responder has denied interests in either of
the 1st two suits, it makes sense to play voluntary kickback RKC response.
Therefore, say partner's last bid is 4X, then 4X+1: signoff, still no
interest, hoping to signoff at 4N; anything else, RKC response as |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 18 It is quite easy start from 1C.
1C 1D
1H(usually 4H +5C except 4-4-1-4) 3C(4 clubs, gf, slam interest)
3S(S honor, cuebid) 4D(RKC)
4N(two no Q) 5D(all KC confirmed, inviting cuebids)
5H(HK) 7C
Front 1NT. Suppose you play minor suit stayman.
1N 2S
3C 4D(RKC)
4N(two) 5D(all KC)
5H(HK) 5N(DK)
7C |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 19 There are just many of them
For example: AJxxx xxx Qxx xx, facing a normal club lead and H Q is likely
to be off, you most likely don't want to play 6H (The 5C bidder can easily
hold xx - AJxx KQJTxxx, shoot 5C and hope to be lucky). There are 3 very
important cards for this hand, SA, HQ and (SJ or 5 spades). A bad 2S wouldn'
t offer you all of them and you will be likely down in 6H. Also, if partner
holds all of them, he would accept your slam invitation. If partner's hand
is weaker, he would r... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 20 Let me make it clear, the whole bidding sequence doesn't make much sense.
After 2C, suppose 2C p 2D 2H 2S p 3C is nonforcing. 3H can be the only gf
bid.
So 3NT is to play, not serious or nonserious slam try, because if 3H shows a
gf spade raise, then you bid 3NT to show some serious slam interest,
partner bids 4S to sign off, there is no way for you to bid 4NT, because you
should just bid 4NT right away in that case.
Now after a natural 3NT, 4S shows mild slam interest in S. 4NT is RKC, 5D
shows... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 21 3H as a splinter, slam can be good if partner holds a very minimum hand like
Qx Axx Axxxxx xx
Here, after the 3H, players should have agreement on 3S. My suggestion is a
cuebid because your splinter is not looking for a major fit so your splinter
often shows 4 spades.
Suppose partner bids 3NT, you can either pass or bid 5D. I think both bids
are very close. If partner bids 3S as a cuebid, you can RKC.
If partner bid 4D to deny 3NT and a control in S/C, you can cuebid 5C to
show SK and C control.... 阅读全帖 |
|
g****o
发帖数: 1284 | 22 那用我最心爱的人工系统海盗梅花试试：
北开叫：
1S - 1NT
2D - 2H
2NT - 3C
3S - 4C
4NT - 7H
1S = 11-15，5+S
1NT = GF
2D = 11-13, with 4+minor
2H = relay
2NT = 4D
3C = relay
3S = 5-3-4-1 shape
4C = RKC with S as trump
4NT = 2 key cards with SQ
7H = This is all I need. Even partner has no other side K, we can still
make 7 since dummy can ruff two clubs.
南开叫：
1C - 1S
1NT - 3D
3H - 4C
4H - 5D
7H
1C = 16+
1S = 5+S, 8+HP
1NT = relay
3D = 5S + 4D, 12+HCP
3H = relay
4C = 5-3-4-1 shape... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 23 If you had a hand that you intended to invite in hearts (plan to bid 1S then
3H), you can bid 4H after 3D. This is a value-showing bid.
The main point is, after jump-shift (which consumes space), you need a
waiting bid like 3H. It is ambiguous, but it makes other bids more defined.
1H-1S-3D, you have:
3S = natural, often 6+ or 5 good ones
3NT = soft value on S and C
4C = cuebid for diamonds
4D = diamond raise but not suitable for 4C cuebid
4H = limit raise in hearts
4NT = RKC in hearts (to RKC i... 阅读全帖 |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 24 That sounds a good approach, with the help of some gadgets.
The design after RKC doesn't sound very normal to me in terms of captainship
. The responder here is captain, but after RKC, he starts to describe his
holding, rather than keeps asking.
1H 1S
2D 3H
3S 4C
4D 4S
4NT ?
5C ask HQ
5H sign off
5D/5NT show D/S queen according to the design at this sequence. Could it be
designed as asking rather than showing? Apparently, this will also change
the meaning of 5S.
knows
standard |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 25 That sounds a good approach, with the help of some gadgets.
The design after RKC doesn't sound very normal to me in terms of captainship
. The responder here is captain, but after RKC, he starts to describe his
holding, rather than keeps asking.
1H 1S
2D 3H
3S 4C
4D 4S
4NT ?
5C ask HQ
5H sign off
5D/5NT show D/S queen according to the design at this sequence. Could it be
designed as asking rather than showing? Apparently, this will also change
the meaning of 5S.
knows
standard |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 26 A
AKQ42
A3
AKT82
Kx
Txxxx
QT9x
xx
2C 2D
2H (can be 4) 3D(4+ H, extra)
3S(cue) 3N(minimum in my range)
4C(cue) 4H(no choice)
4S(RKC) 5C(0 3)
6C(we have all the KC and I have CK) 6D(DQ)
6H(sign off, DQ isn't useful, perhaps can raise 6H to 7H) 6S(SK and I do
have some extra for you)
6N(really no bid!) 7H (5th H, doubleton in C, gotta bid 7)
Standard 2/1 treatment:
2C 2D(gf waiting)
2H 3H
3S 3N (nonserious slam interest)
4C 4H (no cuebids)
4S (RKC) 5C
6C (CK) 6D(DQ)
6H (sign off) 6S(SK)
6N sign off... 阅读全帖 |
|
c******t
发帖数: 1733 | 27 他那是GS swing, gs swing 是snatch的辅助动作，有些high pull在里面，可以直接转
化成snatch.你看他们膝盖动了，实际还是hip drive, 但用了一些trap. 而且，hip 已
经不是hinge了，整个动作更像1/4 squat, 中间有两个dip,和snatch和jerk一脉相承。
现在RKC也改了他们的要点，接受膝盖动一些。以前RKC的口号是efficient training,
说GS是efficient lifting。意思是说gs要点是高效，节省体能，更适合比赛。而他们
利用high tension， 尽量浪费精力，所以训练更有效果。其实你仔细想想gs训练效果
更好，因为它同样时间可以lift更多的重量，更多的reps， 作更多的功，当然效果更
好。比如跑步，你不能说你的技术不好，更费力气，你的锻炼效果更好一样。
我自己的感觉，hard style更适合初学者，很多理念可以直接从power lifting 中
carry over。 而gs 是职业运动员的，没有基础是很难做到的。GS讲究的高效，韵律，
自然，弄不好就会变成sloppy,... 阅读全帖 |
|
c******t
发帖数: 1733 | 28 他那是GS swing, gs swing 是snatch的辅助动作，有些high pull在里面，可以直接转
化成snatch.你看他们膝盖动了，实际还是hip drive, 但用了一些trap. 而且，hip 已
经不是hinge了，整个动作更像1/4 squat, 中间有两个dip,和snatch和jerk一脉相承。
现在RKC也改了他们的要点，接受膝盖动一些。以前RKC的口号是efficient training,
说GS是efficient lifting。意思是说gs要点是高效，节省体能，更适合比赛。而他们
利用high tension， 尽量浪费精力，所以训练更有效果。其实你仔细想想gs训练效果
更好，因为它同样时间可以lift更多的重量，更多的reps， 作更多的功，当然效果更
好。比如跑步，你不能说你的技术不好，更费力气，你的锻炼效果更好一样。
我自己的感觉，hard style更适合初学者，很多理念可以直接从power lifting 中
carry over。 而gs 是职业运动员的，没有基础是很难做到的。GS讲究的高效，韵律，
自然，弄不好就会变成sloppy,... 阅读全帖 |
|
S*********g
发帖数: 24893 | 29 【 以下文字转载自 Stock 讨论区 】
发信人: StephenKing (金博士), 信区: Stock
标 题: 市面上流通1358种电子货币，包括ByteCoin
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Dec 15 00:59:47 2017, 美东)
# Name Symbol Market Cap Price Circulating Supply Volume (
24h) % 1h % 24h % 7d
1
Bitcoin BTC $290,617,804,480 $17,358.40 16,742,200 $15,
825,500,000 -0.36% 5.62% 3.15%
2
Ethereum ETH $63,827,563,522 $662.47 96,348,146 $3,723,
910,000 -0.48% -10.50% 52.62%
3
Bitc... 阅读全帖 |
|
S*********g
发帖数: 24893 | 30 【 以下文字转载自 Stock 讨论区 】
发信人: StephenKing (金博士), 信区: Stock
标 题: 市面上流通1358种电子货币，包括ByteCoin
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Dec 15 00:59:47 2017, 美东)
# Name Symbol Market Cap Price Circulating Supply Volume (
24h) % 1h % 24h % 7d
1
Bitcoin BTC $290,617,804,480 $17,358.40 16,742,200 $15,
825,500,000 -0.36% 5.62% 3.15%
2
Ethereum ETH $63,827,563,522 $662.47 96,348,146 $3,723,
910,000 -0.48% -10.50% 52.62%
3
Bitc... 阅读全帖 |
|
S*********g
发帖数: 24893 | 31 # Name Symbol Market Cap Price Circulating Supply Volume (
24h) % 1h % 24h % 7d
1
Bitcoin BTC $290,617,804,480 $17,358.40 16,742,200 $15,
825,500,000 -0.36% 5.62% 3.15%
2
Ethereum ETH $63,827,563,522 $662.47 96,348,146 $3,723,
910,000 -0.48% -10.50% 52.62%
3
Bitcoin Cash BCH $29,779,262,625 $1,766.66 16,856,250 $2
,532,880,000 -1.05% -5.14% 21.33%
4
Ripple ... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 32 1d - 1s
3h - 4c ( 3h splinter, 4c cue)
4d - 4s
4nt - 5c ( 4nt asks RKC, 5c 1 or 4 key card )
5d - 5s ( 5d asks Sq, no sq)
6d - 6h ( 6d asks dia support, no support)
6s - pass |
|
p*****e
发帖数: 989 | 33 DUH! use your logic, how do you know 5c is RKC? what about standard BW?
5c all the aces?????
even if you had a Key card, THAT MEANS 5C WILL GO DOWN?
DUH!!!! |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 34 "wimptb (一失足成千古wimp),
IMP.
3C was supposed to be 2nd suit, natural. 4C is ace asking, 4S shows 2A; 4NT
was to play. "
read the series of article carefully please.
4C: RKC, 4S showing 2Aces. 4NT sign off.
why opp sign off when his pd shows 2 aces?
if your pd has an ace and a void in club, how can't he double the final 6H
as a lightner double? |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 35
3H waiting to see if pd had some S support. Since LHO bid C, it's better to
play from yourside so you might as well hide D support for now. Partner can
bid 3S to show support, or 3N to show C stopper, after which you can still
show D support. At some point you want to launch the keycard, as all you are
interested in is his number of keycards.
If desperately need a favorable swing, can try the effect of 5C, exclusive RKC
in D with C void, if partner showed 4, they 7S might be a good spot.
3NT wa |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 36 You bid to 6D uncontested with this hand
AK9x
x
K86
A9xxx
J6xx
KJx
AQT97
K
(bidding was
1C-1D
1S-2H(GF)
3D-3S
4C-4D
4N(RKC)-5D
5H-6C(DQ+CK)
6D)
LHO led HA and continues a H, RHO plays low H, and your J wins (you pitch a S
from dummy). How do you proceed? |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 37 1H 1S
2C 3H(limited raise)
4C(cue) 4D(cooperative cue)
4H(wasted value in D) P
or if stretched a bit
1H 1S
2C 3H(limited raise)
4C 4S(cue)
4N(RKC) 5C(1430, 1 key)
5D(HQ?) 5H(not really)
P
will |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 38 1H 1S
3C 3H
3S 4C
4N(two suit RKC) 5C(1 or 4 KC)
5D(Q?) 5S(one queen)
6C(which Q?) 6D(HQ)
6H
here, HQJ are both big cards, so 3H is reasonable I believe.
4C shows a filler card, not neccessarily to be control. |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 39 hehehe, I was wondering how they got 44imp in 8 hands that night:-)
I saw Fred was at the 3rd position, and I was at the fourth with a random
parnter.
The last hand that night, my partner opened a first postion 3c with a 6-digit
telephone number and played -2, while our 3H was cold. I couldn't complain
because earlier he launched a RKC with a side suit wide open and we scored the
slam :-). Luck was on :-)
don't |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 40 p p 1C 2C
p 2N p 3H(better hearts, good hand)
p 4C(cue) p 4D(cue)
p 4H p 4S(RKC)
p 4N(1 or 4) p 6H. |
|
f*o
发帖数: 168 | 41 after rkc, 5c/5d may show 3 key cards
how to continue to ask for trump q and side k?
me pard
1s 2h
3d 3s
4n 5d (3 key cards, we play 1430)
5h 5s
6s
my 5h was to ask trunp q and side K
here are the hands:
me
A J 10 x x
K J
A Q 10 9 x
x
Pard
K 9 x
A Q 10 9 x x
x
A x x
神话有两种
1）神话
2）和平崛起 |
|
j*******e
发帖数: 2168 | 42 en, ought 4S be rkc voidwood with a void in spades?
If nothing else, it moves beyond 3NT on the strength of just opener's 3D bid,
which I am not sure is right.
and
last
see,
cuebidding
real
will
But
once
down
s,shortening ur
在
2nd
suit.
in
opportunity to
spot |
|
|
x***e
发帖数: 2449 | 44
2nt - 3s (tranfer)
4c - 4nt (RKC 1403)
5H (2-5) - 7nt
or
1D, 2c
2nt, 3c
3h, 3nt
4c, 4h
4s, 5s
7nt |
|
o*******n
发帖数: 6500 | 45 扣叫显示方块支持而已，不表示s的东西，挺standard的
同时也有询问黑桃止张的意味，当然这里不是这个意思
(如果s有黑桃stopper，且没有满贯意图，就应该停在3nt)
这个5c不同的约定，含义不同，
偶一般用来做exclusive rkc用 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 46 2C 2S
3C 3S (nautral)
3N(natural) 4C(natural)
4H(cuebid, 4D is RKC, so have to bid 4H here) 5C (sign off, no SA)
5D(cue, grandslam interest) 5H (H control)
5N(grandslam interest, sp void) 7C(gotta bid it). |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 47 if you play 4nt as rkc, it can go like this:
2C 2S
3C 3S
3N 4C
4D 4H
5N(asking for trumps) 7C(one honor) |
|
v*******e
发帖数: 3714 | 48 dont like 3S... I suggest:
1c 1s
2d 2s
3d 4c
5s(rkc without s) 5nt(1)
7c - |
|
c*****u
发帖数: 18 | 49 =========================bidding============
West North East South
1nt
- 4c* - 4s
- 4nt** - 5c***
- 5d****- ?(6s? )
*shows c singleton and both majors
**rkc for s
***1 or 4 kc
****ask for sQ
? how to bid
====================hand====================
North
S:AKJ84
H:QJ987
D:A3
C:J
West East
S: S:
H: H:
D: D:
C: C:
South
S:Q75
H:A3
D:KQJ6
C:K643 |
|
b****s
发帖数: 472 | 50 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
CindyWu (心然) 于 (Sat Apr 14 21:10:38 2007) 提到:
=========================bidding============
West North East South
1nt
- 4c* - 4s
- 4nt** - 5c***
- 5d****- ?(6s? )
*shows c singleton and both majors
**rkc for s
***1 or 4 kc
****ask for sQ
? how to bid
====================hand====================
North
S:AKJ84
H:QJ987
D:A3
C:J
West East
S: S:
H: H:
D: D:
C: C:
South
S:Q75
H:A3
D:KQJ6
C:K643
☆─────────────────────────── |
|
