|
发帖数: 1 | 2 http://www.cnn.com/2018/08/30/us/baltimore-police-detective-sean-suiter-wife/index.html
"[I] will not go on allowing anybody to shame my husband's name and
ruin his
legacy with these false allegations of suicide," she told CNN
affiliate
WMAR.
The detective was in "good spirits" on the day of his death,
Nicole Suiter
said.
"Based on the fact that no one knew my husband better than I, I will
not
accept the untimely death of Sean as nothing other than a murder, which is
being covered up for reasons... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 3 the point is that
with 5-5 two suiters you can seldom commit to 5 level.
Because for 5-5 two suiters, the offensive value usually isn't enough,
unless it's very pure:
I'd bid 4NT with this hand: Sx HAKQxx DKQJxx CKx, because it's pure.
for 6-5 two suiters, it's usually pure:)
sometimes, I belive you can bid 4NT with 5-4 two suiters when white:
Sx HKQJTx DAKJx Cxxx, this hand looks very pure, I don't mind
to five level with such a hand when white.
The basic idea is the ODR, if ODR is very high, |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 4
the reason for Michaels is that bridge is a major suit oriented game.
Playing strength is not only dependent upon 5-5 or 5-4, it is also dependent
upton HCP and quick tricks. ODR for 5-4 is lower than 5-5. However,
pure 5-4 two suiter should have higher ODR than not pure 5-5 two suiters.
So we normally michaels with pure two suiters and double if we have
not so concerntrated value in both majors:
I'd double with something like this: SJxxxx HAxxx DAx CAK, but bid 2C
with SKQxxx HAQJx Dxx CKx for |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 5 because you haven't understood the structure of my system, I bet you've
never read my relay sequences and examples carefully. If you still
play 2NT to show balanced hands, there is no point to make this treatment,
2NT to be natural has been proved to be a bad idea because it takes
up a lot of bidding spaces. How do you bid pure 5-5 two suiters,
normal 5-5 two suiters, normal 5-4 two suiters over such a jump? There is
no way to distinguish all of them. The basic idea of my structure is
to set up |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 6 If partner never passes the double, double certainly looks good. If partner
passes double with 4 or sometimes even 3, you are in serious trouble.
For example, partner may hold a very normal looking AQJxx x ATxx Qxx, it's
almost impossible to beat 2D double and very often, they make an overtrick
without any games on. This is a major disaster you should try to avoid IMO.
In some sense, the takeout double can never be based on too much shape and
too little defensive values. That's also why one sho... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 7 this is tough, usually it's not easy to handle two suiters if you open
1C, perhaps precision players should have the agreement that 4D cuebid show
this hand type.
If you bid 4H, you may miss cold 5C if partner holds something like this:
SKQxxx HQx DKx CJxxx, 5C would be cold, 4H may go down 1 if H 4-2 splits.
However, if you play 4D to show this kind of two suiters, you wouldn't be
able to show slam interest in spades. That's also a huge drawback.
If your overall strength is strong, I believe it |
|
t****g
发帖数: 715 | 8 我有suiter. 你把suiter放箱子里还是手提着登机的阿？ |
|
|
g****e
发帖数: 1426 | 10 From Yahoo MB:
http://finance.yahoo.com/mb/PATH/#mbt=Listen%2520to%2520Safe%25
Listen to Safeguard Sciences webcast of the earning report, Nupathe talked
about.So what will you find when listening the Safegaurd sciences quartly
report?
1. That they now own 17% of Nupathe.
2. That they still have the Nupathe warents at $2/share. Which indicates
they think this is worth much more
3. That someone offered to buy one of the companies they represent but the
offer was to low and the suiter has since co... 阅读全帖 |
|
c********e
发帖数: 147 | 11 （与三位代表核实，辩论会详情如下：）
3月8日星期四下午2：30～4：50，支持新章程的三位FACSS执委代表（主席戴孜然
等三人），反对新章程的三位会员代表，一位中立代表，以及明大Student Unions/
Activity Coordinator （简称SUA，负责指导监督社团活动的校监）Marissa Suiter在
SUA办公室（Coffman Union 126房间）对新章程产生过程是否合法，条款是否合理进行
了讨论。学校及双方代表达成的结论如下：
1. 此前，执委会部分人员未经规定流程，私自修改宪章，在中国同学内部未达成
一致前，擅自递交学校并向校方和同学隐瞒情况，是违反FACSS宪章和学校社团管理规
定的。需要召开会员大会，由FACSS广大会员投票表决新章程的有效性。
2. 执委会应于近日向所有会员公开原有章程，和新章程（SUA也可以查到，在
coffman 126 房间），至少三周后，交由FACSS（CSSA）会员大会投票决定，由全体会
员平等投票决定是否采用。学校SUA管理人员作为独立第三方到场监督。
3. 为保证投票公... 阅读全帖 |
|
c********e
发帖数: 147 | 12 （与三位代表核实，辩论会详情如下：）
3月8日星期四下午2：30～4：50，支持新章程的三位FACSS执委代表（主席戴孜然
等三人），反对新章程的三位会员代表，一位中立代表，以及明大Student Unions/
Activity Coordinator （简称SUA，负责指导监督社团活动的校监）Marissa Suiter在
SUA办公室（Coffman Union 126房间）对新章程产生过程是否合法，条款是否合理进行
了讨论。学校及双方代表达成的结论如下：
1. 此前，执委会部分人员未经规定流程，私自修改宪章，在中国同学内部未达成
一致前，擅自递交学校并向校方和同学隐瞒情况，是违反FACSS宪章和学校社团管理规
定的。需要召开会员大会，由FACSS广大会员投票表决新章程的有效性。
2. 执委会应于近日向所有会员公开原有章程，和新章程（SUA也可以查到，在
coffman 126 房间），至少三周后，交由FACSS（CSSA）会员大会投票决定，由全体会
员平等投票决定是否采用。学校SUA管理人员作为独立第三方到场监督。
3. 为保证投票... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
N**s
发帖数: 56 | 14 =================Quote=====================
Hello,
The results of the Chinese Students & Scholars (CSSA) election held from
August
7-August 8 are as follows:
258 of the 698 eligible voters participated in this election. (36.96%)
President
Eric William Kaler-1 of 255 (0.3922%)
Tianran Chen-12 of 255 (4.706%)
Qiang Xiong-1 of 255 (0.3922%)
Man Liang-1 of 255 (0.3922%)
Tao (Emily) Qu-149 of 255 (58.43%)
Yao Meng-1 of 255 (0.3922%)
Cheng Peng-90 of 255 (35.29%)
Vice President
Chaoyun Bao-132 of 242 ... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 15 try 4NT after that double,
which shows a two suiter and asks pd to bid his lowest suit.
so you may get to 5H. Your pd's double was a sensitive bid,
but it needs ur cooperate:).
still I can't say 4H after 3sp was totally wrong.
Some aggressive players may try it. |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 16 * Rebidding considerations
In many cases, what to open is dictated by rebidding
considerations.
This problem is especially obvious when you hold a 2-suiter,
while you expect to bid your 2nd suit on next turn, reality
often forbids you to do so.
Say, if you have S-C minimum to medium, and open 1S, you'll
be end-bid if partner responds 2D. You can't bid 3C and
rebidding S may be a distortion of your hand.
Generally if you have 2-majors or 2 minors you are less
concerned. If you have:
* S-D, H-D, r |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 17
A natural 2H is not my choice here. Double looks ugly, but has tons of
advantage over 2H.
1. If some heart contract is the best point, Double will work too.
2. If pd has a stack of spades, double works but 2H sucks.
3. If pd has to go back to diamond with no other good option, 2H will
push you to 3 level, double leaves 2 level open.
You do fear that pd will hang you in clubs, don't you?
Well, if he responds with 2C, you have 2D to imply a D+H two-suiter.
3C?? that can almost never happen, co |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 18
That's not a good way to bid. One should always bid to play. Imagining
what the best hand, average hand and worst hand partner can provide is always
a good guide for player's high level judgement.
I would rather play it to show solid diamond suit in 2/1 gf structure.
this is not true. the minimum for a jump rebid can be only 14,
DAKQJTx SAxx Hxxx Cx is enough.
This is usually true, but there are still some exceptions when you hold
7-4 two suiter, it's always right to bid the solid 7 card suit f |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 19 double. 4NT isn't clear here.
double is card showing and take out oriented.
I usually bid 4NT with 6-5 two suiters. |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 20 The problem is that you may open 1 level with many strong hands:
SQxxx Hx DAKQJ CAKQx, 1D is the only opening that makes sense.
1D 1H
2S 2N
3N: 3NT is wrong sided when pd has Sx HAxxx Dxxx Cxxxx
or 6C can be cold here when 3NT has no play when pd has Sx HAxxx Dxxx Cxxxxx
SAKxx Hx DAJxxx CAKQ
similiar,
2C could be bad because you have no way how to show this 3.5 suiter hand
after 2C opening.
1D 1H
2S 2NT
3NT ?
6C can be cold against: Sxx HAxxx Dxxxxx Cxx, but should partner pull 3NT
to 4D?
So I |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 21 the point is that for single suit strong hands,
you would always have rebidding problems if you open one level,
because the basic framework in bridge bidding is that:
new suit forcing, not rebidding your own suit forcing.
So no matter how hard you try, you would always have rebidding problems.
You may argue that you can survive it. However, if you often jump to
3C with doubleton or singleton, your partner would never be able to
raise you. next time, when you have a real two suiter hand, you woul |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 22
value,
To bid or not to bid here is a matter of total tricks. Since pd
didn't raise your clubs, his two suiters are probably Hearts and Dimonds. It's
reasonable to assuem opps have 9 spades and your side
has 8 or 9 diamonds. That gives a total tricks 17 or 18.
Suppose they can make 4S, that means 5DX can take 7 or 8 tricks in
your side. off 3 is not bad, but off 4 is no good at all.
Which way you should go? Because the misfit in sidesuit(hearts) and
you have only 3 trumps, you should make a neg |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 23 IMP red vs white
holding
S Q
H KQ103
D AQ9
C J10863
your pd deals and passes, RHO opens 1S. Your hand is
simple enough for a takeout double. LHO jumps to 4S and wants
to play there, but your pd shows his strong discontentment by covering it with
4NT.
That's two suiters, you choose 5C and pd corrects to 5D. Opps
keep silent. Now it's your turn again, what are you going to do? |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 24 Originally negative double was designed to show hands where you cannot
conveniently show the other 2 suits, or, in most cases, the other major. It is
not designed to show a two suiter with arbitrary strength, in particularly,
not a super strong hand, unless you play negative free bid.
In addition, be on the lookout to make a negative double when you hold a void
in opponent's suit.
In the first case, your negative double is marginal: you do have 5 hearts, and
x would lost 5-3 H fit, and in many c |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 25 As dealer, you hold:
S: X
H: JT98XX
D: --
C: AKQT98
(1) What do you bid?
(2) Suppose you open 1H, opp keep silence during the auction. auction goes:
1H-2D-2H-2S-2N-3H-?
what do you bid now? Do you try H slam? Do you worry about the suit quality? |
|
g********d
发帖数: 89 | 26 I will not try H slam, and bid 4H now.
p do not have 3 heart support, even 2 is not sure, since he do not raise your
2h
directly, he maybe have a singlton honor. even with Ax trump, you probably
had
to lose one or two trump tricks. you sure need p have spade A.
also, p's point kind of wasted in dia. p's club will be short, only on a good
day, you may play club without lose a trick. (p's spade, dia or ruff can not
get rid of your
3 clubs, and finess club is short of dummy's club, trump finess on |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 27 u may go to www.bridgebase.com/forum to find out other's opinion. I apparently
made some mistakes in bidding this hand. The more important question about
this hand is whether I should open 1h or 1c.【 在 gowithwind (小鬼) 的大作中提
到: 】
your
good
good
goes:
quality? |
|
l*********r
发帖数: 65 | 28 I admire the sequence of
1C 1D
1H 1S
2H
But I do not strongly object
1H 2D
2H 2S
3C(and plan to rebid clubs if possible)
The 2NT in the sequence you provided is sin.
I do not think the heart suit is "poor", as some BBO guys suggested.
The distinction between good/poor suit is the context, not the number
of honors you hold. You have solid spots in hearts. It isn't bad.
However, opening 1C doesn't mean you consider the heart suit is
poor. The reason is the huge differenc of the strength in the |
|
j*****h
发帖数: 61 | 29 What hells is that 2NT?
? ? flytoox (workinghard) ??????: ? |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 30 Pd's hand is
S: AJTX
H: KX
D: XX
C: KQTXX
I BID 5D AFTER RHO'S 3H, THEN PD BID 6N, LHO HAS DIAMOND QXXX BEHIND, AND WE
HAVE TO COLLECT 8 TRICKS AND CONCEDE THE REST.
4D seems the best bid. Pd will bid 4N or 5C.
The moral learn this time is that I still cant give up club. Actually, after
4D overcall, there is a clue that i have club fit. I didnt dbl, so denies
spade, i didnt pass, so heart should be short. 5D should show a single suit.
Perhaps we should regard 74 as two suiters. 【 在 josephine (jo |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 31 My principle is when having a self-sufficient 7 card suit,
just forget about showing the 4 card side suit.
Most of the time, 7-4 is a ONE suiter hand,
IMHO it's silly to look for a 4-4 fit when holding a 7
card suit.
So an unusual NT overcall is out of the question, even
though it might have worked well here.
5D was exaggerated, you need partner having something to
cover your side loser even you don't worry about trump at all.
6N over 5D is a little bit overbidded but understandable.
到:
diamon |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 32 3D is a really an appalling bid, IMHO,
if 2D is natural, then bid 2D is much better.
Is it forcing? this question is just dumb. If it get passed out,
then you can just quit bridge, and go buy lottery, because you will
hit the jackpot for sure.
What you should be concerned when holding a strong 2 suiter is whether
you have the opportunity to fully describe your hand. So try to make your
first bid as low as possible, the lower it is, the more improbable it will
be passed out.
Actually you can try |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 33 it's a marginal hand with wild distributions, over a heavy preempt,
why can't you guys accept that it's OK to miss a slam? At least you
found the right suit, congratulations!
Still, bridge is not an accurate science and 6-4 two suiters
are always hard to bid. I think those who found 6C are great, those
who found 5C are not to blame as well. Over 4S cuebid, north's hand
is still not clear to bid 6C, because his partner may have
SKQ Hxx DAKQTx CQJxx, this is a hand enough for a cuebid, right?
Do y |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 34 It's probably OK to make a takeout double over 3S and correct partner's 4D
to 4H. I think pass shows either balanced minimum hands or penalty oriented
hands. So now, over partner's 4C, you can raise it to 5C and it's still
upto partner's judgement to bid the slam. So 4C over 3S
can show 5-5 two suiters and some extra value. Also, double is more felxible,
if partner passes, you don't regret at all; if partner bids 3NT, you have
a hard time, and perhaps you'd play there or pull to 4H, they are clo |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 35
SJS is not right for this hand anyway, it's a 6-4 two suiter.
obviously east's 4S is a huge underbid. The right bid is 4D over 4C as
a cuebid. When one holds only 3 losers and partner made a extra showing
bid(4C) after opened the hand, 4S is just a crime.
West's 4S is rather bad, he should bid 4H as a cuebid and partner would
cooperate for sure.
4H is bad, 4H rebids show a weaker hand here. |
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 36 With expert PD but no many agreements.
1.Both nv
South:
TX
Q87X
QTXX
ATX
E S W N
1D / 3D 4D*
/ 4H / 4S!
/ ?
I don't really understand what 4D means. Perhaps Strong Majors or two-
suiters.
2.Vul v nv
South
T
AK7X
J8X
AKT8X
E S W N
/
/ 1C / 1S
/ 2H / 3C=FG
/ 3D?/ 3H
/ 4C?
Maybe my reverse is a overbid. After 3C, my 3D shows almost 1435, pd's 3H
means 3 card H. I want pd to pass or bid 4H if he has H honor. Is 4C here
forcing?
Should I bid 3NT directly after 3C or 3H? |
|
v*******e
发帖数: 3714 | 37
With expert PD but no many agreements.
1.Both nv
South:
TX
Q87X
QTXX
ATX
E S W N
1D / 3D 4D*
/ 4H / 4S!
/ ?
I don't really understand what 4D means. Perhaps Strong Majors or two-
suiters.
4D应该是双高花，并且很明显同伴D缺门。4S很可能又变成单套黑心，理解成你同伴抓
了近乎2C开叫的黑心好牌。你
只管报控制就可以，5C应一口，这反正也是你的全部实力所在了，所以没有任何后顾之
忧。同伴叫5H 5S 6S都停。
2.Vul v nv
South
T
AK7X
J8X
AKT8X
E S W N
/
/ 1C / 1S
/ 2H / 3C=FG
/ 3D?/ 3H
/ 4C?
Maybe my reverse is a overbid. After 3C, my 3D shows almost 1435, pd's 3H
means 3 card H. |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 38 In your first round, you should bid 3S to show 6-6 two suiter. I don't buy
the western cue nonsense. In my 20 years' bridge experience, I never hold a
hand that justifies a 3S cuebid and I have no other way to show this hand. |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 39 In your 20 years'bridge experience, how many times did you hold 6-6 two-
suiter? :-) |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 40 Well, I think the major difference between 2S and 1 S is not only HCP, but
the suit length and the quality. Double doesn't guarantee 4 spades, so 1S
can be bid with 10 HCPs and a bad 4 card spade suit (for example: Jxxx Kxx
AQJ xxx). 2S should always show good spades, about 8-10 HCPs (can be lower
if you hold 5+ spades). Here, partner denies a good hand, because with a
good hand, he can just bid 4C over 3H. So Axxxx xxx Axxx x is just
impossible (also, I don't mind a 3S with this hand, because i... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 41 Double is very wrong. The correct bid is pass.
Here, there are two groups. One is to bid 3H over the double as gameforcing.
For that group, 5C is an impossible bid, because you can bid 4C with strong
5-5 in S/C. 3H with gf H hands.
For the other group, 3H is nonforcing. So with very strong hands, opener has
to either bid 4H or cuebid first.
Therefore, 5C is ERKC here, because there is no hand that should first cue
3D then jump to 5C with real C. With a very strong 5-5 two suiter, 4C is
still a v... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 42 suppose you hold QJxxx xx KJTxx x, you lead D instead of C?
A failure of leading C is a strong indication here.
For this hand, it doesn't make much sense to hide your C singleton after you
show S-D two suiter. Once you show 2 H, declarer would know you have only
one C.
C lead works when partner holds CA or HA and it is very unlikely to cost you
a trick.
is |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 43 It is usually a good idea to bid 4D instead of 4S to show a very important
side suit. Later, you can easily pass 5H to defend. 4S should show a one
suiter usually. |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 44 Well, my suggestion to most novice to intermediate players is to play a new
suit at 3 level as at least one round forcing facing partner's 2NT bid. Of
course you can construct hands that have good plays in 3D and no play in 2NT
. However, the basic goal of bridge bidding is to find the correct game, not
to sign off. If you play 3D as sign off, you may have huge problems to
handle H-D two suiters with gf to slam values.
very |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 45 folks, calm down. Having differences in opinion shouldn't be the end of the
world, not even the friendships.
This sequence is somewhat analogus to the following (although you may
disagree) with no interference:
1NT 2D/H
2H/S 3m
in which responder showed 2 suiter, a major and a minor. This is gf, but I
don't think there is a general consensus on slam interest -- some may just
bidding this with 11HCP and 5-4.
In such situations, unless I have special agreement with pd about the
serious slam intere... 阅读全帖 |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 46 4D forcing is not convincing, there are just too many hands with strong
diamond support fall below that line.
I think a simple 3S will get you to the right strain. Your partner, if s/he
is of reasonable caliber, would bid 4H.
Because it is wrong to double with a strong one suiter at this level, you
partner would have drawn inference that double already suggested more than
one strain.
almost
is
it |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 47 Responding 2C over 1D with 4-4 in S and C creates a basic bridge problem. It
violates the basic bridge bidding principle: Bidding your 4-4 two suiters
up the line.
This principle is important in many areas. It would clearly show your shape
and if you don't bid them up the line, the higher suit bid shows a longer
length.
If you bid 2C first then show your S later, partner would always take you
for 5+C and 4+S. This shape distortion can be very costly in slam bidding.
For example, suppose your par... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 48 So what do you do with H-D two-suiter (say 5-6 shape) and weakish hand? |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 49 Often you just can't really be the captain after the first round of RKC,
which is especially true in grand slam decisions. In many situations, grand
slams are bid by collaborations. So it's more like a covalent bonding,
instead of ionic bonding. Everybody need to contribute some information to
reach the final decision. Captain types of bidding actually happens less
frequently in bidding. It is good in some shapely two suiters, where side
suit honors or shortness are important. For example, suppo... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 50 Often you just can't really be the captain after the first round of RKC,
which is especially true in grand slam decisions. In many situations, grand
slams are bid by collaborations. So it's more like a covalent bonding,
instead of ionic bonding. Everybody need to contribute some information to
reach the final decision. Captain types of bidding actually happens less
frequently in bidding. It is good in some shapely two suiters, where side
suit honors or shortness are important. For example, suppo... 阅读全帖 |
|
