s**i
发帖数: 93 | 1 今天看了一下 center points 有两点：
1。Truhlar 的 MCMM 和他的EVB本质是一样的
2。Truhlar 的工作用错了参数，尽管事后出了erratum，但是warshel 仍然认为：
the authors still seem to pass the blame for not having correctly reproduced
the EVB potential of ref 17 to us
Adopt |
|
c******x
发帖数: 67 | 2 Truhlar的一些同行就不喜欢他的工作，私下里把他开发的泛函贬得一钱不值。原因很
多人都知道。有些东西无法用现有理论和实验证明对错，只是个人喜好。
Truhlar目前正在招薄厚，好战分子和卧底们可以前去应征。 |
|
w**n
发帖数: 244 | 3 这一两周来都是坏消息. 现在总算有一好消息了.
交了四篇文章到JACS (2 第一作者, 2 第二作者), 现在一篇
第一作者的已经接受了. 不过另一篇第一作者的估计够悬.
一editor 说太难了看不懂给转送到 D. G. Truhlar 手里了.
ft 死了. 还没见过这样的. 不过JACS 不鼓励发理论文章到
比较麻烦. |
|
s**i
发帖数: 93 | 4 Warshel
印象中他的paper都是10页以上的
大段大段的文字，很累人
接下来看truhlar如何应对，呵呵
Adopt |
|
r*****h
发帖数: 61 | 5 很正常。Truhlar同志可是在这种狂风大浪中成长起来的。
两个月左右前，他跟意大利开发COSMO溶剂化模型的人也吵了一架。
起因一样。他宣称自己的SM8(solvation model，表想歪-_-b)模型
比COSMO好，怎样怎样；COSMO的人立刻坐不住了，回了一篇。
这几篇文章在JCTC里。
Adopt |
|
h********r
发帖数: 821 | 6 Truhlar的名声一直就不怎么好，开会的时候不止一个人说了。至于Klamt，个人觉得一
贯aggressive，人家讲报告的时候他直接在下面喊COSMO比你那个方法superior。而且
他现在就是开公司卖软件的吧？ |
|
r*****h
发帖数: 61 | 7 On the Performance of Continuum Solvation Methods. A
Comment on “Universal Approaches to Solvation Modeling”, Acc. Chem. Res.,
2009, 42 (4) 480-492, Klamt坐不住了。
Reply to Comment on “A Universal Approach to Solvation Modeling”,Acc. Chem
. Res., 2009, 42 (4), 493-497 Truhlar同学回帖。 |
|
r*****h
发帖数: 61 | 8 Truhlar同志也有这个习惯。一般是说：你做的这个玩意的思路我多少年前已经想到了，
还做了些工作。。。
物理的更厉害，有一次有个会，底下一个打断了上边的人，说：
大家投一下票，反对他说的东西的请举手。然后第一个举了手。 |
|
h********r
发帖数: 821 | 9 去年Truhlar还上了呢。估计明年就轮到Borden了，这些人都是学有机出身的。 |
|
y****i
发帖数: 1504 | 10 truhlar不是在狂修正functional吗，这位除了算算，有啥贡献没？ |
|
p*******8
发帖数: 158 | 11 UMN, of course. Theoretical chemistry big guy : Donald G. Truhlar is here.
Pros: can publish as many papers as possible, then easy to apply green card,
less chance to touch any chemicals, environmental friendly.
Cons: very very hard to find job (not including Americans, not counting
postdoc), especially in economy downturn.
I have been engaged in this area for 2 plus years, luckily quitting
afterward. It's kind of fancy, but no use at all for solving real world
problems, and has negative cont... 阅读全帖 |
|
S*M
发帖数: 10832 | 12 Truhlar是很不错
不过不知道你听说没听说过B3LYP
呵呵
.
card,
here |
|
p*******8
发帖数: 158 | 13 I heard about this so much in DFT theory. Are these four guys are all in
Duke?? I only see Yang is here. Thanks for reminding me, now Duke is
talking. Whatever, they are both great for people who like computational
chemistry. It seems that Truhlar's ability for 灌水 is much bigger. :). Sometimes, school does not matter compare to which advisor you
will follow and which field you are into. Talk , then decide!
(Slow Eye Movement) 的大作中提到: 】 |
|
S*M
发帖数: 10832 | 14 嗯，truhlar灌水是很凶
去杨伟涛网站上看了一下
出乎意料，好像他的学生placement也不怎么地
Sometimes, school does not matter compare to which advisor you |
|
h*****h
发帖数: 264 | 15 啥时候Shi能得这个奖才能跟 yang 一样。
ACS Award for Creative Work in Synthetic Organic Chemistry
2012 Gregory C. Fu
2011 David W. C. MacMillan
2010 Ei-ichi Negishi
2009 Hisashi Yamamoto
2008 Masakatsu Shibasaki
2007 Steven V. Ley
2006 Stephen L. Buchwald
2005 Chi-Huey Wong
2004 Tohru Fukuyama
2003 Scott E. Denmark
计算牛人一网打尽
ACS Award for Computers in Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research
•2012 Weitao Yang
•2011 Thom H. Dunning, Jr.
•2010 Kenneth M. Merz, Jr.
•2009 Mark S. Gordon
•2... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*****9
发帖数: 1884 | 16 我估计哪天真要给理论化学一个诺奖的话应该是一个stat-mech-based和一个quant-
mech-based来分，当然也可能有第三个，比如搞算法或者软件的。
就quantum来说，我觉得YangWT和Truhlar有一定机会 |
|
a*****9
发帖数: 1884 | 17 Yes, we need physics such as QM and StatMech, chemistry including P-Chem,
Orgchem and Biochem, some biology and computer programming & scientific
computing as well. The thing is that most of us know a little bit of each
but cannot master those whole bunch of stuff. The few guys that managed to
do this finally become PIs, the VERY FEW guys that mastered those stuff
REALLY well become Truhlar, Karplus, Jorgensen, Yang...
I really need to learn a lot, cheers! |
|
