a*******k 发帖数: 25 | 1 November 30, 2009, Douglas E. Warren, Chair of the Board of Examiners (BOE)
and Craig N. Mills, Vice President - Examinations announcing CBT-e changes
in Uniform CPA Examination section structure, section time allocations, and
scoring weights. The letter can be found at:
http://www.cpa-exam.org/download/CBTe_Announcement-Sections-TimeWeights-FINAL.pdf | s*****g 发帖数: 72 | 2 看了感觉还是挺好的,至少对我这种英文写作不是很好的人是个利好消息。
我可以今年考下BEC,2011再考其他三门,这样就totally 没有writing了。
这样的改革加大了simulation的比重,看来是更加突出考试的实用性了,看来死看书,
多做题的思路不行了,必须要彻底搞清,务必做到,拿来能做,做了能平!平了能得分。
反正2011才改革,想考的抓紧吧。
不过不知道跨越两个年度的单科成绩是不是认可,如果认可,那我刚说的没有writing
的想法应该是可行的。。。 | I****s 发帖数: 467 | | c*********0 发帖数: 757 | 4 we live the the time of changing. | c*********0 发帖数: 757 | 5
分。
writing
"Among the topics studied was the reliability (consistency) of each
examination section under both current and new test structures and scoring
weights."
it means all-or-nothing rule, if you take BEC under old rule, the other 3
are under old rule as well. am i right?
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 看了感觉还是挺好的,至少对我这种英文写作不是很好的人是个利好消息。 : 我可以今年考下BEC,2011再考其他三门,这样就totally 没有writing了。 : 这样的改革加大了simulation的比重,看来是更加突出考试的实用性了,看来死看书, : 多做题的思路不行了,必须要彻底搞清,务必做到,拿来能做,做了能平!平了能得分。 : 反正2011才改革,想考的抓紧吧。 : 不过不知道跨越两个年度的单科成绩是不是认可,如果认可,那我刚说的没有writing : 的想法应该是可行的。。。
| l****r 发帖数: 14 | 6 OH, I think you are right. But in that case it will discourage lots of
candidate...
So we need to clarify that...we might call the board to clarify this
question.Or ask somebody in CPAnet forum... |
|