j*****z
发帖数: 5306 | 1 把NHTSA, IIHS以及不同车重量导致的死亡率因素都综合考虑得出的安全参数。我觉得比
单独参考某一个碰撞测试要靠谱一些，毕竟你希望这个车辆能在所有测试当中都得到最
好的评价。
http://www.informedforlife.org/ |
l*********u
发帖数: 19053 | 2 原来是介样滴，日托总挂嘴上的IISH安全数据，果然被＂edit＂过啦 ：）
Vehicle Weight is a Crucial Safety Component
Crash test ratings do not account for the relative weight of your vehicle
compared with vehicles you may collide with. The laws of physics control the
apportionment of forces between colliding vehicles and therefore a vehicle
is not a "safe" choice if it is lighter weight than the average vehicle,
despite receiving excellent crash ratings by both agencies.
The table below, provided by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
, shows the relationship between vehicle size/weight and driver fatality
rate. This correlation is evidence that you are 3.4 times more likely to die
when driving a 2,500 lb. passenger car than driving a 4,500 lb. SUV, even
when the ratings of those vehicles are identical.
http://www.informedforlife.org/viewartcl.php?index=83
得比
【在 j*****z 的大作中提到】
: 把NHTSA, IIHS以及不同车重量导致的死亡率因素都综合考虑得出的安全参数。我觉得比
: 单独参考某一个碰撞测试要靠谱一些，毕竟你希望这个车辆能在所有测试当中都得到最
: 好的评价。
: http://www.informedforlife.org/
|
J*****a
发帖数: 4262 | 3 你想说明什么呢？ 德车并不比日车重
帕萨特比雅阁轻，A4比TL轻，即使A6也只和TL一模一样重（base 3726 lb）
the
vehicle
Safety
die
【在 l*********u 的大作中提到】
: 原来是介样滴，日托总挂嘴上的IISH安全数据，果然被＂edit＂过啦 ：）
: Vehicle Weight is a Crucial Safety Component
: Crash test ratings do not account for the relative weight of your vehicle
: compared with vehicles you may collide with. The laws of physics control the
: apportionment of forces between colliding vehicles and therefore a vehicle
: is not a "safe" choice if it is lighter weight than the average vehicle,
: despite receiving excellent crash ratings by both agencies.
: The table below, provided by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
: , shows the relationship between vehicle size/weight and driver fatality
: rate. This correlation is evidence that you are 3.4 times more likely to die
|
j*****z
发帖数: 5306 | 4 那倒不至于，这句话就是从iihs网站摘下来的，而且iihs也进行了很多大车碰小车的测
试，还有很多车重和死亡率的统计。好像还专门有一期讨论这种碰撞
the
vehicle
Safety
die
【在 l*********u 的大作中提到】
: 原来是介样滴，日托总挂嘴上的IISH安全数据，果然被＂edit＂过啦 ：）
: Vehicle Weight is a Crucial Safety Component
: Crash test ratings do not account for the relative weight of your vehicle
: compared with vehicles you may collide with. The laws of physics control the
: apportionment of forces between colliding vehicles and therefore a vehicle
: is not a "safe" choice if it is lighter weight than the average vehicle,
: despite receiving excellent crash ratings by both agencies.
: The table below, provided by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
: , shows the relationship between vehicle size/weight and driver fatality
: rate. This correlation is evidence that you are 3.4 times more likely to die
|
z***e
发帖数: 5600 | 5 这是个加权参数吧。IIHS Small Overlap数据很少，估计要做缺省处理结果影响不大，
还是应该单看的
得比
【在 j*****z 的大作中提到】
: 把NHTSA, IIHS以及不同车重量导致的死亡率因素都综合考虑得出的安全参数。我觉得比
: 单独参考某一个碰撞测试要靠谱一些，毕竟你希望这个车辆能在所有测试当中都得到最
: 好的评价。
: http://www.informedforlife.org/
|
j*****z
发帖数: 5306 | 6 所有在small overlap里面收到marginal和poor评价的车型都被踢出safest list了。
还有一个所有有数据的车型的列表总结，有某方面有安全隐患的都被著名，small
overlap结果不好就是一方面。
【在 z***e 的大作中提到】
: 这是个加权参数吧。IIHS Small Overlap数据很少，估计要做缺省处理结果影响不大，
: 还是应该单看的
:
: 得比
|
z***e
发帖数: 5600 | 7 但是Small overlap做的车型不多。比如Top 1-2%的Enclave/Traverse/Acadia，MB
ML350，Lexus RX330
都还没做，不知道结果出来后是否还能排在Top 3% Volvo XC60前面
【在 j*****z 的大作中提到】
: 所有在small overlap里面收到marginal和poor评价的车型都被踢出safest list了。
: 还有一个所有有数据的车型的列表总结，有某方面有安全隐患的都被著名，small
: overlap结果不好就是一方面。
|
