A***n
发帖数: 8859 | |
f****t
发帖数: 15913 | |
i****x
发帖数: 17565 | 3 是你上次指出你xc90车体用的那种马口铁吗？
【在 f****t 的大作中提到】
: 大多数是马口铁神疯鸡
|
f****t
发帖数: 15913 | 4 你那烂本田实在太老，否则会榜上有名。
【在 i****x 的大作中提到】
: 是你上次指出你xc90车体用的那种马口铁吗？
|
D********d
发帖数: 2154 | |
f****l
发帖数: 5514 | |
n**x
发帖数: 1898 | 7 车轻重安全性没有必然联系。克莱斯勒300超过4000磅，但是碰撞一样一塌糊涂。
【在 A***n 的大作中提到】
: http://m.motortrend.com/features/mt_hot_list/20-of-the-lightest
: 大部分是日本车。
: 红脖子曰：日本车，OK！
|
A***n
发帖数: 8859 | 8 碰撞成绩越轻越容易做得好，要吸收的能量少
【在 n**x 的大作中提到】
: 车轻重安全性没有必然联系。克莱斯勒300超过4000磅，但是碰撞一样一塌糊涂。
|
p**********e
发帖数: 130 | |
l*********u
发帖数: 19053 | 10 小而轻跟大而重相撞，你认为谁会吃亏？
【在 p**********e 的大作中提到】
: 小车车型多 -> 安全性差
: 博士智商OK
|
|
|
A***n
发帖数: 8859 | 11 神车护体，刀枪不入。要有信仰和梦想。
【在 l*********u 的大作中提到】
: 小而轻跟大而重相撞，你认为谁会吃亏？
|
a*******a
发帖数: 4233 | 12 轻重和安全性没有相关性
iihs大小车互撞 smartfortwo表现比yaris好多了
【在 A***n 的大作中提到】
: http://m.motortrend.com/features/mt_hot_list/20-of-the-lightest
: 大部分是日本车。
: 红脖子曰：日本车，OK！
|
p********e
发帖数: 6030 | 13 按版上说法，应该是碰撞成绩跟安全性没有联系。
【在 n**x 的大作中提到】
: 车轻重安全性没有必然联系。克莱斯勒300超过4000磅，但是碰撞一样一塌糊涂。
|
b*****n
发帖数: 17570 | 14 碰撞成绩不可靠，按一按听一听最可靠
[在 pentaquine (OM) 的大作中提到：]
：按版上说法，应该是碰撞成绩跟安全性没有联系。
：
：........... |
D***0
发帖数: 5214 | 15 iihs有说smart好多了？dummy都是死翘...
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/desktopnews/new-crash-tests-demon
Mercedes C class versus Smart Fortwo
After striking the front of the C class, the Smart went airborne and turned
around 450 degrees. This contributed to excessive movement of the dummy
during rebound — a dramatic indication of the Smart's poor performance but
not the only one. There was extensive intrusion into the space around the
dummy from head to feet. The instrument panel moved up and toward the dummy.
The steering wheel was displaced upward. Multiple measures of injury
likelihood, including those on the dummy's head, were poor, as were measures
on both legs.
"The Smart is the smallest car we tested, so it's not surprising that its
performance looked worse than the Fit's. Still both fall into the poor
category, and it's hard to distinguish between poor and poorer," Lund says.
"In both the Smart and Fit, occupants would be subject to high injury risk
in crashes with heavier cars." In contrast, the C class held up well, with
little to no intrusion into the occupant compartment. Nearly all measures of
injury likelihood were in the good range.
Toyota Camry versus Yaris
There was far more intrusion into the occupant compartment of the Yaris than
the Camry. The minicar's door was largely torn away. The driver seats in
both cars tipped forward, but only in the Yaris did the steering wheel move
excessively. Similar contrasts characterize the measures of injury
likelihood recorded on the dummies. The heads of both struck the cars'
steering wheels through the airbags, but only the head injury measure on the
dummy in the Yaris rated poor. There was extensive force on the neck and
right leg plus a deep gash at the right knee of the dummy in the minicar.
Like the Smart and Fit, the Yaris earns an overall rating of poor in the car
-to-car test. The Camry is acceptable.
【在 a*******a 的大作中提到】
: 轻重和安全性没有相关性
: iihs大小车互撞 smartfortwo表现比yaris好多了
|
