|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r**m
发帖数: 1825 | 1 说的好像发电就不产生污染了一样
http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21636715-why-electric-car-may-be-much-dirtier-petrol-one-cleaner-what
这个报告显示以现在美国发电厂的燃料来源，在美国的电车产生的污染超过石油燃料车
Even a battery car running on the average mix of electrical power generated
in America is much more hazardous than the conventional alternative.
Yet a report which analyses the life cycle of car emissions (ie, all the way
from those created by the mining of materials for batteries, via the ones
from the production of fuel and the generation of electricity, to the muck
that actually comes out of the exhaust) presents a rather different picture.
污染的考量要包括整个Lifecylce包括电池的生产和回收销毁，电的来源等等。
将来的实际情况肯定是电池送到发展中国家去处理，污染也影响不到美国。 | l*******g
发帖数: 27064 | 2 石油燃料开采加工也有污染的，一般也没记录进去吧
未来电车大行其道肯定是必然的，优点太多了，现在最大瓶颈在电池 | T*********s
发帖数: 20444 | 3 用核电站发电
generated
way
picture.
【在 r**m 的大作中提到】
: 说的好像发电就不产生污染了一样
: http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21636715-why-electric-car-may-be-much-dirtier-petrol-one-cleaner-what
: 这个报告显示以现在美国发电厂的燃料来源，在美国的电车产生的污染超过石油燃料车
: Even a battery car running on the average mix of electrical power generated
: in America is much more hazardous than the conventional alternative.
: Yet a report which analyses the life cycle of car emissions (ie, all the way
: from those created by the mining of materials for batteries, via the ones
: from the production of fuel and the generation of electricity, to the muck
: that actually comes out of the exhaust) presents a rather different picture.
: 污染的考量要包括整个Lifecylce包括电池的生产和回收销毁，电的来源等等。
| A***n
发帖数: 8859 | 4 无论新兴和传统能源哪一个更污染大些，
总要去尝试一下。
发电低污染化是有可能进一步的，
烧化石能源似乎必然无解。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
