由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Automobile版 - 买特斯拉省钱,估计出事后没人claim,
相关主题
特斯拉自动驾驶又撞了:这次出了人命!35,000美元只是个幌子 特斯拉的Model 3“定价艺术”
Re: Tesla says fatal crash involved Autopilot (转载)unidentified_title
汽车越重越安全,代价是什么?特斯拉活不过2019年!
if price is not the case, which one are you gonna pick, rx350 vs. xc60? and why?tesla 撞救火车,自动驾驶还是别想了
特斯拉自动驾驶闹出人命!背后真相大曝光《消费者报告》开始琢磨特斯拉Model 3
请教下TESLA车主被割头和烧死的特斯拉粉,把autopilot翻译成自动驾驶了
【特斯拉市值超越福特 在美国汽车领域仅次于通用汽车】Vehicle rating from Insurance losses
Model S事故调查结果公布:发布7次警告,司机均未理睬扫盲贴——US最常见的致命车祸就是Single vehicle Crash
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: autopilot话题: driver话题: car话题: safer话题: than
进入Automobile版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
t**x
发帖数: 20965
1
But there is one fact which is very interesting.
If you own a car which has autopilot facilities then, if they know about
this, , not increase it. They clearly believe that, when engaged in suitable
circumstances, an autopilot is a safer driver than a human. To quote from
the article, “It is estimated that human error is at least partly
responsible for more than 90% of current road fatalities.”
And insurers are not reducing premiums based on a whim or a guess. They are
doing it because they have statistics that cars using automatic “assistive
” driver technologies have fewer claims than those without them.
The , and even when the car cannot avoid a crash it will have reduced speed
considerably.
You can understand why autopilot is safer within the limited scope of its
capabilities. It never suffers from a lack of attention, and is never
careless. It either can cope with something or it can’t, and if it can’t
it generally knows it and will insist the driver takes control, or it will
bring the car to a halt.
d********e
发帖数: 1720
2

suitable
are
assistive
speed
到底有Autopilot保险是便宜了还是贵了?为什么出事后没人claim?

【在 t**x 的大作中提到】
: But there is one fact which is very interesting.
: If you own a car which has autopilot facilities then, if they know about
: this, , not increase it. They clearly believe that, when engaged in suitable
: circumstances, an autopilot is a safer driver than a human. To quote from
: the article, “It is estimated that human error is at least partly
: responsible for more than 90% of current road fatalities.”
: And insurers are not reducing premiums based on a whim or a guess. They are
: doing it because they have statistics that cars using automatic “assistive
: ” driver technologies have fewer claims than those without them.
: The , and even when the car cannot avoid a crash it will have reduced speed

1 (共1页)
进入Automobile版参与讨论
相关主题
Re: plead guilty or not guilty?特斯拉自动驾驶闹出人命!背后真相大曝光
are SUVs really safer than cars?请教下TESLA车主
最近一期american scientist 上关于汽车安全性能的一张图【特斯拉市值超越福特 在美国汽车领域仅次于通用汽车】
insurance questionModel S事故调查结果公布:发布7次警告,司机均未理睬
特斯拉自动驾驶又撞了:这次出了人命!35,000美元只是个幌子 特斯拉的Model 3“定价艺术”
Re: Tesla says fatal crash involved Autopilot (转载)unidentified_title
汽车越重越安全,代价是什么?特斯拉活不过2019年!
if price is not the case, which one are you gonna pick, rx350 vs. xc60? and why?tesla 撞救火车,自动驾驶还是别想了
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: autopilot话题: driver话题: car话题: safer话题: than