f*****h
发帖数: 4489 | 1 问题出在电池上 现在美国本土不让开采锂矿 转嫁污染而已 。还有电池里各类稀有金
属的采集问题，类似的研究会越来越多
That’s because, in terms of the impact on the planet, there’s little
difference between a lithium mine and an open-pit coal mine. Both require
bulldozing entire ecosystems. Both use huge amounts of water. Both leave
behind poisoned aquifers. And both are operated with massive heavy machinery
largely powered by diesel.
I want people to understand that lithium mining is not “good” for the
planet. Sure, compared to coal mining, a lithium mine may ultimately result
in less greenhouse gas emissions. But not by much. The proposed Lithium
Americas mine at Thacker Pass would burn more than 10,000 gallons of diesel
fuel every day, according to the Environmental Impact Statement. Processing
the lithium would also require massive quantities of sulfur—waste products
from oil refineries. One local resident told me they expect “a semi-truck
full of sulfur every 10 minutes” on these rural, quiet roads.
https://www.sierranevadaally.org/2021/01/25/green-lithium-mining-is-a-bright
-green-lie-dispatches-from-thacker-pass/ | n******t
发帖数: 4406 | 2 電池顯然屬於重污染，此外每年發電增長最多的還是火電，此外造電池和造車都有排放
，所以最後算下來，現在這種EV，排放並不比efficient的油車好很多。
此外，這些汽車公司，SUV，truck可沒少賣。雖然我90%的時候在路上看到的truck拖斗
裏面都啥都沒有，SUV里面常常只有一個人。
machinery
result
【在 f*****h 的大作中提到】
: 问题出在电池上 现在美国本土不让开采锂矿 转嫁污染而已 。还有电池里各类稀有金
: 属的采集问题，类似的研究会越来越多
: That’s because, in terms of the impact on the planet, there’s little
: difference between a lithium mine and an open-pit coal mine. Both require
: bulldozing entire ecosystems. Both use huge amounts of water. Both leave
: behind poisoned aquifers. And both are operated with massive heavy machinery
: largely powered by diesel.
: I want people to understand that lithium mining is not “good” for the
: planet. Sure, compared to coal mining, a lithium mine may ultimately result
: in less greenhouse gas emissions. But not by much. The proposed Lithium
|
|
