f*****0 发帖数: 166 | 1 当世界乒联为了降低中国夺冠的可能性而把38mm球改为40mm球时,“美其名曰:增强观
赏性”的时候大概没有想到几年后中国队包揽金银(铜)的现状。
如果不是国际羽联为了限制中国队包揽奥运会金牌,而出台了所谓的排名资格限制,而
超级赛的结果直接影响排名,李永波需要让一些人退赛(假设是真)吗?
不公平的规则,怎样要求公平的对抗?难道这就是spirit of sports? | m****r 发帖数: 6639 | 2 话说回来, 既然羽毛球是一个individual sport, 为啥国际羽联会关心“中国队”的
这个那个?
【在 f*****0 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 当世界乒联为了降低中国夺冠的可能性而把38mm球改为40mm球时,“美其名曰:增强观 : 赏性”的时候大概没有想到几年后中国队包揽金银(铜)的现状。 : 如果不是国际羽联为了限制中国队包揽奥运会金牌,而出台了所谓的排名资格限制,而 : 超级赛的结果直接影响排名,李永波需要让一些人退赛(假设是真)吗? : 不公平的规则,怎样要求公平的对抗?难道这就是spirit of sports?
| f*****0 发帖数: 166 | 3 其实,我不觉得他们关心“中国队”。他们中的很多人也不真正关心羽毛球这个运动的
发展,我觉得他们只关心自己国家/赛区球员的最终成绩。由此,中国队的成绩越差越
好,或者说,越不能威胁到他们关心的球员的成绩
【在 m****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 话说回来, 既然羽毛球是一个individual sport, 为啥国际羽联会关心“中国队”的 : 这个那个?
| S**U 发帖数: 7025 | 4 中国队只关心自己国家球员的最终成绩。他们只关心自己国家/赛区球员的最终成绩。
Is there a difference?
BWF rules are made by majority vote. If you think it's unfair, persuade
others to vote with you.
【在 f*****0 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 其实,我不觉得他们关心“中国队”。他们中的很多人也不真正关心羽毛球这个运动的 : 发展,我觉得他们只关心自己国家/赛区球员的最终成绩。由此,中国队的成绩越差越 : 好,或者说,越不能威胁到他们关心的球员的成绩
| m****r 发帖数: 6639 | 5 i think this is a classic example of substitution effect vs. income effect.
the lesser minds of the world are all stuck on substitution effect, when, if
you look at history, income effect always wins.
【在 f*****0 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 其实,我不觉得他们关心“中国队”。他们中的很多人也不真正关心羽毛球这个运动的 : 发展,我觉得他们只关心自己国家/赛区球员的最终成绩。由此,中国队的成绩越差越 : 好,或者说,越不能威胁到他们关心的球员的成绩
| f*****0 发帖数: 166 | 6 The fact is that I cannot change the rule, but I can/will choose what I can
within the rule to maximize my own benefit.
To me, fair enough. And I won't nag about "Tui Sai" as long as they are
following the rules. And I won't nag about "other people/country" do this or
that to maximize their achievement in tourney.
As nearly the only team that dominates (in a much less degree compare to ping-pong), Chinese-team-interest-representing people with voting power are way less presented in the rules controlling committe. Basically, rules can hardly be changed as MOST of others have the same interest: restricting Chinese-players unless Chinese team is ready to pull her presence out of BWF.
Seriously, I do wish BWF gives up their presence in Olympics (" FOR FASTER, HIGHER, STRONGER") with such a silly rule.
【在 S**U 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 中国队只关心自己国家球员的最终成绩。他们只关心自己国家/赛区球员的最终成绩。 : Is there a difference? : BWF rules are made by majority vote. If you think it's unfair, persuade : others to vote with you.
| S**U 发帖数: 7025 | 7 Does income effect mean the team get better in this case?
if
【在 m****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : i think this is a classic example of substitution effect vs. income effect. : the lesser minds of the world are all stuck on substitution effect, when, if : you look at history, income effect always wins.
| S**U 发帖数: 7025 | 8 PRC can try to join BWF as 22 provinces, 4 municipalities, 5 autonomous
regions and 2 special administrative regions, and send 30+ teams to
tournaments. These badminton associations are more likely to out-vote
oppositions in BWF this way.
Oh, and the restrictive rules probably has no adverse effect on the 30+
Chinese teams, anyway.
can
or
ping-pong), Chinese-team-interest-representing people with voting power are
way less presented in the rules controlling committe. Basically, rules can
hardly be changed as MOST of others have the same interest: restricting
Chinese-players unless Chinese team is ready to pull her presence out of BWF
.
, HIGHER, STRONGER") with such a silly rule.
【在 f*****0 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : The fact is that I cannot change the rule, but I can/will choose what I can : within the rule to maximize my own benefit. : To me, fair enough. And I won't nag about "Tui Sai" as long as they are : following the rules. And I won't nag about "other people/country" do this or : that to maximize their achievement in tourney. : As nearly the only team that dominates (in a much less degree compare to ping-pong), Chinese-team-interest-representing people with voting power are way less presented in the rules controlling committe. Basically, rules can hardly be changed as MOST of others have the same interest: restricting Chinese-players unless Chinese team is ready to pull her presence out of BWF. : Seriously, I do wish BWF gives up their presence in Olympics (" FOR FASTER, HIGHER, STRONGER") with such a silly rule.
|
| n*n 发帖数: 1378 | 9 有个问题想问你很久了,请问你会说中国话么?
PRC都出来了
are
can
【在 S**U 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : PRC can try to join BWF as 22 provinces, 4 municipalities, 5 autonomous : regions and 2 special administrative regions, and send 30+ teams to : tournaments. These badminton associations are more likely to out-vote : oppositions in BWF this way. : Oh, and the restrictive rules probably has no adverse effect on the 30+ : Chinese teams, anyway. : : can : or : ping-pong), Chinese-team-interest-representing people with voting power are
| x*z 发帖数: 694 | 10 这位哥您有逻辑吗,这么没谱的事张嘴就来啊,
看你说话口气总觉得怪,
你是在开玩笑的话,就当我没说了
are
can
【在 S**U 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : PRC can try to join BWF as 22 provinces, 4 municipalities, 5 autonomous : regions and 2 special administrative regions, and send 30+ teams to : tournaments. These badminton associations are more likely to out-vote : oppositions in BWF this way. : Oh, and the restrictive rules probably has no adverse effect on the 30+ : Chinese teams, anyway. : : can : or : ping-pong), Chinese-team-interest-representing people with voting power are
| y****n 发帖数: 782 | 11 应该已经在洗白的过程中了,哥们你千万不要逼人家前功尽弃啊。
【在 n*n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 有个问题想问你很久了,请问你会说中国话么? : PRC都出来了 : : are : can
| S**U 发帖数: 7025 | 12 I can't input Chinese with my computer at work.
【在 n*n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 有个问题想问你很久了,请问你会说中国话么? : PRC都出来了 : : are : can
| S**U 发帖数: 7025 | 13 I forgot to add smiley in my previous post.
【在 x*z 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这位哥您有逻辑吗,这么没谱的事张嘴就来啊, : 看你说话口气总觉得怪, : 你是在开玩笑的话,就当我没说了 : : are : can
|
|