i***0
发帖数: 8469 | 1 T-mo
November 20, 2011 at 12:53 pm
Players are willing to starve this lockout (out of principle that they will
not be making enough money) but then they willingly go to another continent
to play for less money. That is straight up backwards. If u are willing to
play for less somewhere else in the world, why can’t you take the deal that
pays you more in your own backyard? I’m in favor of those who suggest
boycotting the nba until they realize our demand drives the game (not their
supply).
Reply
MagicFAN
November 20, 2011 at 7:52 pm
Thanks for saying something that makes sense!
Reply
Gary
November 20, 2011 at 9:36 pm
Because overseas they have guarantees and this deal is not about the
superstars who can go overseas. Some parts of the deal state that owners can
terminate contracts at any time. Another part is they can send a player to
the D-league at will with reduced pay. The union is looking out for the
little guy. Something I think we all can appreciate.
Reply
Marvin Jones
November 21, 2011 at 10:21 am
There is nothing in the proposed deal that says EITHER of the two
things you just said, your lack of knowledge on the subject is just like the
players and probably the reason they took the action they did; they were
just as uninformed as you are, do a little research before you comment |
|
