Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945 - Biology版 - 未名存档

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档，一周内的贴子最多显示50字，超过一周显示500字访问原贴

Biology版 - Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945

相关主题
● 不好意思，又让另一个牛人郁闷了	● what's the scientific term for "borderline significance" or "borderline p-value"
● Peer-review应该review什么	● 非常,非常,非常郁闷的事情
● 纠结是否该换实验室	● scientific programmer 和 bioinformatician 的区别？
● J1 waiver遇到funding来源问题	● Scientific American讲中国biotech的文章
● ［好消息］现在民间集资搞生物研究也是可能的了	● 请问SCIENTIFIC POLICY/PUBLIC POLICY这个领域是干什么的?
● FYI:quantify individual's scientific contribution	● His Corporate Strategy: The Scientific Method
● Scientific couple	● 应该如何选择PHD TOPIC？
● How To Choose a Good Scientific Problem by Uri Alon	● K99: Scientific Review Group review completed: Application unscored.

相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: scientific话题: review话题: peer

进入Biology版参与讨论

1

(共1页)

t**u 发帖数: 7	1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VRBWLpYCPY
M*****n 发帖数: 16729	2 Man, 800K+ views. too many scientists in US. NIH has to cut fundings.

1

(共1页)

进入Biology版参与讨论

相关主题
● K99: Scientific Review Group review completed: Application unscored.	● ［好消息］现在民间集资搞生物研究也是可能的了
● Scientific Reports ------ a new Plos One?	● FYI:quantify individual's scientific contribution
● 是不是在公司作博士后多数是Scientific career loser?	● Scientific couple
● Database of research projects and funding	● How To Choose a Good Scientific Problem by Uri Alon
● 不好意思，又让另一个牛人郁闷了	● what's the scientific term for "borderline significance" or "borderline p-value"
● Peer-review应该review什么	● 非常,非常,非常郁闷的事情
● 纠结是否该换实验室	● scientific programmer 和 bioinformatician 的区别？
● J1 waiver遇到funding来源问题	● Scientific American讲中国biotech的文章

相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: scientific话题: review话题: peer

未名新帖统计// 7月16日

#	版面	帖数(主题数)
-	全站	4871 (796)
1	Military	3777 (569)
2	Stock	341 (51)
3	Joke	117 (17)
4	History	116 (3)
5	Automobile	100 (9)
6	USANews	55 (9)
7	Midlife	45 (1)
8	Headline	41 (41)
9	Dreamer	33 (13)
10	FleaMarket	32 (20)
11	Living	30 (7)

* 这里只显示发帖超过25的版面，努力灌水吧:-)