F*Q 发帖数: 3259 | 1 在manuscript里把培养的细胞内的实验称为 in vivo 是不是 acceptable? |
F*Q 发帖数: 3259 | 2 google恢复正常了,根据google上的定义,这种实验叫ex vivo。介于in vivo 和 in
vitro之间。这是不是生物界普遍接受的定义?
【在 F*Q 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 在manuscript里把培养的细胞内的实验称为 in vivo 是不是 acceptable?
|
a**y 发帖数: 464 | 3 in my field, that is usually OK. |
M*****n 发帖数: 16729 | 4 ex vivo 不是指tissue culture和organ culture吗?
光是cell 恐怕跟ex vivo还是不一样吧。
除非是blood cells啥的。
【在 F*Q 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : google恢复正常了,根据google上的定义,这种实验叫ex vivo。介于in vivo 和 in : vitro之间。这是不是生物界普遍接受的定义?
|
F*Q 发帖数: 3259 | 5 我在google上也查到了你说的情况,细胞内的实验好像没有严格的类似如in vivo 和in
vitro的定义。
【在 M*****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : ex vivo 不是指tissue culture和organ culture吗? : 光是cell 恐怕跟ex vivo还是不一样吧。 : 除非是blood cells啥的。
|
c**********5 发帖数: 653 | 6 in vitro( refered to "in glass") as compared to experiments using intact
organisms in vivo (" in living organisms"). But in biochemistry lab, in
vitro means in reacitons in test tube whereas "in vivo" refers to any
reaction occurs inside a living cell |
m*******m 发帖数: 127 | 7 You can call it "in cell" |
F*Q 发帖数: 3259 | 8 Yes. That's what I have always been calling. I am trying to find a more
impressive way to call it.
【在 m*******m 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : You can call it "in cell"
|
M*****n 发帖数: 16729 | 9 don't try to fool people working on animals.
in cell has a clearer meaning than in vivo.
【在 F*Q 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Yes. That's what I have always been calling. I am trying to find a more : impressive way to call it.
|
F*Q 发帖数: 3259 | 10 No, I never ever want to fool people. That's absolutely not what I intend to
do.
【在 M*****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : don't try to fool people working on animals. : in cell has a clearer meaning than in vivo.
|
b*******g 发帖数: 1309 | 11 just use in live cell or intracellular or similar
don't use in vivo, the reviewer will laugh at you...
【在 F*Q 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Yes. That's what I have always been calling. I am trying to find a more : impressive way to call it.
|