l*******e
发帖数: 170 | |
a**e
发帖数: 5094 | |
b******k
发帖数: 2321 | 3 拿钱或者站队的好时机
scientifically,我觉得根本不make sence。。
Mike Eisen@Berkeley前一阵有篇很好的blog批评ENCODE project,他的逻辑基本可以原
封不动的拿来批评BAM
http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=1179
【在 l*******e 的大作中提到】
: http://hms.harvard.edu/news/what-brain-activity-map-2-20-13?utm
|
y******8
发帖数: 1764 | 4 好文章
【在 b******k 的大作中提到】
: 拿钱或者站队的好时机
: scientifically,我觉得根本不make sence。。
: Mike Eisen@Berkeley前一阵有篇很好的blog批评ENCODE project,他的逻辑基本可以原
: 封不动的拿来批评BAM
: http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=1179
:
|
u*********1
发帖数: 2518 | |
s******9
发帖数: 283 | 6 站好对，钱很多
http://ngs-brescia.blogspot.com/2012/11/in-situ-single-cell-rna
【在 u*********1 的大作中提到】
: 我只关心我们做neurogenetics的能从中骗到funding/机会吗？
|
P****d
发帖数: 564 | 7 There would be a lot of computational problems in this effort that are very
different from sequence analysis. It really depends on your own interest.
To me, these are more interesting. Sequence analysis these days is more
about clever use of existing pipelines than developing new computational
approaches, esp if you're in a wet biology setting. But on the other hand,
you can focus more on making new discoveries without having to develop all
the tools you'd need to do the discovery.
【在 u*********1 的大作中提到】
: 我只关心我们做neurogenetics的能从中骗到funding/机会吗？
|
y******8
发帖数: 1764 | 8 From this blog article, I see lots of artifacts coming from the way they
would handle the brain samples.
【在 s******9 的大作中提到】
: 站好对，钱很多
: http://ngs-brescia.blogspot.com/2012/11/in-situ-single-cell-rna
|
s*********l
发帖数: 204 | 9 老哥一pending grant的标题有六个关键字，其中三个字是Brain, Activity ,Mapping
。要是不给俺资助，我该恶心谁去？ |
