由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - 冯新华那篇涉嫌造假的cell结论出来了
相关主题
我也说说我的非典型转行经历吧问个 Neurobiology of Aging revision的问题
复旦药学院校友ChengYi Liang news:让人无语的science审稿意见
又一个造假哥被揪出来了从纯化到星辰 那篇帖子的作者现在哪里高就?
Misconduct Called Out on YouTube (ZT)我觉得那个华人生物学家协会应该代表大家抗议那篇sb文章
小保方定论了Lai Jiang 对 Nature 那篇的评论好像被删了!
Feeling very uncomfortable!那篇Autism的Cell paper终于retract了
寻找 Tips for your experiments 的出处那篇"爆料"的帖子呢?
感慨一下NBT那篇miRNA的第一作者和通讯作者之一
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: dr话题: labs话题: editorial话题: liang
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
t******k
发帖数: 599
1
We, the editors of Cell, published an Editorial Expression of Concern http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.038 earlier this year regarding issues raised about Figures 2F, 2H, and 3G of the above article. Dr. Yao-Yun Liang, who performed the experiments in question, claimed to have manipulated his experiments to achieve pre-determined results. The corresponding author, Dr. Xin-Hua Feng, refuted the claims of falsification. In the intervening time, two independent labs have carried out experiments attempting to reproduce the data in question. This Editorial Note is to inform the community about the outcome of this process. Those two labs have now completed their experiments, and their data largely confirm the central conclusions drawn from the original figures. Although this does not resolve the conflicting claims, based on the information available to us at this time, we will take no further action. We would like to thank the independent labs who invested significant time and effort in ensuring the accuracy of the scientific record.
http://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(16)31159-X?elsca1=etoc&elsca2=email&elsca3=0092-8674_20160908_166_6_&elsca4=Cell%20Press
m***i
发帖数: 2013
2
这简直是不惜自毁来毁人啊
真不知道这是怎样的深仇大恨
恭喜冯,真金经受了洗礼
g********0
发帖数: 6201
3
看来自我引爆没起到效果,老板被罚酒三杯没事了?
P****R
发帖数: 22479
4
另外2家实验室实名重复了。
韩春雨有种重复吗?

【在 g********0 的大作中提到】
: 看来自我引爆没起到效果,老板被罚酒三杯没事了?
h*****6
发帖数: 90
5
这个很有意思,是老板自己安排别的实验室重复。
三句话离不开韩。韩已经有仇实名重复了,再找个实验室重复就可以了。我就不信,韩
手中40,50个R01,找不到一个实验室。什么时候公布重复出来也很重要,应该先拖个
两三年。

【在 g********0 的大作中提到】
: 看来自我引爆没起到效果,老板被罚酒三杯没事了?
y*****w
发帖数: 1350
6
Dr. Yao-Yun Liang, who performed the experiments in question, claimed to
have manipulated his experiments to achieve pre-determined results. The
corresponding author, Dr. Xin-Hua Feng, refuted the claims of falsification.
Don't understand this context. The first author Liang claimed to have
manipulated the experiments, while his boss refused to acknowledge that?
g********0
发帖数: 6201
7
就是就是,重赏之下,必有勇夫。
再过个两三年,教主就可以千秋万载,一统江湖了。

【在 h*****6 的大作中提到】
: 这个很有意思,是老板自己安排别的实验室重复。
: 三句话离不开韩。韩已经有仇实名重复了,再找个实验室重复就可以了。我就不信,韩
: 手中40,50个R01,找不到一个实验室。什么时候公布重复出来也很重要,应该先拖个
: 两三年。

t**l
发帖数: 109
8
it is the 3rd author who report himself for data manipulation. nothing to do
with 1st author.
S****r
发帖数: 982
9
这是Cell杂志社选择并安排的两家独立实验室重复的,不然根本要不了几个月,几天就
可以重复实验。

【在 h*****6 的大作中提到】
: 这个很有意思,是老板自己安排别的实验室重复。
: 三句话离不开韩。韩已经有仇实名重复了,再找个实验室重复就可以了。我就不信,韩
: 手中40,50个R01,找不到一个实验室。什么时候公布重复出来也很重要,应该先拖个
: 两三年。

y**h
发帖数: 3093
10
不错不错
相关主题
Feeling very uncomfortable!问个 Neurobiology of Aging revision的问题
寻找 Tips for your experiments 的出处让人无语的science审稿意见
感慨一下从纯化到星辰 那篇帖子的作者现在哪里高就?
进入Biology版参与讨论
y**h
发帖数: 3093
11
发现另外一片无发重复
但是屁事没有
S****r
发帖数: 982
12
那篇Cell杂志社没安排独立实验室重复。拜托用点脑子,如果一疯子嚷着mit版上全是
疯子,是不是版上的所有人都应该关疯人院观察几天?

【在 y**h 的大作中提到】
: 发现另外一片无发重复
: 但是屁事没有

m*********r
发帖数: 2456
13
Good points!

【在 S****r 的大作中提到】
: 那篇Cell杂志社没安排独立实验室重复。拜托用点脑子,如果一疯子嚷着mit版上全是
: 疯子,是不是版上的所有人都应该关疯人院观察几天?

S**********e
发帖数: 620
14

大家一起来造假吧,hcy赶紧找求子蛇,求子猪,求子狗。。。告诉他们密访,大家一
起分经费,2个亿,鬼都能推磨,阿狗就不能咬基基?

【在 h*****6 的大作中提到】
: 这个很有意思,是老板自己安排别的实验室重复。
: 三句话离不开韩。韩已经有仇实名重复了,再找个实验室重复就可以了。我就不信,韩
: 手中40,50个R01,找不到一个实验室。什么时候公布重复出来也很重要,应该先拖个
: 两三年。

e*********6
发帖数: 3453
15
我只是想问,重复这个实验的学生拿到了什么credit?

【在 t******k 的大作中提到】
: We, the editors of Cell, published an Editorial Expression of Concern http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.038 earlier this year regarding issues raised about Figures 2F, 2H, and 3G of the above article. Dr. Yao-Yun Liang, who performed the experiments in question, claimed to have manipulated his experiments to achieve pre-determined results. The corresponding author, Dr. Xin-Hua Feng, refuted the claims of falsification. In the intervening time, two independent labs have carried out experiments attempting to reproduce the data in question. This Editorial Note is to inform the community about the outcome of this process. Those two labs have now completed their experiments, and their data largely confirm the central conclusions drawn from the original figures. Although this does not resolve the conflicting claims, based on the information available to us at this time, we will take no further action. We would like to thank the independent labs who invested significant time and effort in ensuring the accuracy of the scientific record.
: http://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(16)31159-X?elsca1=etoc&elsca2=email&elsca3=0092-8674_20160908_166_6_&elsca4=Cell%20Press

1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
NBT那篇miRNA的第一作者和通讯作者之一小保方定论了
Melton lab最新那篇Cell突破在什么地方?Feeling very uncomfortable!
文章被接收。发包子!寻找 Tips for your experiments 的出处
文献求助感慨一下
我也说说我的非典型转行经历吧问个 Neurobiology of Aging revision的问题
复旦药学院校友ChengYi Liang news:让人无语的science审稿意见
又一个造假哥被揪出来了从纯化到星辰 那篇帖子的作者现在哪里高就?
Misconduct Called Out on YouTube (ZT)我觉得那个华人生物学家协会应该代表大家抗议那篇sb文章
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: dr话题: labs话题: editorial话题: liang