t******k 发帖数: 599 | 1 We, the editors of Cell, published an Editorial Expression of Concern http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.038 earlier this year regarding issues raised about Figures 2F, 2H, and 3G of the above article. Dr. Yao-Yun Liang, who performed the experiments in question, claimed to have manipulated his experiments to achieve pre-determined results. The corresponding author, Dr. Xin-Hua Feng, refuted the claims of falsification. In the intervening time, two independent labs have carried out experiments attempting to reproduce the data in question. This Editorial Note is to inform the community about the outcome of this process. Those two labs have now completed their experiments, and their data largely confirm the central conclusions drawn from the original figures. Although this does not resolve the conflicting claims, based on the information available to us at this time, we will take no further action. We would like to thank the independent labs who invested significant time and effort in ensuring the accuracy of the scientific record.
http://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(16)31159-X?elsca1=etoc&elsca2=email&elsca3=0092-8674_20160908_166_6_&elsca4=Cell%20Press |
m***i 发帖数: 2013 | 2 这简直是不惜自毁来毁人啊
真不知道这是怎样的深仇大恨
恭喜冯,真金经受了洗礼 |
g********0 发帖数: 6201 | |
P****R 发帖数: 22479 | 4 另外2家实验室实名重复了。
韩春雨有种重复吗?
【在 g********0 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 看来自我引爆没起到效果,老板被罚酒三杯没事了?
|
h*****6 发帖数: 90 | 5 这个很有意思,是老板自己安排别的实验室重复。
三句话离不开韩。韩已经有仇实名重复了,再找个实验室重复就可以了。我就不信,韩
手中40,50个R01,找不到一个实验室。什么时候公布重复出来也很重要,应该先拖个
两三年。
【在 g********0 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 看来自我引爆没起到效果,老板被罚酒三杯没事了?
|
y*****w 发帖数: 1350 | 6 Dr. Yao-Yun Liang, who performed the experiments in question, claimed to
have manipulated his experiments to achieve pre-determined results. The
corresponding author, Dr. Xin-Hua Feng, refuted the claims of falsification.
Don't understand this context. The first author Liang claimed to have
manipulated the experiments, while his boss refused to acknowledge that? |
g********0 发帖数: 6201 | 7 就是就是,重赏之下,必有勇夫。
再过个两三年,教主就可以千秋万载,一统江湖了。
【在 h*****6 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这个很有意思,是老板自己安排别的实验室重复。 : 三句话离不开韩。韩已经有仇实名重复了,再找个实验室重复就可以了。我就不信,韩 : 手中40,50个R01,找不到一个实验室。什么时候公布重复出来也很重要,应该先拖个 : 两三年。
|
t**l 发帖数: 109 | 8 it is the 3rd author who report himself for data manipulation. nothing to do
with 1st author. |
S****r 发帖数: 982 | 9 这是Cell杂志社选择并安排的两家独立实验室重复的,不然根本要不了几个月,几天就
可以重复实验。
【在 h*****6 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这个很有意思,是老板自己安排别的实验室重复。 : 三句话离不开韩。韩已经有仇实名重复了,再找个实验室重复就可以了。我就不信,韩 : 手中40,50个R01,找不到一个实验室。什么时候公布重复出来也很重要,应该先拖个 : 两三年。
|
y**h 发帖数: 3093 | |
|
|
y**h 发帖数: 3093 | |
S****r 发帖数: 982 | 12 那篇Cell杂志社没安排独立实验室重复。拜托用点脑子,如果一疯子嚷着mit版上全是
疯子,是不是版上的所有人都应该关疯人院观察几天?
【在 y**h 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 发现另外一片无发重复 : 但是屁事没有
|
m*********r 发帖数: 2456 | 13 Good points!
【在 S****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 那篇Cell杂志社没安排独立实验室重复。拜托用点脑子,如果一疯子嚷着mit版上全是 : 疯子,是不是版上的所有人都应该关疯人院观察几天?
|
S**********e 发帖数: 620 | 14
大家一起来造假吧,hcy赶紧找求子蛇,求子猪,求子狗。。。告诉他们密访,大家一
起分经费,2个亿,鬼都能推磨,阿狗就不能咬基基?
【在 h*****6 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这个很有意思,是老板自己安排别的实验室重复。 : 三句话离不开韩。韩已经有仇实名重复了,再找个实验室重复就可以了。我就不信,韩 : 手中40,50个R01,找不到一个实验室。什么时候公布重复出来也很重要,应该先拖个 : 两三年。
|
e*********6 发帖数: 3453 | 15 我只是想问,重复这个实验的学生拿到了什么credit?
【在 t******k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : We, the editors of Cell, published an Editorial Expression of Concern http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.038 earlier this year regarding issues raised about Figures 2F, 2H, and 3G of the above article. Dr. Yao-Yun Liang, who performed the experiments in question, claimed to have manipulated his experiments to achieve pre-determined results. The corresponding author, Dr. Xin-Hua Feng, refuted the claims of falsification. In the intervening time, two independent labs have carried out experiments attempting to reproduce the data in question. This Editorial Note is to inform the community about the outcome of this process. Those two labs have now completed their experiments, and their data largely confirm the central conclusions drawn from the original figures. Although this does not resolve the conflicting claims, based on the information available to us at this time, we will take no further action. We would like to thank the independent labs who invested significant time and effort in ensuring the accuracy of the scientific record. : http://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(16)31159-X?elsca1=etoc&elsca2=email&elsca3=0092-8674_20160908_166_6_&elsca4=Cell%20Press
|