a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 1 S J1072 H Q105 D 8 C Q10863
MPs, none, your pd deal and open 1D(precision), pass, ? | x****a
发帖数: 817 | 2 hehe, arrow loves 5~6 pts hands.
I would bid 1NT.
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
: S J1072 H Q105 D 8 C Q10863
: MPs, none, your pd deal and open 1D(precision), pass, ?
| a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 3 1D was precision
【在 x****a 的大作中提到】
: hehe, arrow loves 5~6 pts hands.
: I would bid 1NT.
| x****a
发帖数: 817 | 4 Then maybe 1S was better.
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
: 1D was precision
| w****b
发帖数: 623 | 5 Pass, of course. What's the problem?
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
: S J1072 H Q105 D 8 C Q10863
: MPs, none, your pd deal and open 1D(precision), pass, ?
| a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 6
Pass, of course, acceptable.
In this case, I am thinking of 1H, because if opps let you play 1D,
it's probably an ugly contract even worse than 2D! I agree that maybe
you can make only 7 tricks not 8 in dimonds, but you never get a chance
to play there.
【在 w****b 的大作中提到】
: Pass, of course. What's the problem?
| c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 7 if your pd jumps to 2NT or 3D or 3H, it would be more ugly.
If playing sayc or 2/1, I might bid, but not when playing prec,
Still, even if you bid, you might not find club fit.
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
:
: Pass, of course, acceptable.
: In this case, I am thinking of 1H, because if opps let you play 1D,
: it's probably an ugly contract even worse than 2D! I agree that maybe
: you can make only 7 tricks not 8 in dimonds, but you never get a chance
: to play there.
|
|
