a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 1 IMPs Team game:
Vul Both,
precision,
W E
S A72 S 63
H AKQJ63 H 97
D 5 D AKQ83
C KQ6 C A973
W N E S
1C - 2D -
2H - 3C -
3H - 3S X
4C X 4H -
- = | g**********y
发帖数: 14569 | 2 Why you always post questions and never give answer?
They screw a 7NT at 4H, seems not a fun question.
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
: IMPs Team game:
: Vul Both,
: precision,
: W E
: S A72 S 63
: H AKQJ63 H 97
: D 5 D AKQ83
: C KQ6 C A973
: W N E S
: 1C - 2D -
| a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 3 No, I think it's fun if you study why they screw it up.
who should be blamed most?
The answer for this one is I don't know. Since I was one
of these two stupid bidders, I'd like to know what others
think.
【在 g**********y 的大作中提到】
: Why you always post questions and never give answer?
: They screw a 7NT at 4H, seems not a fun question.
| g**********y
发帖数: 14569 | 4 Oh, I thought you give questions as pop-quiz :-)
It's frustrating to see quiz and never see answer.
Just my guess -- many players play American Standard instead of Precision. If
you can give more explanation in original post on conventions used in this
bidding process, maybe more people can understand and discuss.
I played Precision in beginning, but now I forgot all conventions except
knowing 1C is 16+ :-(
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
: No, I think it's fun if you study why they screw it up.
: who should be blamed most?
: The answer for this one is I don't know. Since I was one
: of these two stupid bidders, I'd like to know what others
: think.
| a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 5 This problem is far more than easy if you look at only 1
hand. Actually, this is a common problem where a GF situation
has been set up. i.e. like in this problem, or after a 2 over
1 game forcing. Seems every bid thereafter is a descriptive one
and doesn't necesarily mean extra values.
Then how do you show your extra values?
【在 g**********y 的大作中提到】
: Oh, I thought you give questions as pop-quiz :-)
: It's frustrating to see quiz and never see answer.
: Just my guess -- many players play American Standard instead of Precision. If
: you can give more explanation in original post on conventions used in this
: bidding process, maybe more people can understand and discuss.
: I played Precision in beginning, but now I forgot all conventions except
: knowing 1C is 16+ :-(
| w****b
发帖数: 623 | 6 I think 99% west's fault. The bidding went ok up until 3Sx. When S stupidly
doubles 3S, West had a chance to redouble to show 1st round control, after
which east can cuebid 4C, and now getting to slam is a sure thing.
Later, West's passing of 4H seems pretty conservative, too. East's 4H is not
forced. So the most likely shape is 1-3-5-4, or 2-2-5-4. There's no danger to
venture past 4H, as you won't have 2 S losers to go with a D if east's hand is
as garbage as xxx x KQJxx Axxx.
The real challen
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
: No, I think it's fun if you study why they screw it up.
: who should be blamed most?
: The answer for this one is I don't know. Since I was one
: of these two stupid bidders, I'd like to know what others
: think.
| c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 7 I would jump to 3H over 2D to set up trump and your life would be much
easier. It's nonsense for old precision to
use 3H to show extra value since you are already
in gameforcing sequence.
【在 a*******s 的大作中提到】
: IMPs Team game:
: Vul Both,
: precision,
: W E
: S A72 S 63
: H AKQJ63 H 97
: D 5 D AKQ83
: C KQ6 C A973
: W N E S
: 1C - 2D -
|
|
