w****b
发帖数: 623 | 1 Round 10. Agains Doug Doub et co.
Board 19. EW vul. Dealer S.
KJ83
KJT84
K5
Q6
6542 -
A73 Q95
73 AQT862
AK53 J742
AQT97
62
J94
| f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 2
understandably
This is a good example illustrating how the card lie in one suit affect ur
play in another suit. Here declarer either need 4c+2h+2d or 2c+2h+at least 4d.
So the correct seqence should be cashing cak first, if cq drops, then just
finesee dq, if cq did not drop, then you have to dbl finesse dkj.
Now
but
to
the
【在 w****b 的大作中提到】
: Round 10. Agains Doug Doub et co.
: Board 19. EW vul. Dealer S.
: KJ83
: KJT84
: K5
: Q6
: 6542 -
: A73 Q95
: 73 AQT862
: AK53 J742
| w****b
发帖数: 623 | 3 In imps you certainly would take this line. In pairs, you could go -200 with
this line and get a cold bottom. If DK is offside but DJ is on, then oppo
certainly has some H partial and -100 would still be a great score but -200
would be a disaster. Here South did well by switching to a S and not
continuing H. And later N did well not to block the S suit despite that South
never showed any indication of such a good 5 card S suit.
vul.
left
4d.
were
5Cx
pass
【在 f*****x 的大作中提到】
:
: understandably
: This is a good example illustrating how the card lie in one suit affect ur
: play in another suit. Here declarer either need 4c+2h+2d or 2c+2h+at least 4d.
: So the correct seqence should be cashing cak first, if cq drops, then just
: finesee dq, if cq did not drop, then you have to dbl finesse dkj.
: Now
: but
: to
: the
| f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 4 then it is a good example of how play differ in imp and mp:) But I still doubt
ur argument here.
Here 3d by east is almost certain, so +110 to EW. -100 and -200 should be
quite close.
South
My
a
【在 w****b 的大作中提到】
: In imps you certainly would take this line. In pairs, you could go -200 with
: this line and get a cold bottom. If DK is offside but DJ is on, then oppo
: certainly has some H partial and -100 would still be a great score but -200
: would be a disaster. Here South did well by switching to a S and not
: continuing H. And later N did well not to block the S suit despite that South
: never showed any indication of such a good 5 card S suit.
:
: vul.
: left
: 4d.
| w****b
发帖数: 623 | 5 But with 9 card S fit, you expect many NS will compete to 3S and play there.
If DK is offside, then that contract is on a H guess. In fact some NS might
even buy the contract with 2S so -110 and -140 could be popular scores too (on
those lay out).
I guess I have such a fear of -200 that I couldn't consider any line that
seriously risk that...
The other attraction of Fred's line is that everybody on the table knows Fred
had a S suit, nobody knows how good it is, so perhaps even though the S suit
【在 f*****x 的大作中提到】
: then it is a good example of how play differ in imp and mp:) But I still doubt
: ur argument here.
: Here 3d by east is almost certain, so +110 to EW. -100 and -200 should be
: quite close.
:
: South
: My
: a
|
|
