b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 1 MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？ |
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 2 now 3S.
2S is about one Q weaker.
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
: 左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
: 假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
|
o*******n
发帖数: 6500 | 3 3S吧
平衡位置加倍后再叫大概是15个点左右
现在多一个K，多叫一阶
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
: 左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
: 假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
|
p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 4 What about at the direct seat? (1d-x-p-1s-p-???) 2S enough? |
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 5 No, also 3S. This 18 is too good.
【在 p*********6 的大作中提到】
: What about at the direct seat? (1d-x-p-1s-p-???) 2S enough?
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 6 Looks like all are agreeing with 3S.
How big an overbid would you think 4S is? |
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 7 I prefer 2D. A balanced Dbl only promise 8+, we have a much better hand than
that. As a response to balanced Dbl, PD may have 12p (14p if he has good D)
.
4S is acceptable for me. The only problem is PD may have 3343 without D
stopper and dare to bid NT.
Actually, we do believe PD have some strength because opps did nothing
besides opening 1D.
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
: 左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
: 假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 8 bidding 1S with 14 points over partner's reopening double is a huge nonsense
.
than
D)
【在 v**********e 的大作中提到】
: I prefer 2D. A balanced Dbl only promise 8+, we have a much better hand than
: that. As a response to balanced Dbl, PD may have 12p (14p if he has good D)
: .
: 4S is acceptable for me. The only problem is PD may have 3343 without D
: stopper and dare to bid NT.
: Actually, we do believe PD have some strength because opps did nothing
: besides opening 1D.
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 9 It overbids about one trick.
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: Looks like all are agreeing with 3S.
: How big an overbid would you think 4S is?
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 10 Yes, 1S 0-8P, so you are supposed to pass with no more than 16P.
to bid 3S is to say partner won't make a move over 2S with 5P+,
if you believe that is sensible.
【在 p*********6 的大作中提到】
: What about at the direct seat? (1d-x-p-1s-p-???) 2S enough?
|
|
|
Y****n
发帖数: 812 | 11 2S
MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫
什么？假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.56
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
: 左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
: 假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 12 The modern treatment of 1S is stronger, about 0-10, often 9 or 10 with bad 4
card suits (some experts may even bid 1S with some bad 11).
For example: after 1C x p :
you can and should bid 1S with something like: xxxx Axx Kxx Qxx.
The reason you should bid 1S is that this hand is not strong enough to play
2S facing a 3 card S fit and minimum doubler. For example, your partner may
easily hold something like Qxx KTxx AQxx xx and 2S can easily be high here.
Therefore, a single raise is about good 15 to 17 or some bad 18. A double
raise should show about 18-20. A cuebid then raise should show about 21-23.
The treatment for balancing seats are generally different for different
players. However, a sound approach is still to play the strength about the
same or 1 HCP lower IMO. Those who can't pass 8 HCP hands with the "right"
shape at the 4th seats are my best clients in this game.
【在 a****s 的大作中提到】
: Yes, 1S 0-8P, so you are supposed to pass with no more than 16P.
: to bid 3S is to say partner won't make a move over 2S with 5P+,
: if you believe that is sensible.
|
W******g
发帖数: 887 | 13 直接争叫1NT?
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
: 左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
: 假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 14 这里是平衡位置，争叫1NT有两点错误，一个是这个位置的1NT平衡叫牌力大约为11-15
，而不是15-18；第二个是这手牌没有方块止张，牌型适合技术性加倍。无论是直接位
置还是平衡位置，加倍是本手。
【在 W******g 的大作中提到】
: 直接争叫1NT?
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 15 MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？ |
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 16 now 3S.
2S is about one Q weaker.
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
: 左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
: 假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
|
o*******n
发帖数: 6500 | 17 3S吧
平衡位置加倍后再叫大概是15个点左右
现在多一个K，多叫一阶
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
: 左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
: 假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
|
p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 18 What about at the direct seat? (1d-x-p-1s-p-???) 2S enough? |
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 19 No, also 3S. This 18 is too good.
【在 p*********6 的大作中提到】
: What about at the direct seat? (1d-x-p-1s-p-???) 2S enough?
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 20 Looks like all are agreeing with 3S.
How big an overbid would you think 4S is? |
|
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 21 I prefer 2D. A balanced Dbl only promise 8+, we have a much better hand than
that. As a response to balanced Dbl, PD may have 12p (14p if he has good D)
.
4S is acceptable for me. The only problem is PD may have 3343 without D
stopper and dare to bid NT.
Actually, we do believe PD have some strength because opps did nothing
besides opening 1D.
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
: 左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
: 假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 22 bidding 1S with 14 points over partner's reopening double is a huge nonsense
.
than
D)
【在 v**********e 的大作中提到】
: I prefer 2D. A balanced Dbl only promise 8+, we have a much better hand than
: that. As a response to balanced Dbl, PD may have 12p (14p if he has good D)
: .
: 4S is acceptable for me. The only problem is PD may have 3343 without D
: stopper and dare to bid NT.
: Actually, we do believe PD have some strength because opps did nothing
: besides opening 1D.
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 23 It overbids about one trick.
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: Looks like all are agreeing with 3S.
: How big an overbid would you think 4S is?
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 24 Yes, 1S 0-8P, so you are supposed to pass with no more than 16P.
to bid 3S is to say partner won't make a move over 2S with 5P+,
if you believe that is sensible.
【在 p*********6 的大作中提到】
: What about at the direct seat? (1d-x-p-1s-p-???) 2S enough?
|
Y****n
发帖数: 812 | 25 2S
MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫
什么？假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.56
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
: 左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
: 假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 26 The modern treatment of 1S is stronger, about 0-10, often 9 or 10 with bad 4
card suits (some experts may even bid 1S with some bad 11).
For example: after 1C x p :
you can and should bid 1S with something like: xxxx Axx Kxx Qxx.
The reason you should bid 1S is that this hand is not strong enough to play
2S facing a 3 card S fit and minimum doubler. For example, your partner may
easily hold something like Qxx KTxx AQxx xx and 2S can easily be high here.
Therefore, a single raise is about good 15 to 17 or some bad 18. A double
raise should show about 18-20. A cuebid then raise should show about 21-23.
The treatment for balancing seats are generally different for different
players. However, a sound approach is still to play the strength about the
same or 1 HCP lower IMO. Those who can't pass 8 HCP hands with the "right"
shape at the 4th seats are my best clients in this game.
【在 a****s 的大作中提到】
: Yes, 1S 0-8P, so you are supposed to pass with no more than 16P.
: to bid 3S is to say partner won't make a move over 2S with 5P+,
: if you believe that is sensible.
|
W******g
发帖数: 887 | 27 直接争叫1NT?
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: MP，双无，你手持：AKQ7 / KQ3 / T5 / AT73
: 左手发牌并开叫1D，两家PASS到你，你叫什么？
: 假定你加倍，同伴1S，现在你如何再叫？
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 28 这里是平衡位置，争叫1NT有两点错误，一个是这个位置的1NT平衡叫牌力大约为11-15
，而不是15-18；第二个是这手牌没有方块止张，牌型适合技术性加倍。无论是直接位
置还是平衡位置，加倍是本手。
【在 W******g 的大作中提到】
: 直接争叫1NT?
|
p******e
发帖数: 1151 | 29 纯瞎掰下： 3s是个不是很好的叫品。 这个叫品没什么建设性， 对同伴没帮助。同伴
什么样的牌可以选择叫4s和3nt？而且空间占得又多。
我觉得2s和2d都是可以选择的叫品。 看个人的风格和同伴的配合。 |
