y***e
发帖数: 39 | 1 This is an email I wrote to the management about choosing WWW architecture.
The target is an information portal that may be accessed about 0.3 million
visits(sessions) per month (based on current static page visits).
I'm free to compare the structures. The final decision was to use ASP+SQL
Server. The hidden reason may be that we already bought a beefy NT Server.
Anyway, your opinion is welcomed on the following:
Database:
Choice: DB2, MS SQL Server, Oracle
My Choice(from best to least best): MS | m**i
发帖数: 89 | 2
I think so
There are some fatal memory leak errors in MSSQL, and NT is unstable.
My scores: DB2 on AS400: 9.5 , Oracle 8.0* on Solaris 9.5, Oracle 8i
on Solaris: 9.0 Oracle 8i on Linux 7.0, MSSQL:6.0
You don't know OEM? MSSQL:10 DB2:8 Oracle: 9
Both MSSQL, DB2 and Oracle support ODBC well. There is no difference here.
For JDBC:MS SQL can use ODBC-JDBC bridge. DB2 supports JDBC 1.0 only.
The latest Oracle JDBC driver is JDBC2.0 compliant. IBM WebSphere can use
both DB2 and Oracle as its resourc
【在 y***e 的大作中提到】
: This is an email I wrote to the management about choosing WWW architecture.
: The target is an information portal that may be accessed about 0.3 million
: visits(sessions) per month (based on current static page visits).
: I'm free to compare the structures. The final decision was to use ASP+SQL
: Server. The hidden reason may be that we already bought a beefy NT Server.
: Anyway, your opinion is welcomed on the following:
: Database:
: Choice: DB2, MS SQL Server, Oracle
: My Choice(from best to least best): MS
|
|
