r****o
发帖数: 1950 | 1 比如说甲方想max A，乙方想max B，
怎么提出一种折衷方案让大家都满意呢? |
a****1
发帖数: 61 | 2 都满意只能均分了吧?
把a,b都弄到某个区间,比如[0,1],然后
max(a+b)
【在 r****o 的大作中提到】
: 比如说甲方想max A，乙方想max B，
: 怎么提出一种折衷方案让大家都满意呢?
|
f**********r
发帖数: 2137 | 3 Nash equilibrium
【在 r****o 的大作中提到】
: 比如说甲方想max A，乙方想max B，
: 怎么提出一种折衷方案让大家都满意呢?
|
X*****r
发帖数: 2521 | 4 that's not an approach,man
【在 f**********r 的大作中提到】
: Nash equilibrium
|
t**m
发帖数: 263 | 5 max(wa*A + wb*B)
【在 r****o 的大作中提到】
: 比如说甲方想max A，乙方想max B，
: 怎么提出一种折衷方案让大家都满意呢?
|
X*****r
发帖数: 2521 | 6 i think this is an ill-defined question
you should at least define what is criterion of satisfaction
【在 r****o 的大作中提到】
: 比如说甲方想max A，乙方想max B，
: 怎么提出一种折衷方案让大家都满意呢?
|
f**********r
发帖数: 2137 | 7 why not? it's a strategy, which finds a solution to the simultaneous system:
dA=0, dB=0.
sorry for not able to explain it clearly in bbs.
【在 X*****r 的大作中提到】
: that's not an approach,man
|
X*****r
发帖数: 2521 | 8 what i mean is that
this is just a solution
not AN approach.
system:
【在 f**********r 的大作中提到】
: why not? it's a strategy, which finds a solution to the simultaneous system:
: dA=0, dB=0.
: sorry for not able to explain it clearly in bbs.
|
r****o
发帖数: 1950 | 9 3x,
could u tell me what dA and dB are?
system:
【在 f**********r 的大作中提到】
: why not? it's a strategy, which finds a solution to the simultaneous system:
: dA=0, dB=0.
: sorry for not able to explain it clearly in bbs.
|
X*****r
发帖数: 2521 | 10 derivative
【在 r****o 的大作中提到】
: 3x,
: could u tell me what dA and dB are?
:
: system:
|
