f*****r
发帖数: 229 | 1 I think that many Ph.Ds are in this category. The risk is that maybe they
know the back-end logic and algorithms for the unrealistic systems or
coined problems. Then they build some insights to diverted direction from
common sense. Finally, they find that they are the people who know the
method to kill a dragon, but can not find where is a dragon. |
b***n
发帖数: 53 | 2 授过phd教育的, 学学tool不难. 上手总是要点时间的.
【在 f*****r 的大作中提到】
: I think that many Ph.Ds are in this category. The risk is that maybe they
: know the back-end logic and algorithms for the unrealistic systems or
: coined problems. Then they build some insights to diverted direction from
: common sense. Finally, they find that they are the people who know the
: method to kill a dragon, but can not find where is a dragon.
|
T**********n
发帖数: 480 | 3 问题是，这phd还有啥用？
【在 b***n 的大作中提到】
: 授过phd教育的, 学学tool不难. 上手总是要点时间的.
|
b***n
发帖数: 53 | 4 PhD supposedly是搞研究的. 有的人不适合/喜欢搞研究, 搞点开发也没啥.
【在 T**********n 的大作中提到】
: 问题是，这phd还有啥用？
|
w********g
发帖数: 121 | 5 I guess no difference, the point is if a person is reasonablely smart or not
smart ppl with master can do research w/ no problem, relatively stupid
ppl with Phd may never do good research |
